UK: What To Do About LIBOR: Wheatley Review Consults

Last Updated: 3 October 2012
Article by Rosali Pretorius, Madeleine De Remusat and Emma Radmore

What is the Wheatley Review?

At the end of July, HM Treasury confirmed the Terms of Reference of the review the Government asked Martin Wheatley to carry out following the LIBOR setting issues (the Review). It said the Review should cover:

  • the current framework for settling and governing LIBOR, and whether activities related to it should come within the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulatory perimeter;
  • the scope for criminal and civil sanctions to address LIBOR-related activities; and
  • whether the recommendations the review will make in relation to LIBOR should apply to other price-setting mechanisms.

The Review published a consultation paper on 10 August, setting out its initial views. It will need comments by 7 September to meet the challenging deadline of reporting by the end of September.

The main messages

The paper identifies many significant weaknesses in how LIBOR works and concludes that keeping LIBOR in its current state is not viable. It says this is because of both the weaknesses identified and the lack of credibility in LIBOR that recent events have caused. It also notes initiatives by other regulators, specifically the European Commission in relation to EURIBOR and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in relation to oil spot prices, and recommends consistent action.

The Review believes it must act on two fronts

  • a comprehensive reform and strengthening of LIBOR; and
  • identifying and evaluating other benchmarks that can take on some of the roles LIBOR currently performs.

It also believes there are arguments for a global regulator of benchmarking practices.

LIBOR's weaknesses

The Review has identified key weaknesses of LIBOR:

  • the increased focus on expert judgement rather than actual transaction data, as the market in unsecured interbank borrowing has declined;
  • incentives for banks and individuals within them to try to manipulate the data (to support trading positions or to improve the impression of creditworthiness); and
  • inadequate governance of the submission process within banks and of the compilation process generally.

It says the method of LIBOR administration exacerbates the weaknesses as it is self-policing and the data is often not transaction-based.

Strengthening LIBOR and looking at alternatives

The Review considers the history of LIBOR and its development into the leading global benchmark. It looks at how changing markets have altered the basis of LIBOR submissions and how the changing model for bank funding arguably gives LIBOR less meaning than it has traditionally had.

The paper looks at the role of the banks and of BBA LIBOR Limited (which is responsible for the day-to-day running of LIBOR), Thomson Reuters (which collects, checks, verifies and publishes information) and the Foreign Exchange and Money Markets Committee (FXMMC) which has overall responsibility for the design and review of parameters of submissions). It notes several significant limitations in this structure, including lack of independence and transparency, and inadequate supervision and governance. Also, participation in LIBOR is voluntary.

It suggests a few methods for strengthening LIBOR, such as:

  • introducing transaction-based reporting and making the reporting process more transparent;
  • establishing a code of conduct or similar check to improve transparency and make the LIBOR process more robust and independent, at both bank and administrator level;
  • bringing submission and administration of LIBOR within the regulatory remit and, if necessary, strengthening sanctions.

Alongside this, there should be international initiatives to improve or create alternatives to LIBOR. The Review notes that in some cases, there are existing rates but in others there may be a need to develop new benchmarks. Whichever way the market goes, there must be a carefully planned transition period to allow orderly migration of the many contracts that reference LIBOR.

In this context, the Review suggests it might be appropriate to have a set of principles that govern global benchmarks, to ensure they are transparent, well governed and subject to appropriate regulatory oversight and the calculation methodology is robust. It suggests the IOSCO or the Financial Stability Board might have a role to play in international coordination.

The choices

The Review analyses several ways that might address the weaknesses:

  • moving to a transaction reporting-based system: these systems exist for interest rate benchmarks that rely on transaction data. Clearly, to introduce one for LIBOR would entail, among other things, setting up a central repository for information. The Review sees other potential problems with this solution, including timing of the "fix", its usefulness given only a small number of reportable transactions and the fact that transaction data-based systems are not immune to manipulation;
  • setting up a process for independent corroboration of individual submissions or widening the scope of submissions to include all wholesale deposits and allow corroboration of submissions against transactions. Alternatively, reducing the number of maturities and currencies submissions should cover but broadening the scope of transactions, or just narrowing the scope of LIBOR by reducing the maturities and currencies covered;
  • changing what is included in the calculation rate (rather than just discarding the highest and the lowest submissions) to reduce vulnerability to manipulation;
  • aggregating, ceasing or delaying publication of individual submissions: the Review says this would be an obvious fix, but would come at a cost to transparency. Alternatively, the process could revert to the question banks were asked before 1988, which is "At what rate do you think inter-bank term deposits will be offered by one prime bank to another prime bank for a reasonable market size today at 11am?".The Review says this would help address conflicts of interest but would introduce more inference and judgement to the process, which is not ideal;
  • to increase the quality of scrutiny and oversight, there are several options
    • making more of the FXMMC independent, with members from non-participating banks;
    • introducing a Code of Conduct setting out what is required of participants, including having clearly accountable individuals responsible for the process within participants and introducing sanctions for breach that would be meaningful – so "dropping" participants from the panel would not be sufficient;
    • increasing transparency, either within the current governing structure or by setting up a new body along the FTSE model.

The Review does not seriously consider increasing the number of participants in LIBOR, as it does not see an easy way of encouraging institutions to join.

Regulating LIBOR-based activities

The Review notes that, although FSA is currently investigating several institutions for (presumably) breaches of its Principles in relation to LIBOR, the basis of its investigations is connections between LIBOR setting and other regulated activities. Without specific regulated activities related to LIBOR setting, regulatory powers are limited. Also individuals involved within the banks do not need to be approved persons (and therefore are not subject to FSA's "fit and proper" checks nor to direct regulatory action against them as individuals). The Review also notes that many allegations of misconduct relating to LIBOR are likely to fall outside the market abuse regime.

The paper considers self-standing sanctions regimes. In terms of criminal prosecutions, the Review notes that LIBOR-related activities are most likely to fall within fraud offences that the Serious Fraud Office can prosecute (and has suggested that it will). FSA's only relevant criminal powers come under s397 FSMA (misleading statements and market manipulation) and much of the relevant activity is likely to fall outside the scope of this article. One possibility would be to broaden the scope of s397. The European Commission's proposals to strengthen criminal sanctions under the EU market abuse regime to include benchmark manipulation would increase UK regulatory powers, but cannot take effect for at least two years. Also, the UK has currently chosen not to opt into the Commission proposals, pending seeing the results of the debate on the proposal for a Directive on Criminal Sanctions for Market Abuse.

The choices

The paper looks at whether LIBOR activities should come within the scope of regulated activities under FSMA, which would give FSA a clear mandate to regulate them and take action against those who breach its rules. The paper addresses:

  • which activities should potentially fall within FSMA scope: Contributing to setting LIBOR is an obvious one, and all banks that contribute are already regulated, so a change of this nature would not bring any additional entities within the scope of regulation. But the Review also identifies administering the benchmark as a potential addition;
  • which individuals should be approved persons: The Review suggests this could be any of (a) the senior management responsible for the overall LIBOR process, (b) managers responsible for LIBOR-related activities and (c) individuals responsible for LIBOR submissions; and
  • whether contributing to LIBOR should be compulsory and, if so, how regulation could achieve this.

Alternative benchmarks

Finally, the paper considers whether it would be possible to create alternative benchmarks. It analyses various instruments and the possible scope of benchmarks, some of which already exist. It looks at the conditions that should apply to creating benchmarks and the mechanisms for compiling them and then assesses the cost and complexities of transitioning away from LIBOR.

It analyses various indicators, including:

  • the Central Bank policy rate;
  • SONIA (the UK overnight unsecured lending rate);
  • Certificates of Deposit or Commercial Paper;
  • Overnight Index Swaps;
  • Treasury bills; and Repo rates.

For each of these it identifies whether it addresses counterparty risk, liquidity risk/cash usage, maturity curve, transaction volume, resilience, standardised terms and long data series. Not all products need to address all of these.

It asks several questions, including whether:

  • one benchmark should replace LIBOR, or be used instead of it in specific circumstances; and
  • different benchmarks should apply to different products.

It also considers the timescales within which an alternative could be introduced.

Where next?

The paper asks 16 specific questions. Each question is based on a complex analysis of current practices and future possibilities. The Review has come a long way in a short time, and it will be interesting to see which proposals it includes in its final recommendations paper at the end of September.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

4 Oct 2017, Conference, Munich, Germany

Dentons Global Real Estate Group is delighted to be exhibiting once again at EXPO REAL, the International Trade Fair for Property and Investment which takes place on 4-6 October, 2017 in Munich, Germany.

 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.