UK: Piracy off Africa- Cargo's Perspective

Last Updated: 13 October 2011
Article by Stephen Askins and Stuart Shepherd

For pirates off both West and East Africa, the laden tanker has become the most sought after prize. There are two distinct business models and both present challenges to the owners and underwriters of a high value oil cargo. Off Somalia, the south-west monsoon is coming to an end and there are stark warnings from the military that the new piracy "season" is upon us. Activity levels in September matched those of the past two years and despite the best efforts of an under-resourced coalition of naval forces, the pirates continue to run rings around international law. It is inevitable that another tanker will be taken over the next few months and, as we have seen from recent cases such as the Irene SL and the Samho Dream, this will undoubtedly mean significant ransom payments to secure the release of crew, ship and cargo. Off West Africa, in the Gulf of Guinea, armed gangs are targeting the cargo itself, stealing large quantities that they intend to sell ashore. This bulletin outlines some of the legal and practical difficulties that arise in both scenarios.


The owners and masters of vessels transiting the high risk areas of the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea are expected to be familiar with the Best Management Practices ("BMP") now in their fourth edition. The BMP give comprehensive guidance on reporting requirements to the relevant military authorities responsible for tracking vessels and co-ordinating a response to any attack. The BMP also make suggestions for self-protective measures ("SPM") that a vessel is recommended to adopt, including razor wire and the deployment of fire hoses. The use of armed guards still divides the maritime industry, but the mantra of the maritime security sector that no vessel with armed guards has been captured still holds true. The BMP do not recommend their use, but do recognise that some owners will deploy them where flag state laws allow. Over the past few months, some European nations such as Norway, Cyprus and indeed the UK have changed, or at least signalled that they are looking at changing, national legislation to allow arms on their flagged vessels. The military now suggests that there is about 80% compliance with BMP which it is hoped will mean that, whilst the attacks may continue, their success rate should continue to fall.

West Africa

The industry has feared that the Somali business model would in some way be exported to other parts of the world. The Gulf of Guinea and indeed the areas off the Niger Delta have long been associated with piracy, but the recent attacks have moved from intimidation and occasional kidnapping of the crew and petty theft to something more sinister. Vessels either undertaking an STS operation or preparing to provide bunkers are being targeted and attacked by armed and well organised gangs who are themselves very familiar with the workings of the tanker. The crew are hidden by the pirates and the gangs then call up a small tanker or barge owned by ostensibly legitimate and established firms based in Nigeria who must obviously be complicit in what is happening. The gangs steal the cargo, moving it quickly between other ships in the same management before selling it ashore in Benin for sale back into the commercial market.

The hijackings may last only a matter of days but, in the absence of a ransom demand, what is essentially a theft of the cargo does not constitute a General Average ("GA") event. The loss then falls in its entirety on the cargo interests to be claimed from their underwriters. The Nigerian and Benin navies are said to be mounting patrols to stop this practice, but the area has been declared a high risk area attracting an Additional Premium from war risk underwriters. If the Nigerian flag administration insisted that all oil carrying barges and tankers had to have AIS or the LRIT tracking systems on and live, this would dramatically reduce the ability of those barges and tankers to get involved.


As at October 2011, the average duration of a hijacking by reference to the last six ships released is 241 days. That includes the Eagle and the Dover where the ransoms were paid but the vessels were unable to sail from the pirates' anchorage for mechanical or other reasons. The Savina Caylyn, an Aframax tanker fully loaded with a crude cargo, remains hijacked after seven months. So, depending on the characteristics of the cargo, a hijacking can have serious financial implications for its owners giving rise to the increased risk of significant ROBs and losses arising from the delay in delivery, both in terms of market loss and financing costs. Whilst any loss in the value of the cargo during the vessel's detention will have a marginal effect on cargo interests' contribution in GA, they will need to establish that that hijacking and detention was caused by a breach of the contract of carriage in order to make any recovery in respect of such losses (see further below).

The personal price paid by the crew who bear the burden of these events is enormous. However, despite the threats against the crew, the P & I Clubs do not contribute. Indeed, the issue of "life" contributing in GA was the subject of a recent arbitration where the Tribunal was asked to deduct an amount from the ransom in respect of crew in order to reduce the GA contribution by the cargo interests. That argument was flatly rejected by the Tribunal.

As to the ransom paid, the rolling average for ransoms is about US$4.5 million although, for the tankers taken in the past year, it is probably twice that. The ancillary costs of negotiating the vessel's release, delivery of the ransom and the loss in transit insurance are likely to add nearly US$1 million to the cost. These costs are recoverable in GA and fall to be paid by the relevant property underwriters pro rata to the property values at the end of the voyage.

Legality of ransoms

As a matter of English law, the starting point is that no payments can be made to terrorists or Al Shebab, the Islamic organisation in Somalia whose involvement in piracy is carefully monitored. As long as the pirates are seen as criminals rather than terrorists, then notwithstanding any moral arguments about their payment, ransoms are legal and this was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in the case of Amlin v Masefield [2011] EWCA Civ 24. The Appeal Court concluded in that case that the ransom was legal and expressed the view that the payment of a ransom remained the only way to free the crew in these situations. Other jurisdictions approach this issue differently and there are countries which do not allow payments of ransoms in respect of individuals. This is a factor that has to be taken into account in these situations.

The problem is complicated by the US Executive Order ("EO") of 13th April 2010 and a similar EU Directive issued at the same time. The EO is more wide-reaching but only applies to "US persons" or those companies with a US nexus and prevents funds being paid to certain people that it sees as undermining the peace and stability in Somalia. Both the EO and the Directive name Al Shebab as a "prohibited" entity. However, the EO goes on to name at least two senior figures in the pirate world, to whom any payments are prohibited. This places any cargo owner or cargo underwriter to whom the EO applies and who is paying a ransom under the almost impossible obligation of having to know to whom that ransom money is ultimately going. The EU Directive is narrower in scope and also provides a defence to prosecution where the party paying the ransom has a "reasonable belief" that it is not making a payment destined for Al Shebab.

Total Loss

The Amlin case referred to above also considered the issue of whether a seizure by pirates constituted an Actual Total Loss ("ATL") at the point of capture, as was alleged by cargo interests. In that case, the Court was likely influenced by the fact that the vessel had already been released by the time the matter came to Court. The Court did make it clear, however, that an ATL required the cargo owners to have been "irretrievably deprived" of their goods. This meant not only that the assured must have lost control of its goods at the time of the loss but that there was no hope or possibility of ever ultimately recovering possession of them in the future. A Somali piracy case was described as a classic "wait and see" case where the expectation was that a ransom would be paid and the ship and cargo recovered. However, some policies have detention clauses which provide that there is a deemed Constructive Total Loss after say six months, regardless of whether the ship and cargo are then subsequently released.


Usually, cargo interests play little part in the negotiations for the release of the vessel and this is often out of choice, although the lack of any information regarding the negotiations can be a source of serious frustration. After release, the vessel proceeds to a port of refuge. Before the cargo is discharged, it is likely that GA security will be required from the cargo owners and their underwriters. Liability in GA arises after the cargo has been delivered. This is not the place to set out a detailed analysis of the law in this area but, in general terms, in order to resist that liability, the cargo owners have two potential lines of argument. The first is to allege that the amount paid is unreasonable where the burden of proof is on the owners to show that all the items of expenditure are reasonable. The second line is to allege that the vessel was unseaworthy in that, for example, BMP had not been followed and the crew were ill-prepared for the voyage, with the result that the hijacking arose as a result of the fault of the owners. The definition of seaworthiness is that the owner must properly man and equip the ship to meet the usual perils of the sea. Arguably, a vessel sleep-walking its way into a hijacking is open to criticism, although causation in these cases is difficult to demonstrate. A ship can be well secured with a plethora of SPMs and yet a master of a laden tanker faced with a sustained attack by pirates with RPGs can hardly be blamed for surrendering his ship if he believes his crew or indeed the environment is threatened.

BMP do not on their face apply to the Gulf of Guinea, although many of the principles that apply to risk assessment and threat analysis are common to all regions and will increasingly be seen as good practice in all those areas where pirates are active.


With no immediate solution at hand and piracy set to continue for the foreseeable future, it is probable that more trading companies will find themselves involved in a hijacking off Africa. It remains a complex area giving rise to both legal and practical difficulties which have to be considered and dealt with. This is an area in which Ince & Co LLP has accumulated considerable experience. Similarly to all other maritime crises, it is recommended that early and proactive steps are taken to protect any and all interests that may be affected by piracy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.