UK: The CPS Duty To Pull The plug: Gujra Analysed

Last Updated: 1 February 2013

Article by Katherine Higgins, pupil at 6 Kings Bench Walk.

When should the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) be able to take over and put a stop to private prosecutions?


  1. The vast majority of private prosecutions are brought by the state. However in cases in which the state does not bring a prosecution section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 (the 1985 Act) allows for individuals to bring private prosecutions. There is a strong historical and constitutional basis in entitling ordinary members of the public to bring private criminal proceedings. With the right of access to justice at the heart of private prosecutions section 6(1) of the 1985 Act forms a historic safeguard against wrongful refusal or failure by public authorities to institute prosecution proceedings.
  1. The right of an individual is however somewhat tempered. Firstly in that the Attorney General has a long held power to end proceedings by entering a nolle prosequi and secondly by Section 6(2) of the 1985 Act which confers upon the DPP a power to take over a private prosecution for the purpose of discontinuing it. In determining whether or not to take over a prosecution the DPP has a clear policy in which he applies a certain criteria. The DPP's first criteria is based on the strength of evidence in support of the prosecution. Prior to 23rd June 2009, the strength of evidence criteria was based on whether there was no case for the defendant to answer. If the DPP concluded that on the basis of the evidence there was no case to answer he would take over the prosecution and discontinue it. However since June 2009, under the Code for Crown Prosecutors, the DPP has been required to consider 'whether there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.' In short this may be described as the 'reasonable prospect' test and is the evidential threshold for all prosecutions bought by the state.
  1. This policy and the first set of criteria was the basis of an appeal to the Supreme Court. On 4th October 2012 Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson were asked to review the lawfulness of the DPP's current policy. Judgment was given on 14th November 2012.


  1. Dalvinder Singh Gurja, the appellant, launched a private prosecution in September 2010 against three men for allegedly assaulting, threatening and intimidating him. The following month, upon reviewing the material, the CPS decided that there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction and notified Mr Gujra's solicitors that they intended to take over and discontinue the prosecution. Mr Gujra applied to judicially review the CPS decision and it is that unsuccessful application to the High Court that was subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court.

Judgment of the High Court:

  1. In rejecting Mr Gujra's judicial review, the High Court found that (i) the CPS policy was lawful and (ii) the decision made in relation to his prosecution was rational. In addressing the 2009 policy, the court recognised but ultimately dismissed the view expressed by Laws LJ in R v Director of Public Prosecutions, ex p. Duckenfield [2000] 1WLR 55, a case concerning a private prosecution against two retired police constables connected to the Hillsborough football disaster. Laws LJ stated that applying the 'reasonable prospect' test when considering private prosecutions would emasculate section 6 (1) of the 1985 Act as "the very premise of section 6(1) must be that some cases will go to trial which the DPP himself chooses not to prosecute." The High Court disagreed and concluded that applying the 'reasonable prospect' test was lawful, as section 10(1) of the 1985 Act requires the Code for Crown Prosecutors to be applied to any case. The court further found that the CPS must be entitled to take a view on the prospect of conviction, regardless of who institutes proceedings.

Judgment of the Supreme Court:

  1. The five strong bench held, by a majority of 3 to 2 (Lord Mance and Lady Hale dissenting), that the new 'realistic prospect of conviction' threshold as set out in the CPS policy did not frustrate the constitutional importance of being able to bring private prosecutions and that this was a more relevant question than 'no case to answer'.
  1. Lord Wilson, who delivered the leading judgment, commented that the question as to whether an ordinary member of the public can bring a private prosecution was not the question the court were required to focus on in this case. He noted that whatever the debate as to constitutional importance of the right, the fact is, that, by section 6 of the 1985 Act Parliament chose, albeit in qualified terms, to re affirm the right of private prosecutions. He stated that the question the court must answer is whether, in applying the 'reasonable prospect' test, the DPP frustrates the policy and objects which underpin section 6 of the 1985 Act?
  1. In dismissing the appeal the majority were particularly persuaded by the need for consistency in conducting all prosecutions, no matter whether they are commenced by a private person or a public prosecution agency. They expressed clear concern that an inconsistent approach could lead to a defendant being subject to a private prosecution where there was no evidence giving rise to a realistic prospect of conviction and that this would provide him or her with legitimate grounds for grievance. The majority were also conscious that in applying the more stringent test it protected against the wasting of scarce court resources, which inevitably would lead to the undermining of public confidence. In confirming that private prosecutions have continued in spite of the change of policy in 2009 Lord Wilson highlighted illustrations of private prosecutions which are currently brought and therefore survive the current test. Furthermore Lord Wilson acknowledged what the DPP himself acknowledged, that by para 2.3 of the Code for Crown Prosecutors the DPP would act unlawfully if he were to adopt a rigid approach to the application of his policy in determining whether to institute proceedings and that any determination made by the DPP would be amendable to judicial review.
  1. In her strongly worded dissenting judgment, Lady Hale felt that the new policy emasculated the right of the private individual and left them at the mercy of the prosecuting authority. The possibility of judicially reviewing a decision was, for Lady Hale, unlikely and the new policy threatened rights under Article 3 and 8 of the ECHR.
  1. Therefore the current CPS policy on discontinuing prosecutions remains good law, but only just. The lengthy judgments given by all five judges demonstrate the difficult questions faced by the court. The one cohesive element that ran throughout every judgment however, was the respect each had for maintaining the right to bring private prosecutions. The problem lay in deciding how best this would be managed. The arguments put forward in favour of the current test were both practical and sensible. Applying this threshold does not eliminate private prosecutions; it simply promotes consistency and therefore fairness.


1. [2011] EWHC 472 (Admin)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.