UK: IGAAP Alert: January 2011: IASB Issues Amendments To IAS 12 In Respect Of Investment Properties

Last Updated: 10 February 2011
Article by Deloitte Audit Group

Most Read Contributor in UK, August 2017

In a nutshell

The basic concepts in IAS 39 of fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation are retained in the exposure draft. However, the proposed rules are more relaxed regarding what items can qualify for hedge accounting, what instruments can be designated and the effectiveness testing requirement.

As a result, many hedging relationships that do not currently qualify under IAS 39 would qualify under the ED's proposals.

Please note that the ED proposes a new general hedge accounting model. Proposals for a new portfolio hedge accounting model are expected to be issued separately in 2011.

Contents

  • The proposals
  • Scope
  • Hedged items
  • Hedging instruments
  • Hedge effectiveness
  • Changes to a hedging relationship
  • Fair value hedge accounting
  • Cash flow hedge accounting
  • Disclosures
  • Transition and effective date

The proposals

On 9 December 2010, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published ED/2010/13 Hedge Accounting.

Hedge accounting is the final phase of the project to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The proposals in the ED would allow an entity to mitigate recognition and measurement differences between hedging instruments (e.g., derivatives) and hedged items (e.g., forecast sales) when certain requirements are fulfilled and include many changes to the current requirements, with the aim of better reflecting risk management activities in the financial statements. Many hedging relationships that do not qualify under IAS 39 would qualify under the ED's proposals.

The comment period for the ED ends on 9 March 2011 with a final standard expected in June 2011.

Scope

The ED covers only what the IASB describes as the general hedge accounting model.

A separate ED is expected in 2011 for the portfolio hedge accounting model. It is expected that the ED for the portfolio model will include new proposals for portfolio fair value hedge accounting of interest rate risk (often referred to as the 'macro hedge accounting model'). This will mostly be relevant for financial institutions or corporates with consumer finance operations. The portfolio model is also expected to consider requirements for open-portfolio hedge accounting (i.e., where the hedged items and hedging instruments that are included in the hedging relationship continuously change over time) which may have a wider relevance. The general hedge accounting model includes requirements for hedged items that are closed portfolios of items. For such hedges the hedged items or amounts are specifically identified and designated at inception of the hedge, with any changes accounted for in the same way as for hedging relationships of single hedged items.

This ED does not propose any specific changes to the accounting for hedging a net investment in a foreign operation, commonly referred to as 'net investment hedges'. However, the proposed changes to the hedge effectiveness testing requirements apply to all hedging relationships and therefore would also be relevant when testing the effectiveness of a net investment hedge.

Hedged items

The proposals would make more types of hedged items eligible for hedge accounting.

Hedging a derivative with a derivative

A combination of an exposure and a derivative could be designated jointly as a hedged item. This proposed rule change acknowledges that in practice an aggregate or 'synthetic' exposure, which includes a derivative, may be hedged with a further derivative. This can arise for a variety of reasons but is usually because an entity hedges different risks at different points in time.

For example, consider an entity that has a forecast purchase requirement of a commodity denominated in a foreign currency (FC1). That entity may hedge the commodity price risk, in FC, two years in advance, fixing the price at say FC100 per unit. A year later, it may wish to hedge the currency risk. At that point, the 'hedged item' would be the forecast purchase and the commodity derivative (i.e., the aggregate or synthetic foreign currency exposure of its purchase of commodities at FC100 per unit). Under the ED, the aggregate exposure would be an eligible hedged item whereas under current IAS 39 it is not.

Observation

The ED does not require the original hedge to be in a hedging relationship nor does it require all hedges of a single exposure to be of the same kind (i.e., the original hedge could be a fair value hedge and the subsequent hedge of the aggregate exposure could be a cash flow hedge). Furthermore, it does not limit the number of combinations of hedges and whether any of the subsequent hedges can reverse any of the original hedges. This could give rise to some complex hedge accounting scenarios.

Hedging risk components

The ED aligns the requirements for eligible risk components for both financial and non-financial items. Risk components of any item would be eligible for hedge accounting provided that the risk component is:

  • separately identifiable;
  • reliably measurable.

Under current IAS 39, this flexibility is available for financial items, whereas for non-financial items (e.g., a forecast commodity purchase) only foreign currency risk is an eligible risk component. The ED includes guidance and presents examples of situations where these conditions are satisfied.

For example, if the rentals in an operating lease are contractually linked to inflation, and the inflation component is considered 'separately identifiable and reliably measurable' then inflation would be an eligible risk component of the hedged item.

Observation

When a risk component is contractually specified, for example, an entity has a firm commitment to buy an item based on a specified pricing formula where parts of that price are linked to other prices or indices, it is easier to isolate part of that purchase price and designate only that component. Where a risk component is not contractually specified, for example, an entity has a forecast transaction to buy an item at future market prices, it is harder to isolate parts of that market price into identifiable and measurement components.

Equity investments designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income

When IFRS 9 was issued in November 2009, it introduced the 'fair value through other comprehensive income' (FVTOCI) category for certain equity investments. All fair value changes are permanently recognised directly in other comprehensive income (OCI) except for dividends received on the investment. As all gains or losses recognised in OCI are never reclassified to profit or loss (ie not even in the event of sale or impairment) the ED prohibits hedge accounting from being applied to these investments.

Observation

A holding of a foreign equity investment designated as at FVTOCI could not be designated in a hedge accounting relationship for equity price risk or foreign exchange risk. The dividend income recognised in profit or loss could, however, be eligible for hedge accounting of foreign exchange risk if the other qualifying criteria are met (e.g., highly probable assertion).

Groups and net positions

The ED permits groups of individually eligible hedged items to be hedged collectively as a group, provided the group of items is managed together for risk management purposes. Such groups may be net positions (i.e., items with offsetting fair values or cash flows). However, for a cash flow hedge of a net position (i.e., a group of items with offsetting cash flows), the offsetting cash flows exposed to the hedged risk, must affect profit or loss in the same, and only in that, reporting period.

Examples of net positions that would be eligible include:

  • A group of firm purchase commitments and sale commitments hedged together for foreign exchange risk.
  • A group of fixed rate assets and fixed rate liabilities fair value hedged together for interest rate risk using one or more interest rate swaps.
  • A group of recognised floating rate assets and floating rate liabilities cash flow hedged together for interest rate risk using one or more interest rate swap (assuming interest is accrued in profit or loss at the same time).
  • A group of forecast sales and forecast expenses that affect profit or loss in the same reporting period (e.g., quarterly reporting period if the entity prepares quarterly interim financial statements) hedged together for foreign exchange risk using a single forward foreign exchange contract.

Examples of net positions that would not be eligible include:

  • A group of forecast sales and forecast expenses that affect profit or loss in different reporting periods hedged with a single forward foreign exchange contract.

When an entity hedges a net position that affects different line items in the income statement, any hedging instrument gains or losses recognised in profit or loss must be presented in a separate line item from the items that are hedged.

Hedging instruments

The ED expands the types of financial instruments that would be eligible for treatment as hedging instruments to include any financial instrument, other than a net written option, that is measured at fair value through profit or loss. This includes financial instruments that are required to be classified as at fair value through profit or loss as well as those designated as at fair value through profit or loss under the fair value option.

Additionally, for a hedge of foreign currency risk, a financial asset or financial liability measured at amortised cost could be an eligible hedging instrument. Derivatives embedded in financial assets are not separately accounted for under IFRS 9. As a result, embedded derivatives in financial assets accounted for under IFRS 9 are not eligible hedging instruments in their own right. However, a financial asset that contains an embedded derivative may be an eligible hedging instrument in its entirety if it is classified as at fair value through profit or loss and it is not a net written option.

Financial options

The ED does not propose any change to the eligibility criteria for financial options as hedging instruments. However, a change to the accounting for the time value of an option when only the intrinsic value of the option is designated in a hedge is proposed. A two step approach to accounting for the time value of such an option is proposed.

The accounting would be similar to the accounting for hedging instruments designated in a cash flow hedge.

The first step would be to defer in OCI (over the term of the hedge) an amount of the fair value change of the time value component. This amount would be determined with reference to a hypothetical option that has matched terms to the hedged item. The second step of the accounting would be to reclassify amounts from equity to profit or loss. The basis of this reclassification depends on the nature of the hedged item which will be either:

  • transaction related; or
  • time period related.

For transaction related hedged items the cumulative change in fair value deferred in OCI would be recognised in profit or loss at the same time as the hedged item. If the hedged item first gives rise to the recognition of a nonfinancial asset or non-financial liability (or becomes a firm commitment for which fair value hedge accounting is applied) the amount from equity would be reclassified to the statement of financial position and recorded as part of the initial carrying amount of the hedged item. This amount would be recognised in profit or loss at the same time as the hedged item affects profit or loss in accordance with the normal accounting for the hedged item.

For time period related hedged items, ie where the option hedges an item for the period the option is outstanding, the amount of the original time value of the option that relates to the hedged item (determined with reference to a hypothetical option with terms that match the hedged item) is amortised from equity to profit or loss on a rational basis over the term of the hedging relationship.

Internal derivatives

As with IAS 39, the ED proposes that only contracts with a party external to the reporting entity be available for designation as hedging instruments.

Observation

If an entity lays-off the net risk from internal derivatives with external derivatives, it may overcome this restriction by designating the group of hedged items hedged by the internal derivatives in a group hedge with the external derivatives. The ED changes the eligibility criteria applicable for hedges of groups of items permitting more groups (including net positions) to qualify than under IAS 39.

Hedge effectiveness

Effectiveness threshold: other than accidental offset

For a hedge to qualify for hedge accounting, certain criteria must be fulfilled. Some of the criteria continue to relate to the effectiveness of the hedging relationship.

The ED replaces the current requirement for a hedge to be 'highly effective' (defined in IAS 39 as giving rise to offset of between 80 to 125 per cent) in order for it to be eligible for hedge accounting. Instead, the ED requires only that a hedging relationship must achieve 'other than accidental offset'.

For example, consider an entity that hedges the fair value risk associated with changes in the benchmark interest rate component of a fixed rate loan using a fixed to variable interest rate swap. The fixed leg of the swap closely matches the terms of the hedged item, and hence, the entity can expect the hedge to achieve other than accidental offset. However, if subsequent to the entity entering into the hedge, there were a severe deterioration in the credit rating of the swap counterparty, subsequent offset may be merely accidental because of the magnified effect of credit risk on the fair value of the derivative which is not replicated in the hedged item.

Observation

There is no definition of 'other than accidental offset' or a defined level of offset, or level of correlation between the hedged item and instrument. Hence, judgement will have to be applied to determine whether a hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting.

Objective of the hedge effectiveness assessment

In addition to the 'other than accidental offset' requirement the hedging relationship would also have to 'meet the objective of the hedge effectiveness assessment'. This objective is to minimise expected hedge ineffectiveness. An entity would have to determine the appropriate weightings of its hedged item and its hedging instrument that minimises hedge ineffectiveness. The weightings should not give rise to deliberate hedge ineffectiveness.

Observation

This is not a requirement to use the hedging instrument that minimises hedge ineffectiveness. For example, an entity may have a hedging instrument that it considers will result in an acceptable degree of offset even though other instruments could be available in the market that would make the degree of offset higher. The entity's hedging instrument can be designated, but it must be designated in such a way as to minimise expected hedge ineffectiveness for the given hedging relationship.

Quantitative vs qualitative analysis

In order to determine whether a hedging relationship satisfies the hedge effectiveness requirements (of achieving 'other than accidental offset' and meeting the 'objective of hedge effectiveness assessment', see above) an entity may need to perform some quantitative analysis. However, this is not a specific requirement of the proposals. In some cases a qualitative assessment may be sufficient to determine that a hedging relationship qualifies.

For example, consider an entity that hedges a forecast purchase of a particular grade of a commodity. However, forward contracts over this grade are not readily available and hence, to hedge its exposure the entity uses a forward contract referenced to a different 'benchmark' grade. This gives rise to basis risk. The benchmark grade is not a component of the grade of the commodity that the entity is buying. The entity is aware of, and accepts, that the quantum of this basis risk can vary. The entity would have to determine the appropriate weighting (i.e., amount) of the hedged item to designate against the forward contract so as to minimise the expected impact of basis risk between the two grades. A quantitative analysis would likely need to be performed by the entity.

Observation

Judgement will be required to determine whether, and what type of, quantitative analysis is required to determine whether a hedging relationship meets the hedge effectiveness requirements.

Frequency of assessments

The hedge effectiveness requirements are forward looking. An entity would have to determine that a hedging relationship meets the hedge effectiveness requirements at inception of the hedging relationship and then on an ongoing basis. At a minimum, this would be at each reporting date or upon a significant change in the circumstances affecting the effectiveness of the hedging relationship.

