UK: Cohabitation – A Fair Share?

Last Updated: 4 April 2012
Article by William Massey and Christina Scotland

It is commonplace for unmarried couples to purchase a home together with the intention of living there as a couple. The property will often be in their joint names, and, more often than not, there will have been no discussion or documentation regarding what proportion of the property each owns.

This can cause difficulties, as highlighted by the Supreme Court decision in Jones v Kernott this week. Below we set out the essential facts of that case, and the approach taken by the court to resolve the dispute. Whilst the Supreme Court's judgment provides much needed clarity in what approach the courts should be taken to these disputes, we also set out how to avoid finding yourself in the courts.


Mr Kernott and Ms Jones, an unmarried couple, bought a property in joint names in 1985. They had two children together. They purchased the property for £30,000, with £6,000 funded by Ms Jones and the rest by way of mortgage.

Ms Jones paid the property's outgoings including the mortgage and bills, whilst Mr Kernott paid for some improvements made to the property.

The couple separated in 1993. Mr Kernott moved out of the property and made no further financial contributions to it. The couple cashed in a joint life insurance policy and divided the proceeds, enabling Mr Kernott to purchase his own property, which he did in 1996. It was clear that he was able to afford this new property because he was making no contribution to the joint property, and nor was he making any significant contribution towards the support of his children.

Mr Kernott did not seek repayment of his share of the property with Ms Jones until 2006, some 13 years after their separation. As a result Ms Jones commenced court proceedings to obtain a declaration that she owned the entire beneficial interest in the property. It was common ground that, at the point that the parties separated, they each had a 50% interest in the property. The difficulty lay in what happened to those interests in the 13 years after separation when Mr Kernott was not living at the property and was making no contribution to it.

The Court's approach

Ms Jones and Mr Kernott fought through four levels of Court and spent a huge amount of money and time in trying to reach a conclusion.

The County Court Judge's view was that he had to "look at the whole course of dealings between the parties to infer what the agreement between them was" regarding their ownership of the property.

The Judge ruled that Ms Jones' investment in the property since the couple had separated, meant she was entitled to a greater share. The Judge found that, whilst at the outset, the parties' intention may well have been to provide a home for themselves and the children, it had changed over time and Mr Kernott had essentially shown no interest in the property in the latter years. The Judge assessed the parties' interest in the property on the basis of what was 'fair and just'. He decided, a fair and reasonable division, would be for Ms Jones to retain 90% of the sale proceeds and Mr Kernott 10% (given that the parties had been together for 8 years, with Mr Kernott contributing to the property for 4 years and Ms Jones for over 17/18 years). The High Court agreed with this approach.

However, Mr Kernott, not satisfied with the decisions of the lower courts, appealed to the Court of Appeal, who, by a majority, allowed the appeal and declared that the parties owned the property in equal shares. They found that there was nothing to indicate that the parties' intentions had changed after their separation, and they could not either infer or impute that it had.

Unsurprisingly Ms Jones appealed to the Supreme Court, and it is that judgment that was reported this week.

The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal and restored the order of the county court, awarding Mr Kernott a 10% interest in the property.

The reasoning applied by the Supreme Court was as follows:

The primary search must always be for what the parties actually intended, to be deduced objectively from their words and actions. In this way you can infer what their intention was.

If there is insufficient evidence of what was actually intended by the parties, the court can consider what their intentions as reasonable and just people would have been had they thought about it. In this way an intention can be imputed to them.

Applying that reasoning in this case, three of the judges considered that there was sufficient evidence to infer that the parties intended that, at the time that Mr Kernott ceased making financial contributions to the property, his interest in it crystallised and he would no longer continue to benefit from an interest in it.

The two remaining judges did not feel that there was sufficient evidence to infer that this was the parties' intention, but did feel that this would have been their intention as 'reasonable and just people' had they thought about it.

So what is the answer?

Where cohabiting couples buy a house in their joint names and both are responsible for any mortgage but there is no express declaration of their beneficial interests the starting point is that the couple will own the property equally (even if their financial contributions are different). However, that presumption can be displaced by showing that they had different common intention either at the time when they acquired the home or later.

In ascertaining what their intention was, the court can either infer it from their conduct or can impute it to them on the basis of what the court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property.

So, what lessons are there to be learnt?

1. Unmarried couples who own property together should always discuss between themselves how they intend to hold property and ask a lawyer to prepare a declaration of trust;

2. If their circumstances change, unmarried couples should review their declaration of trust and, if necessary, change it;

3. Unmarried couples who do not have a clear agreement between them as to how they own their property risk having the Courts imputing an intention to them, if the circumstances dictate that it is fair. This is discretionary, and risks a potentially arbitrary result.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Withers LLP
Withers LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions