UK: Software Patents in Europe

Last Updated: 18 September 2002

Article by Caroline Barton

Software patenting has long been a controversial area of European law. Aiming to harmonise the different approaches taken by Member States, the European Commission has adopted a proposal for a Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. Caroline Barton of City law firm Field Fisher Waterhouse looks at whether this Directive will achieve its aims.

How should the law protect rights in computer programs?

Although computers have been around in one form or another since Charles Babbage designed his Analytical Engine in the mid-19th century, it was not until the mid-1970s that the first consumer computers and programs were produced. The commercialisation of computers brought with it the need to protect the investment of time, skill and money that had gone into creating these products. At that time, copyright law seemed to be the best way of protecting computer programs, since direct automated copying is the easiest way of appropriating the skill that went into creating the program.

During the 1980s, it became apparent that some aspects of copyright law would need to be amended to ensure adequate protection of computer programs. In the US, the Copyright Act 1976 was amended in 1980 to include a definition of computer programs (although US copyright law does not contain an exclusive list of works which could be protected by copyright, since the US Constitution provides that Congress shall have a general power "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Investors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries").

In the UK, the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 protected computer programs for the first time, as "literary works". As the creation and licensing of software became an increasingly important part of trade among EU Member States, the Software Directive 1991 sought to harmonise the copyright protection of computer programs throughout the EU. It also gave protection to the preparatory materials for computer programs. Likewise, the World Trade Organisation's TRIPs Agreement 1994, declared that "computer programs, whether in source of object code, shall be protected as literary works under the Berne Convention" (Article 10 (1)).

However, copyright protection only protects against copying - if an identical computer program is produced without the benefit of seeing the original then there is no infringement. Despite the recent recognition in the UK of "non-literal copying" (in cases such as Designers Guild Limited v Russell Williams (Textiles) Limited [2002] FSR 113), copyright law cannot be employed if the original program code has not been accessed by the suspected plagiarist or infringer, or where a "clean lab" procedure has been adhered to.

Patents

Patents differ significantly form copyright, in that they must be applied for and then granted by a Patent Office for a fee. Few inventors can satisfy all of the legal conditions for the granting of a patent, and the application process is invariably a long and costly one.

All inventions must conform to the Patent Act 1977's definition of "novelty". Novelty is an absolute requirement, meaning that the invention must not appear anywhere in the "prior art" (which includes any published work available to the public anywhere in the world at the date of the patent application). To complicate the situation the inventor must also demonstrate that their creation involves an "inventive step" over the prior art. This is an objective test, judged from the standpoint of the hypothetical "person skilled in the art", a person familiar with the prior art in their field and with the general knowledge to be expected of someone skilled in the relevant field, but with no inventive capacity. Once a patent is granted, the holder is afforded a monopoly over the invention. If another individual or research team happens to create something that is ostensibly the same as the original invention, they will have infringed the patent. Whether they had prior knowledge of the patented invention in question is irrelevant.

Can computer programs be patented?

The European Patent Convention was formulated during the 1970s, at a time when copyright was thought to be the appropriate way of protecting computer programs. The Convention therefore provides that computer programs "as such" are not inventions, which in turn means that they cannot be patented.

Previous editions of the EPO's guidelines have provided that:

"a computer program claimed by itself or as a record on a carrier is unpatentable, irrespective of its content. The situation is not normally changed when the computer program is loaded into a known computer".

In a paper given in 1985 by Herr Gunter Gall, then Director of Legal Affairs at the EP, Gall stated that:

"The reasons for the exclusion of programs for computers as such is that … they are not of a technical nature … it can be said that the special provisions excluding programs for computers is only of a declaratory nature … the answer to the question whether computer programs could be patentable in the absence of any explicit exclusion is 'no'".

This approach seems to be based on an assumption that a computer program is essentially an abstract tool, and was mirrored by the approach of the US courts in the Freeman-Walter-Abele line of cases, in which the test was (a) does the claim consist of a mathematical algorithm? and (b) is that algorithm applied to a physical process to produce a physical result?, meaning that a computer program which does not produce a physical result was not patentable. However, the EPO Boards of Appeal began to take the approach, during the 1980s, that a computer program which (when installed and run on a computer) produces a "further technical effect" is patentable. This principle is incorporated into the EPO's current Guidelines, which state that:

"while 'programs for computers' are included among the items listed in Art 52(2) [EPC], if the claimed subject matter has a technical character, it is not excluded from patentability.

But the EPO Boards of Appeal have yet to define clearly what "technical character" or "technical effect" consist of. The Report to the European Commission on the Economic Impact of Patentability of Computer Programs, written by Robert Hart, Peter Holmes and John Reid on behalf of the Intellectual Property Institute (see http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/comp/study.pdf) stated that:

"the requirement of 'technical effect' does not arise from the European Patent Convention … and technical effect has been the subject of considerable discussion in the Technical Board of Appeal in the EPO and in the UK Patent Office and the Patents and Appeal Courts".

Indeed, the word "technical" is in itself the subject of contention and has been queried in several UK cases. In Fujitsu Limited's Application [1997] RPC 608, Lord Justice Aldous said:

"I, like Nicholls LJ [in his judgment in Gale's Application [1991] RPC 305], have difficulty in identifying clearly the boundary line between what is and what is not a technical contribution".

And, as Mr Justice Aldous, in Wang Laboratories Inc's Application [1991] RPC 463, he said:

"As is apparent from other decisions of the Board [of the EPO], the European Patent Office pays particular attention to whether an invention has made a technical contribution and it seems that the word 'technical' has become a word of art … This creates difficulties in that the word 'technical' is open to a number of meaning, depending on its context. Further, it does not appear in section 1 of the 1977 [Patents] Act nor in Article 52 of the [European Patent] Convention."

The difficulty for the English courts is that they are used to construing the words of a statute strictly, and some judges have been unwilling to embrace the approach, taken in other European countries, of looking beyond the legislation to try to identify the aims of the legislator. However, the Patents Act 1977 specifically provides (in s.91 (1)(c)) that EPC Member States must "take judicial notice" of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal in order to harmonise patent law throughout the Convention states. The unfortunate consequence is that UK judges are left to apply these principles without any clear guidelines as to their meaning.

The EU's proposed Directive

Hoping to remedy the differences between the case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal and that of the courts of Member States, the European Commission conducted a review of the patentability of computer programs.

The removal of computer programs from the list of non-patentable inventions was one option. Clearly the usual pre-requisites of novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability would have to be met, so that relatively few programs would be patentable. At the other end of the spectrum was resistance from the growing open source movement, which opposes the enforcement of intellectual property rights (including copyright) in software, and argued vehemently against computer program patentability.

The Commission decided that given the variation in opinion and the dramatic ramifications any changes in the law could have for the business community, sudden change should be avoided. The Commission believed that its aim should be to harmonise the existing position, ironing out differences between the approaches of courts in different Member States which could impact negatively on the free movement of goods and services in the internal market.

A proposal for a Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions has been drafted (see http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2002/en_502PC0092.pdf) and is currently going through the European Union's legislative process.

Despite the continued exclusion of computer programs " as such" from patentability, programs contained in programmed computers or networks, or "other programmed apparatus", and processes carried out by such apparatus through the execution of software, will be patentable. This applies only if they make a "technical contribution" to a particular technical field. The usual requirements for the granting of a patent must also be met. However, the phrase "technical contribution" is not defined in the proposed Directive.

Three years will be given to EU Member States to implement the proposed directive into national law should it be accepted by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU. The proposed Directive is intended to clarify which inventions will be eligible for patent protection, thereby encouraging investment in the development of new and inventive programs by computer programmers and the organisations which employ them or fund their work. But whether this Directive will have a significant effect on research and development, helping to shore up the technology sector in Europe, remains to be seen.

The content of this article is intended as a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.