'Prospective test' vs 'retrospective test'

Under IAS 39, in addition to the forward looking assessment (usually referred to as the 'prospective test') a further backward looking 'retrospective test' is required to determine whether hedge accounting can be applied. Under the ED, a retrospective test is not required for qualification purposes. Therefore, unlike IAS 39, a designation would not fail hedge accounting in a period simply because the hedge was not as effective as it was originally hoped.

For hedge accounting to be applied for the next reporting period, an entity would still have to determine that it satisfies the hedge effectiveness requirements on a forward looking basis at the reporting date.

Measurement of hedge ineffectiveness

As with IAS 39 any hedge ineffectiveness would have to be measured (using a quantitative analysis) and immediately recognised in profit or loss.

Changes to a hedging relationship

The ED provides guidance on how changes to a hedging relationship are accounted for. Changes to a hedging relationship may arise, for example, for one or more of the following reasons:

  • a change in the risk management objective;
  • a change in the expectation of hedge effectiveness;
  • a change to the hedged item; or
  • a change to the hedging instrument.

When there is a change in the risk management objective for a hedging relationship, or a hedge is no longer expected to achieve other than accidental offset, that hedging relationship would have to be discontinued.

In cases where there is a change in expectation of hedge effectiveness, a change in the weightings of the hedged item and hedging instrument may be required in order to continue to comply with 'the objective of hedge effectiveness assessment' (see above).

This could arise for a variety of reasons. For example, the expected behaviour of the basis risk that is known to exist in a hedging relationship may change part way through the term of the hedge.

The change in weightings is referred to as a 'rebalancing' of the hedging relationship. This could give rise to an increase or decrease in the weightings of either the hedged item or hedging instrument. The ED proposes that such changes should not be treated as a de-designation of the original hedging relationship and re-designation of a new 'rebalanced' hedging relationship. Instead, the part of the hedging relationship that remains after 'rebalancing' would be treated as a continuing hedge, with the part that is no longer hedged after rebalancing treated as a discontinued hedge.

Observation

It is mandatory for an entity to rebalance a hedging relationship if without doing so an entity would fail to continue to meet the objective of the hedge effective assessment.

A change in a hedging relationship may also be required when there is a change in the eligibility of part of the hedged item. For example, consider a cash flow hedge of a highly probable forecast purchase of 100 units of a commodity. If during the hedging relationship the entity's purchase requirements change such that now only 90 units are highly probable, the hedging relationship in respect of the 10 units is no longer eligible. To accommodate this change, hedge accounting for 10 units of the hedged item is (mandatorily) discontinued whilst the remaining 90 units continue to be designated with no change.

Observation

Removal of the formal de-designation and re-designation of a hedging relationship when only part of the relationship changes would avoid some of the accounting anomalies that have arisen with IAS 39. For example, in a cash flow hedge, it can avoid the resetting of the hypothetical derivative used to measure the hedged item and consequently would in some cases reduce the amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognised compared with IAS 39 (i.e., the nominal amount of the original hypothetical derivative is reduced to match the hedged item without a 'reset' of its terms). Also, for a fair value hedge where part of the hedged item continues to be hedged with the original hedging instrument, avoiding a formal de-designation can avoid premature amortisation of the fair value hedge adjustment (relating to the hedged item that continues to be hedged) in profit or loss (eg in a fair value hedge of fixed rate debt where only part of the debt is no longer hedged).

Dedesignation of existing hedges

When there has been no change to a designated hedging relationship, and the risk management objective for the hedge remains the same, an entity would not be permitted to discontinue voluntarily hedge accounting. This is a change to the IAS 39 model where an entity can de-designate a hedging relationship (prospectively) if it chooses to.

Fair value hedge accounting

The ED proposes a change to the presentation of fair value hedges in the financial statements.

In the statement of financial position, the fair value hedge adjustment (which represents the change in fair value of the hedged item for changes in the hedged risk) would be presented in a separate line item next to the hedged item whereas under IAS 39 the hedge adjustment is recorded as part of the carrying value of the hedged item (resulting in a potential mix of amortised cost and fair value measurement). The presentation proposed by the ED preserves the original measurement basis for the hedged item by segregating any fair value measurement.

The other proposed change in presentation of fair value hedges is to recognise the gain or loss on the hedging instrument and hedged item (for changes in the hedged risk) in OCI, with any hedge ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss. This is different from IAS 39 where all amounts are recognised in profit or loss.

Example

The fair value risk of a fixed rate loan liability issued at par of €100,000 is hedged with a receive fixed, pay float interest rate swap. The hedge is designated from the issue date of the loan which is the beginning of an annual reporting period and all interest is settled at the end of the reporting period. The gain on the swap at the end of the year is €5,000. This partially offsets the fair value loss on the loan of €6,000 (i.e., hedge ineffectiveness is €1,000).

Under the proposals, the financial statements for the first year of the hedge would include the following line items and balances. The line item descriptions are for illustrative purposes only.

Observation

In order to preserve the measurement basis of hedged items in a fair value hedge, additional line items will be required in the statement of financial position. The amounts in these line items will require tracking to ensure they are derecognised at the same time as the item to which they relate.

Cash flow hedge accounting

Lower of test

For measuring hedge ineffectiveness for a cash flow hedge, the ED retains the 'lower of test'. That is, the cumulative change in fair value of the hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that can be deferred in equity, is the lower of:

  • the cumulative gain or loss of the hedging instrument from inception of the hedge; and
  • the cumulative change in fair value (present value) of the hedged item from inception of the hedge.

Basis adjustment

When a forecast transaction in a cash flow hedge results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a nonfinancial liability it is proposed that an entity should be required to apply a 'basis adjustment'. That is, an entity would remove the amount that has been accumulated in the cash flow hedge reserve and recognise it as part of the recognised asset or liability. This would also apply to cases where a forecast transaction in a cash flow hedge becomes a firm commitment that an entity chooses to fair value hedge (i.e., the amount deferred in OCI in respect of the hedge would be reclassified to a line item in the statement of financial position which would subsequently have fair value hedge adjustments posted to it).

This represents a change to the requirements under IAS 39 where an entity has a choice as to whether to basis adjust or to retain the accumulated gain or loss in equity and only reclassify to profit or loss when the hedged item affects profit or loss (e.g., when the asset arising from the hedged forecast transaction is depreciated through profit or loss).

Disclosures

The disclosure requirements in the ED focus on presenting information on:

  • an entity's risk management strategy;
  • the effects of an entity's risk management activities on the amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows; and
  • the effect that hedge accounting has on the primary financial statements.

It is proposed that disclosures be disaggregated by risk category on the basis of risks that an entity decides to hedge and for which hedge accounting is applied. The proposals require quantitative disclosures of risk exposures and amounts hedged. The ED also includes a requirement for disclosures, in a tabular format, that provide information about the amounts included in the primary financial statements that are a result of hedge accounting.

Observation

Under these proposals the effects of hedge accounting on the financial statements will be more prominent and transparent.

Transition and effective date

When finalised, the hedge accounting requirements will form part of IFRS 9. An entity that wishes to adopt the new hedge accounting requirements may only do so if at the same time it adopts (or has already adopted) the other requirements of IFRS 9.

The effective date of the proposals, if finalised, would be for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 with earlier application permitted although IFRS 9 will be subject to endorsement for use in the EU. Application of the standard would be prospective. To apply hedge accounting under the new model from the date of adoption of the standard all the qualifying criteria must be met as at that date.

On adoption of the new requirements, any hedging relationships designated under IAS 39, that also qualify under the new model, shall be treated as continuing hedging relationships.

Observation

The qualifying criteria for a hedging relationship are different under the new proposals. An entity wishing to continue to apply hedge accounting post-adoption of the new requirements will need to ensure processes are in place to migrate appropriately hedging relationships that exist under IAS 39. Failure to comply with the requirements by the date of adoption will prevent hedge accounting from being applied from that date. Any hedge designation post adoption shall be treated as a new hedging relationship (i.e., failure to comply with the new hedge accounting requirements in time for adoption can cause a break in the hedging relationship which can trigger the amortisation of previous fair value hedge adjustments or reset the hypothetical derivative used in a cash flow hedge).

Footnotes

1 In this document FC is used for units of foreign currency and CU is used for units of functional currency of an entity.

2 The interest expense line will include the fixed interest payable on the loan and an amount equivalent to the net interest accrual on the interest rate swap.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.