UK: A "Miss Is As Good As A Mile" When It Comes To Contractual Notice Provisions

Last Updated: 28 August 2012
Article by Matt Mccahearty

This publication considers the recent case of Ener-G Holdings Plc v Hormell [2012] EWCA Civ 1059. The key issue in the case was whether the claimant had complied with a requirement, under a share purchase agreement, to issue proceedings for breach of warranty within 12 months of notifying the defendant of its claim. Clauses of this nature are not unusual in commercial contracts and, as this case shows, failure to comply with them is likely to result in a claim being time-barred.

BACKGROUND FACTS

By an agreement dated 2 April 2008 (the Agreement), the defendant sold shares in a company to the claimant. Under the terms of the Agreement, the claimant was required to notify the defendant of any claim for breach of warranty no later than the second anniversary of the date of completion (i.e. by 2 April 2010) and to issue proceedings within 12 months of providing such notice. Failure to comply with this obligation would result in the claim being "deemed to have been irrevocably withdrawn and lapsed."

With a view to bringing a claim worth nearly £2m, the claimant sent two identical notices to the defendant on 30 March 2010. The first (the First Notice) was delivered to the defendant's home address by a process server. As the defendant was not in, the process server left the First Notice in the porch and the defendant found it later that day. The second notice (the Second Notice) was sent by recorded delivery to the defendant's home address. On 29 March 2011 a claim form (the Claim Form) was delivered by a process server to the defendant's address. Again, nobody was at home and the process server left the Claim Form in the letter box at the property.

THE DISPUTE

The dates on which the notices and the Claim Form were sent and received were undisputed. The dispute turned on whether the notices had been served in a manner permitted by the Agreement and, if so, when deemed service of the notices and the Claim Form took place; the key issue being whether deemed service of the Claim Form took place within twelve months of the claimant notifying the defendant of its claim.

The Agreement contained the following service provisions:

"13.2 Service

Any... notice may be served by delivering it personally or by sending it by pre-paid recorded delivery post to each party...at or to the address referred in the Agreement....

(emphasis added)

13.3 Deemed service

Any notice delivered personally shall be deemed to be received when delivered...any notice sent by pre-paid recorded delivery post shall be deemed to be received two Business Days after posting...."

Clause 14.2 provided that proceedings could either be served "in accordance with the terms of this Agreement" or "in any other manner allowed by law".

"Delivering it personally"

The claimant advanced two alternative explanations as to how it had complied with the service provisions in the Agreement. The first argument turned on the meaning of "delivering it personally" in clause 13.2. The claimant argued that both the First Notice and the Claim Form had been served in accordance with clause 13.2 because they had been delivered "personally" (i.e. in person) by a process server. If that argument was correct, deemed service of both documents would have taken place when they were delivered (i.e. on 30 March 2010 in the case of the First Notice and on 29 March 2011 in the case of the Claim Form) and the Claim Form would have been served on time.

The Court of Appeal rejected this argument – finding that the word "personally" must be a reference to the person being served (in this case the defendant, Mr Hormell) rather than the person serving the document. The Master of the Rolls accepted that, although "in normal social parlance", 'delivering' a document 'personally' would often be understood to mean service by the sender personally, this was not the natural meaning in a provision such as clause 13.2. In the context of service of documents, the identity of the server was rarely important; whereas the identity of the recipient was usually "of central importance". If the claimant's interpretation was correct, a notice would be served personally if it was posted because it would be delivered in person by a postman. Furthermore, the concept of "personal service" was well understood to mean service on a recipient, not service by the server (or anyone else) personally. Whilst a different phrase was used in the Agreement, the Master of the Rolls took the view that it was intended to achieve the same thing.

Were the methods of service in clause 13.2 exclusive or permissive?

The claimant's second argument related to the consequences of the finding that neither the First Notice nor the Claim Form had been delivered personally for the purposes of clause 13.2 of the Agreement.

It was common ground that failure to serve the Claim Form in accordance with clause 13.2 did not mean that it had not been served at all. In contrast to the provisions for the service of notices, the Agreement expressly provided that proceedings could be served in accordance with clause 13.2 or "in any other manner allowed by law". The Claim Form had been validly served under Part 6 of the CPR. However, under CPR 6.14, deemed service took place on 31 March 2011 (not 29 March, as would have been the case if it had been served under clause 13.2).

This meant that in order to show that it had complied with the obligation to serve proceedings no more than 12 months after it had notified the defendant of its claim, the claimant had to establish that such notification had taken place on or after 31 March 2010. Taken in isolation, the Second Notice complied with this requirement (it being common ground that deemed service of the Second Notice took place on 1 April 2010).

However, the defendant argued that the First Notice, despite not being delivered personally for the purposes of clause 13.2 was nevertheless valid on the grounds that he had opened and received it on 30 March 2010. If this argument was correct, it would mean that the deadline for service of the claim form expired on 30 March 2011 and the claimant was out of time.

Unusually, therefore, the server of the First Notice was arguing that it was invalid whereas the recipient was arguing that it had been validly served. This issue turned on whether the methods of service described in clause 13.2 were exclusive or permissive. In other words, did clause 13.2 prescribe the only two methods by which valid service could take place or could other methods be used as well?

The Master of the Rolls and Gross LJ agreed with the defendant (Longmore LJ dissenting) and held that the claimant's claim was time barred. In their view, the key consideration was that clause 13.2 provided that documents "may" (as opposed to "shall" or "must") be served by either of the two prescribed methods. The purpose of the clause was to provide two methods of service (personal service and by recorded post) whereby the server of the document could guarantee that the document would be deemed served, irrespective of whether the intended recipient of the document actually received it. The parties were still free to serve documents by other means but in doing so they would take the risk that the documents would never be received by, or come to the attention of, the intended recipient and, therefore, not be treated as having been served.

The majority in the Court of Appeal also took the view that the defendant's interpretation made more commercial sense. This was because, if the service provisions were exclusive, a situation could arise where the defendant had, within two years of completion, received and read a notice informing him of a claim but the claim would nevertheless be time-barred because the notice did not comply with the formal requirements of clause 13.2. Very clear wording would be required before the court would find that a party who actually receives a notice in time should nonetheless be treated as not having received it at all. The wording in this case did not achieve that effect.

CONCLUSION

Quoting Lord Nicholls' comments in Valentines Properties Limited v Huntco Corporation Limited [2001] UKPC 14, Gross LJ commented that "Inherent in a time limit is the notion that the parties are drawing a line. Once the line is crossed, a miss is as good as a mile." Certainty is important in commercial transactions and strict time-bars are a means of ensuring that the parties know where they stand. It is essential, therefore, that parties comply with contractual dispute resolution mechanisms and a failure to do so is likely to result in the right to bring a claim being lost. In the words of Gross LJ, "pleas of hardship in this area are untenable".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions