UK: In-House Procurement Not Covered By EU Rules

On 9 February 2011, the Supreme Court issued its judgment in the Brent London Borough Council case, overturning the Court of Appeal on the application of the Teckal exemption for "in-house" procurement.

The Supreme Court held that the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) exemption for in-house contracts in its Teckal judgment did apply to the award of contracts by London local authorities for primary insurance services to a body which was owned, financed and set up by the local authorities for the sole purpose of providing such services to the local authorities.

To view the article in full, please see below:

Full Article


The case centred on whether the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (the 2006 Regulations) applied to a local government shared service vehicle. In 2006 and 2007 various London local authorities set up a shared service vehicle called the London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML).

Under LAML the authorities agreed mutually to insure each other against various classes of risk. The purpose was to reduce the cost of insurance premiums for each authority and improve the standard of risk management generally.

Prior to joining LAML, Brent London Borough Council (Brent) had issued an invitation to tender for the provision of insurance for which Risk Management Partners (RMP) submitted a tender. However, when Brent LBC became a participating member of LAML, it abandoned the procurement procedure. RMP challenged this decision claiming a breach of the 2006 Regulations.

The High Court allowed RMP's claim, ruling that Brent had breached the 2006 Regulations and dismissed its defence that the award of the contract to LAML could be regarded as an in-house award. Brent appealed and its appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. Brent and RMP have subsequently settled the claim for damages.

However, Harrow London Borough Council, another member of LAML, appealed to the Supreme Court on the issue of principle relating to the application of the 2006 Regulations.


The Supreme Court's decision centred on a principle laid down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Teckal srl v Comune de Viano (C107/98) (the "Teckal exemption").

The Teckal exemption provides that, in certain circumstances, the award of a contract by one public body to another separate legal person will not require competitive tender.

The Teckal exemption comprises both a 'control test' and a 'function test'. Firstly, the local authority must exercise control over the person to whom the contract is proposed to be awarded which is similar to that which it exercises over its own departments. Secondly that person must carry out the essential part of its activities with the controlling local authority or authorities.

Supreme Court judgment

The appeal to the Supreme Court concerned three questions in principle:

  1. Does the Teckal exemption apply to the 2006 Regulations at all?
  2. Does the Teckal exemption apply to contracts of insurance?
  3. For the Teckal exemption to apply, must the control which the contracting authority exercises over the contractor be exercised by that authority individually or is it sufficient that it could be exercised collectively, together with other local authorities?

In relation to the first question, the Supreme Court confirmed that the Teckal exemption does apply in English law to the 2006 Regulations.

In response to the second question, the Supreme Court held that the Teckal exemption is available in respect of contracts of insurance. It did not matter that insurance was not a service that the local authority could provide for itself.

In relation to the third question, the Supreme Court held that Directive 2004/18/EC (the "Directive) (which is implemented by the 2006 Regulations) is not intended to protect the commercial sector by forcing public authorities to obtain the services which they need on the commercial market. Rather, its purpose is to ensure that, if public authorities do decide to obtain the services which they need from outside bodies, proper procedures are followed to ensure that potential providers have an opportunity to compete for the work.

The control test

Looking at the control test in more detail, the Supreme Court considered the ECJ case law on the Teckal exemption and concluded that individual control was not necessary. The Supreme Court concluded that it is "irrelevant for the application of the Teckal control test that any single authority does not exert the necessary degree of control by itself. If, taken overall, the control of the body by the authorities that established and finance the body is enough to satisfy the control test, this will be an indication that the body exists to carry out the purposes of the controlling local authorities and so is not to be regarded as an outside body in relation to any of them." Therefore, the argument that individual control is needed is inconsistent with the ECJ's thinking on the rights of local authorities to cooperate.

Applying the control test to this case, the Supreme Court concluded that the participating local authority members of LAML did exercise collective control over LAML that was sufficient to satisfy the Teckal control test. It emphasised certain factors in particular that demonstrated the requisite control:

  • the participating members of LAML appointed all but 2 of a maximum of 11 directors of the LAML board;
  • the participating members had 1 vote each at general meetings;
  • LAML could only offer such insurance as the participating members had agreed at general meetings;
  • the Court of Appeal was wrong to conclude that the nature of LAML's business and the possibly differing interests of different authorities were antithetic to the necessary local authority control. There was collective control over strategic objectives and significant decisions by the participating members at all times;
  • the participating members controlled a service which was designed exclusively for the performance of their public functions. No private interests whatsoever were involved.

The function test

The Supreme Court concluded briefly that the function test is designed to ensure that the Directive always applies unless, in substance, the body concerned only trades with the local authority or authorities, i.e. it is not market-orientated.

Applying this principle to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court held that the Teckal function test was satisfied. It noted that there was no private involvement at all in LAML and that LAML existed only to serve the insurance needs of its members. Finally, the Supreme Court noted that all major contracts for the provision of goods and services to LAML were put out for public tender in accordance with the 2006 Regulations, including its reinsurance contracts.

At a time when budgets are being cut significantly and there is a greater use of shared services by local authorities, this judgment is likely to be welcomed by local authorities.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 11/02/2011.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions