UK: Weekly Update - A Summary Of Recent Developments In Insurance, Reinsurance And Litigation Law - 26/11

Last Updated: 20 July 2011
Article by Nigel Brook

This Week's Caselaw

Fox v Foundation Piling

Court of Appeal ruling on Part 36 offers and the effect of exaggeration of injuries on costs

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/790.html

The claimant beat the defendant's Part 36 offer. One of the arguments which the Court of Appeal was required to consider was the effect of the claimant's exaggeration of his personal injury. Jackson LJ reviewed the prior caselaw on this topic. He noted that in a personal injury action, the fact the claimant has won on some issues and lost on others is not normally a reason for depriving the claimant of his costs.

Further, the fact that the claimant has deliberately exaggerated his claim may also in certain circumstances not be a good reason for depriving him of part of his costs. Although in this case the claimant's ultimate recovery fell far short of the original pleaded claim (in part because of video evidence showing that he was less disabled than claimed), the judge at first instance found no misrepresentation by the claimant. Although that was "perhaps surprising", the Court of Appeal could not substitute a finding of fact which the judge expressly declined to make. In any event, where quantum is inflated, the Court of Appeal said that the defendant's remedy was to make a modest Part 36 offer at the first opportunity. The situation might be different if dishonesty by the claimant is proven.

Jackson LJ also welcomed the forthcoming change to the Part 36 rules (due to come into force on 1 October 2011) which will reverse Carver v BAA [2008]. In that case, it was held that the court was entitled to take into account all the circumstances of a case (and go beyond a mere financial comparison) when deciding whether a claimant had failed to obtain a judgment more advantageous than a defendant's Part 36 offer.

Shovelar & Ors v Lane & Ors

Whether costs consequences of Part 36 should be applied

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/802.html

At first instance in this case, the judge refused to apply the costs consequences set out in Part 36 after the claimants beat their (rejected) Part 36 offer to the defendants at trial. The claimants appealed and the Court of Appeal considered the grounds on which the judge had based her decision that it would be unjust to award additional costs:

  1. The size of the costs meant that it was not possible for the defendants to accept the offers made: Although the Court of Appeal had some sympathy for this argument (here, over £320,000 had been spent fighting over a £134,000 estate), it held that this was not a good reason to refuse the Part 36 consequences because: "the amount of the costs which would have to be paid is a matter for assessment by the costs judge and it is the costs judge who will question, and will no doubt question very closely indeed, whether the costs claimed were necessary and proportionate".
  2. The nature of the case was such that the outcome could not be certainly predicted until after evidence had been given: The Court of Appeal held that this was not a good reason: "It is almost inevitable in all litigation that the nature of the outcome cannot be certainly predicted until after the evidence has been given and even then there is no certainty as to the outcome until the judge has decided the case on that evidence". In this case, it would have been better for the parties to mediate rather than litigate.
  3. The fact that the offer was not accepted could be properly taken into account under Part 44 when determining what order for costs ought to be made: The Court of Appeal held that Part 36 is a separate self-contained code which must be applied - Part 44 cannot be taken into account. In the words of Ward LJ, "Part 36 trumps Part 44".

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed.

Anglo Irish Asset Finance Plc v Riddell

Whether court can order security for costs where the defendant brings a counterclaim

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1657.html

The defendant applied for an order that the claimant provide security for costs. Although the judge concluded that there was reason to believe that the claimant would be unable to pay the defendant's costs, he held that it would not be just to make the order because of the defendant's counterclaim which raised substantially the same issues as the claim. In so doing, the judge referred to the Court of Appeal decision of Crabtree v GPT [1990].

On appeal, the defendant sought to argue that Crabtree did not establish a general principle or rule that where the defendant has a counterclaim raising the same issues as the claim, the court will not order the claimant to provide security for costs. The Court of Appeal held that the evidence now available shows that the claimant would not be unable to pay the defendant's costs.

For that reason alone the appeal should be dismissed. However, the Court of Appeal also went on to consider the Crabtree case. It was a "fair summary" in prior caselaw to refer to "the general rule" established by Crabtree (although it was "ironic" that in the case itself, Bingham LJ emphasised that "there can be no rule of thumb in cases of this kind"). The judge had not misapplied Crabtree in this case. The defendant's offer to give up its counterclaim if security was offered added nothing: "It did not justify making an order that the court would not otherwise have been willing to make".

Where a counterclaim raises the same issues as a claim, (so it may well be a matter of chance who is the claimant and who is the defendant), it will not usually be just to order security for costs (although the court must always have regard to the particular circumstances of the case).

Broster & Ors v Galliard Docklands & Anor

Alleged negligent construction and damage to the "thing itself"

http://www.bailii.org/cgibin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2011/1722.html&query=broster&method=boolean

Weekly Update 44/10 referred to the case of Linklaters v McAlpine, in which Akenhead J considered the scope of the rule in the House of Lords case of Murphy v Brentwood [1991] that a duty of care does not cover damage caused to the "thing itself". Akenhead J has considered this issue again in this case. Here, the claimant homeowners alleged negligence by builders when constructing a common roof over a terrace of houses. Having reviewed the relevant caselaw, the judge concluded that it was necessary to consider the structure in question "as a whole and to avoid any artificiality in practically considering the structure".

He held that there was no realistic prospect of establishing that the builders owed a duty of care to the owners for physical damage to their houses caused by the roof. The houses had been built as one construction (albeit for separate and multiple occupation). Thus: "It would be wholly artificial to argue that the segment of the roof over each individual terraced unit was to be considered as separate from the whole roof or indeed that the roof as a whole was to be considered as separate from the walls of the units below. It follows that there is damage "to the thing itself"."

Pannone Ltd v Aardvark

Extension of time following a consent order

http://www.bailii.org/cgibin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/803.html&query=pannone&method=boolean

In this case, an order was made by consent that the claimant should file and serve its reply and defence to a counterclaim by no later than 1pm on 26 October 2009. The order further provided that if the claimant did not comply "the Claimant's claim be struck out and the Defendant have permission to enter judgment in full for its counterclaim". The Claimant was a few minutes late in filing and serving the required statement of case. The Court of Appeal considered whether the judge had been correct in holding that time should be extended for filing and serving the statement of case. The issue in this case was whether the judge had the power to grant an extension in the case of a consent order.

The Court of Appeal concluded that "There is a world of difference between a case management decision made at the instance of one party to which the other party makes no objection...and a genuine settlement of a substantive dispute as to the parties' rights". In this case, the court had had the power to grant relief from a sanction as a result of failure to comply with the order. It made no difference here that there had been a consent order: "Where however the agreement is no more than a procedural accommodation in relation to case management, the weight to be accorded to the fact of the parties' agreement as to the consequences of non-compliance whilst still real and substantial will nonetheless ordinarily be correspondingly less, and rarely decisive."

F&C Alternative v Barthelemy

Settlement agreement conditional on court not handing down final judgment

http://www.bailii.org/cgibin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1731.html&query=barthelemy&method=boolean

The judge provided a draft judgment to the parties (in order for them to check for typographical errors or obvious factual errors). The parties then reached a settlement agreement which was conditional on the court not handing down the final judgment in open court. An application was therefore made for the court not to hand down the judgment, so that the settlement agreement could take effect. In these circumstances the court has a discretion how to proceed, weighing aspects of the public interest along with the wishes and interests of the parties to the proceedings (see Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd v McBains Cooper [2001] and Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocesan Trustees v Goldberg (No. 3) [2001]).

Sales J decided that he should not grant the application. This was partly because the judgment addresses a range of legal issues which he considered it would be in the public interest to be made the subject of a published judgment for the development of the law and guidance to others. It would not be possible or appropriate to try to produce a partial judgment which did not go fully into the facts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.