UK: Stress At Work: A Case Of Retrospective Recollection?

Last Updated: 19 July 2012
Article by David Drewe

Grimes v City of Sunderland College [2012] was an unusual stress at work case in the County Court, in which DWF acted for the successful Defendant College. The claim focussed upon the Claimant's return to work after two previous breakdowns and her subsequent third breakdown. However, when investigated, it transpired that the Claimant had made an incomplete recovery from the second period of absence and it was held that she had failed to show fault on the part of her employers. The judgment provides a useful restatement of the law and also demonstrates that claimants face considerable difficulties in winning these cases if insurers adopt a robust position. David Drewe draws out the key findings and also highlights a useful practice point for claims handlers.


The 61 year old Claimant had trained as a teacher as a mature student and qualified in 1990. Throughout her teaching career she worked for the Defendant sixth form college which catered for a mixture of academic and vocational students, a number of whom came from deprived areas of Sunderland and could be "challenging".

First absence - in February 2000 she was diagnosed as suffering from a major depressive episode ("MDE") which resulted in an absence of 6 months, allegedly due to a combination of behaviour of students, unsupportive management and an impossible timetable. She returned to work in August 2000 in a non-teaching role in a work based learning unit.

Second absence - she suffered a further MDE in February 2005 which gave rise to another 6 month absence which she blamed on "unethical practices" within the college and lack of managerial support. At the beginning of her absence the College offered to provide her with a return to work in a new role at a new site, offering adult learning support ("ALS"), it being anticipated that she would be able to return to work shortly. It became apparent that this was not in fact going to happen and plans were made for a return to work at the start of the following academic year in September 2005.

There was a dispute about the scope of duties she was to undertake on returning to work, which was eventually to become a central issue between the parties. She asserted that she was to teach ALS on a specialist one to one basis whilst the College argued that the agreement was to work as a lecturer with some ALS duties.

Following a review by the College's Occupational Health provider in August 2005 the Claimant returned before the start of the Autumn term and commenced teaching on 12 September 2005. On 16 September she encountered what she regarded as a particularly unruly class, which she was later to say "broke her".

Third absence - on 2 December 2005 the Claimant ceased work, again blaming a confrontation in class. She did not return to work after that.

A Letter of Claim was issued in September 2006 and shortly after, she was examined by a Consultant Psychiatrist. The thrust of the complaints at that time were the failings of the College in respect of the February 2000 and February 2005 absences and the fact that on return to work in August 2005 she had to deal with unruly students.

Following disclosure of the Claimant's medical evidence, pre-action disclosure was given of her personnel and occupational health files.

Proceedings were issued in 2009. No allegations were made within the Particulars of Claim regarding the February 2000 or February 2005 incidents but it was alleged for the first time that rather than restarting work in an ALS role she was persuaded to work as a specialist tutor with some ALS input. The College's records relating to important meetings were certainly capable of an interpretation which supported this allegation. It was also alleged that the College was negligent in assigning her a large number of students who were aggressive, rowdy and difficult to control in the knowledge that she had previously struggled to cope with unruly students.

The trial took place over four days in February 2012 with the court hearing from thirteen lay witnesses and two medical experts.


HHJ Wood found that the Claimant had failed to discharge the "onerous burden" of showing fault on the part of the College:

  • The court was bound by the Court of Appeal decision of Hatton v Sutherland [2002]. The case had to be decided against the backdrop of the following factors:

- "Unless... there was a real risk of breakdown which the claimant's employers ought reasonably to have foreseen and which they ought properly to have averted, there can be no liability". (Hale LJ (quoting Brown LJ in Garrett v London Borough of Camden) at para 22).

- "In every case it is necessary to consider what the employer not only could, but should have done". (Hale LJ at para 32).

  • The judge then reviewed and applied the relevant "practical propositions" outlined by Hale LJ at para 43 of her judgment.
  • There was no doubt that the Claimant was an employee in respect of whom psychiatric illness was foreseeable. However, the burden rested on the Claimant to show a breach of duty by the College in failing to prevent such injury.
  • Recognising the risk of the Claimant suffering further illness was central to the arrangements made to facilitate a return to work at a new site and in a new job. Regardless of the argument, resolved in the College's favour, about the extent of her duties, she knew the nature of the work, students and courses when she accepted the job. There was nothing to indicate that the job was intrinsically unsuitable. The Claimant had returned to a well thought out job, well supported by excellent management and it was not reasonably foreseeable that the Claimant would suffer injury due to stress at work.
  • Prior to her third absence, there were no indications of impending harm to health arising from stress at work plain enough for a reasonable employer to appreciate that it should do something about it. The Defendant, supported by the Claimant's GP and occupational health adviser, had the right to assume she had recovered and was fit to return.
  • The Claimant's reaction to challenging students was unforeseen and remained not reasonably foreseeable until her third absence.
  • When the Claimant returned to work she was in fact in remission but not fully fit. Unbeknown to anyone, she had also ceased taking her anti-depressive medication.
  • The College acted upon occupational health advice and provided a phased return to work but the "die was cast" as soon as work started unravelling for her on 16 September 2005. The Defendant was therefore not liable.


The case is interesting as a stress claim in which the liability alleged on the employer was confined to the situation where the Claimant returned to work after two breakdowns, and where the allegations of negligence were confined to the situation in which a third breakdown was suffered. It might have been thought that the Claimant was on more fertile ground where her vulnerability was more apparent to the employer as a result of the two previous episodes. Nevertheless, the same law was applied as would have been considered for a second breakdown claim, and the result was in favour of the employer whose actions were above criticism.

In stress cases, it is generally not in a defendant's interest to assert that a claimant is being dishonest. Having said that, there was a stark dispute here between the parties on a number of important factual issues. The approach the College adopted in this case, and which found favour with the Judge in resolving those factual disputes, was to assert that the Claimant's perception had been distorted by her condition as well as having to a degree been reconstructed after the event by reference to documents. This approach was considerably assisted by the fact that the pleaded case differed significantly from the claim as initially presented.

The Judge concluded that "insofar as I can find a reason for the discrepancy in the recollections it is... a case of reconstruction after the event aided by the benefit of sight of contemporaneous documents which, on their own, do lend support to the views of the Claimant. Taken as part of the chronology, however, it can be seen that such a view is erroneous".

Under the Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness claims (paragraph 4.1) the Claimant may in "appropriate" circumstances seek disclosure of the occupational health and personnel records before issuing a Letter of Claim. The Claimant had not done so on this occasion, and it would have been interesting to see how she advanced the claim had she done so.

Insurers should therefore liaise with their insured to refer requests for disclosure of occupational health and personnel records (to which of course the Claimant is entitled under the Data Protection Act 1998) to them and try to persuade the Claimant to outline the broad nature of the claim (if not a detailed Letter of Claim) before such disclosure is given.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.