UK: Legal Issues Arising From Claims Concerning Negligence In Relation To The Diagnosis Of Renal Failure

High blood pressure (hypertension) is extremely common in western societies. In England alone approximately 34% of women and 37% of men have high blood pressure. Hypertension, on its own, is the second most common cause of end-stage renal failure (next to diabetes) and it is customary for all types of chronic kidney disease to eventually cause hypertension. As such, routine blood pressure management forms an integral part of the prevention and detection of these conditions and clinical negligence claims alleging a delay in the diagnosis of progressive renal failure are becoming more widespread.

This article considers trends in the legal issues associated with these claims.

Complaints often concern the adequacy of blood pressure control and/or a failure to monitor renal function and/or a failure to act on results.

The British Hypertension Society (BHS) Guidelines advocate a minimum of three blood pressure readings spread out over some months before considering a diagnosis of hypertension and it is recommended that once a diagnosis of hypertension is made (after several elevated readings) routine investigations should include urine analysis (Dipstix) and the measurement of serum electrolyte and urea (U&Es) or creatinine concentrations. Analysis of claims relating to a failure to diagnose and/or monitor renal function suggests that claimant lawyers frequently rely on a failure to act on a single elevated blood pressure result as evidence of negligence often at the same time overlooking subsequent entirely normal readings. In order to defend allegations of this nature it will be necessary to demonstrate sufficient attempts were made to follow up a potentially 'rogue' result otherwise a practitioner is likely to be vulnerable.

There is some evidence from the late 1990s that GPs omitted to carry out urinalysis in newly hypertensive patients, however, notwithstanding this, the general consensus amongst expert opinion is this was not an acceptable practice (the guidance has been in operation since 1993) and claims of this nature will be difficult to defend. When considering what constitutes an abnormal result it is important not to apply today's standards to the past and what may be considered an abnormal creatinine level now may not unreasonably have been considered essentially normal several years ago. Furthermore, the normal range for serum creatinine is variably quoted depending on the reporting laboratory and elevated creatinine levels do not necessarily mandate referral to a renal physician provided there is evidence of recurrent follow-up.

Recurring allegations centre around the instigation and/or adjustment of treatment in order to reduce risk factors and delays in arranging referral for specialist opinion.

For patients who have high blood pressure and kidney disease ACE inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) drugs lower blood pressure and protect the kidneys from further damage. As such, allegations of negligence may concern an alleged failure or delay in the instigation of this treatment. Whilst ACEi and ARB drugs were being widely used to treat hypertension by the mid 1980s (particularly ACEi) they were recommended by the BHS as 'second line' agents (after thiazide diuretics and beta blockers) until the introduction of the 'AB/CD' algorithm in 2004. Consequently, it may be possible to defend these allegations prior to this date. ACEi can rarely cause serum creatinine to rise after starting or increasing dosage in some patients and, therefore, the British National Formulary recommend that U&Es are measured before and after starting treatment and at periodic intervals thereafter. A failure to adhere to this guidance is likely to constitute a breach of duty. Further, it is now accepted that the prescription of non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), such as ibuprofen, may worsen renal function and, accordingly, their prescription is contraindicated in some patients with kidney disease. This has not always been the case and any allegations of negligence relating to the prescription of NSAIDS should be analysed in the context of the medical knowledge available at the time and without the benefit of hindsight.

Patients tend to develop symptoms of renal failure only when the disease is relatively far advanced and patients will often seek legal redress for what they feel must have been a diagnostic delay resulting in recourse to a lifetime on dialysis or transplantation. Kidney disease is rarely cured by medication and, therefore, the chain of causation may be weak and it may be possible to restrict quantum.

Although there is evidence that good blood pressure control with ACEi can retard the progression of renal failure, it is important to determine if earlier intervention would have avoided the development of renal failure or if earlier diagnosis could have led to measures to slow the progression of renal disease or prepare patients for renal replacement therapy. This is often difficult to predict with certainty. There is a tendency for claimant lawyers not to investigate causation by obtaining independent expert evidence and to assume that the instigation of effective therapy at an earlier stage would have avoided the development of renal failure altogether. The allegations of causation are often poorly particularised and sometimes demonstrate a careless analysis of the medical records. For instance, any subsequent normal serum creatinine and urinalysis results will act to undermine any assertion that renal function would have been abnormal before this time insofar that renal function rarely improves with the passage of time. In addition, ACEi may have been instigated indirectly to control hypertension rather than as a direct response to renal failure and, as such, its effect on preserving renal function may have been overlooked. It is, therefore, crucial to obtain expert opinion on causation since more often than not it is possible to demonstrate that a diagnostic delay has exacerbated the onset of a patient's requirement for renal replacement therapy rather than having actually caused it. This has significant implications for the assessment of quantum insofar that in this instance it will be possible to argue that the mainstay of any claim for special damages would have been incurred in any event (albeit at a later stage).

If a claimant can demonstrate that, but for the alleged negligence, he would have avoided the development of renal failure, then his claim is likely to sound in a significant claim for damages.

Whilst for the majority of the time prior to the need for renal replacement therapy patients will remain relatively well from a renal perspective, once renal function has fallen below 20 ml/min it is generally accepted that they will become symptomatic. Beyond this point claims for loss of earnings and care/assistance are likely to succeed. Patients undergoing dialysis require haemodialysis three times a week in a hospital or satellite unit or, potentially, by home dialysis. Home treatment may entail a claim for accommodation to enable the installation of a clean room or the costs of treatment in the private sector. Where transplantation is anticipated, given the uncertainty as to the availability of donor grafts, compensation for an extended period of dialysis will be sought in order to take account of this. The median survival of living and deceased donor grafts is approximately 20-25 years and 14 years respectively. Therefore, the costs of more than one transplantation in a claimant's lifetime (or further recourse to dialysis) may be sought. In this instance it will be important to consider if a claimant has any comorbidities, since is maybe arguable that by the time a replacement transplant is required the claimant's anticipated life expectancy has been exceeded.


In conclusion, it will be necessary to obtain expert evidence early on to investigate both breach of duty and causation. As a number of these cases are defensible (or partly defensible) on causation (i.e. expert evidence suggests the claimant will establish an exacerbation of his/ her condition rather than causation in full), consideration should be given to an early Part 36 offer in order to limit litigation costs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.