UK: Holiday And Sickness Issues Back In The Spotlight

Last Updated: 22 November 2011
Article by Sarah Ozanne and Anthony Fincham

The recent EAT case of Fraser v Southwest London St George's Mental Health Trust has put the relationship between holiday/holiday pay and sickness absence back in the spotlight. This case concluded that employees on long term sick leave must formally give notice to take holiday during the relevant holiday leave period if they want to preserve their right to it. A failure to give notice to take holiday in the normal way would result in the individual forfeiting the right to the holiday entitlement and to any holiday pay for it.

Although this case is welcome news for employers worried about the prospect of claims for accrued holiday pay over long periods of sickness it also reminds us that the interaction between holiday entitlements and sickness absence remains complicated and often confused. The key questions are (i) can holiday be carried over when there is long term sickness absence, and if so, how long for? and (ii) what is an employer's ongoing liability for holiday pay when holiday has not been taken because of sickness?

This lawnow summarises the current position on statutory holiday, the key issues affecting employers and looks at what can be expected in the future.

To view the article in full, please see below:




Full Article

The recent EAT case of Fraser v Southwest London St George's Mental Health Trust has put the relationship between holiday/holiday pay and sickness absence back in the spotlight. This case concluded that employees on long term sick leave must formally give notice to take holiday during the relevant holiday leave period if they want to preserve their right to it. A failure to give notice to take holiday in the normal way would result in the individual forfeiting the right to the holiday entitlement and to any holiday pay for it.

Although this case is welcome news for employers worried about the prospect of claims for accrued holiday pay over long periods of sickness it also reminds us that the interaction between holiday entitlements and sickness absence remains complicated and often confused. The key questions are (i) can holiday be carried over when there is long term sickness absence, and if so, how long for? and (ii) what is an employer's ongoing liability for holiday pay when holiday has not been taken because of sickness?

This lawnow summarises the current position on statutory holiday, the key issues affecting employers and looks at what can be expected in the future.

The Working Time Directive (originally 1993) ("the Directive") provides that every worker is entitled to paid annual leave of at least 4 weeks in accordance with the conditions for entitlement to, and granting of, such leave laid down by national legislation and other practice. The Working Time Regulations 1998 ("WTR") implemented the Directive into UK domestic legislation. However the WTR also increased the annual holiday entitlement for workers to 5.6 weeks (which includes bank and public holidays) and amongst other provisions included a requirement that statutory holiday of 4 weeks must be taken in the relevant leave year and may not be replaced by pay in lieu except when the worker's employment had terminated (regulation 13(9)), - effectively creating a principle of "use it or lose it". The additional 1.6 weeks holiday may be carried forward to the next leave year, subject to agreement between the employer and worker.

Can an employee on sick leave carry holiday over to the next leave year?

This issue has been the subject of several significant judicial decisions since 2009. In Stringer V HMRC [2009] IRLR 214 the ECJ overruled a decision of the Court of Appeal by stating firstly that workers can take paid holiday whilst off work due to long term sick leave. It also held that workers who were prevented from taking holiday during a leave year due to sickness should be allowed to carry over such holiday entitlement and that accrued holiday must be paid in lieu on termination.

Another ECJ decision, Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA [2009] IRLR 958 extended this principle. In that case Mr Pereda had been injured shortly before he was due to take pre-arranged holiday leave. Not only did the ECJ hold that a worker was entitled to take holiday during sick leave, it stated that the worker was entitled to request to substitute an alternative period of leave which did not coincide with a period of sick leave.

These decisions seem to conflict with UK law and it is not clear whether the WTR can be read consistently with the ECJ decisions to allow for statutory holiday to be carried over in the UK. Fraser-v- Southwest London St George's Mental Health Trust considered this issue but did not expressly clarify that the WTR allows holiday to be carried forward. However, in coming to its decision it implied that it did. What Fraser stated was that Pereda would not assist an employee who did not give notice to take holiday leave.

In order to reconcile this conflict the UK Government's Consultation on Modern Workplaces (which closed in August 2011) proposes amending the WTR so that workers are able to carry over the 4-week statutory holiday entitlement to the following leave year if they cannot take it during the current year. This would maintain the current position in relation to the additional 1.6 weeks holiday entitlement, i.e. that that can only be carried over with agreement between the employer and worker.

Can a worker carry holiday forward beyond the next leave year?

The ECJ and UK cases above consider the specific issue of whether holiday can be carried forward to the next leave year. What also needs to be considered is whether holiday can be carried forward beyond the next leave year.

One of the UK cases to consider this is the Employment Tribunal case of Adams v Harwich International Port ET/1503085 (June 2011). The employment judge upheld the position that words could be read into the WTR to enable workers to carry over holiday where they had been unwilling or unable to take it due to sickness. However, the judge also stated that he did not think that sick workers should be able to accumulate and carry over holiday year on year indefinitely. In a further twist to this the judge held that sick workers are entitled to carry over all of their 5.6 week entitlement under the WTR, not just the 4 weeks provided for by the Directive. This is a first instance case, and therefore only limited weight can be attributed to it.

The ECJ has not yet pronounced on this issue, although there has been an Advocate General's Opinion in KHS AG v Schulte C-214/10 in July 2011. Here the AG has stated that a national law under which annual holiday entitlement cannot be carried over more than 18 months after the end of the relevant holiday year would be compatible with the Directive. The Opinion then stated that a carry-over period of 6 months would probably be sufficient. The ECJ judgment, which is not obliged to but usually follows the AG's Opinion, is awaited with interest.

What is an employer's on-going liability for holiday pay?

Employers often have workers on long term sick leave who have not taken any holiday for some time, perhaps even several years. If holiday can be carried over this could result in a very expensive payment of accrued holiday on the eventual termination of employment of the worker.

The first question is likely to be on what basis a claim for accrued holiday pay would be made out. The two potential rights of recourse available to employees are either under Regulation 30 of the WTR or a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Although a Regulation 30 claim must be brought within 3 months of a specific non-payment, a claim for unlawful deduction from wages can be brought within 3 months of the last of a series of deductions, thereby potentially allowing such a claim to span a number of years. The question is then what holiday a worker is entitled to be paid in respect of on termination of employment.

The EAT has considered the issue in several different cases, coming to different conclusions (albeit on different facts) so that there is no real clarity on the issue. In the cases of List Design v Douglas [2003] IRLR 14 and Canada Life Ltd v Gray [2004] ICR 73 the EAT concluded that holiday pay does not depend on any holiday actually being taken. However the EAT in Kigass Aero Components v Brown [2002] ICR 697 took a different (but essentially obiter) view and stated that there is no right to holiday pay where the right to take holiday has not been exercised in the holiday leave year. On this basis, if a worker wishes to exercise his accrued or accruing right to holiday he has to give his employer notice specifying the days on which the leave is to be taken and he has to give that notice in good time before the leave is required to begin.

A subsequent EAT case, NHS Leeds v Larner [2011] IRLR 894, came to a different conclusion. In a short judgment it held that a worker who had been on sick leave for an entire year and had not taken any holiday during that period was entitled to a payment in respect of that year's unused statutory holiday entitlement on the termination of her employment. The fact that she had not requested holiday during the relevant holiday leave year did not mean that she lost the right to payment. Larner is currently the subject of an appeal to the Court of Appeal and a decision is expected sometime between December 2011 and April 2012. It is hoped that this will result in a binding authority on this issue.

In the meantime, the Fraser case supports Kigass and has a detailed judgment. It decided that the cases of List Design and Canada Life were wrong and that payment should only be made for leave actually taken. Fraser also considered the implications of Pereda. In doing so the EAT stated that, as far as the Directive is concerned, a worker on sick leave can either take statutory holiday (and be paid in respect of it) or request for that holiday to be deferred. The EAT noted that if Mrs Fraser had requested to defer taking her statutory holiday until her return to work the Trust might have been obliged to accede to that request. However, as she made no such request under the WTR her statutory holiday lapsed at the end of the year. However Fraser is only another EAT case and so does not overrule the other EAT cases, although the judgment was given by the Honourable Mr Justice Underhill, the President of the EAT, and so may be more persuasive.

Summary

The current position on carry-over of holiday and holiday pay in respect of employees on sick leave is wholly unsatisfactory for employers trying to determine what their employees' entitlements are.

At present the WTR does not expressly provide for an employee's statutory entitlement to holiday to be carried forward in circumstances where they have been unable to take it during the current leave year. However, subject to the outcome of the current consultation, it seems likely that the WTR will be amended to allow employees to carry-over their 4-week statutory holiday entitlement (in line with the Directive) into the next leave year, and given the current line of ECJ and UK cases on this issue employers should proceed on the basis that this is the case.

Whether employees will be allowed to carry this holiday forward to subsequent years, and in what circumstances, is less certain and we will have to wait the outcome of the ECJ Schulte case and the UK Larner case for guidance on this issue. However, pending the outcome of these cases employers can take some comfort from the decision in Fraser that they are not obliged to pay employees holiday pay on termination of employment for holiday that the employee has not given notice to take, or for which they have not made a request for that holiday entitlement to be deferred.

It should be remembered that the case law above, and therefore the conclusions drawn from it, refers to statutory holiday and not an employee's entitlement to contractual holiday. In respect of contractual holiday entitlement over and above the statutory entitlement, an employer will have more flexibility with regard to how it can manage the granting, taking and payment in lieu of it.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 16/11/2011.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions