UK: Brave New World

Last Updated: 25 January 2013
Article by Stuart Thomson

Dr Stuart Thomson provides an overview of urban growth and associated policy implications in January's Procurement and Outsourcing Journal.

The growth of urban areas is a world-wide phenomenon, but the publication of figures from the 2011 census showed the largest increase, in terms of numbers, in the population of England and Wales since records began in 1801. The population of the UK, according to the Office for National Statistics, is on course to reach over 73 million by 2035. This will change the dynamic of the country.

While the average national population growth rate is around 7%, London is growing at almost twice that rate, at 12%. In some of the London boroughs it is twice as much again. Manchester has reversed a period of decline and is now witnessing an increase of around 19%.

Coping with over 10 million more people will clearly impact on all forms of infrastructure. Decisions to plan for this forecasted increases need to be taken now and as a matter of priority.

New approach to cities

Part of the government's answer to coping with these challenges has been to devolve powers to cities themselves so that they can make the choices necessary to deliver a successful future. This is a necessary but not sufficient step. The government needs to realise that cities need more powers and less interference. This has been the direction of travel for government with less ring-fencing of local authority grants and a shift towards the devolution of budgets.

Cities are critical to future economic development and growth, but they also need to be nice places in which to live and work in order to attract the type of skilled workforce they want. Each location will, therefore, need to make tailored decisions that reflects its economic and social requirements and historical setting.

City Deals have been agreed with all eight Core Cities: Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and Sheffield. Each deal is tailored to the needs of each city and provides the funds, powers and flexibility they need to deliver on their aims.

There are agreements on new finance and investment streams, an emphasis on employment and skills development, and business support services. Transport, and new transport projects, also feature heavily in each of the deals (apart from Birmingham).

The City Deals include the devolution of transport powers and funding as well as powers over rail franchise management. (For more information about the City Deals the series of Briefing Papers from the Centre for Cities provide an excellent starting point).

Different models of governance apply across the cities and these have been chosen to reflect local requirements. Some of these reflect a wider geographical and economic spread of their city region. There is, in effect, a mix of mayors, combined authorities, and local enterprise partnerships (LEPs), which are not mutually exclusive in any one area.


LEPs operate across the country and, being business-led, they provide a commercial and entrepreneurial direction to local decisions. They can also feed business needs directly into the decision-making process. However, the government appreciates that the LEPs have been of varying quality and achievement, to date. This means that some areas are less 'plugged into' business needs.

The role of LEPs may also influence local decisions such as whether local businesses should be expected to contribute to infrastructure such as transport, which often features as a key business priority.

LEPs have received a further boost with the publication of Lord Heseltine's report, 'No Stone Unturned', which sets out an independent view on economic growth and the country's ability to create wealth. The report championed the role of the local over the national with detailed recommendations for further devolution. Among Heseltine's recommendations were more powers and funding to LEPs, establishment of a business support infrastructure, a look at regulation, more 'urgency' in planning and an emphasis on better procurement. Heseltine also sought a national growth strategy.

December 2012's Autumn Statement picked up the themes, if not the detail, of Heseltine's report and put forward the development of a simple capital pot that LEPs could bid for.

Future challenges

The success of the City Deals is critical for the prospects of further devolution. The government needs to continue to drive the City Deals forward if they are to be successful and this means continuing to let go of previously centrally controlled policies and funding streams. It also needs to ensure that governance models are compatible with existing cross border decision-making structures, such as ITAs and PTEs in transport. Too often, the lofty aims of one government department fail to appreciate the realities of existing policies of another.

There are now two city mayors in place – Liverpool and Bristol. The latter's election of an independent candidate in November 2012, has yet to have much effect. In Liverpool, though the mayoral system has had longer to bed down and it is clear that the mayor is adopting an approach of constructive engagement while being openly critical and challenging where he believes it to be appropriate. This shows that there are now counterpoints to the dominance of Westminster and Whitehall.

However, there remain a number of challenges that cities and government need to work through.

