UK: Negligent Valuation

Last Updated: 25 April 2012
Article by Peter Levaggi

Property Litigation - March 2012

The volatile property development sector has led to increased pressure on surveyors. The problem arises in relation to the valuation of distressed property where there are:

  • forced sales
  • revaluation as part of renewed or restructured lending for exiting property portfolios
  • mezzanine lending with a mortgage lender agreeing to take a higher risk

Valuers face substantial difficulty in attempting to arrive at a market value in circumstances where very little market exists. The conventional valuation process involves the consideration of transactions which compare with the current property transaction (i.e. is truly "comparable" in terms of being recent, of a similar/same location and of similar/same property characteristics).

However the market is currently so suppressed that there are little or no comparables available for some locations. Often a valuation is needed immediately and the parties can not/will not wait for the market to improve to provide comparable evidence. The financial crisis has tested the mettle of the valuation industry. There have been numerous cases where valuers have been criticised for looking at circumstances which would not have been known at the valuation date or where valuers have relied on hindsight and not actual comparable transactions (MrJustice Lewison in Marklands v Virgin Retail [2008]).

The case of Paratus AMC Ltd v Countrywide Surveyors Ltd [2012] demonstrated how valuers can be caught out by the downturn in property prices. The loans in that case were made when the property market was booming in 2005. The valuation was then brought into question after the financial crisis in 2008 and proceedings issued alleging negligence. Mr Justice Keyser QC accepted that a valuation did not have to be accurate providing it fell within a "reasonable margin of error" but did have to be based on more than mere guess work. There was no real substitute for comparable evidence.

The point was also emphasised by Mr Justice Coulson in 2010 (K/S Lincoln v CBRE) who allowed only 10% as a margin of error. He emphasised the dangers of making valuation assumptions where there "were limited comparables, an immature investment market and a changing market at the material time".

The extent of a valuer's liability to a mortgage lender (for negligent advice) was summarised in South Australia Asset Management Corporation v York Montague Ltd [1996] 27 EG 125 as follows:

  • If an accurate (i.e. non-negligent) valuation would have resulted in no loan being made, the valuer is potentially liable for all of the lender's losses resulting from the loan.
  • If an accurate valuation would have resulted in a smaller loan being made, the valuer is potentially liable for the difference between what has been lent and lost and what would otherwise have been lent and lost.
  • In either case the valuer's liability is subject to a "cap", equivalent to the amount by which the property has been over-valued. Accordingly valuers can never be held responsible for more than the amount of their error.

These principles involve estimating how much loss the lender suffered and how much loss (if any) would it have suffered if there had been no negligence. The valuer's liability is the difference between the two.

South Australia Asset Management Corporation was recently followed in the case of Capital Home Loans Ltd v Countrywide Surveyors Ltd [2011] PLSCS 237, which concerned a mortgage loan and further advance made by the claimant on the security of a residential property.

The original loan, of £93,400 net of fees, was made in May 2004, after the defendant had valued the property at £110,000. A year later, the borrower applied for a further advance of £21,250. A valuation was again obtained from the defendant (this time at £135,000) and a further loan of £19,492 net of fees was made on the basis of that valuation.

In December 2009, the borrower defaulted on the mortgage payments and the claimant loan company sold the property for some £86,500. By this time, the claimant had already started a negligence action against the defendant valuer, in which it alleged that the property had been worth only £95,000 at the time of the first valuation and only £105,000 at the time of the subsequent advance.

The defendant argued that, even if its valuation was wrong, the claimant had not suffered any actionable loss as a result of relying on it because the further advance had been paid off out of the proceeds of the resale regardless.

In respect of this defence, the court heard evidence as to the claimant's internal financial practices and, in particular, the computer systems of the company to which it outsourced its mortgage administration. It transpired that, in this particular company's systems, a final payment under a mortgage (whether or not sufficient to pay off the outstanding loan) would automatically be allocated first to any further advance before the main account.

According to the rules that govern the appropriation of payments between debtor and creditor in cases where there are multiple debts, a debtor is entitled to apply a payment to whichever debt it pleases. If the debtor does not specify then this decision passes to the creditor. However, once the creditor elects to use the money in satisfaction of debt A rather than debt B, it is bound by this irreversible election.

Applying these principles, the court ruled that the claimant had chosen to use the proceeds of sale in paying off the further advance and it could not therefore show any loss resulting from the defendant's valuation on which the further advance was based. The defendant was not liable for negligent valuation.


The economic difficulties of the last five years have produced challenging times for both lenders and borrowers. The banks are now moving to appoint fixed charge receivers and force properties to be sold. As this process continues there will be a focus on the quality of the original valuation (at the time the loan was originally made) and a focus on the current distressed sale price. Borrowers are naturally concerned that the best value is achieved on a forced sale (to reduce the impact of any shortfall liability). Lenders are concerned to limit any complaint that the borrower may have and evaluate the circumstances which led to the failed loan being made in the first place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions