UK: HR Headlines - London Employment Newsletter

Last Updated: 1 June 2011

In this issue:

  • Compensation for career long loss only appropriate in exceptional circumstances
  • Disciplinaries and right to a fair hearing
  • The use of surveillance film in disciplinary proceedings
  • Employer negligent in making careless and false statements about a former employee

Compensation for career long loss only appropriate in exceptional circumstances

The Court of Appeal has held that when assessing compensation for a discriminatory dismissal, tribunals should award damages only up to the point when it was at least possible that the claimant would find an equivalent job. Only in rare cases where there is no real prospect of the claimant ever obtaining an equivalent job will it be appropriate for tribunals to award career-long compensation.

Key facts

The Claimant brought a race discrimination claim following his unsuccessful application for a promotion. After the employer received the claim the Claimant was called to a meeting on short notice at which he was summarily dismissed. The Claimant successfully brought claims for unfair dismissal and victimisation. The Tribunal assessed the Claimant's loss by reference to the whole of his future career, applying discounts to reflect its findings about the percentage chances of the Claimant (i) leaving his employment in any event and (ii) finding a job with equivalent remuneration by a certain date. The Tribunal also applied the maximum 50% uplift to the award to reflect the employer's failure to comply with the statutory dispute resolution procedures. On appeal the EAT held that the Tribunal should have applied a sliding scale to reflect the increasing likelihood of the Claimant finding a job with equivalent compensation and substituted a 10% uplift for the 50% uplift. Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

The Court of Appeal held that the tribunal had been wrong to assess the Claimant's losses by reference to the whole of his future career. The tribunal ought to have awarded compensation for future loss only up to the point where there was a better than 50% chance that he would have obtained an equivalent job. It would only be appropriate to assess losses by reference to the whole of a claimant's future career in those rare cases where there is no real prospect of the claimant ever obtaining an equivalent job. The maximum 50% uplift would only be appropriate in very exceptional cases and was not justified in this instance.

What this means for employers

The case is reassuring for employers as it emphasises the rarity of cases where career-long losses will be an appropriate basis for assessing compensation. In most cases the tribunal will be required to make a finding as to when the claimant would be likely to get an equivalent job and award compensation only up to that point. Although the statutory dispute resolution procedures have now been repealed, the principle relating to uplifts applies equally to the tribunal's discretion to award an uplift of up to 25% where an employer has unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.

Wardle v Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 545

Disciplinaries and right to a fair hearing

The European Convention on Human Rights provisions on legal representation at internal hearings will only be engaged where the outcome of the proceedings will have a substantial effect on an employee's right to practise their profession. Damage to professional reputation alone will not be sufficient. It was also held that the disciplinary panel need not comprise outside members in order to be independent and impartial.

Key facts

The Claimant, an NHS surgeon, was required to attend a disciplinary hearing following allegations of misconduct, specifically that he had been rude and abusive to fellow staff. The Claimant relied on Article 6 of ECHR on the basis that the hearing could result in his dismissal and damage his professional reputation. He further argued that the disciplinary panel and proposed appeal panel were not independent and impartial so as to comply with Article 6 because they were predominantly made up of members of the NHS Trust (only one of the three disciplinary panel members was from outside the Trust) which he argued would inevitably lead to bias in favour of the Trust.

The decision

The High Court disagreed. There is no general right to reputation and this is not a case in which the effect of the disciplinary proceedings might be to deprive the Claimant of the right to practise his profession. If upheld, the allegations would not themselves prevent him from getting a job elsewhere. Further, even if Article 6 had been engaged, the court stated that it would not have held that the disciplinary panels needed to comprise people external to the Trust in order to comply with the requirement to be independent and impartial.

What this means for employers

The decision in this case is not surprising and follows a number of other recent cases regarding the right to a fair hearing in the context of disciplinary proceedings. Although these cases relate to public sector workers, there are clear parallels between the reasoning in these cases and allegations of serious regulatory breaches in the private sector.

The High Court's comments that the disciplinary panel need not comprise outside members in order to be independent and impartial may give some comfort to employers, particularly small organisations, who find it difficult to identify senior individuals within the organisation to hear a disciplinary or appeal who are genuinely independent/impartial and not aware of the facts surrounding the proceedings.

