UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 20 March 2012

Last Updated: 26 March 2012
Article by Nigel Brook

Welcome to the tenth edition of Clyde & Co's (Re)insurance and litigation caselaw weekly updates for 2012.

These updates are aimed at keeping you up to speed and informed of the latest developments in caselaw relevant to your practice. Please follow this link for further details of the following recent cases:


  • MoD v AB & Ors
    The Supreme Court has ruled on the meaning of "knowledge of attributability in relation to personal injury claims and limitation - of possible interest to liability insurers.
  • Woodland v Essex County
    The Court of Appeal has decided whether a school owes a non-delegable duty of care to its pupils - of possible interest to liability insurers.
  • Procter & Gamble v Svenska & Anor
    A case on whether the court will imply a fixed exchange rate into a contract.
  • Osmium Shipping Corp v Cargill International
    A Clyde & Co case on contract interpretation following an act of piracy and the importance of a comma!
  • Other news
    The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill received Royal Assent on 8 March 2012.

MoD v AB & Ors

Personal injury claims and limitation/what "knowledge" must the claimant have/can knowledge be acquired after proceedings commenced? of possible interest to liability insurers

The appellants were, broadly, veterans who had been involved in experimental explosions of thermonuclear devices in the South Pacific in the 1950s. They claim to have suffered personal injuries as a result of their involvement and commenced proceedings in 2004. It had been uncertain, though, whether they had been exposed to radiation, until a report was produced in 2007 supporting the belief that they had been. (It was also uncertain whether this exposure had caused their injuries).

The Limitation Act 1980 provides that, in the case of personal injury, a claim will become time-barred more than 3 years from the date on which the cause of action accrued or the date of the claimant's knowledge (if later) that (inter alia) the injury was attributable to the alleged negligent act. The Supreme Court considered the following issues in this case:

  1. Is knowledge (of attributability) the same as belief? By a majority of 4:3, the Supreme Court held that it is. The dissenting judges believed that, although the appellants may for a long time have believed that their injuries were attributable to the exposure, they did not have knowledge of attributability until the 2007 report (and hence time had not start running until then). That position was rejected by the majority though - they endorsed the view of Lord Donaldson MR in Halford v Brookes (1991) that a claimant is likely to have acquired knowledge of (inter alia) attributability when he first came reasonably to believe it. It cannot be said that he lacks knowledge until he has the evidence with which to substantiate his belief in court. Thus it was concluded that the appellants had had the requisite knowledge more than 3 years prior to the commencement of proceedings and so the claims were time-barred.
  2. As stated above, the appellants had (unusually) sought to argue that they only acquired knowledge of attributability after they had commenced their proceedings. The majority held that it is a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability after he has issued his claim - "by that date, he must in law have had knowledge of it" (as per Lord Wilson).
  3. Finally, it was held that the Supreme Court should not interfere with the exercise by the Court of Appeal of its discretion under section 33 of the 1980 Act and its refusal to allow the time-barred claims to proceed.

Woodland v Essex County

Court of Appeal decides whether school owes non-delegable duty of care to its pupils - of possible interest to liability insurers

Weekly Update 38/11 reported the first instance decision in this case. The claimant schoolgirl suffered suffered personal injury whilst attending a swimming lesson during the school day. The lesson took place at premises owned by the local council and neither the lifeguard nor the swimming teachers were school employees. At first instance, the judge held that the claim was bound to fail because it could not be said that the school owed a non-delegable duty to ensure that third parties take reasonable care of their children during the school day. The Court of Appeal, by a majority of 2:1, has now dismissed the appeal from that decision.

Tomlinson LJ and Kitchin LJ agreed that the imposition of a non-delegable duty would have a "chilling effect on the willingness of education authorities to provide valuable educational experiences for their pupils". Furthermore, "the general rule which recognises that the duty to take reasonable care may be discharged by entrusting the performance of a task to an apparently competent independent contractor is an important feature of the law of negligence; and any departure from the general rule must be justified on policy grounds". There was no such justification in this case.

However, Laws LJ, dissenting, had sought to argue (relying on Australian caselaw) that a non-delegable duty should be imposed where a defendant accepts responsibility for a group of persons who are particularly vulnerable or dependent (usually a school or a hospital), provided that the injured child or patient is (a) generally in its care and (b) is receiving a service which is part of the institution's mainstream function of education or tending to the sick.

Procter & Gamble v Svenska & Anor

Whether a court will imply a fixed exchange rate into a contract EWHC/Ch/2012/498.html&query=title+(+procter+and+sv enska+)&method=boolean

The parties entered into a contract which provided for the supply of goods at fixed prices expressed in Euros, but payable in sterling. The issue was whether the contract (either expressly or impliedly) provided for a fixed exchange rate or whether the buyer had to pay however much sterling was required to cover the fixed Euro price.

Hildyard J rejected the argument that an annotation at the foot of the document (for a Ł/Euro exchange rate of 1.49) was an express term mandating that exchange rate. This was a contract drafted with the help of legal firms and, given the size and complexity of the transaction, was a carefully worded document. As a result, it would be "uncharacteristic" to leave such an important provision as an annotation without any further elaboration.

Nor would the court imply into the agreement a fixed exchange rate. The risk of currency fluctuation would have been foreseen by the parties and the issue fundamentally affected the allocation of risk between the parties. If they had wanted to provide for fixed sterling prices, they could have done so unequivocally. The contract was not unworkable or even difficult to operate in the absence of the implied term. Nor did the approach in Rainy Sky v Kookmin (see Weekly Update 39/11) that a court should adopt a construction which is consistent with common sense support an argument for implication: "I cannot think that this requires or permits a court simply to imply or interpolate terms that it happens to consider would be fairer".

Accordingly, there was no term (either express or implied) to dislodge the ordinary rule that the Euro prices are to be converted into sterling at the market rate applicable when payment is due.

An alternative argument for rectification of the contract was also rejected: "The presumption that the parties have recorded their true agreement is not easily to be rebutted. It seems to me that the task may be the more difficult where the parties have agreed an "entire agreement clause". The fact that one side had an erroneous perception was not sufficient to justify rectification in this case.

COMMENT: This case will be of particular interest given the ongoing uncertainty in the Eurozone. Where a direct insurance policy had not made any provision for significant currency fluctuations, this case clarifies that the courts will not readily imply into the policy a fixed exchange rate provision. It is therefore worth giving this issue some thought when drafting new policies - for example , reinsurance contracts do commonly contain a "Currency Conversion Clause" which aims to avoid the reinsured making an exchange gain or loss.

Osmium Shipping Corp v Cargill International

Contract interpretation following act of piracy and the importance of a comma! html

Clyde & Co for defendant

The claimant owners appealed against an arbitration award which had held that a vessel which was hijacked by pirates off the coast of Somalia had been "off-hire" under the terms of the charterparty. The off-hire clause in the charterparty read as follows: "Should the vessel put back whilst on voyage by reason of any accident or breakdown, or in the event of loss of time ... or by reason of the refusal of the Master or crew to perform their duties, or oil pollution even if alleged, or capture/seizure, or detention or threatened detention by any authority including arrest, the hire shall be suspended from the time of the inefficiency until the vessel is again efficient in the same or equidistant position in Charterers' option, and voyage resumed therefrom" (emphasis added).

The key issue was whether, as the owners sought to argue, the vessel would only be off-hire if the capture or seizure was made "by any authority" or whether (as the charterers argued) it was a stand-alone and unqualified provision. Cooke J agreed with the charterers: "In my judgment, the wording used, the structure of the clause, its punctuation and its grammar all clearly support the Charterers' submissions". It was clear from the use of the word "or" and the positioning of the commas in the clause that it was only "detention or threatened detention" which was qualified by the expression "by any authority". As the judge put it: "Whilst it is right to say that there is not total consistency or uniformity in the use of commas, since there is no comma after the passage in parenthesis, it cannot be said that the commas are insignificant".

The owners had sought to rely on the Privy Council case of Sammut v Manzi [2009] as a warning against reliance on the significance of punctuation in a word processed document. Cooke J rejected that argument - his conclusion did not turn simply on a comma, but upon the whole language of the clause, its grammatical form, and the usage of the word "or" throughout it, "in a purposeful manner".

Other news

The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill received Royal Assent on 8 March 2012 and so has now been passed. It will be recalled, however, that the Act provides for a (minimum) one-year gap between the date the Act is passed and the date it comes into force:

Further details of the Act can be found in Weekly Update 19/11.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.