UK: Liability Of A Parent Company: Chandler V Cape Plc

Last Updated: 19 July 2012
Article by Rob Edwards

Rob Edwards examines this recent Court of Appeal decision, the first reported case in which express findings on the issue of liability of a parent company to a subsidiary's employee, have been made. Rob draws out the crucial detail and looks at the potential implications for the parties in this case and potentially for other cases.


The Claimant was employed by Cape Building Products Ltd ("Cape Products"), formerly Uxbridge Flint Brick Company Ltd ("Uxbridge"), for a short period in 1959 and again between January 1961 and February 1962. During the course of his work the Claimant was exposed to asbestos dust and fibre. At trial, the system of work was found to be unsafe and it was also found that Cape Products' parent company, Cape Plc were well aware of this systemic failure. A problem arose however because Cape Products was dissolved some years ago and the relevant EL policy of insurance contained an asbestos exclusion clause. Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in restoring Cape Products to the companies register and seeking to enforce rights against the EL policy.

It was against that background that the claim was brought against Cape Plc which was of course, formerly one of the UK's largest asbestos companies.

The Cape asbestos story

The history of the companies and the extent of their relationship is of some importance to the outcome of this case.

Cape Plc was a major producer of asbestos products operating several factories throughout the UK. After the Second World War Cape Plc were looking to expand. Near to their Barking factory, Uxbridge occupied two factories on a single site at Cowley Works, Uxbridge. One of the factories produced bricks, the other stood empty. By 1953 Cape Plc had acquired all the share capital of Uxbridge and set about modifying the empty factory for the production of asbestolux board. They appointed their own manager to run the branch. However it must be remembered that Cape Plc was still an operating company, not just a holding company with shares in its subsidiaries. Initially Cape Plc was merely a tenant paying rent and rates at the market rate. However the relationship blossomed and Cape Products became a part of an integrated group of companies headed by Cape Plc.

First instance findings

It was accepted that the mere fact that Cape Products was a subsidiary of Cape Plc, or part of a group of companies of which Cape Plc was the parent, was not enough for Cape Plc to owe a duty to employees of the subsidiary firm.

However, a duty was found to be owed by Cape Plc in the circumstances, not because of its ownership of the subsidiary, but because of Cape Plc's actions and assumptions of responsibilities towards the employees of its subsidiaries. It is helpful to highlight aspects of the history to understand how Wyn Williams J came to that conclusion:

  • Cape Plc had a long history of asbestos goods manufacture.
  • Cape Plc was capable of exercising control over Cape Products as a majority shareholder and indeed appointed a director and manager of the company.
  • The main purpose of acquisition of Uxbridge was for the facility to produce asbestos products as an expansion from businesses elsewhere. Minutes of the two companies showed they were working very closely together. Uxbridge changed its name to Cape Products and became a wholly owned subsidiary producing asbestos products.
  • During the period of the Claimant's employment Cape Plc and Cape Products had common directors. Cape Plc also raised capital for "the group's activities" including the asbestos manufacture at the Uxbridge site operated by Cape Products.
  • Minutes of various meetings of both companies showed that Cape Plc considered in detail the cost/benefit of Cape Products' work and expansion and in principle allocated funds to it.
  • Cape Plc, through its company doctor, was taking an active part in discussions relating to the health and safety of an employee of Cape Products suffering from asbestosis. The company doctor was also responsible for the health and safety of all the employees of the companies within the group.
  • A Monopolies and Mergers Commission report concluded that "the chairman of each of the principal UK subsidiaries is an executive director of the parent company and reports to the managing director of the parent company".
  • Witness statements in earlier actions were relied upon to show, and the judge accepted they showed, that Cape Plc accepted responsibility for the health and safety of employees of subsidiaries as well as its own employees.

In the circumstances, relying on the approach in the well known case of Caparo v Dickman [1990 HL], Wyn Williams J held that there was sufficient foreseeability and proximity between the parties, and it was fair, just and reasonable for there to be a duty independently owed by Cape Plc to Cape Products' employees.

Court of Appeal findings

Appreciating the significance of this case, the Court of Appeal emphasised they were not looking to "pierce the corporate veil", as a subsidiary and its parent company are separate entities and there can be no assumption of responsibility simply by virtue of one company being the parent company of another.

The Court of Appeal stressed the question was simply whether what the parent company did, amounted to taking on a direct duty to the subsidiary's employees.

Given the circumstances of this case, in particular Cape Plc's knowledge of the systemic failings of the factory where the Claimant worked, combined with its superior knowledge about the nature and management of asbestos risks, the Court of Appeal concluded it was appropriate to find Cape Plc had assumed a duty of care either to advise a subsidiary on what steps to take or to ensure that those steps were taken. Cape Plc had issued operational instructions to the subsidiary on other matters. Accordingly Cape Plc owed a direct duty of care to the employees of Cape Products.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged that this case demonstrates that in appropriate circumstances the law may impose on a parent company responsibility for the health and safety of its subsidiary's employees. Those circumstances include a situation where:

  • The businesses of the parent and subsidiary are in a relevant respect, the same;
  • The parent has, or ought to have, superior knowledge on some relevant aspect of health and safety in the particular industry;
  • The subsidiary's system of work is unsafe as the parent company knew, or ought to have known; and
  • The parent knew or ought to have foreseen that the subsidiary or its employees would rely on its using that superior knowledge for the employee's protection. It is not necessary to show that the parent is in the practice of intervening in the health and safety policies of the subsidiary; the court will look at the relationship between the companies more widely. It may be sufficient if it is shown a parent company has a practice of intervening in the trading operations of the subsidiary for example production and funding issues.

Wider implications

  • The principles in this case are of course potentially of far wider application. In the disease sphere in particular, it is not unusual to be faced with historic claims from former employees of associated or subsidiary companies which have long since ceased trading and for whom insurance can no longer be traced.
  • In the Chandler case, one should not be fooled by the outcome. The case in fact demonstrates clearly that a parent company will not be held liable simply because it owned, or could control, or had shared directors with, a subsidiary company. Liability attached to Cape Plc because of its own assumption of a responsibility to the subsidiary's employees in relation to their health and safety and of course was then in breach of that duty of care by failing adequately to discharge that responsibility.
  • The case is yet another in a long line of cases over the years where the court looks at the relationship between parties and whether that gives rise to a duty of care. There is no general duty to prevent third parties causing damage to another, though the particular circumstances or relationship between the parties may give rise to an assumption of attachment of responsibility. It must not be forgotten that the burden of proof for establishing this "special relationship" and therefore the assumption of responsibility would rest upon the claimant. In many instances, given the passage of time and the dissolution of companies, it is difficult to see what information a claimant will be able to obtain to discharge that burden.
  • In the Chandler case the Claimant had the benefit of a detailed company history of the company called "The Cape Asbestos Story". They had contemporaneous minutes of board meetings and a long line of previous litigation involving Cape Plc with witness statements from those cases. There will be few cases in general where such similar evidence will exist or survive.
  • Another important feature in the Chandler case was the specialist knowledge of Cape Plc as well as its groupwide medical input. That gave rise to quite a different relationship with its subsidiaries than would be the case in most companies. In many instances subsidiaries will generally have been a separately established business subsequently acquired by the parent to diversify its activities rather than a vehicle for the discharge of the group's main operation. The sharing of premises was also an unusual feature.
  • In cases after Chandler, a claimant will not of course have to demonstrate close analogy with the facts of Chandler but just that he has satisfied the Caparo v Dickman test. That will always be arguable but in the vast majority of cases there will be little reason to depart from the normal rule of no liability of parent companies for the actions of subsidiaries.
  • The Chandler case is an exception that tests the rule because of the strong facts of an asbestos manufacturer acting through subsidiaries but where the parent had specialist knowledge and then undertook an assumption of responsibility for asbestos related disease within the subsidiary's workforce.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.