UK: IP Snapshot July 2011

Bringing you regular news of key developments in intellectual property law.


Case T-318/09 Audi AG and another v OHIM, 6 July 2011

The General Court of the European Union rejected the applicants' appeal against the First Board of Appeal's decision refusing an application for registration of the word mark "TDI" as a CTM. The General Court considered that: (i) the mark TDI was a descriptive acronym (meaning "turbo direct injection" or "turbo diesel injection") which the public concerned would perceive as being a description of motor car vehicles or their components or one of their characteristics (Article 7(1)(3) Community Trade Mark Regulation); and, (ii) it had not been demonstrated that the sign had acquired a distinctive character through use in all Member States of the European Union pursuant to Article 7(3) Community Trade Mark Regulation.

This case highlights that the fact that a mark has been the subject of national and/or international registrations is irrelevant for the purpose of assessing whether it should qualify for registration as a CTM; and that market share statistics are not enough, on their own, to show that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use – there must be other evidence to link market share with the idea that the mark has a distinctive character in the minds of the public concerned.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Schütz (UK) Limited and Schütz GmbH v Delta Containers Limited and Protechna SA, High Court, 5 July 2011

The defendants' actions in replacing original bottles within a branded metal container, in circumstances where the claimants made and distributed a combined container and bottle product, infringed the claimants' trade marks and constituted passing off.

The claimants had already been in dispute in recent patent proceedings over the same issue against another defendant.  The High Court had found that replacement of bottles within the container did not infringe the claimants' patent for a bulk container, whereas the Court of Appeal disagreed and found that the patent for the complete product (cage and bottle) was infringed.  By placing a new bottle in the container, the defendant was completing the patented product (Schütz v Werit, [2011] EWCA Civ 303). As the defendants now cannot replace the bottle due to this patent judgment, this trade mark decision is therefore of relevance only to the time when the patent may have expired or if the Court of Appeal judgment is overturned by the Supreme Court. 

For the full text of the decision, click here

Edwin Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Case C-263/09 P, 5 July 2011

The Italian fashion designer Elio Fiorucci enjoyed victory at last on 5 July 2011, when the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed the General Court's decision that, where national law permits, an individual can prevent the use of his name as a Community trade mark.

An individual's right to a name, as protected under Article 8(3) in Italy, is not restricted to a non-commercial context such as an individual's personality.  The right also includes those names which have already had commercial exploitation.

By contrast, in a previous decision, Elizabeth Emanuel, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that where a person had previously exploited their name commercially, the registration would not become misleading, and therefore revocable, on the grounds that the person was no longer involved in that commercial activity.  This decision may now encourage others whose names are registered as trade marks to revoke such registrations.  However, it will be of concern to assignees of such trade marks, who will understandably consider that, where an assignment includes a trade mark consisting of a personal name, the assignor should be taken as having consented to the continued registration of that name.

For our Law Now of the decision, click here

Mundipharma GmbH v OHIM, Case T-76/09, 22 June 2011

Mundipharma objected to the registration of Farmamundi's figurative CTM, arguing there was a likelihood of confusion with its own figurative CTM. The General Court of the European Union upheld the OHIM Board of Appeal decision in which it stated that there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks under Article 8(1)(b) of the Community trade mark (CTM) Regulation.

The Mundipharma CTM was registered in class 5 for pharmaceutical, sanitary and dietetic goods, whereas the Farmamundi mark was to be registered in class 39 services for storage, distribution, delivery and packaging of pharmaceutical, sanitary and dietetic preparations.  The Board had ruled (and the General Court agreed) that these goods were not complementary, as the users of the class 39 services would be professionals, while the buyers of the class 5 goods would purchase the goods from pharmacies without any use of class 39 services.
This decision shows that there needs to be a sufficient connection between the products for the goods and services to be considered complementary and therefore for a likelihood of confusion to arise.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Future Publishing Ltd v The Edge Interactive Media Inc, Edge Games Inc and Dr Timothy Langdell  [2011] EWHC 1489 (Ch), 13 June 2011

The High Court ruled that the defendants breached an agreement between themselves and the claimant relating to the use of trade marks for EDGE.  The agreement had assigned the EDGE trade marks owned by the defendants to the claimants, however the defendants went on to use three variations of the EDGE logo. Furthermore, the court ruled that the defendants had breached the copyright in the EDGE logo and were liable for passing off as the defendants had been trying to take advantage of EDGE Magazine's goodwill.

An injunction was ordered to stop the defendants from continuing to infringe copyright and the defendants' trade mark was revoked. This case can provide some assurance to clients whose trade marks and copyright is being infringed, particularly where an agreement has been made but not kept.

For the full text of the decision, click here


Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat, Case C-271/10, 30 June 2011

The Court of Justice of the European Union held that legislation which establishes a system under which the remuneration payable to authors in the event of public lending is calculated exclusively according to the number of borrowers registered with public establishments, on the basis of a flat-rate amount fixed per borrower per year, did not comply with Article 5(1) of Council Directive 92/100/EEC, as it did not take into account the number of works or the number of public establishments lending.

This decision is unlikely to have any effect on the system currently administered by the Public Lending Right Office in the UK, as the remuneration system for public lending is based on the number of times which a particular work is borrowed, but it may result in greater income for copyright owners whose works are borrowed in other EU countries.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH and others, Case C-462/09, 16 June 2011

National courts are now obliged to find a way to impose copyright levies on those based outside of their jurisdiction. A copyright levy is a tax on the manufacturers or suppliers of devices used by consumers to transfer media; the copyright holders are then compensated with the proceeds of the levy. Certain Member States had introduced a levy where there is a legal right for consumers to transfer media between devices, whereas others had not (where there is no such legal right).

The issue concerned a distance selling situation, where the consumer was based in a country imposing a levy (here, the Netherlands) and the supplier of the device was based in a country not imposing a levy (here, Germany). The Court of Justice of the European Union held that Member States that have a levy must "guarantee" the recovery of the levy for copyright holders. It is therefore for the Member State to seek an interpretation of national law that enables it to obtain the levy from the importing supplier. It is of no bearing that they are established in another Member State.

This case is problematic for those Member States that have introduced a copyright levy, particularly as the Court has not stated how they should enforce the levy where the relevant person is based in a Member State where no levy exists and over which its national courts will have no jurisdiction.

For our Law Now of the decision, click here


1-Click/AMAZON, T 1244/07, 27 January 2011

The Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office has upheld the determination of the Examining Division that Amazon's 'one-click' method was obvious. The patent under examination was entitled 'Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network'. It was determined that omitting confirmation steps in the process of placing an order relate to a method of doing business and therefore cannot contribute to inventive step.

This decision shows that a patent construed as a business process, particularly one dependent on user preference (here the user could elect to use the one click ordering system), may be a factor in determining obviousness.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Cephalon Inc and others v Orchid Europe Ltd and another [2011] EWHC 1591 (Pat), 24 June 2011

The High Court has held that three related patents claiming pharmaceutical compositions of modafinil and associated processes were not infringed and were invalid for obviousness.  The critical issue in the determination of infringement was construction of the element of the claims relating to particle size. Floyd J applied a purposive construction, in accordance with Kirin Amgen, based on the common general knowledge of the skilled man and the teaching of the patents, rather than on a strictly verbal analysis of the claims.

The comments on construction, and the weight given to common general knowledge and practices within the industry are interesting.  The summary of the approach to construction is useful, as is the way in which Floyd J formulated the common general knowledge of the skilled person. It is likely some of the principles discussed in relation to construction and obviousness may be useful to other cases.

For the full text of the decision, click here

Nokia Corporation v IPCom GmbH & Co KG [2011] EWHC 1470 (Pat), 16 June 2011

The High Court rejected invalidity attacks on a divisional patent of a parent mobile-phone patent, although the parent had been held invalid in earlier litigation between the same parties. The High Court held that the defendant's patent was valid and Nokia were infringing the patent through the sale of certain mobile phones.

This case demonstrates that just because a parent patent had been held invalid does not mean that the finding of invalidity is easily extendable to a divisional patent.

For the full text of the decision, click here


Sphere Time v OHIM, Case T-68/10, 14 June 2011

The General Court of the European Union has upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that a design for a watch attached to a lanyard, which was filed in April 2005, was not validly registered under the Community Designs Regulation (6/2002/EC) (CDR). Furthermore, the General Court also ruled that the contested design was not of individual character and thus produced the same overall impression as the SYMBICORT design. Therefore the design was invalid under Article 6 of the CDR.

This case demonstrated that the General Court and the Board of Appeal will consider evidence such as shipping invoices to be sufficient proof that a design had been disclosed to the public before the filing date of the application for the contested design.

For the full text of the decision, click here


ICANN vote for creation of new domain suffixes

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN") voted on 20 June 2011 to increase the number of generic top-level domain names (gTLDs). At present there are 22 gTLDs (e.g. .com, .biz, .org), as well as approximately 250 country-level domain names (e.g. .uk, .fr). This vote follows the announcement of the proposal to expand the number of gTLDs in 2008.

Under the new proposal applicants will be able to apply for a domain name suffix comprising almost any word and in any language. The approval is expected to significantly increase the number of domain name suffixes. This will enable organisations to use a script that better reflects the language of their business and it will assist internet users who use a different alphabet to the Latin letters currently used in domain name endings.

For our Law Now of the decision, click here

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 28/07/2011.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.