UK: English High Court Provides Guidance On Scope Of Documents Required To Be Provided To Private Equity Fund Investors

Last Updated: 18 July 2012
Article by Jonathan Shenkman and Marc Melia

A series of High Court judgments in London have provided a degree of clarity on the extent to which a limited partner in an English Limited Partnership is entitled to obtain information in relation to a private equity fund and its underlying investments.1 These judgments are likely to impact contractual discussions between fund managers and limited partners in the key area of investor reporting.

In giving judgment, Norris J considered the extent to which an investor is entitled to obtain such information as a matter of statute (under the Limited Partnerships Act 1907) and as a matter of contract (under the terms of a limited partnership agreement), noting the practical limits to the requests that a limited partner can make. Over the course of two judgments, the judge ultimately decided the case in favour of the general partner by applying a somewhat restrictive interpretation as to what constituted "partnership documentation" and by drawing a distinction between information physically in possession of the partnership (by being held by its general partner and/or manager) and other information which was solely held by underlying investment entities of the partnership.

The judgment is likely to have an effect on the manner by which investors will approach negotiations with general partners on reporting issues in new funds and also provides general partners with some degree of comfort, absent conflicting contractual provisions in their limited partnership agreement, over the means by which limited partners can secure detailed information on the fund's investments and wider activities.

Background to the Case

The case was brought against a US-based private equity real estate fund manager by a Spanish investor, which had taken certain limited partner positions in a European private equity real estate fund structured as an English Limited Partnership. The fund had a conventional management structure – management of the partnership was vested in the general partner which in turn delegated the performance of certain of its duties to an external manager pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. Under the partnership agreement, the manager was obliged to keep full and accurate books of the partnership to cover all receipts and expenditures, assets and liabilities and profits and losses of the partnership. It appears that the manager produced a conventional level of reporting for the investors in the fund by providing audited accounts of the partnership as well as (amongst other reports) market value and funding package reports for the underlying investment vehicles. The fund made eight investments in all, of which two were particularly in issue as the investors' capital for those two investments had been eroded by approximately half. These particular investments were not described in detail in the judgments, but it is apparent that the investments were made via an underlying layer of special purpose vehicles ("SPVs").

Prior to the losses being recognized on the deals, the investor wrote to the general partner seeking to obtain a better understanding of the investments and their underlying financial structures. Certain information was provided by the general partner, which was deemed insufficient by the investor who then requested further detail. The general partner ultimately refused to provide the further information on the basis that the documents requested went "well beyond what the limited partner was entitled to review"; the proper entitlement being to the partnership documents only. The matter came before Norris J in the High Court who was asked to determine what information a limited partner is entitled to obtain pursuant to its rights under s6(1) the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 "to inspect the books of the firm and examine into the state and prospects of the partnership business."

In reaching judgment the judge noted that, despite the investor's arguments, the general partner had in fact identified and collated a substantial body of documentation which it had determined were "partnership documents", and that therefore the onus had passed to the investor to demonstrate in what respects the available documentation was insufficient to enable it to make a determination as to "the state and prospects of the partnership business" within the meaning of the Act. There can be no doubt that the general partner's provision of an extensive set of documentation put the investor in a more difficult position in bringing its claim for further information.

The concept of "Partnership Documentation" in relation to the business of "Private Equity"

In giving judgment, the judge noted that the general partner of a partnership was obliged to maintain a record of the partnership's business and affairs sufficient to enable a partner with access to it to examine into the state and prospects of the partnership business but that the extent of this obligation varies from case to case depending upon the partnership business.

For the purposes of the business of "private equity funds", it is possible to derive some interesting guidelines from the judgment in relation to key private equity documentation and reporting.

Funding Documentation - the investor sought disclosure of all credit agreements, mezzanine facilities and indeed all correspondence with bank lenders. The judge disagreed that all such information was required to be provided save insofar as the documentation related to credit lines and facilities established in the name of the partnership for which the limited partners could be liable. Most importantly, funding documentation had also been sought by the investors from the investment-level SPVs, but here the judge found that such documentation only needed to be provided to the investor if it was the practice of the partnership to call for and review copies of the transactional or operational documentation of the SPVs. If the information stayed at the SPV level and (subject to the broader principles, sufficient information was still provided for accounts to be drawn up accurately at partnership level), then there was no right for the investor to obtain that information.

Constitutional Documents and Other Documentation of the SPVs - disclosure was sought in relation to the constitutional and participation agreements relating to the SPVs as well as draft documentation, any notes or records of meetings or conservations where any decision to invest in one of the particular investments was considered, as well as any formal or informal records of the investment strategies of the underlying SPVs. The investor requested the information so that it could determine (over the course of the life of the investment) how and upon the basis of what information, decisions were taken on underlying investments. The general partner argued that this information had already been provided in its broader reporting schedules. Despite being supportive towards the cause of the investor, the judge found that the general partner was only obliged to provide the constitutional documents in relation to the underlying SPVs and its general reporting package and that there was "no question of the general partner having any obligation to make up partnership books and records which do not at present exist in fact by using whatever shareholder rights the partnership may have to enforce against the underlying SPVs". The judge also did not see any basis upon which the investor could require the general partner to obtain drafts or notes or conversations between the underlying SPVs and third parties.

Advisory Committee Documentation - the investor also sought disclosure of all documentation in relation to the limited partners' advisory committee (including presentations made to the advisory committee, minutes of meetings and documents referred to in those meetings). The judge found that while the minutes and agenda of the meetings (including any documents annexed to such documents) were "partnership documents", the documents referred to in such meetings were not "partnership documents" and did not need to be disclosed. However, the judge also found that a reasonable request to supplement the formal record by the provision of readily available and obviously relevant information ought to be met by the general partner.

Underlying Hedging Documentation - due to the nature of the specific transactions in issue, the investor sought disclosure of the hedging documents relating to the partnership's indirect participation in the two investments (note that with the exception of one document, these were all entered into at SPV level only). Again the judge noted that the conventional reporting provided by the manager to the investors would have covered this information (and in particular the pricing of the various hedges) and that this was sufficient in itself.

Primary Transactional Documentation - this was an extensive request by the investor for a complete breakdown of all commitments, including details of when those commitments were made, all investments, amounts invested, all sale and purchase agreements together with a very complete schedule of all investments (including opening balances, additions, disposals, revaluations, gains and losses). The judge was unsympathetic to this request, comparing it to a limited partner in a retail business asking for a copy of all till receipts. The judge referred the limited partner to the audited accounts of the partnership which he had not been persuaded were insufficient to make the necessary determination.


One conclusion to be drawn from the judgment is that sound extensive reporting by a general partner will render it difficult for a limited partner to obtain further documentation from a limited partnership absent specific provision for such further information in the partnership documentation. Another important element of the decision is the extent to which certain documentation retained at the SPV level may be largely insulated from investor requests for disclosure (at least as a matter of statute). As partnership reporting becomes increasingly scrutinized, it will be interesting to see to what extent limited partners will look to negotiate fund limited partnership terms to provide for information flows not just from the partnership itself but also in relation to the underlying SPVs of the partnership. Should this occur, it is likely that this will be resisted by general partners on the basis that they are already spending significant resources on reporting for limited partners and that facilitating the types of detailed investment-level disclosures sought by the investor in the Inversiones case would be excessive.

General partners may take away from the case the importance of confidentiality and that requests for disclosure of certain "partnership documents" could be trumped or minimised through an effective confidentiality clause in their relevant limited partnership agreement or management agreement.

While the case concerned an interpretation of English partnership law, it is likely to have implications in other common law jurisdictions and we would expect its interpretation to be relevant to common law offshore fund jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands and the Channel Islands.


1 Inversiones Frieira SL and another v Colyzeo Investors II LP and another. Judgments are available at: (July 2011 Judgement) (May 2012 Judgement)

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.