UK: Terrorism Insurance in Today´s Market

Last Updated: 27 June 2002
Article by Shelagh McKibbin

A standard commercial property insurance policy covers loss or damage to property caused by fire or explosion, but where the cause of that fire or explosion was due to a terrorist act, insurance cover was generally limited to £100,000. However, the insured could purchase extended cover, and since the mid 1990s, the insurance market for terrorism insurance had been bullish and premiums relatively low.

In addition to the market generally, extended cover was available through the Pool Re Scheme. This is a government backed reinsurance scheme which meets the cost of claims over £100,000 occurring as a result of terrorism in Great Britain (ie not Northern Ireland). It was established by legislation in 1993 because the reinsurance industry declined to cover terrorism as a result of escalating IRA attacks - triggered by the St Mary Axe bomb in 1992. If the Pool Re funds are exhausted the government picks up the balance of all claims as reinsurer of last resort.

Authorised insurance companies and Lloyds Syndicates are eligible to be members of Pool Re. The insured pays the premium for the extended cover to the reinsured members of Pool Re; premium rates are set by agreement with the government and are calculated by reference to property valuers and rating zones.

Post 9/11

Even before 9/11 world insurance markets had been jittery because of poor underwriting results and a number of high profile insurance company failures. Insurance companies had already begun to narrow the scope of cover they were willing to provide, and in the US, some companies had withdrawn from the real estate insurance market altogether. Premiums were increasing and greater emphasis was being placed on risk management regimes.

Since that tragedy, UK insurers have begun to exclude loss or damage by terrorist action from new policies or on policy renewals after 1st January 2002, because the re-insurance industry will no longer cover the risk. Property owners, occupiers and mortgagees are therefore considering the wording of insurance policies closely to check whether they are adequately insured against loss or damage caused by an act of terrorism. They are also examining the terms of their leases and security documents to ascertain their position, should their premises be damaged or destroyed by an act of terrorism.

Currently, the only available cover for terrorist risk is through the Pool Re scheme, which has (and always has had) limitations (although at least for the time being it has said it will cover fire and explosion caused by any terrorist act within the definition of terrorism in the 1993 Act which established Pool Re, and hold its rates).

  • it is available only to insured parties whose insurers are members of Pool Re (although most of the big insurance names are)

  • it covers terrorism damage caused by fire or explosion only, so loss or damage caused by flood, impact (arguably) and chemical attack are not covered;

  • the definition of terrorism in the Re-insurance (Acts of Terrorism) Act 1993 which established Pool Re is limited, and of particular significance, having regard to the events of 9/11, does not cover terrorist activity for religious or ideological purposes;

  • a freeholder or landlord cannot pick and choose which of its buildings to insure; reinsurance cover with Pool Re is available only for the whole of a freeholder/landlord’s property portfolio (although the insured can opt not to take out cover for business interruption, which obviously reduces the premium);

  • if Pool re makes a loss in any year, its insurance company members can be called upon to make an additional payment (of up to 10% of the premium).

The Association of British Insurers, the BPF and other interested parties in the property market are lobbying Government to address these issues, but this will take time since it may well need legislation to correct the deficiencies.

Pending clarification of the situation, many landlord clients now have limited, or even no, terrorism insurance at all, leaving landlords, tenants and funders exposed.

In the medium to long term this will affect relocation and financing decisions, and the widespread absence of insurance cover may make property untradeable. All of this will inevitably impact adversely on the property investment market. Also, there is evidence emerging in the market that the issue of uninsured risks is beginning to be raised in rent review negotiations, giving rise to a concern that a two tier market may emerge in leases which deal with uninsured risks and those which don’t.

Uninsured Risks - Landlord and Tenant Exposure

In most leases, the landlord will not have given an unequivocal covenant to insure against loss or damage caused by an act of terrorism. Older leases are often completely silent on the subject; leases granted more recently generally enable the landlord to exclude from its insurance obligation risks (notably acts of terrorism) which are either not insurable at all or are not insurable at a reasonable cost.

Leases generally require the landlord to reinstate loss or damage caused by an insured risk. There is generally no obligation to reinstate if the loss or damage is caused by an uninsured risk, and furthermore the cesser of rent provisions will not kick in this situation. The drafting of the tenant’s repairing covenant may mean that technically it is obliged to reinstate the premises at its cost as well as continue to pay the rent. A tenant is going to resist this most strenuously. It may seek to claim that the lease is frustrated; this is an evolving area of the law and under present circumstances, the tenant may well succeed in this argument.

There may be a right for the tenant to determine the lease if the landlord has not reinstated the premises (at its cost) by the expiry of the loss of rent period, typically 3 – 5 years depending on the nature of the premises. In this case, whilst the tenant is required to pay the rent for this period, it will then be off the hook and the landlord will be left with damaged or destroyed premises, no insurance proceeds with which to reinstate and no tenant.

Leases generally require the tenant to pay the insurance premium, whatever the cost. Qualifying terms such as “fair and reasonable” will be fairly meaningless since, if the tenant insures with Pool Re, the premium is in effect fixed by the Government. Moreover landlords will be more reluctant than previously to agree such qualifying terms given the recent hikes in insurance premiums generally.

