UK: Lords Overturn Controversial Limitation Decisions - Time Limits Restored in Professional Negligence Claims

Last Updated: 3 May 2002
Article by Julian Copeman

To the relief of professional services firms (and their insurers), the House of Lords has overturned recent decisions on section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980. The effect of those decisions had been that claims for negligence could be brought long after the time when it had previously been thought the limitation period had expired.

In a widely anticipated decision, the House of Lords gave judgment on 25th April 2002 in an appeal from the Court of Appeal in Cave v. Robinson Jarvis & Rolf [2002] 1 WLR 581 which now establishes the proper interpretation of Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980. In effect, the House of Lords has found that the interpretation of Section 32 in an earlier Court of Appeal decision (Brocklesby v. Armitage & Guest [2001] 1 All ER 172) was wrong, and that the law is as it had been understood to be before Brocklesby.

As Lord Millett noted in his judgment, the effect of the reasoning of the Court of Appeal judgment in Brocklesby was that a professional subject to a claim for negligent advice would never have a limitation defence, even where he denied that the advice was negligent, or even wrong. Only once he had shown on the merits that the advice was not negligent could he have asserted a limitation defence. It had always previously been considered that the limitation period would only be extended where facts relevant to the claimant's right of action had been deliberately concealed, or where the defendant had deliberately committed a breach of duty in circumstances in which it was unlikely to be discovered for some time.

Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980

Section 32(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980 postpones the commencement of the limitation period where "any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant". If so, the period of limitation does not begin to run until the claimant discovers the concealment or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Further, section 32(2) of the Limitation Act 1980 provides "for the purposes of sub-section (1) above, deliberate commission of a breach of duty in circumstances in which it is unlikely to be discovered for some time amounts to deliberate concealment of the facts involved in that breach of duty".

It had always been considered that, although differently worded, this preserved the broad effect of section 26 of the Limitation Act 1939, so that "the start of the limitation period is postponed whenever the defendant has committed the wrong, knowingly or recklessly, in circumstances such as to prevent a plaintiff coming to know of his cause of action" (para 33-25 of Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, 18th Ed. (2000)).

Recent Court of Appeal decisions

However, in Brocklesby, in which a firm of solicitors were alleged to have failed to procure their client's release from his mortgage obligations but were not alleged to have been aware of the fact that they had been negligent, Morritt LJ held that

"it is not necessary for the purpose of extending the limitation period pursuant to section 32(1)(b) to demonstrate that the fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has been deliberately concealed in any sense greater than that the commission of the act was deliberate in the sense of being intentional and that that act or omission, as the case may be, did involve a breach of duty whether or not the actor appreciated that legal consequence" (p605).
Thus, any intentional act, or presumably failure to act, which constitutes a breach of duty, whether or not the actor knows it, in circumstances in which the breach of duty is unlikely to be discovered for some time, would postpone the commencement of the limitation period until the breach could have been discovered. In other words, mere negligence would be enough to prevent a limitation defence.

Brocklesby was followed in two cases. In the first, Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocese Trustees Inc v. Goldberg [2001] 1 All ER 192, Laddie J held, applying Brocklesby, that it was sufficient to bring the case within section 32 that the defendant had intentionally given the advice in question and that (if negligent) it amounted to a breach of duty. It was not necessary to appreciate that the advice was wrong or negligent.

In the second, Cave, another case concerning a claim that a solicitor had been unknowingly negligent, this time in failing to ensure that Cave acquired enforceable mooring rights for 100 years over land in the Isle of Wight sold in 1989, Newman J applied Brocklesby and ruled out a limitation defence under section 32. Before the Court of Appeal, much of the argument related to whether it was bound to follow the decision of Brocklesby, a two-man Court of Appeal which gave an extempore judgment in a case in which numerous authorities had not been cited (and which had subsequently been heavily criticised). The Court of Appeal concluded that it was so bound, and therefore that it was obliged to dismiss the appeal. In doing so, Jonathan Parker LJ said

"However, I confess to being uneasy about the decision in the Brocklesby case. In particular, I find the reasoning and the decision difficult to reconcile with the observations of Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Lord Nicholls in Sheldon v. RHM Outhwaite (Underwriting Agencies) Limited [1996] AC 102 to the effect that Section 32 is concerned with unconscionability and impropriety... Yet if [Brocklesby] is right, a wholly innocent act or omission may suffice to deprive a defendant of a limitation defence.

I am also concerned that the effect of the decision in the Brocklesby case, as I understand it, is to render the word "deliberate" in section 32(2) more or less otiose."

The House of Lords Judgment in Cave

In a unanimous decision, the House of Lords held that the construction of section 32 by Morritt LJ in Brocklesby was wrong, and that Goldberg and Cave had therefore been wrongly decided. Following Sheldon, the Lords considered the ordinary and natural meaning of the words of section 32(2), as well as the purpose for which section 32(2) was enacted (which Lord Millett noted was explained by decisions on the 1939 Limitation Act). They concluded that section 32(1)(b) requires deliberate, or active, concealment of the breach of duty. Where there was no deliberate concealment of the breach, section 32(2) covers cases where there was deliberate commission of a breach of duty in circumstances where it was unlikely to be discovered for some time. Mere negligence in such circumstances could not be sufficient to postpone the limitation period. Lord Scott further noted that, while it was difficult to think of a case of deliberate concealment or commission of a breach of duty that did not involve unconscionable behaviour, the Act does not require a further criterion that the defendant's behaviour be shown to be unconscionable.


In summary, therefore, the effect of section 32(1)(b) and section 32(2) of the Limitation Act 1980, is, as previously thought, that the limitation period will only be postponed if:

  1. The defendant takes active steps to conceal his breach of duty after becoming aware of it; or

  2. The defendant was guilty of deliberate wrongdoing, and conceals it or fails to disclose it in circumstances where it is unlikely to be discovered for some time.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.