The whole country needs London to continue to be a leading global city. The challenges it faces include those set out in the McKinsey report 'Urban World: Cities and the Rise of the Consuming Class'.

London dominates our national economy in a way that few other cities across the globe do domestically. If there is to be a 'rebalancing of the economy' and other cities are not to become second class (which would exacerbate this economic issue still further), then we need to look at where investment is made. Much of this is down to national decisions, and if we stick to the traditional way of allocating finance and deciding on projects then spending will continue to go to London and other cities will be fighting for scraps from the table.

How larger-scale projects, such as those in transport (what we used to think of as regional priorities), are to come forward, and who will champion them, has still to be fully addressed. The 'Duty to Co-operate' in relation to sustainable development, introduced by the Localism Act, may help but it has yet to have any real impact.

There are also planning and spatial issues to address. These impact not just on accessibility but also the 'liveability' of a city, how attractive it is to live and work in, which again impact on the economics of a city. There needs to be a discussion about the way that land is used, urban design issues, and maybe even the role of the greenbelt.

If a 'single pot' approach to local finance is to be introduced by government then the competition criteria between LEPs will be critical as will Whitehall's continued, or otherwise, level of involvement. This is a consistent theme whenever discussions about devolution take place. While governments insist that the local level is the right one for decisions to be made, centrally they retain powers and never fully let go. It is also easy to talk about government being one entity, but it is really a series of separate departments. While centrally devolution may be the approach, departments are often very poor at implementing this, some more so than others.


The devolution of power to major cities has a number of clear implications for all involved:

  • Local authorities: the more that powers and funding are passed down to them, the more responsibility and scrutiny there will be. They will also be expected to have skills and expertise available in new areas of responsibility. In the past, people could be brought in or consultants used but with the tighter financial environment that will be especially difficult.
  • LEPs: as things stand, they are the body that government is continuing to put their efforts into. However, there remain issues of size (some have a very large membership), relationships with other stakeholders and of where responsibility actually resides.
  • Accountability: turnout at local elections is often very poor and the elections to the Police and Crime Commissioners showed that despite the argument of greater local control, the electorate were not enthused. LEPs are business-led so are largely unaccountable.
  • Mayors: the government has suggested that city mayors will be able to draw down additional funding and powers. With only two mayors in place, alongside London which has its own governance arrangements, it will be interesting to see how much prominence the government awards them. The mayors will need to get any 'bid' to government right politically as well as in policy and business case terms.
  • Procurement: will continue to change at a national and local level. Central government is looking to make changes, and the issues thrown up by the fiasco over the West Coast Main Line rail franchise have still to be resolved. Reading the Laidlaw report into those events did not give a clean bill of health to other government departments, not just Transport, so further change can be expected. Locally, there may also be variations in processes, built to suit local circumstances. That is a potential outcome of a devolutionary ideal.
  • Delivery: while the emphasis is on delivery, the resources needed are not solely in local hands. With referendums being triggered by increases in council tax that government deems 'excessive', that leaves the Community Infrastructure Levy s106 and, potentially, Tax Increment Finance or Workplace Parking Levies as options. It is not though clear that businesses would find these attractive options.
  • Political change: Political change: governments have differing priorities and just as the coalition abolished the regional level of government, a new incoming administration may decide that LEPs are not the way forward. Until the LEPs have time to really bed down and start delivering, they run the risk of being 'reviewed'.
  • Competition: while we are not there yet, there is the potential for increased competition between areas and cities for business investment. The level of business taxation, city environments, etc could all be influences in the inward investment decisions. A 'single pot' approach to funding suggests that competition is the preferred option going forward. There is clear question as to whether cities can be allowed to act as a series of sole traders. Central government retains a role in ensuring joined-up thinking and providing a solid base for the cities to compete from. How far government is prepared to allow a postcode lottery approach is unclear.

While significant progress has undoubtedly been made, government needs to continue to consider the powers, structures and funding mechanisms that are needed to address the urban challenge. Otherwise infrastructure will not be up to the challenge and the growth that government desperately wants to see will not be delivered.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Stuart Thomson
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.