UK: Tort and Time Bars - Suing by Stop Watch

Last Updated: 27 May 2002
Article by Miriam Bartlett

Even the laziest law student knows that the ingredients of a tort claim for professional negligence are duty, breach and damage. Time starts to run once all 3 elements are present. In Malik Khan -v- RM Falvey & Co, the Court of Appeal reminded the legal profession of these basic principles in a professional negligence claim where several debt recovery actions were struck out for want of prosecution.

Until Khan, the assumption was that time runs from the date the court strikes out the negligent litigation, and not before, if suing a solicitor who allows litigation to be struck out. This was thought to be so even if the case had been dead on its feet for years before the court put it out of its misery with a strike-out order. It was certainly a convenient assumption in that it provided a clear and easily identifiable trigger date for limitation purposes, and made quantification of the loss easier as it was performed with hindsight. This assumption cannot survive after Khan.

On 2 June 1999, Malik Khan issued proceedings alleging his solicitor had conducted debt recovery actions negligently from 1987 until 1999 : the actions were struck out between 1997 and January 1999. The Claimant did not instruct the Defendant firm continuously from 1987 onwards: he would occasionally handle the litigation himself, re-instructing the Defendant when matters became complex, on at least one occasion a few days before a Court hearing; he also instructed other firms to handle the same actions on similar terms. Every solicitor knows this can be a recipe for disaster. Despite the Defendant's best efforts (negligence was denied), disaster befell.

The Claimant pleaded (a) that judgments should have been obtained in the three debt recovery actions by 1987, 1988 and an unspecified date; (b) that two actions were vulnerable to strike-out from 1990 and 1992 respectively - the vulnerability of the third was not specified; and (c) that the l suffered was wasted litigation costs paid in the 1980s and early 1990s and loss of the chance to recover the debts themselves by 1988, 1989 and an unspecified date. (The third case was not pleaded clearly and the Court of Appeal's attempts to elicit a more detailed set of facts during the appeal hearing were unsuccessful. In the end, the Court of Appeal took the view it was statute barred on the facts pleaded.)

The Claimant's Leading Counsel relied on Hopkins v McKenzie [1995] PIQR43(CA), a loss of opportunity personal injury action against a doctor. Hopkins was a very narrowly pleaded case, claiming only for the loss of the chance to pursue the original action. There was no allegation that the value of the action had been diminished at any point prior to its being struck out. The court in Hopkins concluded the loss was only sustained when the original personal injury action had been struck out and not before.

The Court of Appeal in Khan went back to first principles of tort and had a close look at what constitutes actual damage: "any detriment, liability or loss capable of assessment in money terms [including] liabilities which may arise on a contingency…loss of earning capacity, loss of a chance or bargain, loss of profit..." [Forster v Outred]. The Court of Appeal pointed out that the Claimant in Khan had sustained actual damage more than six years before the date on which he issued proceedings against the Defendant.

The Court of Appeal then reviewed Hopkins citing the judgment of Saville LJ, in particular the fact that at the relevant limitation date the Plaintiff's cause of action as at the date of strike-out remained in being, adding "certainly the Plaintiff was by then potentially worse off as a result of the alleged negligence, since he was highly likely (if not foredoomed) to lose his cause of action. To my mind, however, he had not at that stage suffered that loss [loss of his cause of action] or damage""what on the Plaintiff's case has been lost is the right to advance his medical negligence claim in a Court of law. That loss was not sustained until the action was struck out. To my mind a cause of action for diminishing the value of a claim is not the same thing as a cause of action for losing the right to advance that claim in a Court of law" (emphasis and bracketed words added).

Unfortunately, in the author's view, Saville LJ then muddied the waters slightly in Hopkins by rejecting Rupert Jackson QC's submission that it was not necessary for the action actually to be struck out before the client could bring tort proceedings against the solicitor for negligence. The other two judges in Hopkins, Mann LJ and Nourse LJ, agreed with Saville's reasoning as cited above but Mann LJ reserved his position on Jackson's question of whether the diminution in value of a cause of action through its susceptibility to a strike out could constitute damage for the purposes of an action in negligence. He felt that it could but went on to stress that that was not the situation in Hopkins. Nourse LJ also was at pains to point out that Hopkins had not sued "in respect of the loss or damage suffered by him by reason of some earlier depreciation in value of his right of action against the Defendants" [emphasis added].

In Khan the Court of Appeal agreed with defence Counsel's submission that Hopkins v McKenzie could be distinguished on the facts. They nevertheless felt it was important to go on to address the other defence submissions that Hopkins was wrongly decided and/or could not stand in the light of the House of Lords decision in Nykredit Mortgage Bank PLC -v- Edward Erdman Group Limited (No.2) [1997] 1 WLR 1627.

Nykredit No 2 was a valuer's negligence case concerning the date on which interest on damages should start to run. The valuers over-valued a property by £1.4 million. In reliance on that over-valuation, the lender advanced £2.45 million to the borrower in March 1990 who defaulted at once. The House of Lords held that the lender's cause of action arose as soon as he made the advance because that was when he suffered loss on the facts of that particular case. They accepted that on some facts, a lender might not suffer loss the moment he made the advance: for example, if the borrower does not default at once, or if the over-valued security is nevertheless worth enough to cover the loan at the time of default. Their Lordships in Nykredit No 2 were unanimous in deciding that the cause of action arose when relevant and measurable loss was first revealed. Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead recognised that selecting such an early date might make it difficult in practice to quantify losses which are ongoing but took the view this was no reason to set a later date: "such difficulties as there may be are evidential and practical difficulties, not difficulties in principle".

Sir Murray Stuart-Smith in Khan stressed that a Claimant cannot defeat the statute of limitations by claiming only in respect of damage which occurs within the limitation period if he has suffered actual damage from the same wrongful acts outside the limitation period. He went further and held that where a Claimant decides to sue only for loss of his opportunity to pursue the original litigation, one may nevertheless conclude on the facts that he had "already suffered damage by diminution in the value of his chose in action well before the actual striking out of the actions". He goes on to stress there must be real damage, not nominal, and concludes: "…a claimant does not suffer real damage in the form of diminution of the value of his chose in action until there is a serious risk that the original action could be dismissed for want of prosecution… it does not seem to me that that diminution in value has to be quantified by a sale or settlement provided it can be shown that it has been substantial… If it is clear that the value of his chose in action has been substantially diminished before the limitation date, the action will be statute barred" [emphasis added].

Chadwick LJ in Khan distinguished between litigation cases where proceedings were struck out for want of prosecution after delays of months if not years ("delay strike-outs") and those cases where proceedings are struck out under CPR 3.4(2)(c) because of some failure to comply with a Rule, practice direction or Court order ("procedural strike-outs"). In the latter cases it is easy to see when the claim became liable to be struck out – it is the date when the solicitor fails to comply with the procedural requirement and that is when the opportunity to pursue the claim is lost: a case could have no residual value after such a date.

In the delay strike-outs, however, Chadwick LJ recognises it may be much more difficult to identify when the claim became vulnerable to being struck out. He states that once a claim becomes vulnerable to strike-out, its value begins to diminish and it is impossible to say damage has not occurred as a consequence of the previous delay. It is no answer that the damage may be difficult to quantify. If measurable damage has arisen from the delay then the cause of action is complete.

Where a Claimant pleads solely that he has lost his right to pursue the earlier action it will give rise to problems if the earlier action was worthless by the time it was eventually struck out. Chadwick LJ concludes that: "All that the Plaintiff could recover … would be the value of the claim immediately before the earlier action was struck out. If the Plaintiff's right to pursue the earlier action had become valueless by the time that action was struck out, the striking out of the action caused no loss; and, ex hypothesi, there could be no cause of action in tort arising from the strike out".

Tips for Practitioners

  • It is no longer safe to assume that time for suing for negligently conducted litigation starts when it is struck out by the court;
  • where proceedings are struck out because of some failure to comply with a Civil Procedure Rule, practice direction or Court order the start date is the date when the solicitor fails to comply with the procedural requirement;
  • where proceedings are struck out as a result of delay, the limitation period begins to run when that delay causes "real, not nominal, measurable" damage, assuming all the other ingredients of the tort of negligence are present;
  • once a claim becomes vulnerable to strike-out as a result of delay, its value begins to diminish and the court will take the view damage has occurred; it is no answer that the damage may be difficult to quantify at that early stage or that further damage may yet result – the limitation period has been triggered;
  • if the only pleaded case is one for damages for loss of the opportunity to pursue the struck out cause of action then it is correct to say that the Claimant's cause of action only accrues on strike-out; pleading a narrow case for lost cause of action still may not save the Claimant because the Court will look at the value of that cause of action at strike-out - if the claim is worthless by then because of earlier delays or poor conduct, then no loss is suffered on the claim being struck out, and without the "loss" element of the claim, there is no complete cause of action in tort.

Case Citation: Malik Javid Khan -v- R M Falvey & Co, 22 March 2002 (unreported), Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Schiemann LJ, Chadwick LJ and Sir Murray Stuart-Smith, on appeal from QB Division, McKinnon J.

This article first appeared in New Law Journal 24/5/2002 Page 782".

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
24 Sep 2019, Seminar, London, UK

From 9 December 2019, the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) will apply to all solo-regulated FSMA authorised firms - including investment advisers, investment managers, private equity firms and consumer credit firms.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions