UK: Pensions Update

Last Updated: 16 February 2011
Article by Caoimhe O'Neill


  • Nortel/Lehman Brothers decision strengthens regulators powers
  • The Government issues its first CPI Revaluation/Indexation Order
  • Pensions Regulator issues revised guidance on "Inducements" now called "Incentives"
  • Government introduces "Fixed Protection"
  • The Government clarifies its position on abolition of contracting out by defined contribution schemes
  • Government consults on the impact of CPI on private pension schemes
  • End of compulsory annuity purchase at age 75
  • Early Access to pension saving

Nortel/Lehman Brothers decision strengthens Regulators powers

On 10 December the High Court gave its decision on the appeal by the administrators the Lehmans and Nortel Group concerning the validity of the imposition by the Pensions Regulator of Financial Support Directions ("FSD") and Contribution Notices ("CNs") upon companies that were in administration or insolvent liquidation.

The key issue was to establish whether the cost of complying with the FSD or the monetary obligation enforced by a CN is a provable debt (and whether the Regulator stands as another unsecured creditor) or an expense. The Court in particular looked at what priority on insolvency Parliament had intended to give the Regulator when imposing these financial obligations.

The administrators of Lehmans and Nortel had argued that the orders simply created a non-provable claim against the target companies and therefore, could only be payable if there was a surplus available after the full payment to all unsecured creditors. The Regulator argued that the cost of complying with such liabilities was an expense of administration or liquidation.

The Court concluded that where an FSD or CN were imposed on a target company before insolvency started, then this would simply create a provable debt on the insolvency and therefore, the Regulator would stand as an unsecured creditor. However, if the obligation were issued after the commencement of administration/insolvency it could not be a provable debt and therefore would be considered to be an expense of the winding up and take super priority above other creditors.

The case is interesting to note because it appears to suggest that if the Regulator imposes an FSD or a CN upon a party after it commences administration/ insolvency that obligation takes higher priority than if the same obligation had been imposed by the Regulatory prior to the commencement of insolvency. The case clearly suggests that the Regulator is nearly always better off imposing its powers after the commencement of the administration/insolvency process upon a party after it commences rather than before. The Judge stated that that Parliament may want to consider dealing with this discrepancy as it could be perceived that an FSD or CN imposed after the commencement of a winding up is potentially unfair to the targets' other creditors and potentially inconsistent with the decisions taken around the Pensions Act 2004 to not generally elevate employers pension claims over the claims of other creditors. We understand the decision is to be appealed.

The Government issues its first CPI Revaluation/Indexation Order

The Occupational Pension Schemes (Revaluation) Order 2010 has been laid before parliament on 8 December. This Order which deals with increases in pensions in payment and revaluation of deferred pensions by reference to a reference period of 1 January 2010. This is the first Order to calculate the increase by going forward by reference to CPI (the Consumer Prices Index) rather than RPI (the Retail Prices Index).

Pensions Regulator issues revised guidance on "inducements" now called "incentives"

The Guidance itself is designed to address both incentive exercises (such as cash induced transfer requests) and the modification of defined benefits (for example the surrender of non-statutory pension increases). The guidance is an update of the Regulator's previous position set out in its guidance dealing with inducement offers (incentives being the Regulator's preferred word to inducements).

While the Guidance is simply that, Regulator guidance, this version does have a number of areas which suggest that the Regulator is taking a much more pessimistic attitude to such exercises. In particular, the Regulator advises Trustees that their starting position should be that an incentive exercise is not in members' best interests and should therefore be approached cautiously by all parties.

The Guidance sets out the five principles that must be adopted before such exercises should be completed. These are:

  1. Clear, fair and not misleading information
  2. Open and transparent communications
  3. The specific management of conflicts of interest
  4. The Trustees being consulted at all points during the process
  5. Independent financial advice should be recommended, and "in almost all circumstance the structure of the offer should require the member to take financial advice"

While the Guidance is correct that the Regulator does have a duty to protect members' interests, ultimately, whether individuals wish to transfer out of their pension scheme is really a matter for them in exercise of the statutory right to take cash equivalent transfer. However, it is probable that trustees (who are likely to feel bound to comply with the guidance) will take a more cautious approach.

The revised Guidance is therefore likely to make the planning and putting into place of such incentive arrangements more difficult for employers. While we do not believe that ultimately, the guidance can have any impact upon whether companies do seek to put in place incentive schemes, particularly those designed outside of the pension arrangement, it is worth employers and trustees noting the terms of the guidance should they wish to consider such an exercise.

Government introduces "Fixed Protection"

Under the Finance Bill 2011, which will introduce the new lifetime and annual allowances, the Government has confirmed that a new protection regime will enable individuals to take advantage of the current £1.8 million lifetime allowance so long as they accrue no further benefits. Individuals that have already claimed enhanced or primary protection pre-6 April 2006 will be able to rely on the £1.8 million limit.

Therefore, if you have members that fall in this category because they have exceeded the £1.5 million but less than £1.8 million it is worth considering the impact of the Finance Bill on their future pension provision.

The Government clarifies its position on abolition of contracting out by defined contribution schemes.

On 30 November 2010 the DWP issued "Abolition of Contracting Out on a Defined Contribution Basis – Government Response to Consultation on Draft Consequential Legislation".

This paper follows the announcement of 10 March 2010, from the then Labour Government where it confirmed the abolition of contracting out on a defined contribution ("DC") basis with effect from 6 April 2012. Among the key changes the Coalition Government has now suggested it will implement to aid this process are:

  • It will amend legislation to make it clear that any transfer prior to 6 April 2012 involving benefits transferring out of a contracted out defined contribution scheme to a contracted-out salary related scheme will continue to be treated in the receiving scheme as contracted-out rights under section 9(2B) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993.
  • It will amend legislation to make it clear that schemes that are contracted out on a mixed benefits basis would have their certificate automatically amended so that the scheme would only be contracted out on a final salary basis. There was therefore no need to reissue any contracting out certificates. The Government confirmed that any information it will issue between now and April 2012 will heavily emphasise the change in contracting out post April 2012.
  • The Government confirmed that once contracting out on a DC basis is abolished, the certificates will be cancelled and any contracting out rebates accrual will cease on 6 April 2012.
  • The Government confirmed that they will create an exemption from the requirement to inform members within one month of their scheme ceasing to be contracted out on a DC basis and an exemption from the requirement to inform members within four months of the effects of the scheme ceasing to be contracting out where schemes have informed affected members and provided the required information within the year preceding the abolition date of April 2012. This then gives the scheme the ability to inform members of these changes in any regular member communication in the run up to abolition, for example in an annual benefit statement or scheme report.
  • The Government also confirmed that the implications under the Disclosure of Information Regulations should only apply to affected members i.e. members who are in active service that is contracted-out on a DC basis rather than all members.
  • Helpfully the Government have also confirmed that from April 2012 protected rights (the name given to contracted out benefits on a DC basis) shall be treated as ordinary rights under the scheme.
  • Looking at transfers, the Government clarified that because protected rights will no longer exist, any of the existing restrictions which prevent the transfer of protected rights funds will no longer apply.
  • Crucially the Government also confirmed that transfers from defined benefit contracted-out schemes to contracted-in schemes will be allowed post abolition. Safeguards will be included to ensure members are aware of the implications of such a transfer in particular that there will no longer be a requirement to provide a survivors benefit after transfer.
  • Finally, the Government confirmed that survivors of members who died before 6 April 2012 will continue to be considered protected rights and dealt with under the current legislation. Therefore survivor benefits would still need to be provided as under the old rules. However for deaths post 6 April 2012 there is no requirement to provide a survivors pension.

Government consults on the impact of CPI on private pension schemes

On 8 December 2010 the Government commenced its consultation regarding the impact of CPI on private sector pension's schemes. In summary the Government's view is as follows:

  • The Government concluded that it does not propose to introduce legislation to provide a statutory override i.e. legislation that would override schemes rules and require them to apply CPI where RPI or other forms of increase are required. The Government claims this is an unwarranted interference of the rights of employers and trustees to manage their financial affairs.
  • The Government also confirmed it had no plans to interfere with any existing buy-in or buy-out contracts by means of a statutory override where RPI had already been the agreed basis of revaluation.
  • That as GMP increases as calculated by reference to the general level of earnings, the change from RPI to CPI under the Government's Revaluation Order is not relevant. Therefore GMP's will continue to increase by reference to the current mechanism.
  • The Government clarified that the revaluation and indexation legislation does not actually specify that the increase must be by reference to any particular index. Therefore it is the discretion of the Government whether it calculates by reference to RPI, CPI or any other methods selected.
  • The Government acknowledges that without further legislation, any schemes that do not specify the basis of revaluation or state that it will be calculated by reference to overriding legislation can apply CPI straight away.
  • Schemes that specifically apply RPI will only apply CPI where CPI is greater than the RPI increase stated in the relevant scheme's rules.
  • The Government acknowledges that there are schemes where the rate is set by reference to the RPI or such other indexes that may be selected by a party, in which case that party would have the power to select to move to the CPI, subject to any fiduciary duties that may apply.
  • The Government clarified that it will amend the consultation regulations so that any change to the basis of revaluation or indexation would be a listed change requiring consultation "but only where the change would be less generous to members or members of a particular description".
  • It is interesting to note this reference to it "would be less generous" given that a straight change from RPI to CPI is not guaranteed to be less generous, only that historically it has been less generous. This proposed amendment to the consultation regulations is likely therefore to generate quite a few responses during the consultation.
  • However, the government is considering introducing modification powers i.e. powers to allow trustees to make changes to their scheme and to introduce CPI where otherwise there will be restrictions under their scheme rules. The Government states that it is finally balanced on this point and welcomes views.
  • The Government appears to be of the view that introducing such a modification power is likely to be very difficult given their restrictions under Section 67 and the balance of powers of particular schemes.

Such reference to warranted interference and the rights of employers and Trustees somewhat ignores the fact that up till 1997 pension increases were not required under statute in the first place and it was only legislation that provided a requirement to index pensions in the first place rather than agreement between trustees and employers. However, we suspect there is more likely to be issues in relation to human rights law in particular the right to protection of property behind this decision, as well as the political fallback which has led to this decision rather than anything on whether to introduce amendments.

Interestingly, and potentially more boldly for the Government, they suggest that they are considering the possibility that any scheme that has increases calculated by reference to RPI may not be required to provide a CPI underpin in any year where the CPI is higher than the RPI. The Government justifies this potential change on the basis that if RPI is generally expected to exceed RPI, members in schemes that choose to use RPI would be better off over time compared to the schemes that did not and should not benefit essentially from a ratcheting up in any years were these indexes the other way around.

In addition, the effect of not making such a change would be to increase pension costs for schemes and employers, penalising and discouraging those who choose to stick with the RPI.

The Government proposes to make this change by an amendment directly to Section 51(2) of the Pensions Act 1955. Consultation is due to run from 8 December 2010 to 2 March 2011.

End of compulsory annuity purchase at age 75

The Finance Bill 2011 also seeks to end the legal requirement for annuities to be purchased by the age of 75. Under the draft bill, where an individual can prove that he will secure a minimum income through pension benefits of £20,000 per annum he will be able to take advantage of draw down provisions contained within the regulations. However, funds remaining in the individual's pension arrangements on death after the age of 75 will face a 55% tax charge but no inheritance tax will apply. This is designed to avoid individuals using their pension arrangements as tax shelters. Schemes will be provided with overriding powers to make payments under the new legislation even if they are not permitted by their scheme rules.

Early access to pension saving

On 13 December Mark Hoban MP, Financial Secretary to the Treasury kicked off a consultation with the pensions industry with respect to whether allowing individuals early access to their pension saving was both beneficial to the individuals and a way of making pension saving a more attractive option to individuals. Among the concepts being consulted upon are as follows:

  • Is it likely that allowing individuals to draw benefits prior to retirement would be beneficial to overall pension saving and not be outweighed by a decline in overall pension saving.
  • Is it beneficial to allow individuals access to their DC funds held in pension schemes where financial crisis arrives as a result of unemployment or threat of repossession of their home and they have no other liquid savings. However the Government acknowledges that individuals who do not have "spare" money available in case of hardship are also likely for individuals who have no or limited pension saving. Therefore this may not be the solution to the problem.
  • In particular the Government is looking for comments on the following questions:
  1. Would allowing early access to pension saving in situations such as acute hardship help a significant proportion of people in such circumstances?
  2. Is there an argument for early access as a way of promoting intergenerational redistribution of pension's wealth in cases where the pension saver's relatives face financial difficulties?
  3. Would this create a risk for the individual's income on retirement?
  • The models being considered are a loan model: in which the pension scheme would loan money to the individual, permanent withdrawal, under which the individual would be allowed to withdraw certain monies from the pension scheme in limited circumstances permanently; early access to the 25% tax free lump sum and finally a feeder fund model under which other tax free savings such as ISA's could be linked up to the pension scheme for the purposes of.
  • The Government is also looking at other possibilities for being more flexible with the pension tax rules to allow better saving. In particular the Government is also after comments with respect to trivial commutation limit of £18,000 on for all occupational schemes and the £2,000 limit on trivial commutation from individual arrangements. In addition the Government is also consulting with respect to any changes which will allow transfer of pension benefits to be much easier to facilitate.
  • Any individual wishing to make a comment is required to write to the Treasury by 25 February 2011

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Caoimhe O'Neill
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Travers Smith LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Travers Smith LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions