UK: Stress At Work: A Case Of Retrospective Recollection?

Last Updated: 19 July 2012
Article by David Drewe

Grimes v City of Sunderland College [2012] was an unusual stress at work case in the County Court, in which DWF acted for the successful Defendant College. The claim focussed upon the Claimant's return to work after two previous breakdowns and her subsequent third breakdown. However, when investigated, it transpired that the Claimant had made an incomplete recovery from the second period of absence and it was held that she had failed to show fault on the part of her employers. The judgment provides a useful restatement of the law and also demonstrates that claimants face considerable difficulties in winning these cases if insurers adopt a robust position. David Drewe draws out the key findings and also highlights a useful practice point for claims handlers.


The 61 year old Claimant had trained as a teacher as a mature student and qualified in 1990. Throughout her teaching career she worked for the Defendant sixth form college which catered for a mixture of academic and vocational students, a number of whom came from deprived areas of Sunderland and could be "challenging".

First absence - in February 2000 she was diagnosed as suffering from a major depressive episode ("MDE") which resulted in an absence of 6 months, allegedly due to a combination of behaviour of students, unsupportive management and an impossible timetable. She returned to work in August 2000 in a non-teaching role in a work based learning unit.

Second absence - she suffered a further MDE in February 2005 which gave rise to another 6 month absence which she blamed on "unethical practices" within the college and lack of managerial support. At the beginning of her absence the College offered to provide her with a return to work in a new role at a new site, offering adult learning support ("ALS"), it being anticipated that she would be able to return to work shortly. It became apparent that this was not in fact going to happen and plans were made for a return to work at the start of the following academic year in September 2005.

There was a dispute about the scope of duties she was to undertake on returning to work, which was eventually to become a central issue between the parties. She asserted that she was to teach ALS on a specialist one to one basis whilst the College argued that the agreement was to work as a lecturer with some ALS duties.

Following a review by the College's Occupational Health provider in August 2005 the Claimant returned before the start of the Autumn term and commenced teaching on 12 September 2005. On 16 September she encountered what she regarded as a particularly unruly class, which she was later to say "broke her".

Third absence - on 2 December 2005 the Claimant ceased work, again blaming a confrontation in class. She did not return to work after that.

A Letter of Claim was issued in September 2006 and shortly after, she was examined by a Consultant Psychiatrist. The thrust of the complaints at that time were the failings of the College in respect of the February 2000 and February 2005 absences and the fact that on return to work in August 2005 she had to deal with unruly students.

Following disclosure of the Claimant's medical evidence, pre-action disclosure was given of her personnel and occupational health files.

Proceedings were issued in 2009. No allegations were made within the Particulars of Claim regarding the February 2000 or February 2005 incidents but it was alleged for the first time that rather than restarting work in an ALS role she was persuaded to work as a specialist tutor with some ALS input. The College's records relating to important meetings were certainly capable of an interpretation which supported this allegation. It was also alleged that the College was negligent in assigning her a large number of students who were aggressive, rowdy and difficult to control in the knowledge that she had previously struggled to cope with unruly students.

The trial took place over four days in February 2012 with the court hearing from thirteen lay witnesses and two medical experts.


HHJ Wood found that the Claimant had failed to discharge the "onerous burden" of showing fault on the part of the College:

  • The court was bound by the Court of Appeal decision of Hatton v Sutherland [2002]. The case had to be decided against the backdrop of the following factors:

- "Unless... there was a real risk of breakdown which the claimant's employers ought reasonably to have foreseen and which they ought properly to have averted, there can be no liability". (Hale LJ (quoting Brown LJ in Garrett v London Borough of Camden) at para 22).

- "In every case it is necessary to consider what the employer not only could, but should have done". (Hale LJ at para 32).

  • The judge then reviewed and applied the relevant "practical propositions" outlined by Hale LJ at para 43 of her judgment.
  • There was no doubt that the Claimant was an employee in respect of whom psychiatric illness was foreseeable. However, the burden rested on the Claimant to show a breach of duty by the College in failing to prevent such injury.
  • Recognising the risk of the Claimant suffering further illness was central to the arrangements made to facilitate a return to work at a new site and in a new job. Regardless of the argument, resolved in the College's favour, about the extent of her duties, she knew the nature of the work, students and courses when she accepted the job. There was nothing to indicate that the job was intrinsically unsuitable. The Claimant had returned to a well thought out job, well supported by excellent management and it was not reasonably foreseeable that the Claimant would suffer injury due to stress at work.
  • Prior to her third absence, there were no indications of impending harm to health arising from stress at work plain enough for a reasonable employer to appreciate that it should do something about it. The Defendant, supported by the Claimant's GP and occupational health adviser, had the right to assume she had recovered and was fit to return.
  • The Claimant's reaction to challenging students was unforeseen and remained not reasonably foreseeable until her third absence.
  • When the Claimant returned to work she was in fact in remission but not fully fit. Unbeknown to anyone, she had also ceased taking her anti-depressive medication.
  • The College acted upon occupational health advice and provided a phased return to work but the "die was cast" as soon as work started unravelling for her on 16 September 2005. The Defendant was therefore not liable.


The case is interesting as a stress claim in which the liability alleged on the employer was confined to the situation where the Claimant returned to work after two breakdowns, and where the allegations of negligence were confined to the situation in which a third breakdown was suffered. It might have been thought that the Claimant was on more fertile ground where her vulnerability was more apparent to the employer as a result of the two previous episodes. Nevertheless, the same law was applied as would have been considered for a second breakdown claim, and the result was in favour of the employer whose actions were above criticism.

In stress cases, it is generally not in a defendant's interest to assert that a claimant is being dishonest. Having said that, there was a stark dispute here between the parties on a number of important factual issues. The approach the College adopted in this case, and which found favour with the Judge in resolving those factual disputes, was to assert that the Claimant's perception had been distorted by her condition as well as having to a degree been reconstructed after the event by reference to documents. This approach was considerably assisted by the fact that the pleaded case differed significantly from the claim as initially presented.

The Judge concluded that "insofar as I can find a reason for the discrepancy in the recollections it is... a case of reconstruction after the event aided by the benefit of sight of contemporaneous documents which, on their own, do lend support to the views of the Claimant. Taken as part of the chronology, however, it can be seen that such a view is erroneous".

Under the Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness claims (paragraph 4.1) the Claimant may in "appropriate" circumstances seek disclosure of the occupational health and personnel records before issuing a Letter of Claim. The Claimant had not done so on this occasion, and it would have been interesting to see how she advanced the claim had she done so.

Insurers should therefore liaise with their insured to refer requests for disclosure of occupational health and personnel records (to which of course the Claimant is entitled under the Data Protection Act 1998) to them and try to persuade the Claimant to outline the broad nature of the claim (if not a detailed Letter of Claim) before such disclosure is given.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions