UK: Planning Act Regime - Are Other Consents Necessary?

Last Updated: 23 January 2012
Article by Angus Walker

This is entry number 312, published on 18 January 2012, of a blog on the Planning Act 2008 infrastructure planning and authorisation regime. Click here for a link to the whole blog. If you would like to be notified when the blog is updated, with links sent by email, click here.

Today's entry calls for other consents to be folded into the Planning Act regime.

The Planning Act regime is approaching its second anniversary, and there is now a reasonable amount of experience to draw on. Here is the first of a series of entries with suggestions for how the regime could be improved.

There are six areas where improvements could be made. I deal with the first one here, and will expand upon the others in future blog entries.

  • other consents - there are too many of these, and they are insufficiently tied into the infrastructure authorisation process;
  • change procedure - there should to be a published procedure for when and how changes can be made to an application;
  • consultation database - pre-application consultation would be a lot simpler if a database of consultees was maintained by a central body;
  • National Policy Statements - these should be speeded up, and issued even when there are no developments needed or wanted;
  • no special Parliamentary procedure - this lengthening of the regime is outdated, repetitious and wasteful;
  • simplified wording - the model clauses should be modernised to make them fit for the 21st century.

Other consents

The Planning Act regime was intended to be a 'one stop shop', i.e. all physical development relating to a project and all construction-related consents were to be combined into a single 'development consent order' (DCO). Once consent was given, a promoter should be able to put a spade in the ground, more or less. A one stop shop is not only simpler for promoters, but also for other stakeholders, who can see the application as a whole and don't need to track separate processes with separate consenting bodies. There are operational consents that come later, but here we are talking about consents that enable you to build the thing.

The regime has largely succeeded on the physical development point, although there have been learned debates about complying with guidance that associated development must be both 'necessary for' and 'subordinate to' the main project. That is by the by - my main point is on other consents.

There are a plethora of consents that might be required for an infrastructure project, some commonly-used, some rare and obscure. The Penfold review in 2010 looked at rationalising non-planning consents. The interim review identified 86 different consents that might need to be obtained. These consents have different procedures, are applied for to different bodies, and seldom have a timescale or an incentive for prompt completion.

The Planning Act regime deals with consents in three different ways:

  • 11 of them are explicitly able to be combined in a DCO for all projects - they are 'not required' for Planning Act projects. These include planning permission, Electricity Act consent and listed building consent;
  • a further 42 consents in England and 78 in Wales can be included in a DCO on a case by case basis, but only if the body that would have given the consent allows you to do this. I call these 'consent for inclusion' consents; and
  • any other consents can be disapplied in a DCO under general powers to modify legislation.

The 'not required' consent list is currently fixed, but the Localism Act will allow new consents to be added to it. That is good, but each of the 86 Penfold consents should be considered for inclusion as soon as possible. This won't need primary legislation.

The 'consent for inclusion' consents are worse than useless because you not only have to persuade the original body to give up its consenting powers, which is harder than obtaining the consent from it in the first place, but also persuade the IPC that the consent can be safely avoided via the DCO. (Having said that, I have succeeded on one occasion in getting permission to include a consent on the list in a DCO - hurrah!).

The remaining consents can be disapplied by a DCO, which is effectively the same as saying they can be included in the DCO. The body that would have given consent has to make its case to the IPC if it would rather the consent should be applied for separately, or be subject to conditions.

Meanwhile, the Treasury is expressing increasing concern that secondary consents are taking too long and are not focused on sustainable development. The 2011 National Infrastructure Plan (NIP) states that the government will (page 10):

  • ensure the key consenting and advisory agencies have a remit to promote sustainable development as soon as the National Planning Policy Framework is finalised; and
  • introduce a 13 week maximum timescale for the majority of non-planning consents.

What's more, the EU is proposing a Europe-wide consenting regime (see earlier blog entry) where each member state must either have a full one stop shop or at least have a combined programme and common deadline for obtaining separate consents. That is surely a good idea.

Some say that the entire list of 'consent for inclusion' consents should be revoked (which doesn't need primary legislation either). All consenting bodies should just have to make their points to the IPC on the 'one stop shop' application, as other statutory consultees and interested parties without consenting powers have to do.

That would certainly streamline things, but if it is too unpalatable to get rid of the list altogether, then the consenting bodies should be more integrated into the process. The NIP proposals help, but are piecemeal and don't go far enough. The consents are still being treated too much in isolation and not in the light of the complete project of which they form part.

For any 'consent for inclusion' consents that are retained, the bodies concerned should publish the circumstances in which they will agree to give up their consenting powers to give more clarity to project promoters. The consents may be separate, but they should become part of a common programme, timetable and have similar criteria for approval. The IPC could include the consents in its timetable for the examining the main application.

Part 1 of a 'charter for reform' is therefore to:

  • review the Penfold consents for those that can be included in all DCOs so that this can be done once the relevant part of the Localism Act comes into force;
  • review the 'consent for inclusion' consents and remove all or as many as possible from that category; and
  • for any that remain, require the consenting bodies to publish their criteria for agreeing to inclusion, and subject them to time limits and criteria for acceptance or refusal related to the main project.

This is an issue that has been taken up by the National Infrastructure Planning Association (NIPA), which should lend it some weight. It chimes with EU proposals, the National Infrastructure Plan and the Red Tape Challenge.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Angus Walker
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bircham Dyson Bell LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Bircham Dyson Bell LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions