UK: Corporate Governance – ABI and NAPF Launch Best Practice Statement On Executive Contracts and Severances

Last Updated: 5 February 2003

In December 2002 the ABI and NAPF jointly published a best practice statement on contracts and severance pay. Boards and remuneration committees of listed companies will need to bear this in mind when preparing their Directors’ Remuneration Reports, determining their remuneration policy, negotiating service contracts with newly recruited directors, and agreeing compensation for departing executives.

The statement will have increasing importance in light of the new statutory vote on the remuneration report introduced by the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002 (for further information see separate briefings dated August 2002 and December 2002).

The statement forms part of the ABI Guidelines on remuneration, also covering principles and guidelines for the structure of remuneration and guidelines for share incentive schemes – these are covered in a separate briefing available on request. The Guidelines themselves can be accessed from the ABI website

The statement is a response to growing criticism in the media and elsewhere of "rewards for failure" where executive directors receive large payments on departure from the company. This has occurred because, by the time poor performance is evident and the writing is on the wall, it is too late to rewrite the rules and the executive’s entitlement to compensation is set in stone – in his service contract. In the absence of proof of gross misconduct such as fraud or dishonesty, the circumstances in which a director can be summarily dismissed without compensation are usually very limited. In theory it has always been open to companies to broaden the circumstances in which a director can contractually be dismissed with no or limited compensation, but in practice they have rarely done so. Shareholder pressure may mean that this is now an option companies will need to consider more carefully.

Emphasis on negotiating appropriate contracts at the start of employment

The main thrust of the ABI/NAPF statement is that remuneration committees must focus very carefully at the outset – that is, when the service contract is first entered into – on the potential cost of termination. Remuneration and nomination committees should work together to design service contracts which do not commit companies to payment for failure, and should develop a clear considered policy on service contracts which is included in the remuneration report. They should bear in mind – and avoid – the serious risk to the company’s reputation if it is obliged to make and disclose large payments to executives who have failed to perform.

This will clearly require remuneration committees to devise means of measuring performance, and the statement provides that the objectives set for the executive director should be clear and where possible made public – the more transparent the objectives, the easier it should be to determine whether the director has failed to perform and therefore to prevent payment for failure.


Executives’ claims for compensation on termination often include sizeable amounts for bonus that would have been awarded during the contractual notice period. The ABI/NAPF statement notes that these claims can be limited by imposing clear performance conditions on the payment of bonuses in the first place, and by specifying that a proportion of the bonus is for retaining the executive and falls away in the event of severance. This should be expressly provided in the bonus scheme rules or in the service contract, even where the bonus is expressed to be discretionary. Where a company states what factors it will consider in exercising its discretion (which is advisable in terms of producing evidence to refute any discrimination claims), it will only lawfully be able to consider these factors and no others – therefore it should consider stating that longevity is a relevant factor and/or providing expressly that no bonus will be payable where the executive’s employment has been terminated or (possibly) where notice of termination has been given, prior to the end of the bonus year or the bonus payment date. (Note however that there is a potential, as yet untested, argument that even this may fallfoul of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.)

Length of contract

The guidelines state that the one year period provided for under the Combined Code should not be seen as a floor, and remuneration committees should be prepared where appropriate to consider shorter periods. Equally, change of controlclauses giving rise to an entitlement exceeding one year’s remuneration should not normally be included. Only in exceptional circumstances, such as where a new chief executive is being recruited to a troubled company, will a longer notice period (or more generous change of control clause) applying during an initial period possibly be appropriate.

Contract provisions regarding severance compensation

The statement suggests a number of ways to reduce the compensation companies will be contractually obliged to pay on severance:

• The statement supports the inclusion of a clause providing for phased payments, where the company continues to pay the departing executive on the usual basis for the outstanding term of the contract or, if earlier, until the executive finds new employment. Although this does not lead to reduced compensation for poor performers, it does mean that the company gets the benefit of any mitigation of loss (although of course a poor performer will usually take longer than others to find another job). This proposal seems to envisage a contractual provision enabling the company to give notice of termination and place the executive on garden leave until the earlier of his notice period and his finding alternative work. The statement suggests that in many cases executives will prefer to seek further employment rather than remain idle – in some cases this may be rather optimistic, but there is nothing to prevent the contract making continued payment conditional on the executive making reasonable efforts to find other employment (and, possibly, providing the company with proof of this).

(The statement says that this phased payment approach needs to be specifically provided for in the initial contract, and it is based on continuing the employment rather than terminating without notice. However, the same effect with regard to compensation can be achieved by including terms, either in a termination agreement or in the initial service contract, providing that in the event that the employment is terminated summarily, phased payments of damages become payable until what would have been the expiry of the notice period or, if earlier, until the director finds fresh employment.)

