UK: Advocate General Gives Opinion On Exhaustion Of Rights

Last Updated: 6 June 2001
Article by Sahira Khwaja


On 5 April 2001, Advocate General Stix-Hackl delivered her Opinion (available at on the questions referred to the European Court of Justice by the English High Court in Davidoff, Levi Strauss v Tesco and Levi Strauss v Costco & Others. The ECJ, which usually follows its Advocate General's Opinions, will deliver its full judgment later this year.

These cases raised once again the problem of the principle of exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark under Article 7 of the EC Trade Marks Directive, in the context of parallel imports, and the interpretation of the concepts of consent and legitimate reasons of the owner of the trade mark to oppose marketing of trade marked goods in the EEA.

In 1998, in Silhouette v Hartlauer [1998] ECR I-4799, the ECJ had held that a trade mark owner could prevent the importation of goods into the EEA if he had not "consented" to the imports. The Court elaborated on this in Sebago v. GB Unic SA [1999] ECR I-4103, holding that trade mark rights were only exhausted if the trade mark owner had consented to the placing on the market in Europe of each item.

In an English case, Zino Davidoff SA v. A&G Imports [1999] 3 All ER 711, Davidoff sold or consented to the sale of genuine Davidoff perfume and aftershave, which bore its registered trade marks, in Singapore. Bar codes, containing source information, had been affixed to the products in accordance with Davidoff's obligations under the EC Cosmetics Directive.

A&G Imports Limited bought the goods and somewhere along the distribution chain, the bar codes were removed. When Davidoff sued for trade mark infringement, A&G alleged that Davidoff had impliedly consented to the importation of the goods into the EEA. Laddie J concurred, and held that, unless express instructions confirming that no such consent had been given were imposed on all parties in the distribution chain, Davidoff was presumed to have consented. Nevertheless, he decided that the proper construction of aspects of Articles 7(1) and (2) had not been determined and so referred a set of extremely detailed questions to the ECJ. ([2000] 2 CMLR 750).

In two unrelated trade mark infringement cases, Levi Strauss & Co and its licensee had refused to supply jeans bearing its marks to the UK's leading supermarket chain, Tesco, or to Costco UK Ltd, a membership-only discount warehouse chain. Tesco and Costco accordingly obtained them from other suppliers, including some who sourced their goods from North America, and none of whom stipulated where the goods could be sold.

Tesco and Costco both argued that they had an unlimited right to sell the jeans wherever they wished, whilst Levi Strauss said that it had imposed contractual restrictions on the resale of the jeans in North America, effectively prohibiting their importation into the EEA. Again, the English High Court decided that the cases raised fundamental questions on the meaning of "consent" in Article 7(1) and referred the matter to the ECJ (OJ 2000 C79 18/03/2000), which decided to join the three cases.

Article 7 Of The Directive

The concept of exhaustion of rights is spelled out in Article 7(1), which states that:

"The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit its use in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent."

The effect of Article 7(1) can be negated by Article 7(2) where:

"there exist legitimate reasons for the proprietor to oppose further commercialisation of the goods, especially where the condition of the goods is changed or impaired after they have been put on the market."

In Davidoff, Laddie J had decided that consent within the meaning of Article 7(1) should be construed on the basis of the law applicable to the first contract in the distribution chain. The Advocate General initially rejected this argument because of the practical difficulties it would cause. She also thought that such an approach was contrary to the directly stated objectives of the Directive as it was likely to re-import international exhaustion and impede the harmonisation of European trade mark laws. "Consent" should therefore be interpreted under Community law rather than under the relevant national law governing a particular contract.

The Advocate General then reviewed the case law concerning the condition of consent in relation to exhaustion of rights. She concluded that, as Article 7(1) draws a distinction between the marketing of goods by the trade mark proprietor or with his consent, "consent" must be more than the expression of legal intent necessary to conclude a contract. Consent is the action attributed to the trade mark proprietor which allows the legal consequences arising from exhaustion to take effect and which prevents him impeding the free movement of goods by artificially partitioning the market. The aim of the Community's national courts should be to determine objectively whether consent was given, although this is subject to the condition that he had or could have had an opportunity to exercise his right to first market the goods bearing the trade mark within the EEA.

This right should however be balanced against general commercial interests, including those of the parallel importer. Consent under Article 7(1) solely relates to this exclusive right and control over marketing so that the proprietor should only be able to counter parallel imports if he had not yet exercised his exclusive right to control marketing of the goods within the EEA or had been unable to do so. A third party cannot therefore assume that the proprietor has consented to goods being placed on the market or has waived his right to do so, although he will not be protected if he has simply failed to act.

In order to determine whether the proprietor had exercised consent or had been given an opportunity to do so, it was crucial to determine who was responsible for the distribution chain. The national court, having regard to Community law, would have to balance the requirements of free movement of goods against the need to protect the trade mark and examine whether the trade mark proprietor’s conduct, in all the circumstances of the case, could sufficiently justify a subsequent purchaser’s belief that the proprietor had waived the exercise of his trade mark rights in the EEA. The court would then have to consider its conclusion against the principle of Community wide exhaustion rights set out in Article 7(1) so that it was not made practically impossible for the trade mark proprietor to rely on his exclusive right to first marketing in the EEA.

Batch/Bar Codes And Article 7(2)

The Court was also asked by the English High Court in Davidoff whether there were circumstances in which the removal or obliteration of a batch code number affixed to a product in pursuance of a statutory obligation could be treated as a "legitimate reason" within the meaning of Article 7(2).

In Davidoff, the batch code numbers had been damaged or erased so that it would be more difficult for Davidoff to trace the goods. The Advocate General considered that "legitimate reasons" in the context of Article 7(2) would mean that further sales of the goods bearing the trade mark would affect the essential function of the trade mark in a way that the trade mark proprietor could not be expected to tolerate. Such sales must be liable to damage seriously the value, allure or image of the trade mark.

The Advocate General concluded that, in the absence of other repackaging or relabelling, damage to bar codes would only be relevant if it had a disproportionately adverse effect on the specific subject matter of the trade mark. This was the only case where an infringement of the EC Cosmetics Directive would be directly relevant to trade mark rights although the Advocate General thought that the position might be different if such an infringement imposed criminal liability on the trade mark proprietor.


Brand owners who felt that the English Courts' attitude was out of step with other jurisdictions, may take some comfort from this Opinion. In Davidoff & Joop v M&S Toiletries Ltd [2000] 2 CMLR 750, on facts almost identical to those in the English Davidoff case, the Scottish court reached the opposite, and perhaps more orthodox, conclusion and was altogether less tolerant of parallel importers' efforts to demonstrate consent. An appeal against this decision was unfortunately abandoned on 29 May 2001, just before it was due to be heard, and so the Advocate General's Opinion will not now be tested until the ECJ issues its judgment later this year.

Until then, brand owners would be wise to review their standard terms and conditions to check that they have not consented, or apparently waived their right to consent, to the importation of trade marked goods in to the EEA. Parallel importers should assess critically whether they will be able to prove that such consent, or a waiver equivalent to it, was given.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.