UK: Double Trouble - the problem of Duplicate Proceedings in International Arbitration

Last Updated: 22 July 2002
Article by Dominic Roughton

Experience, as Oscar Wilde noted, is the name people give to their mistakes. There can be no worse experience in international arbitration than for a party, however unwittingly, to have allowed his opponent to bring duplicate proceedings. This may happen where one party commences arbitration under the arbitration clause of one agreement, only to find that his opponent commences a parallel arbitration against him in relation to the same dispute under the arbitration clause of a separate, but related agreement.

The likelihood of this happening is greater than is commonly imagined. In any commercial relationship where there is more than one agreement or more than one party (e.g. joint venture arrangements, construction projects and "string" commodities deals), the potential for duplicate proceedings exists. And it does happen. The Bulk Oil1 disputes, albeit involving arbitration and litigation proceedings, are real examples of a real problem.

The immediate consequence is cost. It will inevitably cost more to fight two arbitrations than to fight one. Challenges to the jurisdiction of the competing tribunals will only add to spiralling legal bills. Moreover, if the two arbitrations are to be conducted in different countries or under different laws or languages, a second firm of lawyers may need to be instructed. Taken together, these factors could have a serious impact on the ability of a party with limited resources to obtain an award against a larger party with much greater resources.

If each arbitration is allowed to run its course, the potential for arbitral chaos is immense. For example, the tribunal in arbitration A may make a different award to that made by the tribunal in arbitration B2. Should each party then seek to enforce the Award most advantageous to it in the national courts, chaos will ensue. The resulting confusion is amply demonstrated by the string of conflicting decisions arising in the disputes between OTV and Hilmarton3.

From a practical perspective, there is relatively little that can be done to stop a parallel arbitration in its tracks. The only answer is to challenge the jurisdiction of the usurping tribunal. Unlike parallel proceedings in litigation4, there is no general principle of lis alibi pendens in international arbitration (although a sympathetic tribunal may adopt the doctrine and apply it by analogy). A challenge to the tribunal’s jurisdiction must therefore be made on more general grounds. Amongst the arguments which have been used in the past, parties have submitted that:

  • Overlapping arbitration clauses should be viewed as options to arbitrate. So, by invoking arbitration clause A, the Claimant necessarily prevents the Respondent from invoking arbitration clause B in relation to the same disputes.
  • As a matter of subjective intention, the parties cannot be taken to have agreed to arbitrate the same disputes before two different tribunals and under two different arbitration agreements.

As a matter of logic, both submissions must be right. If so, the arbitration first commenced should take precedence over the second, which should be stayed.

If the challenge fails, the alternative is to try to have the two arbitrations consolidated. The power to do so certainly exists under some national laws5 and institutional rules6. But practical application of that power is not without its own problems.

The principal problem is that the consent of both parties will be required before proceedings will be consolidated. Indeed, since the Sofidif decision of the French Cour d’Appel7, the ICC has shied away from consolidating separate, albeit related, arbitrations in the absence of the parties’ agreement to that effect.

More problems may arise if the tribunals in each arbitration are different. Indeed, a party may seek to derail attempts at consolidation by nominating different co-arbitrators in each arbitration. Assistance may be had from appointing institutions who may refuse to confirm the appointment8; and from national courts who may overrule the appointment and instead appoint the same arbitrator(s) to each reference9. But again, relief may be harder to obtain in practice than might be supposed.

This may be particularly true where the two arbitration clauses provide for different seats, languages, governing laws or institutional rules. A party may then insist on its right to arbitration under one of the clauses, if it perceives tactical advantages in doing so (e.g. the arbitration may have its seat in that party’s home jurisdiction, or may have to be conducted in that party’s native language). In such circumstances, consolidation will present a practical difficulty as to which of the differing factors should prevail in the consolidated arbitration. Even putting aside the issue of party consent, this may make it even more difficult to persuade a court or institution to consolidate the separate proceedings.

There is one solution. Before parties enter into multilateral or multi-contractual relations, they should provide for a dispute resolution procedure which will avoid the potential for duplicate proceedings. Without seeking to generalise, the following suggestions should be considered:

  • Provision of only one dispute resolution procedure, binding upon all parties. This may require some form of umbrella agreement.
  • All other agreements should make reference to that procedure and provide that disputes arising under them are to be referred to arbitration in accordance with that procedure.
  • The dispute resolution procedure should additionally make provision for consolidation of arbitral proceedings involving substantially the same or connected disputes, and/or the same parties.
  • Depending on the nature of the parties’ relationship and the number of parties involved, it should also provide for multi-party arbitration.
  • Provision requiring parties to appoint the same arbitrators in the related arbitrations.

Drafting such a dispute resolution procedure will not be easy. It will require a close understanding of the parties’ relationship and the nature of the disputes that may arise between them. That said, the effort involved in drafting such a procedure will be amply rewarded if it avoids the cost and chaos which parallel proceedings can produce.


1 Bulk Oil (Zug) v Trans-Asiatic Oil SA [1973] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 129

2 A point not lost on Lord Denning in Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Limited v Eastern Bechtel Corp. [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep. 425, CA. In fact, just such a situation arose in an investor dispute against the Czech Republic. Two different arbitrations in two different countries were decided by two different panels. Each arbitral tribunal reached a different conclusion on a similar set of facts and law.

3 Although the second set of proceedings was occasioned by the resignation of the sole arbitrator in the original arbitration. [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 146

4 See, e.g. article 21 of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (to be replaced by Section 9 of EC Council Regulation No. 44/2001 on 1 March 2002).

5 See, e.g. Arbitration Act 1996, section 35 (England); Code of Civil Procedure 1986, article 1046 (Netherlands). There is no similar provision under the Model Law; for this reason, some states adopting the Model Law have added a provision for consolidation of arbitrations (e.g. Florida and California).

6 ICC Rules of Arbitration, article 4, rule 6; Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules (JCT 1998 ed.), Rule 3.3; GAFTA Arbitration Rules, No. 125, article 7.2. Note there is no equivalent under the LCIA Rules (although article 22(h) does provide for joinder of third parties), nor the UNCITRAL Rules.

7 Cour d’Appel , Versailles, 7 March 1990 (OIAETI et Sofidif v. COGEMA, et al ).

8 See the powers contained in the ICC Rules, article 7, rule 4; LCIA Rules, article 11.1.

9 As indeed happened in Abu Dhabi Gas (op. cit.). This can result in an award being refused enforcement because the tribunal was not properly constituted in accordance with the provisions of the New York Convention, Article V(1).

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.