The standard tenant’s unqualified covenant to comply with the insurer’s requirements and recommendations (often objected to or qualified by tenants and their advisers) will now be insisted upon by landlords because failure to do may result in the insurer cancelling or avoiding the policy. It is likely to be strengthened by a requirement to keep the landlord and its insurers advised of the tenant’s risk management procedures.

For structuring reasons, it has become commonplace for landlords and occupiers to be set up as special purpose vehicles (SPVs). However, property owners and funders will be likely to object to this now, at least without adequate security, since SPVs are unlikely to have the means to reinstate uninsured damage.

Negotiated Solutions

There are an increasing number of negotiated solutions to deal with this issue; these depend upon the negotiating strength of the parties, the location of the premises, the importance of the location to the tenant and other relevant factors.

Frequently each of the parties accepts a degree of risk sharing; after all, damage or destruction by an act of terrorism is clearly a no-fault situation. For example, the landlord may have a period in which to decide whether or not to reinstate at its cost. During this time the tenant may pay no rent, or a reduced rent. If the landlord takes the decision to reinstate, the tenant will remain on the hook and depending on the negotiations, pay rent, or a reduced rent, for an agreed period (but this will not usually be the whole of the time it takes the landlord to reinstate).

Increasingly, however, tenants are refusing to accept any risk at all on the basis that they have no capital interest in the land or building; they simply want to walk away if the unthinkable happens, or worse, oblige the landlord to reinstate at its cost. They also want to exclude responsibility to reinstate damage or destruction by an uninsured risk from the scope of their repairing obligations. Moreover tenants may well seek to exclude or limit their liability to pay any additional premium. This position is not going to be acceptable to most landlords, particularly institutions and those funding development.

We have come across a number of recently negotiated compromises.

  • A tenant may agree to repair minor damage (such as the replacement of windows which have been blown out by an explosion).

  • The whole of damage or destruction by an uninsured risk (as well as insured risks) is excluded from the tenant’s repairing liability, but the tenant is unable to determine the lease if the landlord decides within an agreed period to reinstate at its cost; however, the tenant pays no rent at all, or at best a reduced rent, during the period from the date of damage or destruction until the reinstatement works are completed.

  • The parties agree an obligation on the landlord to reinstate at its cost where the cost of doing so amounts to less than an agreed percentage of the reinstatement value of the premises, with the tenant paying rent, or a proportion of it, for an agreed period, but where the damage or destruction is more substantial, the landlord will have a first right to decide whether or not to reinstate with a mutual break right thereafter.

Lenders and Borrowers

Funders lending against property have a clear concern to protect their security by requiring, in the loan agreement, that the property is comprehensively insured. A failure to insure in accordance with the loan agreement could result in the funder having the right to accelerate the loan without the borrower having the means to repay it.

In the past, the borrower's insurance covenant in favour of funders in respect of terrorism insurance has varied depending on what is negotiated. At one end of the spectrum, funders have required an absolute obligation to take out terrorism insurance – whether or not it is available and whether or not it is obtainable on reasonable commercial terms. The view of funders here is that the availability and cost of terrorism insurance should be at the risk of the borrower; if it is not available (or not obtainable on reasonable commercial terms) the funders want the ability to control the situation; they, therefore, want the right to accelerate the loan (and if necessary enforce their security over the property to repay their loan). Borrowers argue that this is inherently unfair in that they may face their loan being accelerated as a result of circumstances beyond their control. Funders are generally unsympathetic to this argument and require the risk to sit with the borrower.

At the other end of the spectrum, some funders have accepted that the terrorism insurance covenant in the loan agreement should only apply for such time as terrorism insurance is available on reasonable commercial terms in the London insurance market. Even before 11th September, funders’ views on terrorism insurance have been generally hardening and funders are increasingly reluctant to accept this position, insisting on the borrower having an absolute obligation to take out terrorism insurance. Many funders view 11th September as further justification for the hardening of their views.

Subject to the terms of the lease and the insurance policies themselves, funders generally seek to have the right to have insurance proceeds applied in prepayment of the loan. Some funders are willing to agree regimes about reinstatement where it is economically viable to do so. A key point for both landlords and tenants to appreciate is that where funders exercise their security, the funders will have access to the insurance proceeds to repay their debt, since almost invariably the funder will be a composite insured and/or will be named as loss payee. However these clauses overlook the fundamental duty of the property owner to reinstate damage – one owed to tenants and funders alike. The maximum proceeds from an insurance claim will only come from a reinstatement claim. An indemnity settlement – where no repairs are carried out - will generally be for far less. As such, it is unlikely that they will be sufficient to satisfy the funders’ outstanding debt. Far better to reinstate both the building and the income stream.

Funders will insist upon full compliance with the insurers’ requirements in respect of the borrower’s risk management procedures.

What the Future Holds

One thing is clear and that is that the commercial real estate insurance market is not going to revert to the position of a few years ago. In an increasingly volatile political world, terrorism insurance will become more and more expensive and governments are going to have to stand behind the reinsurance market as reinsurers of last resort. Of the European countries, only France has so far set up similar arrangements to the UK but all of the others are considering their position. The ABI and other interested parties are lobbying the Treasury to make up the gap between the total exclusion now being applied and the cover currently available from Pool Re but thus far, its response has been slow and unsatisfactory. Watch this space!

This e-brief was produced in conjunction with Bill Gloyn, Chairman of the Commercial Property Practice Group of AON.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.