UK: Professional Negligence and the Scope of Brokers’ Duty to Notify

Last Updated: 22 May 2003
Article by Paul Lewis

Alexander Forbes Europe Ltd v SBJ Limited ([2002] All ER (D) 349)

This recent professional negligence case on the scope of a broker’s duty to make notifications under a policy gives guidance on brokers’ standard claims handling practices and may have implications for broking standards generally.

Factual background

In 1994 Alexander Forbes Europe Limited bought the business of the insurance brokers Nelson Hurst Financial Consultants Limited (NHFC), from the Nelson Hurst Group (the Group). The Group’s professional indemnity brokers, SBJ Limited (SBJ), arranged E&O cover to run from March 1994 to February 1995 by way of both a group policy and separate cover for NHFC. Two policies instead of one overall Group cover were arranged for regulatory reasons. The case turned on SBJ’s actions in relation to the separate NHFC policy, which required notification during the policy period of any claims made, or circumstances giving rise to claims, but the scope of their duty was considered in the context of their knowledge of the two policies.

As is now well known, the Securities and Investment Board’s (SIB) 1994 "Review of Past Business", concerning advice given about investments in personal pension schemes, resulted in industry-wide firm reviews, which aimed at identifying potential cases of poor advice and informing investors of their rights. As a result of these developments, claims were notified to the Group in December 1994, including one by a certain schoolteacher, Mrs Patterson. NHFC made this notification in the form of a letter about Mrs Patterson’s claim enclosing various papers including a memorandum discussing the SIB’s Review and NHFC’s own subsequent reviews.

Notification of Mrs Patterson’s claim should have been made under the separate NHFC policy but was mistakenly transmitted by SBJ to the underwriters of the Group policy. SBJ did not realise their mistake until after the end of the policy period.

NHFC’s professional indemnity insurers were persuaded retrospectively to accept liability for Mrs Patterson’s claim, in the event below the excess, but declined to accept that any wider notification of circumstances had been made. NHFC therefore incurred and failed to recoup a professional liability loss of the kind which the package of two policies had been designed to absorb. NHFC’s new owner Alexander Forbes Europe Limited sought to recover this loss from SBJ, being the only source left, via an action for professional negligence.

The negligence issue

The parties disputed almost everything in this case but the central issue, which the court had to resolve in deciding whether or not SBJ had been negligent, was the scope of their duties of care to the insured. SBJ accepted that they owed duties in both tort and contract to the insured. It fell to the court to consider how wide these duties were and whether or not they had been broken. The resulting decision gives some specific guidance on the standards expected of brokers handling claims, which also may be viewed as helpful general guidance about how brokerage firms must act as responsible entities.

According to NHFC the issues were very straightforward. They asked SBJ to notify the underwriters. SBJ notified the underwriters under the wrong policy, in the full knowledge of the existence and purposes of the two policies. The question put by NHFC to the court was whether what SBJ did or did not do on receiving the notification package fell short of the duty owed by a reasonable broker to its client. NHFC submitted that SBJ had indeed fallen short and caused the loss complained of because if valid notification of Mrs Patterson’s claim and the surrounding "circumstances" had been made then both the instant individual’s claim and subsequent further claims would have been recoverable under the 1994/5 policy.

What actually happened was that SBJ received a package of papers which were on the face of it not entirely consistent or clear. The letterhead used was in fact not NHFC’s but that of another subsidiary of the Group. NHFC admitted in correspondence that they had lost Mrs Patterson’s file and appeared generally somewhat disorganised. The pivotal letter was headed "Notification under our Group E&O Policy" and made no mention of the separate NHFC policy. For their part, SBJ tried to show that in assessing and acting on this material they had not been negligent because they were by contrast orderly, followed standard working practices and had carried out their client’s instructions literally to the letter.

According to SBJ, the issue for the court was to decide how the request for notification should have been read. SBJ argued that they had made the notification with reasonable skill and care because the individual brokers concerned had followed their standard practices; having read the material given to them they had taken it to mean what it overtly said it meant; and they had been reasonable in not second guessing communications from clients who were themselves brokers.

What is the scope of the duty?

In attempting to ascertain what the scope of the broker’s duty was and whether they had broken it, the court heard evidence from several witnesses for SBJ as to their working methods and also from experts on both sides as to what practices and standards prevail in the market.

SBJ’s expert witness suggested that the duty of a broker, unless specifically agreed otherwise is to act as a conduit between the insured and the insurers and make certain that all relevant information is provided and a clear strategy exists to handle the issue notified. It goes without saying that SBJ in this case thought their strategy was sufficient. Expert evidence for NHFC, attempting to counter SBJ’s argument that since NHFC were also in the broking business they didn't need their hands held, suggested that the extent of a broker’s duty to clients who were themselves brokers would be precisely the same as that owed to all other sophisticated professionals unless this was otherwise agreed or, for example, reduced remuneration was agreed.

The judge David Mackie QC held that brokers have a duty "going beyond being a post box merely looking at a heading and passing material on". It was for SBJ to "get a grip on the proposed notification, to appraise it and to ensure that the information was relayed to the right place and in the correct form".

It had become apparent to the judge that whatever standard working practices had been employed by individual brokers, the discrepancy between what the client at first glance appeared to be saying and what was really required of SBJ had not been picked up as in his opinion it was SBJ’s duty as an entity so to do. SBJ was found liable because they failed to show reasonable care in a situation in which SBJ "as a company was well aware of the existence of the two separate policies and in 1994 had recently negotiated both of them". The judge held that "quibbles about letterheads, headings and references to the Group are no answer when SBJ was closely aware of and had negotiated E&O cover for the Group".

It is worth noting that SBJ’s arguments in defence about individuals doing everything that could be expected of them, did not survive the point that evaluation was of SBJ’s performance as an entity. The judge decided "this fell short of a reasonable standard judged by the measure of expert evidence and common sense".

Therefore broker firms have a duty to be alert to possible desirable actions in response to correspondence from a client and must have a firm-wide strategy in place which ensures that when such information is received from clients, the broker is alive to making such notifications accurately and promptly. They have to consider what they receive and give advice in the context of their overall knowledge, even where the client is himself a broker and so could be expected to have similar knowledge.

So what?

This decision clearly has a number of implications in relation to insurance broking. Brokers should check the working practices of their claims handling teams and the clarity of their communications with both placing brokers and clients in order to ensure a good level of alertness. The responsibility falls on the broker company as an entity, rather than on the individual brokers, to ensure that sufficient strategies are in place so that documents are not read purely at face value and attention is paid to detail.

In terms of possible time frames for picking up mistakes, the judge commented in relation to any reservations which might be expressed by underwriters on receipt of a notification of claims from the broker, that a competent broker should assess the situation and advise and act promptly, albeit given only a brief opportunity. In this case a total window of three working days was considered to have been sufficient time for a competent broker to investigate the underwriters’ concerns in relation to the notifications.

Brokers should be aware that such strategies and alertness must apply to all their communications with clients even, and perhaps especially, if they are fellow professionals who may assume that a lesser level of detail is required in communicating on subjects of which they and the brokers have common professional knowledge. Nobody wants, as the judge put it, to "teach their expert grandmothers to suck eggs" but it may nonetheless be necessary to second-guess professional clients. SBJ will be somewhat comforted by the judge’s comment that they had made a "clear but honest mistake". Nevertheless this case shows that there is no substitute for an organised and consciously rigorous approach.

Article by Paul Lewis and Susie Wilson

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions