UK: International Accounting Standard 27 - Briefing Update

Last Updated: 3 August 2011
Article by Jonathan Brinsden


Recent developments have re-ignited the debate surrounding the government's intention to apply the International Accounting Standards 27 (IAS 27) to NHS linked charities.

IAS 27 will require the consolidated financial statements for a group of entities under the control of a parent body. NHS charities governed by corporate trustees which are themselves NHS bodies (eg NHS Trusts, Primary Care Trusts etc) are set to be affected by the IAS 27.

To date, NHS charities have been exempt from the effect of IAS 27, with HM Treasury deferring the implementation of IAS 27 to NHS charities several times. The government now intends to implement IAS 27 for NHS linked charities from 1 April 2013. HM Treasury is going ahead despite considerable criticism from the media, lobbyists, the Association of NHS Charities and the Charity Commission itself.

The Implementation of IAS 27

HM Treasury has deferred the application of IAS 27 to NHS bodies several times since it was due to take effect in 2009/10 financial year, when the government adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards. In large part these delays have been the result of considerable media and lobby group pressure, though the Treasury remains unswayed by the serious criticism the proposal has provoked. In advance of the most recent deferral, the Treasury published its 'Report of the Review Group of NHS Linked Charities in the context of the government accounting framework', in which it concluded that IAS 27 would 'not impact the legal integrity of trustees' nor would it 'affect the use of funds by NHS Bodies.' Yet many interested parties remain unconvinced by the Treasury's conclusions, suggesting that they are 'potentially misleading' and its report 'ignores or misinterprets fundamental issues'.

The Concerns It is anticipated that IAS 27 could give rise to a number of adverse implications for NHS Charities. Control A key concern, as argued by the Charity Commission from the outset, is that the definition of 'control' used for the purposes of IAS 27, is inappropriate in the context of NHS Charities. In relation to the IAS 27, 'control' is defined as 'the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefit from its services'. In the Charity Commission's view, any assumption that this definition covers the relationship between NHS Charities and their corporate trustees undermines the fundamental characteristics of any charity – independence, public benefit and having an exclusively charitable purpose. Further, there is considerable concern about what impact characterising charitable funds as being under such 'control' might have. Could the consolidation ultimately encourage the relevant NHS bodies to consider the charities' respective funds as within their budget?

While government maintains that the consolidation is 'purely a technical accounting matter', authors of the 'Review Group of NHS Linked Charities in the context of the government accounting framework: Dissenting Report' see the potential for a 'hard-pressed finance team within a NHS trust' to 'come to regard the charitable funds as simply another budget'. Far from the Treasury's aim of 'enhanced transparency and accountability', they suggest the consolidation 'may actually enhance the potential for bad practice.'

Transparency and donor confidence

At the centre of this debate, is the question donor confidence and the growing concern that consolidation will create the impression that charity funds have been 'nationalised'. The Treasury argues that consolidation will bring the 'increased transparency and accountability' required for the government's Big Society plan – the use of third sector groups to deliver services currently provided by the government – to achieve its aims of 'empowering communities, redistributing power and fostering a culture of volunteerism.' In stark contrast, the dissenting report suggests that a 'particular concern of the public in the present economic climate is that donations may be counted in to fill gaps in the NHS budgets.' Consolidating accounts may appear to confirm this suspicion and thereby 'damage public confidence,' ultimately reducing the number of donations and amount of funds available, in what the dissenting report characterises as 'a double financial blow so far as the ultimate beneficiaries of the charities – the NHS patients – are concerned.'

Additionally, despite suggesting that consolidation will increase transparency, in its report, the Treasury blurs a key distinction between the objects of NHS charities and NHS bodies. In its opinion, like NHS charities' objects, 'the objects of NHS bodies is similarly to benefit NHS patients, so that there is a convergence of objects.' But this somewhat syllogistic approach fails to address a fundamental objection posited by critics. This is that unlike, NHS bodies, 'the activities of the charity are not conducted according to the specific business needs of the NHS body' but directly channelled towards the specific needs of the patients.

Cost and practicality

Critics argue that the consolidation will incur considerable cost and will give rise to problematic practical difficulties. For example, while the NHS and linked charitable trusts operate on the same financial year, charitable trustees have ten months to produce accounts while the NHS must produce accounts within 11 weeks. The change would require charity account arrangements to adjust to comply with the NHS' considerably shorter time frame. The Treasury's expectation, that such adjustments will require 'moderate increases in staffing and audit costs,' is directly contradicted by the dissenting report, which asserts that the cost would be 'significant' and 'questions the implications' by the Treasury that 'the requirements would not be expensive.' Taken together, the Treasury's attempts to address the specific concerns fuelling opposition to the consolidation focus less on addressing and quelling those concerns, and more on driving home its message that consolidation will 'apply in full to the NHS in respect of linked charities,' regardless of these fundamental issues.

Going forward

What can NHS charities do to avoid consolidation and secure independence in advance of the implementation date in 2013? Wait and see? Fundamental changes to the NHS are waiting in the wings. PCTs are to be abolished; GP consortia will be established in their wake. At least 39 PCTs in England hold charitable funds in their own right, while many other PCT funds are held on their behalf by other NHS bodies. Revised trustee arrangements will inevitably have to be constructed for all these funds. The dissenting report considers this 'precisely the wrong moment to distract NHS organisations and their associated charities with trying to implement consolidated accounts' which, given the restructuring, may only be required 'for a few years.' Hold on, and if critics can secure another year long implementation deferral, this could render the entire debate moot under the new NHS structure.

New Governance model for NHS Charities

The Barts and The London Charity recently pioneered a new constitutional framework taking it completely outside the scope of IAS 27. The Barts Charity has replaced its Section 11 trustee body with a corporate trustee in the form of a charitable company limited by guarantee. In doing so, it hopes to reassure supporters that their charitable donations will not be subsumed into hospital accounts. At present, it is relatively commonplace for NHS charities to have corporate trustees. Until now these trustees had always been NHS bodies. Under the Barts Charity model, however, the corporate trustee (also a registered charity in its own right) is governed by company and charity law, not NHS legislation. So, while the corporate trustee would be a charity, it would not be a NHS charity thereby diminishing the Department of Health's confused role of quasi charity regulatior.

By making this change, the Barts Charity is in a better position to provide much needed certainty to current and potential donors as to the ultimate use of funds.


At the root of HM Treasury's argument for implementation of IAS 27 is a drive for 'enhanced transparency and accountability'. The move 'is intended to keep UK government in line with accounting best practice.' However, critics of IAS 27 perceive it as the thin end of the wedge that will inevitably culminate in charity funds forming part of the NHS budget for Treasury purposes. Given the weight of criticism mounted against the move by lobbyists and the media, and the considerable misgivings of the Charity Commission and the Association of NHS Charities, each NHS Charity would be wise to make up its own mind on how to achieve transparency of accounting and best practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions