UK: Early Redelivery Of Vessels: Repudiation And Its Consequences In The Current Market

Isabella Shipowner SA V Shagang Shipping Co Ltd (The "AQUAFAITH")

The recent decision of the English High Court by Mr Justice Cooke in the case of the "AQUAFAITH" concerns the purported early redelivery of a vessel by Time Charterers to Owners. The decision confirms that Owners are entitled to reject such repudiatory breach and insist that Charterers perform the charterparty, subject to two exceptions, namely where (a) Owners have no legitimate interest to insist upon the continuation of the charterparty; or (b) Owners cannot perform their contractual obligations without Charterers' cooperation.

This decision has particular resonance given current economic conditions in shipping, and in particular recent cases reported in the media of Charterers attempting to relieve themselves of time charter commitments by redelivering vessels early.

1. What is repudiation, and what are its practical implications?

The English law concept of "repudiatory breach" is where a contracting party (the "Defaulting Party") manifests an intention not to be bound by the contract. For example, in the AQUAFAITH, Charterers' attempted redelivery of the vessel 94 days prior to the contractual redelivery date constituted a repudiatory breach of the contract.

The case of White v Carter [1962] confirmed that in the event of contractual repudiation, the Innocent Party may elect to either keep the contract on foot and operational, or to terminate it. In the context of a charterparty, the decision by Cooke J in the AQUAFAITH clarifies that, subject to the abovementioned exceptions, Owners, as the Innocent Party, will have two options:

Option A: Owners may reject the repudiation, insist that Charterers perform, and continue to invoice Charterers for hire at the contractual times and rate up to the earliest contractual redelivery date. Owners will not be required to mitigate their loss. Owners can then bring a procedurally straightforward and speedy claim against Charterers for simple debt in respect of any hire invoice issued.

  • Although this may sound like an attractive option to Owners, the claim will only be for unpaid invoices up to the point at which a claim is made, and it will be that limited sum for which security can be sought. Vessel running costs will continue to be incurred, and Owners will of course not be entitled to earn income from the vessel on the spot market, as they will remain bound under the charterparty with Charterers. Therefore, if Charterers are in financial difficulties, this option can leave Owners with significant, and increasing, exposure.

Option B: Alternatively, Owners may accept early redelivery, terminate the charterparty, and bring a claim for damages in arbitration at court, such claim generally being for the difference between the contractual rate of hire and that obtainable on the open market from the date of termination until the end of the original charterparty period. Owners will be obliged to mitigate, but in doing so will at least be earning revenue from the vessel. After electing to terminate in such circumstances, Owners would be able to seek security for their full claim arising from termination of the charterparty, which if obtained could offer significant protection. Owners' loss and damage due to termination of the charterparty will "crystallise" into a reasonably identifiable range.

  • However, there could be lengthy argument between the parties in arbitration or at court over the correct calculation of this range of loss and damage in the future. During this time, Charterers' assets could be subject to various claims by other creditors, which, in the absence of security, could leave very little against which Owners can enforce any successful award or judgment eventually obtained.

Clearly, there are both advantages and disadvantages to choosing one or other of the abovementioned options. Owners should carefully consider the following matters before making an election: (i) the balance of time remaining until the earliest contractual redelivery date; (ii) prevailing freight market conditions; (iii) the circumstances of the particular charterparty, including the parties' respective rights and obligations in the event of repudiation; (iv) whether competing claims against Charterers can be identified (for example, from other Owners, financial institutions, and bunker suppliers); and of course (v) the solvency of Charterers. The appropriate strategy for Owners will depend on the circumstances of the particular case.

2. What are the exceptions to owner's right to elect one option over another?

In the AQUAFAITH, Cooke J clarified the situations where Owners would not be entitled to insist upon performance (as per Option A above), and would instead only be entitled to terminate and to sue for damages (as per Option B).

These exceptions were described in White v Carter [1962] in a non-shipping context, and are further discussed below. It will be for the Defaulting Party (relevantly, the Charterers) to prove that an exception is applicable.

(a) No legitimate interest

The first exception is where Owners have no "legitimate interest" in continued performance of the contract. There will be no legitimate interest in performance where to insist upon it would be "wholly unreasonable", "extremely unreasonable", or even perhaps "perverse".

This exception has its basis in equity. Simply put, equity in this sense will prevent or ameliorate the enforcement of a strict right where otherwise there could be an unjust or abusive result.

An example of wholly unreasonable, extremely unreasonable, or perhaps perverse given by Cooke J was THE PUERTO BUITRAGO case. In that case, Owners insisted that Charterers repair the vessel, in strict compliance with the contract, rather than redelivering the vessel, even though such repairs would cost double the value of the ship when repaired and four times as much as its scrap value.

Even a small benefit to Owners would ordinarily be sufficient for the court to be satisfied there is a legitimate interest, such that the Innocent Party is entitled to reject the repudiation. The court will not concern itself with whether or not electing to keep the contract on foot and operational was unreasonable, and will only consider extreme conduct by the Innocent Party.

Some relevant examples of where there could be a substantial benefit in keeping the contract operational would include: (a) difficulties in trading the vessel on the spot market; and (b) the potential insolvency of Charterers. With respect to the later, Owners in the AQUAFAITH successfully argued that as Charterers were in financial difficulty, they were at risk that Charterers would direct their limited funds to meet obligations to other parties, whilst delaying payment of any sums owing to the Owners until assessment at arbitration of what was due in damages. However, as mentioned in Section 1 above, this may not necessarily be an appropriate strategy in all circumstances.

(b) Owners' proper performance is reliant upon Charterers performing

The second exception is where the Innocent Party's own proper performance is reliant upon the Defaulting Party performing.

It could be said that if Charterers did not provide and pay for bunkers, Owners could not ordinarily perform their own contractual obligations and would have to accept the repudiation. However, Owners could simply stem the vessel and charge the Charterers that cost. Equally, if Charterer's did not give orders in relation to the employment of the vessel, it might be said that Owners could not perform. Nevertheless, Owners could simply maintain the vessel's position, awaiting orders. In either case, Owners would not be reliant on Charterer's performance to continue to properly perform themselves.

Whether Owners can carry out their own obligations under the contract following a repudiatory breach will depend on the type of contract. The rights and obligations of the parties under a Demise Charterparty will not be the same as those under a Time Charterparty. For example, in the THE PUERTO BUITRAGO the ship was abandoned by Demise Charterers, and Owners were obliged to put their own personnel on board. This would bring the charterparty to an end as the vessel would not longer be in Demise Charterers' possession. Owners could not continue to claim hire in such circumstances.

It is notable that Cooke J's decision should be applicable to the subject matter of contracts other than charterparties.

3. Forcing charterers to perform

In the AQUAFAITH, Owners initially sought an award at arbitration to declare that they were entitled to refuse redelivery and could hold Charterers liable for hire for the balance of the minimum hire period. Owners lost, and then appealed the case to Cooke J in the High Court, where they won.

Cooke J noted in his decision that the essential issue was whether the Innocent Party could perform, even if the Defaulting Party refuses to do so. In such circumstances, Charterers could be held to the contract. Note that to be restrained from breaching the contract in this manner is not the same as being forced to perform. However, Charterers should be aware in practical terms the effect may be equivalent, as if Charterers are not entitle to redeliver, they may have no option but to find gainful employment for the vessel (see LauritzenCool v Lady Navigation [2005]).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.