UK: Supreme Court Reviews Sovereign Immunity

Last Updated: 7 October 2011
Article by Carol Searle and Tim Johnson

NML Capital v Argentina [2011] UKSC 31

In this case, the Supreme Court had to decide whether NML, a vulture fund, was entitled to enforce a New York judgment ordering Argentina to make payment of the principal and interest due under sovereign bonds on which Argentina had defaulted in 2003. The Supreme Court's judgement that NML were entitled to enforce this action in the UK courts sheds light on the current standing of sovereign immunity under English law.

The background facts

In 1994, the Republic of Argentina issued a series of sovereign bonds subject to New York law pursuant to a fiscal agency agreement under which it agreed a waiver of immunity. The terms of the bonds provided that a final judgment in New York would be enforceable against the defendant in other courts in which it might be amenable to a suit on the judgment. Between June 2001 and September 2003, NML bought a number of bonds at a discounted rate. Argentina defaulted on the interest payments on its bonds and sought a general restructuring of its external debt, but NML refused to take part in any restructuring offer and commenced proceedings in New York seeking to recover principal and interest due under the bonds (US$284,184,632.30). On 18 December 2006, the US District Court of the Southern District of New York entered judgment against Argentina in favour of NML for the sum claimed.

NML sought and obtained permission from the High Court in London to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction on Argentina. NML brought the claim for the enforcement of the New York judgment.

Argentina sought to set aside this order and to obtain a declaration that the Court had no jurisdiction in respect of the claim brought against it by NML, arguing that as a sovereign state, it was immune from suit under section 1 of the State Immunity Act 1978 (the "1978 Act") which says that a "state is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the UK except as provided in the following provisions of this Part of the Act."

At the hearing of that application, NML said that the New York court would have had jurisdiction in the matter, applying state immunity rules corresponding to those applicable in the United Kingdom, and therefore its judgment was recognised and enforceable in England under section 31(1) of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (the "1982 Act") which provides for the circumstances in which a foreign judgment may be enforced in the UK against a state. NML also added that the terms applicable to the bonds meant that Argentina had submitted to the jurisdiction of the English court and thereby waived any immunity from suit.

The defendant contended that section 31 of the 1982 Act was concerned with the substantive merits of the claim and applied only if the English court otherwise had jurisdiction under one of the exceptions to state immunity in the 1978 Act.

The decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal

At first instance, Mr. Justice Blair held that section 31 of the 1982 Act comprehensively dealt with the recognition and enforcement of the judgments of foreign courts against states and that Argentina was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity and dismissed the application. Argentina applied to set aside this order, arguing that as a sovereign state, it was immune from suit under section 1 of the State Immunity Act 1978, which grants a general immunity to states unless specific exceptions apply. The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010.  NML appealed, and the Supreme Court was asked to rule on the following three principal arguments:

1. Was Argentina caught by section 3(1)(a) of the 1978 Act, which provides that sovereign states are not immune "as respects proceedings relating to a commercial transaction entered into by the State;"

2. Was Argentina caught by section 31 of the 1982 Act, which provides a further exception, namely that foreign judgments against a sovereign state would be enforceable through the English courts if two conditions were met: (a) the state in question would not have been immune if English law was applied (i.e. the 1978 Act), and (b) the judgment would otherwise satisfy the criteria for enforceability under English law; and

3. Under the terms of the bonds themselves, had Argentina waived immunity and submitted to the jurisdiction of national courts for the purposes of enforcement?

The Supreme Court Judgment

1. The Supreme Court judges were split 3-2 against NML on the first question. There was no dispute that the bonds between NML and Argentina constituted a commercial transaction, and no dispute that NML's action in New York constituted proceedings relating to a commercial transaction. The issue was whether the UK proceedings, for the enforcement of a foreign judgment, could also be said to be relating to a commercial transaction. Lords Phillips and Clarke felt they could, but Lords Mance, Collins and Walker favoured a narrower interpretation, based on the intention of Parliament at the time the 1978 and 1982 Acts was enacted and common practice at the time in the international loan and bond markets.

2. However, this disagreement was purely academic for the purposes of this case, since all the Justices agreed that section 31 of the 1982 Act did provide NML with an alternative route that it could rely on to lift Argentina's state immunity. Lord Phillips gave the following neat summary of the effect of section 31: "State immunity cannot be raised as a bar to the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment if, under the principles of international law recognised in this jurisdiction, the state against whom the judgment was given was not entitled to immunity in respect of the claim."

The question that should be asked in such cases is therefore, 'would I have been precluded by the 1978 Act from suing this state had I chosen to sue in the UK?' The answer in this case was no, because section 3(1)(a) of the 1978 Act would have stripped Argentina's immunity had NML sued on the bonds (i.e. brought the adjudicatory proceedings) in the UK.

3. On the third issue, the Justices were also unanimous in NML's favour. The terms of the bonds provided that "the related judgment shall be conclusive and binding upon Argentina and may be enforced in any specified court or in any other courts to the jurisdiction of which Argentina is or may be subject by a suit upon such judgment". As Lord Collins said, "Argentina agreed not to claim any immunity. The contrary conclusion of the Court of Appeal is not readily explicable."


The lessons of this case are clear: if you are seeking to contract with a sovereign state, you should ensure that the wording of your agreement contains an express waiver of sovereign immunity, both for adjudication, and for enforcement. If your agreement does not provide such a waiver and you still wish to enforce a foreign judgment against the state's assets in the UK, ask whether the state would have been immune under the 1978 Act if you had sued in the UK; if not, you may be able to use the section 31 of the 1982 Act route to lift immunity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions