UK: Cost Cutting Cornwall Fails - Local Authority Pushes The Principle Of Pure Ultra Vires To The Limit In An Attempt To Jump Out Of Its Contractual Obligations

Last Updated: 3 January 2013
Article by Peter Levaggi and Alison Crabbe

It is an unattractive feature of public law that allows public bodies to escape contracts with private parties by evoking their own lack of capacity.

However, the recent Court of Appeal case of Charles Terence Estates Limited ("CTE") v Cornwall Council will be welcomed by private businesses dealing with local authorities.

In this ground breaking case, the Court of Appeal has upheld an appeal against the High Court decision that had allowed Cornwall Council to rid itself of what it considered to be bad bargains by evoking its own, or rather its predecessor district authorities (Restormel's and Penwith's) lack of capacity.


Between 2007 and 2008, CTE had granted 30 leases of houses to Cornwall's predecessor authorities to allow the local authorities to house vulnerable homeless people in good quality accommodation and reduce the use of temporary accommodation. This was a unique arrangement designed to assist the local authorities in meeting their statutory duties to house the homeless.

High Court Decision

The High Court reluctantly found that the local authorities had breached their fiduciary duties to their council tax payers by failing to have regard to market rents when negotiating the terms of the leases. The High Court felt that Section 17 of the Housing Act 1985, which confers on local authorities the power to acquire land, should be read as a power to require such land at a reasonable price. The Court felt therefore that Cornwall's singular failure to have regard to market rents meant that Cornwall had lacked capacity when entering into the leases. Accordingly, all 30 leases were void and of no effect. The irony was that the fault was all Cornwall's (in fact the High Court Judge, Sir Ross Cranston, the former attorney general accepted that CTE acted completely in good faith) and the council were in fact seeking to argue that their own bad behaviour should allow them to avoid their own contractual liabilities freely entered into.


CTE duly appealed and the issues for the Court of Appeal to determine were:

  • The "threshold" question of whether Cornwall (or its predecessors) had breached their fiduciary duties in the first place.
  • If the authorities had breached their fiduciary duties was that enough to null and void the leases i.e. should the concept of pure ultra vires allow a local authority to be released from its obligations in circumstances where it had the power to enter into a contract but had not used that power in accordance with its fiduciary duties.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

The High Court had found that Cornwall's purported breach of fiduciary duty resided solely in the local authorities failure to have regard to market rents. The Court of Appeal however found unanimously that Cornwall had not breached its fiduciary duties pointing to the lack of evidence adduced by Cornwall.

The Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Maurice Kay pointed to the obvious difficulties in identifying the particular market that CTE and Cornwall operated within. If the relevant market was one in which local authorities pay private landlords to let their properties to those in housing need, then the Court of Appeal found that Cornwall had failed to adduce any evidence that such a market had developed to offer a comparison. Alternatively, if the market was one in which a private landlord might let his property to unattractive tenants then Court of Appeal found that Cornwall had failed to produce any expert evidence to demonstrate what a market rent would be.

Maurice Kay LJ pointed out that in any event, the reality of this matter was that both parties were striving to produce a novel solution to address the problems of housing homeless people.

The High Court's finding had depended on the duty under Section 17 of the Housing Act 1985 to acquire land being read so that property must be acquired at a "reasonable price". However, the Court of Appeal felt that it was "rarely appropriate to read into a statutory power a limitation defined by something such as a "reasonable price". To do so would be to invite judicialisation of the limits of legal capacity in the sense that capacity might be ascertainable only upon a judicial determination of the reasonableness of a price". Clearly the Court of Appeal was wary about opening the floodgates to further litigation on this point.

Consequences of Breach

The Court of Appeal disagreed with the High Court decision further, finding that even if there had been a breach of fiduciary duty, it would not have lead to the leases in question being void.

The three appeal judges focused on the decision in two cases - Credit Suisse v Allerdale Borough Council and Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission.

In the Credit Suisse a local authority set up an SPV company to develop a swimming pool and timeshare flats and act as a guarantor in respect of the company's borrowing. Sales of the flats were poor and in an attempt to avoid meetings its obligations under the guarantee, the local authority successfully argued that the contract was void. The Council asserted that it never had the power to enter into the guarantee or transaction and accordingly the Council escaped liability for a £6,000,000 guarantee to Credit Suisse. The Court of Appeal agreed with the local authority that it had no capacity to enter into the kind of arrangement that the transaction represented. Two substantive judgments were given in Credit Suisse by Neill LJ and Hobhouse LJ.

Neill LJ believed that there was no distinction in a private law dispute between a decision of a public body which was "narrowly" ultra vires (i.e. lacking capacity) and one which was "widely" ultra vires (i.e. whilst the public body may have capacity, a particular power was exercised for an improper purpose).

However, Hobhouse LJ took a different approach stating that "Private law issues must be decided in accordance with rules of private law. The broader and less rigorous rules of administrative law should not without adjustment be applied to the resolution of private law disputes in civil proceedings... after taking into account the applicable public law, the civil law proceedings have to be decided as a matter of private law. The issue does not become an administrative law issue; administrative law remedies are irrelevant... it remains necessary to ask what amounts to a defence to a private law course of action ...".

In the present case both Maurice Kay LJ and Etherton LJ preferred to the approach of Hobhouse LJ to that of Neill LJ when dealing with public law ultra vires as a defence to a private law claim.

Maurice Kay LJ stated "it would be highly undesirable if, years after time expired for the making of a prompt public law challenge by a person with a sufficient interest, the fact of an historic breach of fiduciary duty should inevitably lead to the defeat of a private law claim brought by a party who acted throughout in good faith".

Nevertheless, Maurice Kay LJ stated that "at some point, it will be desirable for their to be judicial consideration of the territory between the extremes of Credit Suisse and the present case". Cornwall no doubt hope that this will be soon as, despite being refused permission by the Court of Appeal they are currently petitioning the Supreme Court for permission to appeal. We will keep you updated.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions