UK: Obtaining Post-Acquired Assets Under POCA: Condemning Criminals To A Life Of Crime?

Last Updated: 26 March 2012

Article by Aoife Drudy, pupil at 6 Kings Bench Walk

Introduction

1. In the opening paragraph of his judgment in Peacock [2012] UKSC 5, Lord Brown posed the following question:

"Suppose that a convicted drug trafficker is found to have benefited from his trafficking to the extent of £1m but, having at the time realisable property worth only £100,000, a confiscation order is initially made against him just for this lesser sum. Suppose then that the defendant, entirely legitimately, later acquires property to the value of upwards of a further £900,000. Is he at that stage liable to a further court order increasing to the full extent of his criminal gain the amount recoverable under the confiscation order by reference to these after-acquired assets?"

2. If the case falls under the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("POCA"), the answer is clearly yes. In Peacock, the Supreme Court found, by a majority of 3-2, that the result is the same under section 16 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (the "1994 Act"). Much of the judgment in that case focused on complex questions of statutory interpretation, and this article does not propose to address that analysis. However, the judgment also brought up questions, upon which the Court was divided, about fairness and the proportionality of the interference with the property rights of the defendant. Do those provisions act as a disincentive for defendants to earn a legitimate living following payment of the confiscation order? If so, do the provisions thereby condemn criminals to a life of crime?

Legislative provisions

3. Section 16 of the 1994 Act and section 22 of POCA operate in broadly the same way. Where a confiscation order was made for a sum less than the defendant's benefit, the prosecutor or a receiver can apply for an increase in the amount of the original order. The application takes part in two stages. Under the 1994 Act, the first stage takes place in the High Court and the second in the Crown Court. Under POCA, both stages take place in the Crown Court. The stages are as follows:

  1. The relevant court (the High Court or the Crown Court) makes a new calculation of the defendant's assets as of the date of the application. The new calculation is mandatory.
  2. If, as a result of the new calculation, the defendant's assets are found to be greater than the original order, the Crown Court may substitute the new amount for the original amount. Under the 1994 Act the judge may substitute "such amount ... as appears to the court to be appropriate having regard to the amount now shown to be realisable". Under POCA, the judge may substitute "such amount as it believes is just". It seems unlikely that those tests will differ in substance.

Potential for unfairness

4. The potential unfairness to the defendant is obvious in relation to post-acquired assets. In Peacock, Lord Brown described the problem as follows at [26]:

The main argument in support of the appellant's case is that it is unfair and counter-productive to increase the amount of a confiscation order by reference to after-acquired assets. This, it is said, would militate against his reform and rehabilitation and be likely to discourage him (once he has satisfied any initial confiscation order and been released from any sentence of imprisonment) from engaging in lawful and openly profitable employment. And, of course, the longer after conviction it is sought to confiscate after-acquired assets, the more unfair it may appear."

5. Perhaps the cases where the perception of unfairness is most acute are those cases where the legislation has already operated in a draconian manner against a particular defendant. One example is the case of R v. Smith [2002] 1 WLR 54. The defendant's benefit was calculated to be the whole of the duty evaded following the importation of 1.5m cigarettes, despite the fact that the cigarettes were forfeited and the defendant never actually received any money so as to enjoy the fruits of his crime.

The discretion not to increase

6. Lord Brown in Peacock considered that the potential unfairness to a defendant is mitigated by the discretion afforded to the Crown Court, but he declined to give any guidance as to how Crown Court judges should exercise their discretion. He expressly declined to consider whether the exercise of discretion could ever be affected by considerations arising under the Human Rights Act 1998. However, previous decisions of the Court of Appeal have confirmed that the Crown Court must consider the defendant's rights under Article 6 and Article 1, Protocol 1 of the Convention.

7. In R v Griffin [2009] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 89, Aikens LJ observed that the discretion of the Crown Court not to increase the amount provides the defendant with procedural protection against delay, as required by Article 6(1) of the Convention. In Saggar [2005] EWCA Civ 174, Rix LJ held that the passage of time runs for the whole of the period of the proceedings for the offence(s) and not simply from the time that the Crown discovers that the defendant's assets have increased. More recently, in Re Dahner [2010] EWHC 3397 (Admin), following the grant of a certificate under section 16 of the 1994 Act by the High Court, HHJ Hale in the Crown Court declined to substitute a new amount for the original amount on account of the "unconscionable delay" of about 5 years in making the application.

8. There has been little litigation in relation to the property rights of the defendant, but the Court of Appeal in R v Spears [2009] EWCA Crim 2875 accepted in principle that a person's property rights under Article 1, Protocol 1, of the Convention could be violated by an application and/or an order under section 22 of POCA for an increase in the amount to be paid.

9. Lord Wilson in Peacock gave some guidance on the exercise of the discretion at [47], where he observed:

"It is clear ... that factors such as the defendant's abandonment of a life of crime, the legitimate nature of his acquisition of the assets, the passage of time since the confiscation order was made and matters of exceptional hardship may be relevant to the exercise of the discretion."

10. Despite these statements of principle, however, there have been few reported cases in which the courts have declined to exercise their discretion to increase the amount under a confiscation order. In R v. Tivnan [1999] 1 Cr. App. R. (S.) 92, Rose LJ in the Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the Crown Court judge to increase the amount payable, observing that section 16 of the 1994 Act forms part of the "stripping process".

11. Similarly, in R v. Bates [2007] 1 Cr. App. R. (S.) 2, the Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the Crown Court judge to increase the amount of the order. The appellant argued that the exercise of the discretion to increase in that way is a significant disincentive to good conduct, to somebody who seeks in the wake of a term of imprisonment with a history of drug dealing to break the mould and to develop and change, because of the threat that anything that he achieves may be taken away from him. Penry Davey J in the Court of Appeal considered that the purpose of the legislation justified the adverse effects on the appellant.

The Dilemma

12. An examination of the above cases is unlikely to give much comfort to a defendant who remains in jeopardy following payment of a confiscation order. Absent significant and culpable delay by the Crown, one cannot be confident that the discretion will be exercised in the defendant's favour. A practical dilemma therefore faces the defendant. Should he proceed with attempts to rehabilitate himself and earn a legitimate living, with the residual risk that it may be taken from him? Or should he seek to stay below the radar, declining to acquire any assets or only acquiring undetectable (criminal) assets, for an indefinite period?

13. The policy factors behind the draconian provisions relating to confiscation are well rehearsed, most notably in the observations made in R v Rezvi [2003] 1 AC 1099 and May [2008] 1 AC 1028. However, as Lord Hope observed in his dissenting judgment in Peacock, there is nothing in those observations that suggests that they had mind the problem raised by the question of post-acquired assets.

14. Arguably, the exercise of discretion by the Crown Court ought to focus more on considerations arising under the Human Rights Act 1998 and on the competing policy considerations in relation to rehabilitation of offenders. The latter considerations ought to be given particular weight when there is no suggestion that the post-acquired assets have anything to do with offending. Otherwise, it may well be that the practical effect of the provisions is to condemn criminals to a life of crime.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions