UK: Online Reputations, Cybersmearing and the Changed World Of The Internet

Last Updated: 23 May 2003
Article by Jonathan P. Armstrong

What is Cybersmearing?

Cybersmearing does what it says on the tin. It is the smearing of an individual or company online. Cybersmearing can take a number of different forms including websites, message boards, e-mail and auctions. We will look at each of these in turn - but it might help first to illustrate the problems at their simplest level with a cybersmearing case from Ireland. Back in May 2001 the Irish courts heard their first cybersmearing case when an Irish businessman, Frances Kenny, was convicted for malicious publication of a defamatory libel under the Irish Defamation Act 1961. Kenny ran a sandwich business in Castlerea, Co Mayo, as did his business rival Maureen Walker.

Kenny posted Walker's details on a website which advertised for escorts and prostitutes, as he believed that she was taking his business. The advert placed was headed "Exclusive Maureen" and included details of the services that Walker would provide including something described as 'water games'. In evidence Walker said that she had received over 100 phone calls in the first 2 days alone - proof positive perhaps that internet advertising can work. The explanation for the calls came to light when one of the callers had not withheld his number - Walker called him back and persuaded him to tell her how he came by her. At this stage the police became involved and Kenny admitted his actions. His offer of 10,000 IRPounds in compensation was rejected by the judge as 'totally inadequate'.

We have seen a number of cases on both sides of the Atlantic which show that this type of practice is not uncommon and we have also seen the catastrophic effect cybersmearing a company can have on its share price. Cybersmearing takes many forms but amongst them are:

Cybersmearing by website

The oldest form of cybersmearing was to set up a website pretending to be that of the company that you wanted to defame. The trend started around 8 years ago but as businesses have become better at protecting their own trading and brand names as domain names cybersmearing by site has become more sophisticated. There are a whole host of motives for cybersmearing but many of the dedicated cybersmearing sites are set up to advance a particular political cause, such as attacking a company for the way in which it allegedly exploits child labour overseas, is providing tools used for war or the way in which it has handled a particular industrial dispute. This type of cybersmearing is not just confined to the technically able - I have seen a site by two truck drivers who were effectively trying to encourage their fellow drivers to work to rule or walk out and the 'evidence' relating to the unofficial industrial dispute was shown on the site. This illustrates another point. It is not just companies that have an internet presence that are vulnerable - in fact the reverse is often true. Because the company concerned did not have a meaningful internet presence it was easy for the drivers' site to get significant prominence on the internet to the extent that in some search engines the site about their industrial dispute ranked more highly than the company's official internet presence.

Cybersmearing by site can take a sinister form as in the case of Craig Cottrell. Cottrell registered 9 common mistypes of the Marks & Spencer domain name including Marks& He copied the legitimate Marks & Spencer site onto his server but instead of the payment mechanism he told people that there was a software problem with the site and he told them to e-mail their credit card details. When Cottrell's computer was seized there was evidence that over 80 people had done this. After prolonged court proceedings Marks & Spencer were successful in getting a court order to transfer the domain names back to them and in having a prison sentence for contempt of court passed against Cottrell.

Cybersmearing by e-mail

The most well known case in this area is the Intel v. Hamidi case involving an ex-employee sending 6 separate e-mails to up to 35,000 Intel employees after he left. This case is still rumbling on in the US. In August we saw an extreme case of cybersmearing by e-mail in the education sector when a former student with a grudge spread false information that the director of a local education authority was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, that another director was openly homophobic and that the institution's General Counsel and his team were neo-Nazis. The complaints resulted in an investigation lasting almost a year at the end of which all three were cleared. A detailed programme of harassment against some of the institution's officials started soon after. This included:

  • A former employee who changed job was accused of being a member of the Ku Klux Klan, and hate letters signed with his name were sent to the newspapers and churches in his new home town.
  • A bill was sent to the office of one of the lawyers demanding payment for a number of unpleasant medical procedures.
  • E-mail messages were sent to a Jewish group to antagonize them supposedly signed by one of the lawyers and concluding with his home phone number.

The tools for this type of attack are readily available. In some of the cases I have seen the attacks have only needed one member of staff to leave his office with his computer still logged on for use by the cybersmearer to send e-mails as if from him. Clearly this requires no technical knowledge and less than two minutes at the keyboard making it difficult to trace the culprit.

Cybersmearing by a message board

The Varian Associates v. Delfino and Day case involving around 14,000 postings on a hundred different message boards is still going on. In these messages Delfino and Day falsely accused various members of Varian management of being homophobic, discriminating against the pregnant, having sexual liaisons and secretly video taping employees whilst in the bathrooms. Varian estimated that the loss through Delfino and Day's activities was just over Ł530,000.

August 2002 brought us another case - the $699 million claim in Texas concerned an allegation by a rival credit card processor, ZixIt, against Visa over 437 message board postings made by one of Visa's Vice Presidents on a Yahoo! message board relating to ZixIt's stock. The postings dated back to 1999 when ZixIt was trying to raise more funding. The court heard how Visa's VP, Paul Guthrie, 'set out on a mission' to undermine the company challenging ZixIt's own information and urging those who had already bought stock to sell 'before it's too late'.

ZixIt alleged that Visa used Guthrie as its agent in its online campaign and then started an offline campaign against it using other employees. They sued Visa but not Guthrie - Visa argued that Guthrie had not acted as their agent and called him to give evidence on their behalf and said that he had acted alone. ZixIt's Vice President testified that Guthrie's postings contained 592 lies. Visa analyzed the postings and in court argued that of those 20 were true or had been taken out of context. The trial lasted 3 weeks with jury deliberations of 2 ˝ days before the case against Visa was dismissed as the jurors found that Guthrie was not acting in the scope of his employment.

Whatever the result of the case the tale is a sorry one for all three parties. Whilst we do not know whether separate proceedings will now take place against Guthrie, we do know that harmful allegations were made in court about both companies and that each of them will have significant irrecoverable costs.

The case reminds us all that executives in an organisation also need to be told via a company's acceptable use policy that disparaging rivals, or indeed commenting on the organisation's own performance, however well intentioned, will not be tolerated. The latter point was rammed home by another case in February this year with another large action against former employees, this time brought by Minnetonka based credit card company Metris against two former employees, Bryan Williams and Ken Corbin. Metris alleges that Williams and Corbin posted defamatory and misleading messages about it and its former CEO, Ronald Zebeck on internet message boards. The case alleges that the employees used anonymous user names to obscure their identities and give the impression that they were privy to inside information.

Metris claims that as the result of its postings it lost revenue, income, investors, customers and relationships with business prospects. They seek unspecified damages. They also say that the messages were posted to bring Zebeck and Metris into "disrepute with the domestic and international business and investment communities". Metris parted company with CEO Zebeck after the postings. Interestingly Williams is also accused of being a skilled polyglot having supposedly posted messages in English, French, German, Norwegian, Italian and Portuguese.

Cybersmearing via other means

One of the great features of the Enron debacle has been the role that the internet has played. Message boards were full of Enron related information both before and after its collapse. It is undoubtedly the case that part of Enron's climb to the dizzy heights of its share price were due to small investors on message boards significantly over valuing the company and its prospects. It is also true that its fall has been accelerated by message board postings but one of the more interesting aspects of the cybersmearing of Enron has been the role that auction sites like eBay have played in its collapse. Traditionally the disaffected have used message boards and perhaps dedicated websites to hasten a company's demise or simply just to hit its share price so that their former bosses who generally have significant stock options and whose pay is linked to share price will suffer. In Enron however, some employees saw that as well as having their former bosses suffer, they could profit by selling what they knew and what they had accumulated with a news hungry audience online. When I looked at one auction site alone at the time of the Enron collapse there were over 1200 Enron related items for sale including confidential memos, letters, internal Enron procedures and more mundane items such as Enron logoed golf balls with words like "integrity counts" stamped on them. In particular one of the memos that seemed to hasten recategorisation of Enron from a collapse to a scandal seems to have been purchased by a newspaper from one such auction site - some of the material was going for as little as $150, a small price to pay for a worldwide scoop.

In January this year we saw this trend continue in a case brought by Robert Grace, the publisher of a Los Angeles legal newspaper, against the auction site eBay and an eBay user, Tim Neeley. Grace claims that Neeley used the buyer feedback function of eBay to smear him and that Neeley and eBay refused to remove the comments when asked. According to Grace, Neeley's reply was simply "Get a life, dude.'' Grace's action seeks damages of $2.5 million from eBay and $100,000 from Neeley for the harm done to him. This case mirrors the successful actions in the UK brought by the then Northern Ireland First Minister David Trimble against Amazon.

What can be done?

Companies need to take a proper look at their online reputation. Specialist external counsel will often be part of that process. It is an unenviable task for any business to do this on top of the other day to day business tasks. Clever software solutions like our own Brandcomplete can be only part of the answer. We are now seeing cybersmearing of one form or another almost every day. Some of my top tips would be:

  1. Take any incident seriously. From my experience the cybersmearer usually starts with a minor attack which many companies just ignore. For many cybersmearers that's just testing the water - do nothing and the battle will commence. Respond appropriately to the initial attack and you might find the cybersmearer picks on easier prey instead.
  2. You may need to alter the terms and conditions on your own site to tell people what they can and cannot do with content from your site, your images and your trademarks - this might open the door for a criminal prosecution after any attack.
  3. You will need to look at your employment policies as quite often cybersmearing, like security, is an inside job.
  4. You need to review your relationship with third parties, such as design agencies. Some of the more sophisticated cybersmearing attacks have been traced back to agencies and graphic designers who are aggrieved because their claims for payment have been reduced.
  5. You need to make sure that your own internet presence works. If legitimate information about your company dominates the search engine rankings there is less chance of the cybersmearer's sites getting through.

Regrettably many companies have learned from bitter experience that in these challenging times cybersmearing can significantly hit the bottom line. As the volume of stock traded for some companies, particularly technology companies who are traditionally vulnerable to this type of attack, continues to be low then only a few panic trades after an attack can make the share price plummet - we have seen one incident where bad news on an internet site meant a stock price drop of around 8% in an hour. A proper strategy against cybersmearing must be a cornerstone in our strategy to minimise the harm done to our online reputation.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.