• The liquidated damages approach, where the parties agree upfront how much the director will receive on severance as a lump sum, is not generally supported by the shareholder institutions on the basis that the amount cannot be varied to reflect under-performance (nor does it allow for mitigating earnings to be offset). Of course it would be possible to expressly provide that the specified amount of damages is smaller than otherwise if the company terminates for poor performance (or misconduct). However, this is not suggested by the shareholder institutions, who instead recommend that boards adopting liquidated damages clauses should provide that the amount of the damages be determined by arbitration (presumably the contract should make clear that factors such as performance should be taken into account by the arbitrator). The costs of arbitration would also need to be taken into account.

• If the contract is simply to include a notice period, damages for which would then be subject to the director’s duty to mitigate his loss, shareholders will expect reassurance that the board has taken steps to ensure he does so to the fullest extent possible – and therefore any termination agreement should reflect this duty fully. Again the institutions suggest that the board should consider providing for claims to go to arbitration rather than litigation.

• The statement notes that in due course a statutory disciplinary procedure will be implied into every contract of employment, including directors’ service contracts, pursuant to the Employment Act 2002. This is likely to come into force towards the autumn of 2003. Although not yet clear, the procedure is likely to apply to dismissals for poor performance as well as misconduct, and might also apply to redundancy dismissals. The shareholder institutions note that boards should be prepared to use the procedure if warranted and, if a director is dismissed following the use of such a procedure, the contract should provide for termination on a shorter notice period than otherwise. They suggest that an appropriate period would be the statutory minimum period of notice, which is between one and twelve weeks depending on length of service. This is quite a radical suggestion given the wide applicability of the procedure and the fact that the company could choose to invoke the procedure where the misconduct or poor performance is minor in nature (and where the dismissal would ultimately beunfair).

• Perhaps more palatable is the suggestion that contracts permit dismissal without notice in cases of serious financial failure – such as a very significant fall of the share price relative to the sector. However, would this be appropriate for all the directors of the failing company? – should all directors be responsible for such a failure or should an individual director be terminable with no or reduced notice only if he has failed to meet personal performance targets?

• Finally, the statement suggests that companies could provide for cash compensation on termination to be paid by reference to shares, with the amount of the shares set at the outset of the employment, thereby tying the compensation to the company’s fortunes. Remuneration committees adopting such an approach should satisfy themselves that it is workable and will yield advantages greater than the other approaches outlined above. The use of shareholding targets is seen as a more effective means of aligning the financial interests of executives with those of shareholders.

Of course the above suggestions deal only with the executive’s contractual entitlement. Executives dismissed for poor performance will often have valid unfair dismissal claims where the company has not been willing or able to give them targets and time to improve. The compensatory award for unfair dismissal will be capped at £53,500 from February 2003.

The Combined Code and the Higgs review

The Combined Code on corporate governance also touches on these issues. The Code states that remuneration committees should consider the advantages of providing explicitly in the initial contract what compensation commitments will apply on the termination of a director’semployment, save in the event of dismissal for misconduct. The Higgs Review of non-executive directors published earlier this week proposes that the Code be amended to include an additional comment that "in doing so, they should bear in mind the need to ensure that such provisions do not have the effect of rewarding poor performance which would not amount to misconduct or otherwise entitle the company to terminate the contract". This stipulation could be fulfilled by expressly providing that differing amounts of compensation are payable on dismissal for misconduct, poor performance and otherwise – or achieving the same effect by providing for differing notice periods for each type of dismissal. However structured, the contract could also provide for mitigating earnings to be offset.

Parliamentary initiative

Perhaps not surprisingly in view of the media attention given to this issue, the ABI/NAPF best practice statement and Higgs Report are not the only recent initiatives relating to "rewards for failure". Archie Norman MP has introduced a Private Member’s Bill "to amend the law in relation to payment of a company director by way of compensation for loss of office so as to require boards to take respective director’s performance into account in settling the amount of any such payment, notwithstanding anything in the contract". As the Bill has not yet been published, it is unclear exactly how it would work and whether it would cover private companies and unlisted public companies. If the proposal is to modify contract law to reduce a director’s contractual entitlement, the director might still be able to claim additional compensation for unfair dismissal. Would the law apply to current contracts or only new contracts entered into after the legislation came into force? How would boards determine that a director had performed poorly where no specific targets were set – to what extent would a director be deemed responsible for poor company performance? The Bill is due to receive its second reading in the House of Commons on 31 January 2003.

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.