R (Puri) v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 970

The use of surveillance film in disciplinary proceedings

Where surveillance film is relied upon as evidence of the fairness of an employee's dismissal, footage should be examined by an expert and any investigation should be fairly and thoroughly undertaken.

Key facts

The Claimant was employed by Caterpillar Logistics Services UK as a Warehouse Operative. After suffering an injury in the course of his employment, the Respondent's occupational health doctor accepted that the Claimant was not fit for work as a result. After being advised by occupational health to go to his own GP, the Claimant's sick note was extended. The Respondent's insurers - being suspicious about the accident – arranged for an investigator to follow the Claimant for several days. The resulting footage showed him driving, carrying a small shopping bag, walking his dog and clearing ice from his car. On his return to work, the Claimant attended a meeting to discuss the incident and was suspended on an allegation of gross misconduct for falsely claiming company sick pay. An investigation hearing was held, followed by a disciplinary meeting at which the opinion of the Claimant's GP was heard, having been formed on the basis of a narrative of the footage. The Claimant was dismissed.

The decision

The Claimant alleged that the dismissal was unfair on the basis that the reason for dismissal was not the true and genuine reason and that the investigation had been one-sided and inadequate. The tribunal upheld the claim for unfair dismissal on several grounds. Firstly, it had been the insurance company which had started the procedure, not the Respondent. Secondly, the charge was established before the Claimant was spoken to about his account of the incident. The letter alleging gross misconduct was pre-prepared and handed to the Claimant on his return to work. Thirdly, it was 'completely incomprehensible' that no medical professional had seen the DVD. The decision had been made solely on lay consideration of the evidence. Finally, the advice of the GP who commented on a narrative of the DVD had been 'cherry-picked' by the Respondent and excluded content whereby the doctor praised the Claimant's work absence record and stated that he was genuinely ill.

What this means for employers

The case did not address whether surveillance footage can be used as evidence for a fair dismissal, but rather concentrated on how it could be used legitimately. The employer should ensure that its occupational health doctor, or at least another medical professional, examines the footage in order to provide a valid medical opinion of its contents before any decision is reached. Any investigation should be conducted fairly without any prior conclusions being drawn.

Pacey v Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd ET 3501719/10

Employer negligent in making careless and false statements about a former employee

An employer was liable to a former employee when it negligently made false statements to the employee's current employer that were likely to cause damage to the Claimant.

Key facts

The Claimant had recently started a job at the University of Bath as a director of studies, a role requiring him to liaise with and visit Swindon College, his former employer and the Defendant. Shortly after the Claimant's employment commenced the University of Bath received an email from the Defendant's Human Resources Manager stating that the Defendant would be unable to accept the Claimant on its premises. The email stated that the Defendant had concerns over the safeguarding of its students and that there had been serious staff relationship problems during the Claimant's employment. The email was sent several years after the Claimant left the Defendant's employment and was not a reference. As a result of the email the Claimant was dismissed.

The decision

The Claimant brought a claim for negligent misstatement against the Defendant. At the hearing the Claimant produced strong witness evidence which persuaded the Court that the contents of the email were untrue.

The Claimant argued that this was a reference situation (it being established law that an employer providing a reference owes the employee in question a duty to take reasonable care in its preparation) but the Court disagreed. The Court did find, however, that it was fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care on the Defendant. The damage the Claimant suffered was "eminently forseeable" and the sending of the email brought about the requisite degree of proximity between the Claimant and the Defendant, despite six years having elapsed since the Claimant had been employed by the Defendant. The duty of care in negligent misstatement claims is usually owed to the recipient, rather than the subject, of the information. In this case, however, the Court held that the Defendant owed the Claimant a duty of care in respect of the email and that it was liable to him.

Whilst the Court felt that the University of Bath had acted unfairly in dismissing the Claimant without further enquiries, the Claimant had less than one year's service and therefore could not claim unfair dismissal.

What this means for employers

Whilst it is already established that an employer owes a duty to take reasonable care when preparing a reference for a former employee, this case imposes a similar duty for statements made other than in references. Most employers already have guidance and procedures in place to ensure that references are appropriate and this should be extended to cover all communications regarding former employees.

McKie v Swindon College [2011] EWHC 469 (QB)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.