UK: Double Trouble - the problem of Duplicate Proceedings in International Arbitration

Last Updated: 22 July 2002
Article by Dominic Roughton

Experience, as Oscar Wilde noted, is the name people give to their mistakes. There can be no worse experience in international arbitration than for a party, however unwittingly, to have allowed his opponent to bring duplicate proceedings. This may happen where one party commences arbitration under the arbitration clause of one agreement, only to find that his opponent commences a parallel arbitration against him in relation to the same dispute under the arbitration clause of a separate, but related agreement.

The likelihood of this happening is greater than is commonly imagined. In any commercial relationship where there is more than one agreement or more than one party (e.g. joint venture arrangements, construction projects and "string" commodities deals), the potential for duplicate proceedings exists. And it does happen. The Bulk Oil1 disputes, albeit involving arbitration and litigation proceedings, are real examples of a real problem.

The immediate consequence is cost. It will inevitably cost more to fight two arbitrations than to fight one. Challenges to the jurisdiction of the competing tribunals will only add to spiralling legal bills. Moreover, if the two arbitrations are to be conducted in different countries or under different laws or languages, a second firm of lawyers may need to be instructed. Taken together, these factors could have a serious impact on the ability of a party with limited resources to obtain an award against a larger party with much greater resources.

If each arbitration is allowed to run its course, the potential for arbitral chaos is immense. For example, the tribunal in arbitration A may make a different award to that made by the tribunal in arbitration B2. Should each party then seek to enforce the Award most advantageous to it in the national courts, chaos will ensue. The resulting confusion is amply demonstrated by the string of conflicting decisions arising in the disputes between OTV and Hilmarton3.

From a practical perspective, there is relatively little that can be done to stop a parallel arbitration in its tracks. The only answer is to challenge the jurisdiction of the usurping tribunal. Unlike parallel proceedings in litigation4, there is no general principle of lis alibi pendens in international arbitration (although a sympathetic tribunal may adopt the doctrine and apply it by analogy). A challenge to the tribunal’s jurisdiction must therefore be made on more general grounds. Amongst the arguments which have been used in the past, parties have submitted that:

  • Overlapping arbitration clauses should be viewed as options to arbitrate. So, by invoking arbitration clause A, the Claimant necessarily prevents the Respondent from invoking arbitration clause B in relation to the same disputes.
  • As a matter of subjective intention, the parties cannot be taken to have agreed to arbitrate the same disputes before two different tribunals and under two different arbitration agreements.

As a matter of logic, both submissions must be right. If so, the arbitration first commenced should take precedence over the second, which should be stayed.

If the challenge fails, the alternative is to try to have the two arbitrations consolidated. The power to do so certainly exists under some national laws5 and institutional rules6. But practical application of that power is not without its own problems.

The principal problem is that the consent of both parties will be required before proceedings will be consolidated. Indeed, since the Sofidif decision of the French Cour d’Appel7, the ICC has shied away from consolidating separate, albeit related, arbitrations in the absence of the parties’ agreement to that effect.

More problems may arise if the tribunals in each arbitration are different. Indeed, a party may seek to derail attempts at consolidation by nominating different co-arbitrators in each arbitration. Assistance may be had from appointing institutions who may refuse to confirm the appointment8; and from national courts who may overrule the appointment and instead appoint the same arbitrator(s) to each reference9. But again, relief may be harder to obtain in practice than might be supposed.

This may be particularly true where the two arbitration clauses provide for different seats, languages, governing laws or institutional rules. A party may then insist on its right to arbitration under one of the clauses, if it perceives tactical advantages in doing so (e.g. the arbitration may have its seat in that party’s home jurisdiction, or may have to be conducted in that party’s native language). In such circumstances, consolidation will present a practical difficulty as to which of the differing factors should prevail in the consolidated arbitration. Even putting aside the issue of party consent, this may make it even more difficult to persuade a court or institution to consolidate the separate proceedings.

There is one solution. Before parties enter into multilateral or multi-contractual relations, they should provide for a dispute resolution procedure which will avoid the potential for duplicate proceedings. Without seeking to generalise, the following suggestions should be considered:

  • Provision of only one dispute resolution procedure, binding upon all parties. This may require some form of umbrella agreement.
  • All other agreements should make reference to that procedure and provide that disputes arising under them are to be referred to arbitration in accordance with that procedure.
  • The dispute resolution procedure should additionally make provision for consolidation of arbitral proceedings involving substantially the same or connected disputes, and/or the same parties.
  • Depending on the nature of the parties’ relationship and the number of parties involved, it should also provide for multi-party arbitration.
  • Provision requiring parties to appoint the same arbitrators in the related arbitrations.

Drafting such a dispute resolution procedure will not be easy. It will require a close understanding of the parties’ relationship and the nature of the disputes that may arise between them. That said, the effort involved in drafting such a procedure will be amply rewarded if it avoids the cost and chaos which parallel proceedings can produce.


1 Bulk Oil (Zug) v Trans-Asiatic Oil SA [1973] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 129

2 A point not lost on Lord Denning in Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Limited v Eastern Bechtel Corp. [1982] 2 Lloyds Rep. 425, CA. In fact, just such a situation arose in an investor dispute against the Czech Republic. Two different arbitrations in two different countries were decided by two different panels. Each arbitral tribunal reached a different conclusion on a similar set of facts and law.

3 Although the second set of proceedings was occasioned by the resignation of the sole arbitrator in the original arbitration. [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 146

4 See, e.g. article 21 of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (to be replaced by Section 9 of EC Council Regulation No. 44/2001 on 1 March 2002).

5 See, e.g. Arbitration Act 1996, section 35 (England); Code of Civil Procedure 1986, article 1046 (Netherlands). There is no similar provision under the Model Law; for this reason, some states adopting the Model Law have added a provision for consolidation of arbitrations (e.g. Florida and California).

6 ICC Rules of Arbitration, article 4, rule 6; Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules (JCT 1998 ed.), Rule 3.3; GAFTA Arbitration Rules, No. 125, article 7.2. Note there is no equivalent under the LCIA Rules (although article 22(h) does provide for joinder of third parties), nor the UNCITRAL Rules.

7 Cour d’Appel , Versailles, 7 March 1990 (OIAETI et Sofidif v. COGEMA, et al ).

8 See the powers contained in the ICC Rules, article 7, rule 4; LCIA Rules, article 11.1.

9 As indeed happened in Abu Dhabi Gas (op. cit.). This can result in an award being refused enforcement because the tribunal was not properly constituted in accordance with the provisions of the New York Convention, Article V(1).

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions