UK: A Summary Of Recent Developments In Insurance, Reinsurance And Litigation Law - (02/12)

Last Updated: 26 January 2012
Article by Nigel Brook

Natas Group v Styles & Wood

Effect of the terms in an ATE insurance policy on a security for costs application Html

The defendant applied for security for costs. Akenhead J agreed that the threshold test for the exercise of his discretion had been met, given the claimant's financial position. However, the claimant argued that the discretion should not be exercised, in part because it had taken out an ATE insurance policy.

Prior caselaw has established that an ATE insurance policy can, in principle, provide sufficient protection for a defendant, but it will be rare for the policy to be as good security as a payment into court or a bank bond or guarantee. In order for a claimant to be able to rely on an ATE insurance policy (and so resist a security for costs application), there must not be terms which allow the insurer to "readily but legitimately and contractually" avoid the policy (see Newman v Wenden Properties [2007]). In this case, there were "genuine concerns and uncertainties relating to the ATE insurance policy", namely:

(1) The policy provided (broadly) for payment only if the insured was ordered to pay the other side's costs after having lost "entirely on all sections or heads of claim". Thus, in theory, the insurer would be under no liability to pay if the claimant insured succeeded on one out of ten heads of claim. Akenhead J said that he "would hope that any decent insurer would not take the point" but "there is no evidence before the Court about the pedigree of this Liechtenstein insurer".

(2) The termination clause in the policy provided that "in cases where the Insurer is informed...of any material development the Insurer may at its absolute discretion withdraw the benefit of this Policy". That was described as a "worrying" clause because of the lack of definition of a "material development".

(3) The policy provided for avoidance (and forfeiture of the premium) in the event of misrepresentation and this was said to have "ramifications in respect of and over which neither the Court nor the Defendant can be aware or have any control".

Despite all these concerns, the judge concluded that there was a real chance that some part of the ATE insurance might be available, and he took this into account when fixing security.

COMMENT: This case may encourage claimants (and their advisers) to examine closely the terms of any ATE insurance policy taken out and possibly to push for potentially "worrying" terms to be removed (in the hope that they will not need to provide security (if an application is made) on top of paying the ATE insurance premium).

North Shore Ventures v Anstead Holdings

Disclosure and the meaning of within a party's "control" where a family trust has been set up

North Shore obtained judgment in its favour against the appellants. Prior to judgment, though, the appellants disposed of virtually all their assets to family trusts which they had set up (and in respect of which they were discretionary beneficiaries). Judgment debtors can be compelled to produce at court documents in their "control" (pursuant to CPR r71.2). There is no definition of control in CPR r71.2 but the same term is used in relation to standard disclosure under CPR r31, where it is said that a party has, or has had, a document in its control if the document falls within three categories (eg the document is or was in his physical possession or the party has (or has had) a right to possession of it). North Shore sought disclosure of certain trust documents which had never been in the physical possession of the appellants and which they had no right to possess. At first instance, the judge ordered disclosure and the appellants brought this appeal.

The Court of Appeal has now upheld the disclosure order. It was said that, in determining whether documents in the physical possession of a third party (here, the trustees) are in a litigant's control for the purposes of CPR r31, "the court must have regard to the true nature of the relationship between the third party and the litigant". A right to possession would arise where "the true nature of the relationship was that the litigant was to be the puppet master in the handling of money entrusted to him [ie here, the trustee] for the specific purpose of defeating the claim of a creditor. The situation would be akin to agency." Even if local laws prevented a trustee from handing over documents to a beneficiary, the English courts could still, as a matter of fact, find that the documents were within the control of the beneficiary. Furthermore, (and of more general application), a party can have a document within its control even if the situation does not fall within the three categories listed in CPR r31.

However, the Court of Appeal stopped short of finding that an order could be made under CPR r31 or CPR r71.2 solely on the basis that the litigant is or was a beneficiary under a trust. In most cases such an order could not be justified. On the other hand, it could not be argued that such an order could never be made because the trust document was not in the beneficiary's physical possession.

Bennett v Stephens & Anor

Whether periodical payments order was reasonably secure/arguments raised by MIB

The claimant suffered serious injuries following a road traffic accident caused by the admitted negligence of the first defendant. The first defendant's insurers and the claimant entered into a settlement agreement which provided for an order for periodical payments to be made. Section 2 of the Damages Act 1996 provides that a court may only make a periodical payments order if it is satisfied that "the continuity of payment under the order is reasonably secure". Mackay J believed that this criterion had been met and granted two orders which (in relevant part) provided that the periodical payments should be paid by the insurer "or, if and to the extent that they are not paid by the Defence Insurer within 7 days of the due date, by the Motor Insurers' Bureau".

The key issue in this case was this: If the insurer defaulted or failed, what were the claimant's prospects of making the MIB liable to make the periodical payments instead? Mackay J agreed that MIB would not remain liable to the claimant "whatever might happen in the future" but nevertheless found that the continuity of payment was reasonably secure.

Tugendhat J has now dismissed the appeal against that finding. Although the agreement between the MIB and the Secretary of State might be terminated in the future, the judge said that "I regard the risk of the Claimant having no legally enforceable claim against either MIB, or an equivalent institution or body, as so remote as to be capable of being discounted entirely for present purposes". Should the MIB in future cease to be liable to the claimant, though, that would be a breach of the order.

However, Tugendhat J cautioned that if the insurer was unable to procure payment by the MIB, the insurer (and not the MIB) would be in default. The judge concluded: "In the event that any similar order referring to the MIB is to be drafted in the future, in a case where MIB is not a party, those preparing the draft may wish to consider adopting a form of words which will not give rise to concerns on the part of MIB of the kind that have arisen in this case".

RBS v Revenue & Customs

Chargeability to VAT of commission payments following transfer of insurance business

Prudential transferred its general insurance business to companies within the Winterthur group. Under the terms of the agreement, Prudential received a capital sum plus payments, described as commissions, on renewal. The issue in this case was whether those commission payments were chargeable to VAT.

Prudential sought to rely on two exemptions:

(1) The first exemption applies to payments for sales of a business as a going concern. Mann J agreed with the Tribunal's decision that the payments did not come within this exemption on the facts of the case.

(2) The second exemption applies to payments for insurance brokerage and insurance agency services. The Tribunal held that this exemption did not apply because Prudential did not bring Winterthur and the insured together: "Any bringing together (or introduction) of Prudential and the insured has happened in the past and may have been performed by a broker at the time". Nor had Prudential carried out any preparatory work or assisted in the administration and performance of the contracts. Mann J considered prior caselaw on the meaning of "insurance broker" and "insurance agent" and agreed with the findings of the Tribunal. Prudential merely passed on renewal information to the Winterthur group and this did not "amount to bringing the parties together, or amount to introducing them, as a broker does".

Accordingly the payments were chargeable to VAT.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions