UK: Claimants In Competition Damages Claims Put To Proof On Causation - Court Of Appeal Upholds CAT Decision In Enron Coal Services v EWS

Last Updated: 17 March 2011
Article by Peter Scott

January 2011


On 19 January 2011 the English Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in Enron Coal Services Ltd v English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd1 - the first damages action to have gone to trial in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). The Court of Appeal confirmed that findings of fact in an infringement decision by a competition authority are binding on a court2 considering a damages claim, but held that this does not mean that a claimant can rely upon a finding that the claimant has been the target of infringing conduct to establish causation. The judgment emphasises that claimants in "follow-on" actions must prove that the infringing conduct has resulted in the loss claimed. This has significant implications for companies looking to recover damages on the back of decisions by the European Commission, the Office of Fair Trading and the UK sectoral regulators, as well as defendants.


The appeal concerned a claim issued in the CAT by Enron's administrators, seeking damages from English, Welsh & Scottish Railway (EWS) for practices on the rail haulage market for coal in Great Britain. The claim followed a decision of the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) that EWS had infringed Article 82 of the EC Treaty (now Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) and the Chapter II Prohibition in the Competition Act 1998 by abusing its dominant position in rail haulage. The ORR's decision stated that EWS's abusive conduct included discriminatory treatment of Enron Coal Services Ltd (ECSL) and that this had placed ECSL at a competitive disadvantage in its contractual negotiations with Edison Mission Energy. The Enron administrators sought to recover damages arguing, among other things, that EWS's conduct had deprived ECSL of the chance of winning a lucrative contract to supply coal to one of Edison's power stations.

As a follow-on action, the claim relied upon the ORR's decision that EWS had infringed competition law to establish liability. The Enron administrators also sought to rely upon the ORR decision to prove causation (i.e. that EWS's abusive conduct in breach of the competition rules had caused ECSL to suffer loss), arguing that causation could be inferred from the ORR's finding that EWS's abusive conduct had put ECSL at a disadvantage and from other statements in the decision that referred to ECSL's business. The Enron administrators asserted that these inferences were binding on the CAT due to section 58 of the Competition Act, which states that a finding of fact by a competition authority3 made in the course of its investigation is binding unless the court decides otherwise.

The CAT decision

The CAT rejected the argument that causation was proved by the ORR's findings, and held that the claim failed. Specifically, the CAT concluded that the ORR's finding of discrimination resulting in competitive disadvantage was not in itself a finding that ECSL had suffered loss. Reviewing the additional evidence put forward by the parties, the CAT did not accept that ECSL had suffered any loss because ECSL had no real or substantial prospect of supplying coal to Edison regardless of EWS's conduct4.

The Enron administrators subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal's decision

The Court of Appeal considered two questions:

  • a broader question concerning the extent to which findings in an infringement decision by a competition authority are subsequently binding on the High Court and the CAT when considering a damages claim that relies upon the decision; and
  • a narrower question concerning whether the claimant could rely upon inferences drawn from the ORR decision to establish that an infringement has caused loss.

On the broader question, the Court of Appeal confirmed that section 58 equally applies to damages claims before both the High Court and the CAT, requiring that findings of fact in an infringement decision are binding, subject only to the court's power to direct that a particular finding shall not be binding. However, for a statement to be binding the party seeking to rely on it must be able to demonstrate that the competition authority has made "a clearly identifiable finding of fact to a given effect". Not every statement in the ORR's decision will be a binding finding of fact, and it is not enough to point to passages in the decision from which a finding of fact might arguably be inferred. An inference that might arguably be made from a statement in the decision could not therefore be a finding that is binding on the court.

Answering the narrower question, the Court of Appeal agreed with the CAT that the ORR's specific reference to ECSL having been at a competitive disadvantage was not sufficient to demonstrate that the infringement established by the ORR's decision had caused ECSL any loss.


The distinction the Court of Appeal has drawn is a fine one. But it is important. It meant that the CAT could not disagree with the finding that ECSL had suffered a disadvantage as the result of EWS's unlawful conduct, but it could not be inferred from this that the disadvantage had result in loss.

The Court of Appeal's judgment emphasises that while claimants in follow-on actions can rely upon an infringement decision for a cause of action on which to base a claim, they will need to adduce clear evidence of causation and loss to recover damages. This means showing that "but for" the infringement a different outcome would have resulted, where the claimant would have been in a more favourable position. It will not be enough to assert that the losses and/or the causal link between the infringement and loss are established by inferences drawn from statements made about market effects in the competition authority's decision.

This case also demonstrates that statements about an infringement being targeted at, or even having effects on, a particular company are not really that helpful in proving that loss has been caused by that conduct. To be binding in a damages case, the competition authority would have to make a finding that the infringement actually caused damage to specific companies. However, this type of conclusion is unlikely to be made in an infringement decision, where findings on specific effects are not generally required for a competition authority to make an infringement finding and impose sanctions.

The failure of the ECSL claim may give cause for potential claimants to think more carefully about whether they can prove causation and loss, before they issue a claim. Relying merely upon assertions drawn from isolated phrases contained in the infringement decision will not be enough.


1. 2011] EWCA Civ 2.

2. Including the CAT.

3. Including one of the UK sector regulators (e.g. Ofcom, the ORR and Ofwat) exercising its competition powers.

4. [2009] CAT 36.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions