European Union: Taking The St Michael? The CJEU Decision In Interflora v M&S

Last Updated: 4 October 2011
Article by Nick Beckett, Stuart Helmer and Tom Scourfield

Marks & Spencer will be concerned that a finding of infringement may be the outcome when Interflora's claim against M&S for infringement of Interflora's mark INTERFLORA, used by M&S as a Google Adword, returns to the High Court following the CJEU decision handed down on 22 September. 

The CJEU has confirmed its decision from Google France that an advertiser who selects a competitor's trade mark as an Adword can be liable for "double identity" trade mark infringement if consumers are unable to determine whether the advertiser is economically linked to the trade mark owner.  It has also held that, in this case, the prospects of such confusion were greater because of the nature of Interflora's business, being a network of separate and widely varying retailers.  In addition, the CJEU has held, for the first time, that the use of a competitor mark as an Adword can also infringe by taking unfair advantage of the mark.

To view the article in full, please see below:



Full Article

In a decision of 22 September 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed its decision from Google France that an advertiser who selects a competitor's trade mark as an Adword can be liable for "double identity" trade mark infringement if consumers are unable to determine whether the advertiser is economically linked to the trade mark owner. It has also held that, in this case, the prospects of such confusion were greater because of the nature of Interflora's business, being a network of separate and widely varying retailers. In addition, the CJEU has held, for the first time, that the use of a competitor mark as an Adword can also infringe by taking unfair advantage of the mark.

Background

In addition to its natural search results, Google also offers a paid-for referencing service, known as "Adwords". Advertisers can bid on words, and if a user of Google searches for those words, then in addition to the "natural" search results, advertisers' sponsored links may be displayed in a separate box. The frequency with which an advertiser's sponsored link appears, and its position in the list of sponsored links, depends on the amount the advertiser bids for the Adword and the quality of the link. In this case, Marks & Spencer selected "Interflora" as an Adword, such that a sponsored link to M&S Flowers Online appeared prominently when users of Google searched for "Interflora". Interflora brought trade mark infringement proceedings, alleging that M&S's use as an Adword of their registered mark INTERFLORA, and similar words, constituted both "double identity" (identical mark, identical goods) infringement and also that M&S's acts took unfair advantage or, or were detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the INTERFLORA mark.

Questions referred to the ECJ

The High Court initially referred ten questions to the ECJ (as it then was). Following correspondence between the High Court and the ECJ, and the ECJ decision in the joined Google France cases (cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08), six of these were withdrawn. The questions on which the CJEU has now ruled were:

1. Where a trader which is a competitor of the proprietor of a registered trade mark and which sells goods and provides services identical to those covered by the trade mark via its website:

  • selects a sign which is identical ... with the trade mark as a keyword for a search engine operator's sponsored link service,
  • nominates the sign as a keyword,
  • associates the sign with the URL of its website,
  • sets the cost per click that it will pay in relation to that keyword,
  • schedules the timing of the display of the sponsored link; and
  • uses the sign in business correspondence relating to the invoicing and payment of fees or the management of its account with the search engine operator,

but the sponsored link does not itself include the sign or any similar sign, do any or all of these acts constitute "use" of the sign by the competitor within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation?

2. Is any such use "in relation to" goods and services identical to those for which the trade mark is registered within the meaning of Article 5(1)(a) of the Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation?

3. Does any such use fall within the scope of either or both of:

(a) Article 5(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation; and

(b) Article 5(2) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation?

4. Does it make any difference to the answer to question 3 above if:

(a) the presentation of the competitor's sponsored link in response to a search by a user by means of the sign in question is liable to lead some members of the public to believe that the competitor is a member of the trade mark proprietor's commercial network contrary to the fact; or

(b) the search engine operator does not permit trade mark proprietors in the relevant member state ... to block the selection of signs identical to their trade marks as keywords by other parties?

Google France

In Google France, the ECJ held that advertisers' use, in Adwords, of competitors' trade marks constituted actionable trade mark use (in contrast with Google, whose offer of the mark as an Adword did not constitute trade mark use). The ECJ further held that the use of competitor marks in Adwords would constitute trade mark infringement if such use had an adverse effect on the essential functions of the trade mark. These include not only the function of indicating origin but also other functions including the guarantee of quality, the communication function and the advertising function. In particular, if the advertiser's ad suggested that there was an economic link between the advertiser and the proprietor of the trade mark, or was at least so vague that the average consumer had difficulty in determining whether the goods or services were those of the trade mark owner, there would be an adverse effect on the origin function, and the use of the mark in the Adword would be infringing.

Google France did not, however, address the question of whether the advertiser using a competitor mark as an Adword thereby takes unfair advantage of or causes detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the mark.

CJEU Decision – double identity infringement

As is its habit, the ECJ distilled the questions referred, holding that the High Court was essentially asking:

  • whether the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prevent a competitor from displaying, on the basis of an identical keyword, an advertisement for goods or services identical to those for which that mark is registered; and
  • whether, in those circumstances, it is relevant (i) that the advertisement concerned is liable to lead some members of the relevant public to believe, incorrectly, that the advertiser is a member of the trade mark proprietor's commercial network and (ii) that the provider of the internet referencing service does not permit trade mark proprietors to prevent signs identical to their trade marks being selected as keywords.

The CJEU confirmed its decision in Google France that the use by an advertiser of a competitor's trade mark as an Adword constituted potentially actionable use in the course of trade, and in relation to goods or services, even if the trade mark does not appear in the ad. It also confirmed that, for the use to be infringing, one of the essential functions of the mark must be affected. It then went on to consider the origin function, advertising function and investment function separately.

Origin function

The CJEU again confirmed the Google France point that where an advertiser's ad suggested that there was an economic link between the advertiser and the proprietor of the trade mark used as an Adword, or the average consumer had difficulty in determining whether the goods or services were those of the trade mark owner, the function would be adversely affected. On the facts of this case, the CJEU said that the referring court may take into account the nature of Interflora's business, being a commercial network composed of a large number of widely varying retailers. Ominously for M&S, the CJEU considered that in such circumstances it may be particularly difficult for the average consumer to determine whether M&S is part of Interflora's network.

Advertising function

The CJEU acknowledged that the use of a trade mark by its owner's competitors may increase the costs to the trade mark owner if it wishes to ensure that its sponsored links appear above its competitors'. However, this does not on its own adversely affect the trade mark's advertising function, and the trade mark owner is not denied the opportunity to use its mark to inform and win over customers. Accordingly the advertising function is unaffected.

Investment function

The CJEU defined the investment function of a trade mark as the use of the mark by its proprietor to acquire or preserve a reputation capable of attracting consumers and retaining their loyalty, and held that the investment function of a mark is affected where a competitor's use of the mark substantially interferes with this. On the other hand, the investment function will not be affected if the only consequence of the competitor's use of the mark is to oblige the trade mark owner to adapt its efforts to acquire or preserve its reputation – provided that such use respects the trade mark's origin function.

CJEU Decision – detriment to distinctive character / unfair advantage infringement

The CJEU again reformulated the questions asked by the High Court, holding that the question referred was, essentially, whether the proprietor of a trade mark with a reputation is entitled to prevent a competitor from basing its advertising on a keyword corresponding to that trade mark which the competitor has, without the proprietor's consent, selected in an internet referencing service.

Detriment to distinctive character

The CJEU held that the use in the course of trade of a sign identical or similar to a registered mark is detrimental to the distinctive character of the mark if it contributes to turning the trade mark into a generic term. However, the use of a competitor trade mark as an Adword does not necessarily contribute to that development.

It went on to say that if the internet user can tell that the goods or services offered in the ad triggered by the Adword originate not from the proprietor of the trade mark but from its competitor, the trade mark's distinctiveness would not be reduced by that use. It would have merely drawn the consumer's attention to an alternative product or service.

Unfair advantage

The CJEU held that, where a competitor of the proprietor of a trade mark with a reputation selects that trade mark as an Adword, the purpose of that use is to take advantage of the distinctive character and repute of the trade mark, and that if the consumer buys the competitor product as a result, real advantage accrues to the advertiser. If done without due cause, the advantage is unfair, especially where the goods offered by the advertiser are imitations of the goods of the trade mark owner. However, where the ad does not offer a mere imitation of the trade mark owner's goods, does not cause dilution or tarnishment and does not adversely affect the functions of the trade mark, such use will generally be fair competition and thus not without due cause.

Comment

When it returns to the High Court this case appears likely to be determined on its particular facts. In particular, it is ominous for M&S that, given the nature of Interflora's business, there seems a real possibility that the average consumer might think that M&S were within Interflora's network and would thus only be able to determine with difficulty whether M&S's goods and services were also being offered under the Interflora mark. If so, the origin function of the INTERFLORA mark will be adversely affected and M&S will be liable for double identity infringement.

While this part of the decision suggests that M&S will be liable, the rest of the decision is unhelpful. The CJEU frequently does no more than restate established principles without providing further guidance on them. Moreover, such guidance as it does provide often blurs together separate concepts. For example:

  • The CJEU holds that there will be no dilution provided that consumers can distinguish the advertiser's goods from those of the trade mark owner. This makes confusion a necessary element of the test for dilution, despite the well established principle that confusion is not required to succeed in a dilution claim.
  • In its discussion of unfair advantage, the CJEU holds that an advantage will not be unfair provided, among other things, that there is no dilution or tarnishment. However, unfair advantage is a separate concept from dilution (detriment to distinctive character) and tarnishment (detriment to repute). By making the absence of dilution and tarnishment a condition of a finding that there is no unfair advantage, the CJEU imports these concepts into the consideration of unfair advantage.
  • In its explanation of the investment function the CJEU stipulates that a trade mark owner may not prevent the use of an identical sign in relation to identical goods or services just because the trade mark owner will have to adapt its efforts to acquire or preserve a reputation, on the proviso that the use of the sign respects the trade mark's origin function. However, if the use being made does not respect the origin function, there is no need to consider the investment function in the first place, as the necessary adverse effect on one of the essential functions of the mark would be made out. On this basis, the investment function is redundant, and the CJEU gives no guidance or examples as to when the investment function will be adversely affected in the absence of an effect on the origin function.

There is therefore ample scope for further CJEU references on the subject of keywords. In the meantime, advertisers using competitor marks as keywords should take care to avoid any possibility of the consumer being unsure whether the goods they see when they click on the link originate from the advertiser or from the owner of the trade mark, particularly in cases where the trade mark owner operates a network of affiliated organisations of which the advertiser could reasonably be a member. The prominent use of an appropriate disclaimer should achieve this. Once this is achieved, and subject to the uncertainties noted above, then providing the goods are not imitations of the trade mark owner's goods (as in L'Oréal v Bellure) there appears considerable freedom to use keywords without being found liable for infringement by way of double identity, detriment to distinctive character or unfair advantage.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 27/09/2011.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.