UK: Good News For Brand Owners As Sun Sets On Euro-Defences

In a long awaited decision, the Supreme Court has refused to allow a parallel trader to rely on so-called "Euro-defences" against a trade mark infringement claim, which will come as a great relief to brand owners across all industry sectors. The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal and reinstated the summary judgment of the High Court, which had allowed Sun Microsystems' claim of trade mark infringement relating to second hand hardware imported from countries outside the EEA without its consent. The Supreme Court found that the Trade Mark Directive should be treated as "standalone" legislation and not subject to any additional limitation under competition law principles. Further, there was no relevant connection between the allegations made by the importer of anti-competitive behaviour by Sun Microsystems and the trade mark infringement claim.

To view the article in full, please see below:

Full Article

Background: Fortress Europe and Competition Law

Doctrine of Exhaustion

Article 7(1) of the Trade Mark Directive ("TMD") precludes trade mark owners from enforcing their rights in cases where products have been placed on the market in the EEA by them or with their consent (subject to limited exceptions under Article 7(2), for example where a product has been damaged). However, the position is different where goods are imported into the EEA from outside the EEA without consent. In these circumstances, trade marks can be enforced and the CJEU has confirmed that the TMD precludes member states from adopting a principle of worldwide exhaustion. Commentators have termed this Community-only exhaustion policy "Fortress Europe".

Competition Law

Article 34 (ex Art 28) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") enshrines the principle of free movement of goods. However, Article 36 TFEU (ex Art 30) provides an exception to Article 34 whereby restrictions are justified on the basis of protection of industrial and commercial (including intellectual) property, provided that the restrictions are not a disguised restriction on trade. Further, Article 101 TFEU (ex Art 81) prohibits agreements between undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between member states, the object or effect of which prevents, restricts or distorts competition within the EU.

The Facts

Sun Microsystems Inc ("Sun", which is now Oracle America Inc) sought to enforce its series of UK and Community Trade Marks against M-Tech, a UK company, following M-Tech's importation into the UK of 64 Sun branded disk drives which it had purchased from a broker in the USA. The goods had originally been placed on the market by Sun in Chile, China and the USA and had not entered the EEA market with its consent.

Sun applied for summary judgment in the High Court in 2009. This was resisted by M-Tech on the grounds that Sun's behaviour and its distribution agreements were anti-competitive, which dissuaded independent traders from dealing with any Sun products (even legitimate goods) and allowed Sun to control the secondary market via its own authorised network of distributors. In particular, it was alleged, Sun aggressively enforced its trade mark rights and refused to confirm to traders whether individual serial numbers appearing on its products related to products first placed by Sun within, or outside the EEA, and were therefore infringing or not. This was significant as this type of product was frequently sold on without a full trading history. The High Court dismissed these Euro-defence arguments and granted summary judgment.

To the dismay of many brand owners the Court of Appeal reversed the High Court's decision holding that (i) Articles 5 and 7 of the TMD must be read consistently with Articles 34 to 36 and general principles of EU law; (ii) the TMD is not a complete code and trade mark owners' rights may be subject to sources outside the TMD; and (iii) there was an arguable case of sufficient nexus with the trade mark claim for the purposes of Article 81.

In particular, the Court of Appeal held that the High Court's decision had failed to take account of the allegation that the agreements with Sun's distributors and resellers formed part of an overall scheme for excluding secondary traders from the market, and further that the CJEU had not previously held that Article 101 could not be used in trade mark cases. The Court of Appeal did however acknowledge that it may ultimately be decided that these issues should rightly be addressed in competition law, rather than intellectual property law, and suggested that a reference to the CJEU may be necessary. Permission to appeal the decision was granted and the case was heard by the Supreme Court over 30 April and 1 May 2012.

The Supreme Court Decision

In a decisively brief and definitive judgment, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal's decision, in particular holding that 'it was not good enough' for M-Tech merely to establish a breach of the TFEU. It was reasoned that as specific legislation exists with the purpose of harmonising EU legislation, then that legislation, here the TMD, supersedes general provisions of the TFEU. The TMD must be treated as a complete and exhaustive code relating to trade marks. The scheme of the TMD (including Article 7) already embodies the TFEU provisions governing free movement of goods in Articles 34-36.

The Supreme Court stated "Sun cannot be prevented from doing something which is in itself entirely lawful and consistent with the free movement of goods, simply because it proposes to do something else as well which is unlawful and inconsistent with that principle... It cannot therefore follow that because Sun enforces it trade mark rights "vigorously" it should have no trade mark right to enforce in those circumstances."

A limitation on Sun's ability to enforce its trade mark rights would effectively suspend Sun's rights across the EEA market as a whole, against anyone, which could not be correct. Logically such an argument would make Sun's trade mark rights unenforceable against not only parallel traders but also counterfeiters.

Further, the CJEU case of Van Doren, Case C-244/00, concerning burden of proof on consent, and used by M-Tech to argue that the enforcement of trade mark rights must be consistent with freedom of movement of goods, was not relevant. That case concerned a dispute as to whether the goods were indeed on the EEA market with the consent of the trade mark owner (and therefore the attempted enforcement of rights potentially affected trade between member states), whereas here it was agreed by all that the goods were not within the EEA with Sun's consent.

Although the Supreme Court acknowledged that M-Tech may have a legitimate claim in competition law against Sun, this was irrelevant. Further, there was no relevant connection between Sun's right to control the first marketing of its product in the EEA and possible breaches of competition law under Article 101. Neither was there an "abuse of rights" as claimed by M-Tech.

The Supreme Court admitted: "That there are obscurities in parts of this area of EU law is beyond question," but despite the Court of Appeal's recommendation for a reference to the CJEU, held that the particular legislative provisions and legal principles were entirely clear, as laid down by the CJEU, and that national courts had a duty to apply them. A reference was therefore not necessary.


This decision brings us full circle: following clear decisions by the CJEU, notably the Zino Davidoff cases, C-414-416/99, trade mark owners were very confident in enforcing their rights against imports into the EEA from outside the EEA without their consent, provided that the evidence was clear. Although in Sportswear SpA -v- Stonestyle in 2006 the Court of Appeal had decided that a breach of Article 101 could possibly constitute a defence to trade mark infringement, that case did not proceed to a full trial, and in any event, concerned parallel trade within the EEA.

The Sun/M-Tech dispute case had cast serious doubt on the ability of trade mark owners to enforce against imports from outside the EEA and threatened to develop into a long drawn-out dispute, with a reference to the CJEU potentially delaying a conclusion for a number of years. Thankfully the Supreme Court has clarified the position without further ado.

For the full text of this decision click here.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 04/07/2012.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions