UK: The Importance of Being Evidenced - RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd. v. DM Engineering (NI) Ltd, Court of Appeal, 8 March 2002

Last Updated: 10 July 2002

Get that document signed!

It is an important part of project administration for employers to ensure that their trade contractors/main contractors execute their Trade, Works or Management Contracts and that their consultants execute their professional appointment documents. It is equally important, for main contractors, to ensure that their sub-contractors and design advisers execute their sub-contracts and professional appointment documents.

Unfortunately, with deadlines to be met and potential purchasers or tenants wishing to take possession of the building or works, it is often easy to overlook the pitfalls of not getting documents executed. It is easy to fall into the trap of getting the trades/ consultants/sub-contractors on site, issuing them a letter of intent, and then paying them under that letter, often considerably above the ceiling amount specified in the letter or (even worse) having a letter with few terms and no ceiling on payment at all.

Then, suddenly, when the works are delayed or drawings have to be re-issued, and the parties look to the terms of the agreement to try to protect their position, the employers or main contractors find that they have little or no protection if the contract has not been signed up. This is because the contractor/consultant/sub-contractor may then be entitled to be paid on a quantum meruit basis. In other words, they may be entitled to be paid a reasonable amount for doing work of a reasonable quantity within a reasonable period of time - hardly the sort of contract that most employers or main contractors would willingly enter into with their contractors/consultants/ sub-contractors (see British Steel Corporation v. Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co. Ltd. (1981) 24 BLR 94, [1984] 1 All ER 504).

If that weren’t reason enough…

There is now, however, a further reason to get those documents executed, and that follows the decision of the Court of Appeal in RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd. v. DM Engineering (NI) Ltd. on 8 March 2002.

In only its third judgement concerning Adjudication, and in particular the meaning of section 107 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 ("the Act"), the Court of Appeal held that all the terms of a construction contract have to be evidenced in writing if the contract is capable of being referred to adjudication, and that the mere existence of a contract with some of the terms set out therein does not suffice for that purpose.

The facts of the case will have a familiar ring. DM Engineering were the M&E sub-contractors on the refurbishment of the Holiday Inn hotel in Liverpool. DM needed some of their sub-contract works designing, so they approached RJT, the employer’s M&E consultants, and asked them to carry out that design. The initial approach was made orally, but throughout the period when RJT carried out the design for DM, fee notes which referred to the project were submitted, correspondence passed between the two which referred to DM’s tender and RJT’s professional indemnity cover, drawing schedules were prepared and design team meetings (at which minutes were taken) were held.

Therefore, although the initial approach was made orally, there was a significant body of written evidence describing the nature of the agreement between RJT and DM.

Disputes arose during the course of the works between DM and RJT, largely concerning the quality of RJT’s design work. DM submitted a claim for £858,000 to adjudication, alleging that RJT’s design was not of satisfactory quality and had caused DM to suffer loss. RJT resisted the claim on the grounds that the oral engagement was not an agreement in writing for the purposes of section 107(2) of the Act. Section 107(2) provides as follows:

"(2) There is an agreement in writing;

(a) if the agreement is made in writing (whether or not it is signed by the parties);

(b) if the agreement is made by exchange of communications in writing; or

(c) if the agreement is evidenced in writing."

The Adjudicator found that the written evidence of the agreement was sufficient for the purposes of s. 107(2)(c) of the Act, and proceeded to make a decision on the facts of the Adjudication. At the enforcement proceedings in the Technology & Construction Court sitting in the Liverpool District Registry, RJT sought a declaration that the Adjudicator had purported to make a decision as to an oral contract which could not be subject to the adjudication provisions contained within Part II of the Act. HH Judge MacKay refused to make the declaration sought, but granted leave to appeal.

Giving the leading judgement of the Court of Appeal, Ward LJ clearly signposted the way in which he was thinking in his analysis of the provisions of s. 107(2) of the Act, at paragraph 13 of his judgement:

"Section 107(2) gives three categories where the agreement is to be treated in writing. The first is where the agreement, whether or not it is signed by the parties, is made in writing. That must mean where the agreement is contained in a written document which stands as a record of the agreement and all that was contained in the agreement. The second category, an exchange of communications in writing, likewise is capable of containing all that needs to be known about the agreement. One is therefore led to believe by what used to be known as the eiusdem generis rule that the third category will be to the same effect namely that the evidence in writing is evidence of the whole agreement."

In other words, by logical extension of the requirements of s. 107(2)(a), which requires that the whole document be set out, so "evidenced in writing" must mean "evidence of all the terms of the Agreement". Ward LJ continued:

"17 In my judgment the learned judge was wrong to conclude as a matter of law that it was sufficient to give the jurisdiction to entertain an adjudication that there was evidence in writing capable of supporting merely the existence of the agreement, or its substance, being the parties to it, the nature of the work and the price.

18 … All of this is evidence of the existence of the contract, some evidence of the consideration and some indication that the nature of the work was design and advisory. But it is not evidence of the terms of the oral agreement that was made between the two gentlemen back in April 2000. It is certainly not evidence of the terms of the contract on which the respondents rely in the adjudication. For that reason I would allow the appeal

19 On the point of construction of section 107, what has to be evidenced in writing is, literally, the agreement, which means all of it, not part of it. A record of the agreement also suggests a complete agreement, not a partial one."

Crucially, Robert Walker LJ agreed with Ward LJ’s judgment, ensuring that Auld LJ’s more restrained view became only persuasive, rather than binding (as also applies to Ward LJ’s agreement with Auld LJ that it would be a "pity if too much ‘jurisdictional wrangling’ were to limit the opportunities for expeditious adjudication having an interim effect only."). Auld LJ took the view that:

"22 Although clarity of agreement is a necessary adjunct of a statutory scheme for speedy interim adjudication, comprehensiveness for its own sake may not be. What is important is that the terms of the agreement material to the issue or issues giving rise to the reference should be clearly recorded in writing, not that every term, however trivial or unrelated to those issues, should be expressly recorded or incorporated by reference."

It remains to be seen what the impact of this decision will be. It is not known whether DM will seek to appeal this decision to the House of Lords. However, if DM do not appeal, this judgment as to what is and is not "writing" or "evidenced in writing" may be a significant jurisdictional feature on the adjudication landscape for some time to come, as Responding parties search for oral variations that will remove jurisdiction from Adjudicators and force impecunious sub-contractors to fall back on the costly and time-consuming methods of dispute resolution for which Adjudication was supposed to be a cure.

Therefore, despite the inevitable commercial pressure to complete projects as quickly as possible, clients should avoid finding themselves in the position of having to argue whether the RJT v. DM case means that "all the terms" or "all the material terms" of an agreement must be set out in writing, by ensuring that the contract appointment documents are executed without delay, and that all other "agreements" are reduced to writing, be they formal Variations, Change Orders, or even site instructions.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions