UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 6 March 2012

Last Updated: 12 March 2012
Article by Nigel Brook

West African Gas Pipeline Co Ltd v Wilbros Global Holdings

Wasted costs order following failures in a party's disclosure exercise

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2012/396.html

Various problems arose in relation to the claimant's disclosure exercise. Various disclosure orders were made at a CMC in October 2011 and an order for "costs in the case" (whereby the party in whose favour the court makes an order for costs at the end of the proceedings is entitled to his costs of the part of the proceedings to which the order relates) was also made. The reasons for the disclosure problems then became apparent and at a further CMC the defendant applied for a wasted costs order (because the claimant's disclosure failures had caused its solicitors and their litigation support experts to incur additional costs). Ramsey J held as follows:

(1) Although the costs order made in October 2011 included a "liberty to apply", the court would need good grounds to vary or revoke that costs order. In this case, the deficiencies in disclosure which had since become apparent did not mean that the October 2011 costs order had been made on an erroneous basis. However, in relation to the second CMC, the defendant should have its costs of the applications for that CMC in any event (ie the defendant was entitled to its costs in respect of the disclosure application, whatever other costs orders are made in the proceedings).

(2) The defendant was not entitled to a wasted costs order because of the claimant's failure to provide reasonable OCR versions of each PDF document which it disclosed. Ramsey J said that OCR copies are never perfect and there was no evidence here that the problem was greater than might be expected with the quality and type of documents in this project. (This view is supported by PD31B para 34 which provides that "if OCR versions are provided, they are provided on an 'as is' basis, with no assurance to the other party that the OCR versions are complete or accurate"). Nor would a wasted costs order be made in relation to a corrupted or missing field in a database - once the problem had been identified it had been quickly rectified.

(3) However, the defendant was entitled to a wasted costs order in relation to the following three problems with the disclosure exercise:

(a) A failure to de-duplicate properly: "Whilst I accept that de-duplication of electronic documents has a number of technically complex facets, if appropriate software is properly applied it can remove multiple copies of the same or similar documents. In this case, the extent of the failure of de-duplication ...indicates that there was a serious failure in the de-duplication process. Where that happens, I consider that it is a case where the Court should properly exercise its discretion to deal with the costs wasted by that error".

(b) A failure to carry out an adequate initial review and to gather together (or "harvest") a consistent and complete set of electronic data for the purpose of electronic disclosure: "This was not a case where there are particular complexities in the important initial process of identifying the repositories of electronic documents, contacting custodians and identifying relevant folders and sub-folders so as to ensure that a comprehensive compilation of electronic documents is obtained".

(c) A failure properly to review documents which were located in the searches of the electronic database. The review had been carried out by a litigation support company based in India and documentation had been mistakenly marked as not being disclosable (although the original review had been supervised by the claimant's lawyers who had provided initial briefings and established escalation procedures).

Joyce v West Bus Coach Services

Deemed service and whether Part 36 offer can be accepted after claim struck out

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/404.html

The claimant was ordered to serve a standard disclosure list by 4pm on 10 September 2010. If it failed to do this, the order provided that "the claim will be struck out without further order". The list was posted first class on Thursday 9 September. CPR r6.26 provides that the deemed date of service is the second day after it is posted (or the next business day thereafter). Accordingly, the list was deemed to be served on Monday 13 September (ie 3 days late). The document was in fact received, though, on 10 September and the defendant acknowledged its receipt. Parker J has held as follows:

(1) Applying Godwin v Swindon BC [2002], the deemed date of service is not rebuttable by evidence. It was not possible to distinguish Godwin on the basis that service followed an unless order or that this case did not involve service of a claim form. Nor could an express agreement between the parties to extend the relevant time limit to 13 September be effective and "there is simply no room under CPR r6.26 for any "estoppel" arising from conduct rather than by express agreement".

(2) The claimant purported to accept the defendant's Part 36 offer (made in September 2009) on 17 September 2010. By that date, the defendant's solicitors had written to the court inviting it to strike out the claim. The strike out which the court made took effect from 10 September. Could the claimant accept a Part 36 offer after the claim had been struck out?

The claimant conceded that a Part 36 offer cannot be accepted after a claim is dismissed. The judge held that the situation was the same where a claim had been struck out. In both situations, the claim is to all intents and purposes at an end. CPR r36.11(1) provides that if a Part 36 offer is accepted "the claim will be stayed", and the judge decided that this meant that there needs to be an extant claim which can be stayed.

Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers

Whether non-parties had right to see certain court records/whether documents were "statements of case"

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2012/397.html

Two non-parties applied for an order under CPR 5.4C for permission to obtain certain documents. CPR r5.4C(1) provides (broadly) that a non-party may obtain a copy of a statement of case from the court records without the court's permission. CPR r 5.4C(2) provides that a non-party can obtain any other document on the court records if the court gives permission. A "statement of case" is defined in CPR r2.3 as "a claim form, particulars of claim where these are not included in a claim form, defence, Part 20 claim, or reply to defence; and.. includes any further information given in relation to them voluntarily or by court order under rule 18.1".

Vos J carried out an extensive review of caselaw authority and the background to CPR r5.4C and held as follows:

(1) The definition of statements of case includes amendments to the documents mentioned in the rule. It was accepted at the time the rule was drafted that the statements of case might well continue to evolve as issues are refined up to the time of the trial.

(2) A Notice to Admit and the Response to it were not "statements of case". Although they were in the nature of a pleading, the only documents covered by CPR r5.4C(1) are those expressly mentioned in CPR r2.3: "It would have been easy enough for the Rules Committee to include some general words such as "and other like documents" had it meant so to provide".

(3) There is a presumption that a non-party can have access to a statement of case under CPR r5.4C(1) and the reason why he/she wants to see it is "of little or no importance". However, where a non-party seeks to rely on CPR r5.4C(2), the court must look at the reasons why the document is sought. In both cases, it will be a powerful factor if it can be shown (as was unsuccessfully argued here) that disclosure would prejudice the fair trial of any criminal charges subsequently brought against a party to the proceedings.

(4) Full disclosure was ordered in this case because it was in the public interest that the decision-making process in this case be scrutinised. It was also of relevance that the Notice to Admit and Response had earlier been referred to in open court.

Merchant International v Naftogaz

Whether English court judgment should be set aside because foreign judgment on which it was based had been set aside

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/196.html

The claimant obtained a judgment in its favour against the defendant in Ukraine. It sought to enforce that judgment in England and, since England has no reciprocal enforcement regime with Ukraine, the claimant brought a fresh action under common law. It obtained judgment in England. However, the Supreme Commercial Court of Ukraine ("SCCU") then set aside the Ukrainian judgment. The issue in this case was whether the English court should, as a result, set aside the judgment obtained in England. At first instance, Steel J refused to set aside the judgment and the defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal has now dismissed that appeal. It held as follows:

(1) The English judgment had been properly obtained and the subsequent judgment of the SCCU offended against the principle of legal certainty which the English courts regard as a fundamental part of the rule of law and the European Court regards as an integral part of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (to which Ukraine is a party). The facts raised by the defendant in its appeal to the SCCU had been known to it during the original litigation in Ukraine and should have been advanced then.

(2) "An English judgment is a form of property which may have real value." There may be injustice to both the judgment creditor and third parties if a properly obtained judgment is set aside. Therefore the court has to consider the question of what is just. The judge's refusal to set aside the English judgment in this case had been just.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions