Worldwide: Investment Outlook - September 2012

Last Updated: 7 September 2012
Article by Jonathan Davis, Christopher Bates and Michael Quach

Hopes of an autumn resolution

World equity markets advanced and government bonds temporised in August as investors looked forward, in hope as well as expectation, to a more effective policy response on both sides of the Atlantic to the eurozone debt crisis.


Bond yields in Spain and Italy have fallen from the highs seen in mid-July due to speculation that the European Central Bank (ECB) is ready to step up its efforts and intervene once more in bond markets. Minutes of the recent Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting hinted at further quantitative easing (QE) in the US as the Federal Reserve keeps one eye on next year's looming 'fiscal cliff'. Yet there remains a fear that policymakers' actions, as we have seen so many times in the past, will not live up to market expectation. Time and again talk of central bank action has temporarily ignited markets, only to fall short on any kind of substance.

As we enter an important few months that may settle the fate of the eurozone, we remain cautious in the near term, given the risk that policymakers will again fail to deliver. While many equity markets look attractively valued on a relative basis, our long-term focus remains on good quality companies with robust business models, global franchises and high and sustainable dividend yields. We are also focusing on a suitably diversified mix of index-linked, conventional and good quality investment-grade corporate bonds. Our stance is designed to combine a measure of insurance against further deflationary pressures with reasonable exposure to the assets most likely to generate sustainable positive returns in a fragile economic environment.


The upward revision to the second quarter GDP figure from -0.7% to -0.5%, does little to change the bleak outlook for the UK economy and failed to provoke a positive reaction from financial markets. The UK economy remains a big underperformer among the major developed economies. According to the official statistics, GDP is still more than 4% below its pre-crisis peak, although employment has shown a surprising degree of resilience. While Britain's Olympic athletes enjoyed an extremely successful games and restored some pride for the UK on the international stage, policymakers still appear to be short on ideas on how to stimulate the sluggish economy. The Bank of England, in its latest Inflation Report downgraded its growth forecasts from a somewhat optimistic 1.3%, to closer to zero by the end of the year, with growth of around 2% expected in 2013. The Coalition Government and the Bank of England are pinning a lot of hopes on the funding for lending scheme (FLS) that was launched on 13 July, designed to stimulate more bank lending. Further QE and/or another interest rate cut are likely to be delayed until the impact of the scheme becomes clearer. Although inflation picked up marginally in July, this looks to be the result of temporary factors. Consumer price inflation is expected to drop below the Bank of England's 2% target by the end of the year and provides further scope for a more dovish approach by the Bank's monetary policy committee.

Despite a backdrop of poor economic growth and an uncertain outlook for the eurozone, the UK equity market has remained surprisingly resilient. Seven of the ten major sectors have performed well year-to-date and the UK remains home to many good quality, 'nifty fifty' companies with robust business models and global franchises. However, given the continuing slowdown in China, the UK market's large weighting in mining companies will continue to be a drag on performance in the short term. A return to growth in many of the Far East's larger countries, should that materialise, would have a positive impact on the sector and the overall market.


US equity markets hit four-year highs during August but continue to listen with anticipation to the Federal Reserve for hints that a response to the mixed economic data and potential fallout from the eurozone is just around the corner. The continuing fall in consumer price inflation to 1.4% in July remains well below the Federal Reserve's 2% target and certainly provides scope for further stimulus. However, while market expectations of further monetary stimulus are clearly high, for the Federal Reserve to act so close to the presidential elections in November would be politically contentious. In addition to this, the real question remains whether the US needs further QE. There is little evidence to suggest that the previous two rounds of QE have had any lasting beneficial impact on the real economy. While equity markets have received a temporary boost, the impact has clearly been diminishing. With the S&P 500 and NASDAQ indices among the world's best performers this year, we expect the most certain ground for further monetary stimulus to come in response to a seismic shock from the eurozone, should this occur in the coming months.

Recent data releases continue to paint a mixed picture for the economy's progress. The two main Achilles heels since the last financial crisis, unemployment and the housing market, both now appear to have bottomed out, but look to be on different trajectories. The labour market continues to limp along with the unemployment level still a concern. Payroll and jobless figures remain range-bound. This reflects a lack of confidence in the corporate sector, with companies unwilling to commit to large, labour-intensive investment projects given the prevailing uncertainty. The outlook for the housing market, however, remains brighter and looks to be gaining significant traction. New home sales have increased around 36% since the trough in February 2011. With mortgage rates likely to remain low for the foreseeable future and a shrinking supply of housing, this could provide a genuine boost to the US economy and no longer act as a drag on confidence.


Despite a continued equity market rally and optimism among investors that the ECB stands ready to react, second quarter GDP figures continue to show a deteriorating economic environment throughout the region. Spanish and Italian equity markets have both rallied on the back of ECB president Mario Draghi's comments that the central bank will do "whatever it takes" to save the single currency. The future path of European equities remains closely linked to future decisions by the ECB and Europe's political leaders. A backdrop of deepening recession, rising unemployment and a lack of competitiveness across southern Europe is making it harder for policymakers to put together a credible plan for resolving the ongoing eurozone crisis. The divergence in performance between the troubled peripheral nations and stronger countries in the north, which is at the root of the eurozone's problems, continues to widen. While countries such as Germany and The Netherlands grew by 0.3% and 0.2% respectively in Q2, there were further contractions in Spain (-0.4%) and Italy (-0.7%). The eurozone as a whole looks set to fall further into recession by the end of the year.

Some of this deteriorating outlook appears to have been priced into markets already. With many eurozone leaders returning from their summer breaks, we are entering a potentially crucial period for the region with a Greek exit now very much back on the agenda if an agreement to revise the terms of its bailout package cannot be reached at the next planned summit in October. A crucial ruling by the German Constitutional Court on the legitimacy of the European stability mechanism, the proposed new bailout fund, is due on 12 September. While many investors harbour hopes that a credible and sustainable plan to save the eurozone can still be agreed by policymakers, the risk remains that without tangible signs of progress the markets themselves may force another outcome, with uncertain consequences for the region and the rest of the world.


Japan's vulnerability to slowing global demand and reliance on exports has further been highlighted by July's concerning trade data. Global equity markets reacted badly to news that Japanese exports decreased by 8.1% year-on-year last month. Exports to the troubled eurozone (which account for around 9% Japanese exports) have fallen by 25% in the past year as demand in the region continues to contract. More concerning still is that exports to China, Japan's main trading partner, have fallen by 12% over the year. The continued strength of the yen combined with slowing global demand has meant Japan's trade balance has slipped further into deficit. This presents a genuine long-term concern for a nation whose gross public debt currently stands at around 205% of GDP, historically financed by strong export-led growth and a substantial trade surplus. With domestic demand still weak and foreign appetite for Japanese equities still dictated by a strengthening yen, we are likely to see further pressure on the Bank of Japan to help reign-in the runaway currency and for the Government to pursue policies to help boost waning demand domestically.

The weak start to the second half of the year points to a continuing slowdown in China, the world's second largest economy. Policymakers are under increasing pressure to react to slowing domestic demand and sluggish global economic growth. Domestically, industrial production has dipped to 9.2% year-onyear, while retail sales have fallen to 13.1% in July, from 13.7% in June. As we have seen in Japan, weak global demand and a strong currency continue to impact Chinese exports which slowed significantly in July to a mere 1% from 11.3% in June. However, the silver lining for China is that, unlike many economies in the West, policymakers have both fiscal and monetary tools at their disposal. With inflation falling to 1.8% and now looking under control, there is further scope to stimulate the Chinese economy. While the eurozone continues to dominate the headlines, China's ability to achieve a 'soft landing' is also important in determining in which direction markets move next.

Market highlights

Market returns

The eurozone crisis

The future of the eurozone has dominated market sentiment for more than two years now. In this Q&A, Jonathan Davis explains the key issues. Jonathan was appointed as a part-time director and adviser to Smith & Williamson Investment Management in 2012. A former full-time business journalist at The Times, The Economist and The Independent, he is a director of two other investment companies, a regular columnist at the Financial Times and the author of three books on investment. You can read his blog at

The eurozone crisis never seems to end. How close are we to a resolution?

It depends which crisis you mean. There is an immediate and serious crisis about the sustainability of the euro as a single currency for 17 of the EU's 27 member states. That is moving nearer to a resolution, with a number of key decisions needing to be made by the end of the year. But there is also a second crisis to do with the fundamental economic and financial problems many countries in Europe will continue to face whether or not the euro survives in its present form. That deeper-seated crisis is unfortunately still a long way from being resolved. It could take many years to fix.

What is the fundamental problem with the euro?

When the euro was launched as a single currency in 1999, with 11 members, it was intended to be just one step towards economic and monetary union across the EU. However, many of the other steps which are needed to make sure a single currency works effectively, such as integration of the banking system and a mechanism for agreeing and enforcing government budget limits, have still not been introduced more than a decade later. In that sense the euro project, though well-intentioned, was flawed from the beginning.

Does that mean it is bound to fail?

No. History does show that most currency unions eventually fail, typically when the economies in it start to move in different directions. This forces some members to subsidise or bailout others to ensure the currency's survival. The dollar is an example of one that has survived for more than 100 years, but the US has many characteristics, such as greater labour mobility and a clear national identity, that the EU lacks. The euro's misfortune is to have been by far the most ambitious project of its kind ever undertaken. The flaws in its design are unfortunately coming home to roost on a commensurate scale.

Is it all the fault of the way the euro was set up?

Not entirely. The flaws in design didn't matter so much when the world economy was growing steadily, as it did for most of the first nine years of the euro's existence. But the failure to establish an effective governance regime, or to stick to the government deficit limits laid down in the treaties that established the euro, have become critical since the global financial crisis of 2008. Trying to hold a single currency together in a debt crisis when economic growth is stagnating makes the task infinitely harder. It is compounded by the fact that for political reasons the creators of the euro deliberately set out to make the process irreversible, with no provision for any country to leave, however difficult their circumstances.

What triggered the current phase of the crisis?

It started in 2010 when it became clear that Greece, which had joined the euro in 2001, was unable to continue servicing the huge debts that it had run up in the years leading up to the banking crisis. In a single currency zone, the central bank can only set one interest rate for all member countries, regardless of whether that rate is appropriate or not for each country. Greece, along with Spain, Portugal and Ireland, was among the primary beneficiaries of cheaper money in the euro's early years. Its interest rates fell sharply after 2001, stimulating a huge private sector credit boom and a big increase in borrowing by the Greek Government. The build-up of eurozone debt was dangerous and unsustainable, but it got a lot worse when the global financial crisis hit, as most governments across Europe found themselves having to rescue their worst affected banks from bankruptcy, adding yet more to their public debt burdens.

Why is such a small country as Greece so important?

Greece was the first, but not the only, country to run out of money. With the help of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the other members of the eurozone organised a bailout loan, and then a second one, more grudgingly, in 2011. Bailouts have also been organised for two other struggling countries, Ireland (in 2010) and Portugal (in 2011). The problem is that if Greece is forced out of the single currency, it might not stop there. Once one country leaves, the risk is that others will soon follow as contagion spreads. More serious still is the risk that if Europe cannot convince the financial markets that it has sufficient firepower to defend even a small country like Greece, it will have no chance to save bigger and economically more important countries such as Spain. Nobody knows for sure how real these risks are.

Why haven't the rescue measures worked so far?

Europe's leaders have held more than 20 summit meetings in an effort to resolve the spreading crisis, but so far without managing to convince the financial markets that their plans are credible. They are hampered by genuine policy differences and the fact that without a central government, any substantive new steps have to be ratified by 17 individual member countries – a painfully slow business. Given the huge sums involved (more than €3trn to date in loans or guarantees), the bailouts are proving an increasingly difficult political sell. Public opinion has begun to turn against the euro in both the north of Europe, which has to foot most of the bill for the bailouts, and in the south, where the austerity measures are unpopular, making effective government responses harder To make things worse, this year Europe's economy has been slipping into recession, making the financial position of struggling countries, such as Greece, even worse, and the ability of richer countries, such as France and Italy, to fund rescues harder. More than half the countries in the eurozone have debt to GDP ratios well above the limits envisaged in the treaties that set up the euro. Spain, France and Italy are all struggling to bring their debts under control. Spain in particular is expected to have to seek a national bailout, given the scale of the problems in its banking sector, and its continuing inability to tap the markets for private sector funding at an affordable cost.

So what happens next?

At their most recent summit, Europe's leaders attempted to put more impetus behind the measures agreed at earlier summits. In addition to finalising the terms of a permanent bailout fund, the European stability mechanism, to help troubled members states in future, they also agreed to look at plans for moving towards a Europe-wide banking union, in an attempt to ring fence the problems of banks from those of governments. The ECB is also working on a plan to cap government bond yields. A series of official meetings in September will attempt to finalise the details. A team of officials from the EU, the ECB and the IMF (dubbed the 'troika') is meanwhile monitoring Greece's progress in meeting the conditions of its two bailouts, and another is monitoring Portugal. The Greek Government has again asked for more time to repay the loans advanced under its bailouts. The troika monitoring team is due to report by early October. A European summit later that month will have to decide, in effect, whether it can help Greece any further; and if not, how it plans to defend the rest of single currency zone against further enforced departures.

What will happen if Greece (or another country) is forced to leave?

Nobody knows for sure. It depends in part whether one country's exit leads to a much broader exodus. The short-term economic impact on the country leaving would undoubtedly be severe, most likely involving a deep recession, bank failures, bankruptcies and capital controls. While historical experience shows that countries that leave fixed exchange rate regimes do recover eventually, sometimes surprisingly quickly and strongly, it is inevitably a painful experience in the short term.

The knock-on effect on the remaining member countries is the bigger worry. Banks that have lent money to the departing country's banks and businesses would suffer losses. Thousands of business contracts denominated in euros would have to be written off or rewritten. In the worst case, a collapse in confidence could lead to bank failures right across Europe and a rerun of the financial crisis that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. But a worst case scenario is just that. Assessing the likely effects is difficult precisely because no provision was made in the treaties for how it could happen.

What are the odds on the eurozone breaking up?

The politicians cannot afford to countenance the possibility in public, but many analysts are convinced that it is only a matter of time before Greece is forced to leave the single currency. On the betting exchange, Intrade, the odds on at least one country leaving the euro before the new year are around 30% and before the end of 2013 more than 50%. There is no reason why that has to mark the end of the euro altogether. A smaller membership, built around the core European countries with the closest economic links, should in theory be easier to manage. The real issue is whether Europe's political leaders can muster sufficient political will and popular support to take the big steps, such as mutual guarantees of government debt, needed to ensure the single currency survives. There are also deep divisions between countries as to the best way forward. As the richest country in Europe, Germany in particular has been reluctant to shoulder the lion's share of the bill to bail out other countries without more certainty that bailout conditions will be met. Its own economy is slipping into recession.

What is the ECB's role in this process?

Compared to other central banks, the ECB has a relatively narrow mandate, confined to controlling inflation and maintaining financial stability across the eurozone. Its constitution specifically excludes it from buying the public debt of euro member states directly, a clause that was insisted on by Germany and others, essentially to prevent member states reneging on their tax and spending commitments. But many members of the eurozone want the ECB to be allowed to do more to help cap the interest rates on government bonds issued by Greece, Spain, Italy and others. The Federal Reserve and Bank of England have both been printing money to help their economies, something the ECB has so far only done on a relatively modest scale. Many analysts think that greater ECB involvement, combined with some degree of credible crossborder debt guarantees, will be necessary if the euro is to survive.

Is that going to happen?

It is possible, but not certain. The German central bank, the Bundesbank, remains strongly opposed to any such move by the ECB. Mario Draghi, president of the ECB, said recently that the bank will do "whatever it takes" to keep the euro intact. His officials are drawing up plans to help cap the rates at which troubled member countries can borrow in the public markets. Until the details have been fleshed out, it is impossible to know how effective these measures will be. Mr Draghi's statements have however served to remove some of the worries about the eurozone in professional investors' minds, at least for now.

How worried should investors be about the eurozone's problems?

It is clearly foolish not to have a contingency plan in case fragmentation takes place, given the likely disruption that would follow. The two outcomes – breakup or muddling through – could have very different consequences, making effective planning difficult. Most investors, however, are already well aware of the risks. They have long since sold their holdings of the most exposed European government bonds. European equities have also sold off, making them appear very cheap by historical standards. Policymakers and businesses have had plenty of time to prepare contingency plans for a possible Greek exit. But financial markets hate uncertainty and so investment performance is likely to remain subdued until the fate of the euro is clarified, and hopefully settled one way or another.

UK sector performance in 2012

One encouraging feature of the UK stock market's performance during August is that the gains were spread fairly evenly across all sectors of the market. This is in contrast to the market's performance since the start of the year, which has been notably uneven in sector terms. The weakness of companies in the energy and mining sectors have been a big drag on the UK market's performance, especially in the second quarter, a period which has been characterised by sharp falls in some key commodity prices, including oil, iron ore and copper, all of which are sensitive to changes in the pattern of global economic growth.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.