UK: Public And Regulatory Law Group Alert: January 2013

Last Updated: 23 January 2013
Article by Sarah Ellson and Juliet Oliver


Happy New Year and welcome to the first PRG alerter for 2013. This year is set to bring in changes across a number of regulatory areas following the introduction of revalidation for doctors in December, and a number of regulators consulting on changes to their regulatory regimes.

In terms of case law from December, the Court decided in favour of two doctors upon whom interim suspension orders were imposed. In both Patel and Houshian, the allegations concerned issues around dishonesty and probity and neither doctor was facing allegations in relation to their clinical practice. See below for further details.

Regulatory news

Health and social care

GMC - Regular checks for doctors begin:

Revalidation, a new system of checks to ensure the fitness to practise of doctors has now come into force. The process will include annual appraisals and feedback from patients and colleagues. Doctors will be required to revalidate every five years in order to retain their license to practise. Further information is available here

Health Select Committee 2012 accountability report on GMC

The Health Select Committee has published its annual accountability report on the General Medical Council and describes it as an 'effective' organisation. The report highlights progress made by the GMC in key areas, including the new impartial tribunal service. To read the report in full please click here

Professional Standards of Nursing & Midwifery

This article from Personnel Today explores how standards for Nursing & Midwifery can be achieved and also investigates the introduction of revalidation for nurses and midwives, planned for 2015. It also considers the professional requirements and competencies required to meet the necessary standards. To view the article click here

GOsC starts consultation process on consensual disposal

The General Osteopathic Council is undergoing a consultation process in relation to consensual disposal of certain fitness to practise cases. It would allow cases to be concluded by agreement at the end of the investigation stage, as an alternative to referral for a hearing in circumstances where an admonishment is considered appropriate. The GOsC invites views on this proposal - for further information on this consultation and to respond please click here

GPhC responds to BBC investigation

The General Pharmaceutical Council has responded to an investigation by BBC Inside Out London which alleged that some pharmacies had illegally sold prescription drugs without a prescription. The Council has announced it is working with the Police and has launched its own investigation into the allegations. The response can be viewed here

HCPC Consultations on profession-specific standards

The Health and Care Professions Council has launched two consultations on proposed changes to the profession-specific standards of proficiency for chiropodists/podiatrists, prosthetists and orthotists. The review will ensure that the standards of proficiency are relevant to each profession. Interested parties have until 29 March 2013 to comment. Further details about the consultations can be found here

Legal and Finance

Update on introduction of QASA

The Joint Advocacy Group which comprises the Bar Standards Board, ILEX Professional Standards and the Solicitors Regulation Authority has agreed the next steps for introducing the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates ("QASA"). The changes have been agreed following comments received in response to the fourth consultation but mean that the scheme will not start this month as planned. For more information please click here

LSB report on Special Bodies consultation

The Legal Services Board has considered the responses received regarding the regulation of special bodies/non commercial bodies and concluded that they will not become licensed under the Legal Services Act 2007 until at least April 2015. With no regulator ready to provide an appropriate licensing framework, statutory transitional arrangements will remain in place for at least the next two years. To view the consultation and response in full please click here

LSB publishes regulatory assessments

The LSB has published its first assessments of the performance of regulators in the legal services sector, focussing on five of the seven regulators operating in the sector. It has concluded that some regulators demonstrated a clear understanding of the need to move to an outcomes focussed and risk-based approach, however a 'sustained drive' to implementation is needed. A consultation has also been issued on the LSB's draft business plan. To read more about the assessments please click here

FRC takes on board comments following consultation

The Financial Reporting Council has confirmed that observations made by interested parties during its consultations on Sanctions Guidance to Tribunals and changes to its disciplinary schemes have now been incorporated into revised drafts of those documents. These include an amended definition of 'misconduct' and more clarity in relation to the objectives of the sanctions guidance. More information can be found here


Consultation on reform of regulation of private security industry

The Security Industry Authority has announced that it is seeking the views of those involved in the private security industry, before commenting on the Government's favoured option of reform by way of a phased transition to a business regulation scheme. The consultation closes on 15 January 2013. For more information, see here


Disclosure and Barring Service

The disclosure and barring service was launched on 1 December 2012. The introduction of the DABS has resulted in the merger between the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) and the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). To find out more about these changes please click here

Judicial Review - proposals for reform

The Government has launched a consultation in relation to new measures intended to stem the growth in applications for judicial review. It aims to seek views in three key areas; reducing the time limits for bringing a judicial review relating to procurement or planning in line with the appeal timetable which already applies to those cases; removing the right to an oral renewal where a judge refuses permission where there has been a prior judicial process, or where the claim was judged to be totally without merit; and the introduction of a new fee for an oral renewal - if the oral renewal is successful, the fee for post permission stages would be waived. The consultation period runs until 24 January 2013. Further information and details on how to submit your views are available here

Case Law

Patel v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 3688

The applicant, P, a GP, sought to terminate an 18-month interim suspension order imposed upon him by the General Medical Council's Interim Orders Panel. P had been a member of the Board of Governors and was Chairman of the Finance Committee at a school. He was arrested in connection with these roles following an allegation that he had authorised substantial payments to staff who were not entitled. This was alleged to have occurred over six years and he was charged with a conspiracy to defraud and committing fraud by abuse of his position. The sum involved was £1.8 million.

The panel made an 18-month suspension order on the basis that this was necessary to maintain public confidence in the profession. It noted that whilst suspension removed P's ability to practise, the probity concerns, the seriousness of the charges and the amount involved meant no conditions could be imposed to adequately protect the public interest before a full hearing could resolve matters. P appealed on the basis that suspension was not necessary, proportionate, nor in the public interest given that the allegations were not related to clinical matters.

The Court held that although a large sum of money was involved in the conspiracy charge, it was the nature of the wrongdoing that was the important factor, not the sum itself. No other complaints had ever been made about P's clinical competence or honesty. He was innocent until proven guilty and there was no allegation of personal gain and dishonesty still had to be established.

Applying the test in the Guidance for Interim Orders Panels as to what a reasonable onlooker would think of P being allowed to continue to practise if convicted of the conspiracy, it was clear that no reasonable onlooker would be offended to learn that P had been allowed to continue to practise in the interim. There was no evidence of a threat to the public's welfare and the decision would not undermine the public confidence in the profession. On that basis it could not be said that the public interest required P's suspension. The appeal was accordingly granted.

Houshian v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 3458

H appealed against an interim suspension order imposed upon him by the GMC's Interim Orders Panel suspending his registration for 18 months pending the determination of his fitness to practise. Between 2004 and 2008, H had been employed by an NHS Trust as a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. He was dismissed for gross misconduct relating to his treatment of colleagues. There were no issues as to his clinical practice.

H had claimed against the Trust for unfair dismissal and discrimination but his claim was dismissed, following a finding by the employment tribunal that H had deliberately fabricated evidence and made a number of unsubstantiated and damaging allegations against former colleagues. H faced an allegation of impaired fitness to practise before the GMC which included an allegation of dishonesty in the forging of documents and the submission of them as authentic for the purposes of the tribunal proceedings.

The Panel considered whether an interim order was necessary and it concluded that the allegations against H were serious, concerned his probity and that an interim order was necessary to protect the reputation of the profession and maintain public confidence. It concluded that, whilst suspension removed his ability to practise medicine, the seriousness of the allegations and the tribunal's findings meant suspension was a proportionate response to the risks posed by H remaining in unrestricted practice. H argued that the Panel's decision was unfair, disproportionate and plainly wrong and that the reasons provided were inadequate.

The Court held that whilst the Panel had considered that suspension was a proportionate response to the risk posed by H's remaining in unrestricted practice pending hearing, it had failed to expressly identify that risk or its degree. The risk was to the public interest in maintaining confidence in the profession, rather than to the safety of the public, since the public interest ground was the sole basis for the Panel's order. However, the Panel had not sufficiently focused upon the question of the likelihood of serious damage to the public interest. It was not enough to rely on the seriousness of the allegations faced by H going to his probity and the weight of the reasoning and findings of the tribunal (which was not a criminal court dealing with specific allegations of dishonesty). The evidential burden of proving the charges remained on the GMC, and the use of the documentation before the tribunal might yet be open to entirely innocent explanation or substantial mitigation. The public interest considerations could fairly be reflected by an appropriate decision at the final hearing when all the facts had been fully explored, and all defences had been fully advanced. It was not necessary to suspend H from practice before that exercise had been undertaken. The interim order was accordingly terminated.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.