UK: Data Protection: a Privacy Law by any other Name?

Last Updated: 15 April 2003

Unless you have spent the last few days on a desert island, you will be aware that the judgment in the case brought by Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones against Hello! has, like their OK! Magazine wedding exclusive, now been widely publicised (Douglas and Others v Hello! And Others [2003] EWHC 786).

Case Comment

The Douglases and the publishers of OK! Magazine won their breach of confidence claim against Hello! for publication of surreptitiously-taken photographs of the Douglases’ New York wedding. One aspect of the case which has received less attention is the fact that the Douglases were also awarded compensation for damage and distress under the Data Protection Act 1998 (the "Act"). The level of damages under the Act is expected to be fixed at a subsequent hearing but is described in the judgment as "nominal".

For data privacy commentators the subsidiary role given to the Act is a little disappointing since, in some respects, the Act provides more versatile ‘privacy’ protection than the law of confidence; certainly the Act is capable of providing redress in circumstances where no duty of confidence arises.

The Data Protection Act Analysis

The court held that the unauthorised wedding pictures were personal data, that the Hello! defendants were data controllers and that therefore the publication of the pictures in England was processing by Hello! which was bound by the Act's requirements.

In his judgment Mr Justice Lindsay stated "when a data controller is responsible for the publication of hard copies [i.e., the Hello! magazines] that reproduce data that has previously been processed by means of equipment operating automatically, the publication forms part of the process and falls within the scope of the Act".

Hello! argued that their publication of the unauthorised photographs fell within the wide journalism exemption under section 32 (recently deployed successfully against Naomi Campbell in the Court of Appeal – Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ. No. 1373 – click here for the Data Privacy Newsflash on this case on 17 October 2002). This was roundly rejected as the Judge found no credible evidence that Hello! had the necessary belief that publication was in the public interest, particularly given the photographs were obtained by a trespassing paparazzo and Hello! knew OK! was about to publish a wedding exclusive. Mr Justice Lindsay commented "[t]hat the public would be interested is not to be confused with there being a public interest."

An unsuccessful argument by Hello! that their processing was covered by a transitional exemption confirms the narrowness of this exemption, which requires processing to have been already under way immediately before 24 October 1998. The Judge held that "already under way" suggested a continuous process from 24 October 1998 "as would be the case where, for example, running a bank account was processed both before and after that date". He went on to find that "photographs even of the same subjects are quite separate items of personal data in a way that, say, operations on a running bank account, where the balance at any time is dependent upon the cumulative effect of earlier transactions, are not."

The Act’s first principle, requiring processing to be fair and lawful, was held to have been breached by Hello! on two main grounds. First, the surreptitious manner in which the photographs had been obtained was not fair. Second, none of the conditions in Schedule 2 prescribed for fair and lawful processing had been met. As for the condition at paragraph 6(1) of the Schedule (which requires processing to be necessary for legitimate interests of both the data controller and the data subject, giving priority to the latter), the court held that Hello! had a legitimate interest in publishing details of the Douglas wedding in their magazine, however, in the circumstances publication was found to be unwarranted by way of substantial prejudice to the legal rights of the Douglases.

The judgment also concluded that, despite Hello! having no defence to the Douglases’ claim to compensation under section 13 of the Act, any damage or distress which occurred was not by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of the Act (which is necessary for the right to compensation to arise).

This part of the judgment is hard to follow and, with respect, it is doubted that it is correct. The test applied by the Judge was: "if the obligations under the Act had been performed would it truly have made any difference?" Mr Justice Lindsay went on to state that "it is only if deployment by Mr and Mrs Douglas of the data protection argument would have caused the Hello! Defendants, on consent being refused to them, to elect not to publish the unauthorised pictures … that it could reasonably be said that the damage and distress occasioned to the Douglases was by reason of a contravention of the Act – section 13". The Judge’s conclusions in what he conceded was a speculative exercise were that Hello! would have elected to go ahead and publish in any event (therefore damage did not flow from the breach of the Act).

The above analysis overlooks the fact that Hello! contravened the Act not only because they did not have the Douglases’ consent to publish but because, more generally, the requisite fairness and lawfulness were lacking. It could be argued that it was this general lack of fairness and lawfulness which caused damage and distress to the Douglases. Further, if the court’s more limited approach were the correct one then it would severely limit the right to compensation under the Act.

The clue to the real reason for the "nominal award" is likely to lie with the Judge’s finding that he did not "see [the Act] as adding a separate route to recovery for damage or distress beyond a nominal award…" In so doing Mr Justice Lindsay was essentially trying to make breach of confidence and breach of the Act two alternative bases for the same award of damages – the approach Mr Justice Morland took at first instance in the Naomi Campbell case (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EMLR 617).

Is There A Future for Data Protection Act Damages?

It is possible to interpret the Douglas judgment as limiting the compensation available under section 13 of the Act to nominal amounts (particularly where, on the same facts, damages are awarded by the court for breach of confidence) but it is suggested that this is not the correct approach. Leaving aside the desirability of preventing double recovery by a claimant, there is no reason why the level of compensation available under the Act cannot be substantial, depending on the facts.

"Privacy" - A New Law Coming Soon to English Courts?

The judgment is as interesting for the law it does not make as for the law it confirms. In dismissing the Douglases’ claim for breach of privacy, Mr Justice Lindsay confirmed there is no free-standing or ‘sui generis’ law of privacy in the UK. Obiter remarks in the judgment appear to have fuelled speculation that the courts will soon be called upon to do what the legislature has failed to accomplish in terms of protecting privacy but this may be based on a misconception as to the current state of the law.

Mr Justice Lindsay’s judgment leaves unanswered the question of whether the Act (in force since 1 March 2000) could provide an effective remedy in circumstances where UK law has been found wanting in the past. One such situation referred to in this judgment was the case of Peck v UK (The Times, 3 February 2003 – click here for the Data Privacy Newsflash on 4 February 2003) in which the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK had failed to provide Mr Peck with an effective domestic legal remedy for violation of his right to respect for his private life, as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The facts of that case were that unauthorised publications and broadcasts had been made of CCTV footage showing Mr Peck - clearly identifiable from the images - walking along a street in Brentwood in 1995, suicidally depressed and carrying a large knife. In those circumstances there was no duty of confidence, as Mr Peck was filmed walking along a public street.

If the facts of Peck arose now, there is a good prospect that the Act (and, in particular, the compensation right) would provide Mr Peck with an effective remedy. One argument would go as follows (applying the legitimate interests condition from Schedule 2 of the Act): although distribution of the footage might be for the purposes of a legitimate interest i.e., promoting the effectiveness of CCTV as a crime deterrent, showing identifiable images of Mr Peck in a confused, suicidal and distressed state to thousands of viewers would be unwarranted and prejudicial to his right to respect for his private life, particularly because promoting awareness of CCTV could be achieved without revealing Mr Peck’s identity. Under section 13 of the Act, Mr Peck would be entitled to compensation for any damage he suffered "by reason of any contravention" of the Act by the data controller.

This leads to the conclusion that UK law may now provide adequate redress for privacy breaches where no duty of confidence can be implied. And the name of this law? The Data Protection Act 1998.

Article by Kate Brimsted

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.