UK: Recent Developments In Money Laundering

Last Updated: 20 January 2011
Article by Peter Binning and Charles Elton

This article first appeared in Money Laundering Bulletin, December 2010

There have been two cases of significant interest to practitioners in the field of criminal litigation and money laundering compliance in 2010. The first, in February, was the case of Shah v HSBC Private Bank (UK) about the remedies available to a customer faced with a bank failing to carry out instructions and the second, in July, was the case of R v Geary, in which the Court of Appeal gave some useful guidance on the interpretation "criminal property" for the purposes of "arrangements" under section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).

Defining the scope of 'criminal property' for the purposes of Part 7 of POCA 2002

The issue before the Court of Appeal in R v Geary [2010] EWCA Crim 1925 was the scope of the words 'criminal property' in the context of section 328 POCA 2002.

Section 328(1) reads:

'A person commits an offence if he enters into or becomes concerned in an arrangement which he knows or suspects facilitates (by whatever means) the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person.'

The issue before the court was whether, for the purposes of section 328, property could be construed as 'criminal property' if it was only rendered so by the very 'arrangement' itself.

In Geary, H sought to launder with G money acquired through fraudulent means. G was to hold the money for a short while, spend some of it and then return to H the goods bought and the balance. H lied to G about the provenance of the money, spinning G the yarn that the purpose of the arrangement was to conceal H's matrimonial assets from his soon-to-be-ex-wife. G entered the arrangement on this premise. The basis of G's guilty plea at trial formed the subject of his appeal. G asserted that the mental element of the offence had not been satisfied, because he did not know or suspect that he was dealing with 'criminal' property. It is important to remember, as Moore-Bick LJ made clear at the beginning of his judgment, that the issue in the case was the mens rea, even if much of the argument centred on the actus reus.

The Crown's case was that the mental requirement was satisfied since G had knowingly entered a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and/or defraud H's wife, thereby giving the money, in effect, a second layer of criminality. Alternatively, the Crown argued that, developing the conspiracy line of thought, the money became criminal property (for the purposes of G's mental state) when the money was first handed to G and the offence was satisfied only subsequently when G returned it to H.

The court favoured the appellant's argument, thus opting for a narrow interpretation of section 328. The rationale was that the natural and ordinary meaning of the section led to the conclusion that, for the offence to be complete, the property in question must already have become criminal property before the arrangement begins to operate on it:

'In each case the natural meaning of the statutory language is that in each case the property in question must have become criminal property as a result of some conduct which occurred prior to the act which is alleged to constitute the offence.'

The corollary effect of the court's strict approach to section 328 was that G's defence was that he had intended to commit a different crime of dishonesty. No doubt therefore there will be some who think that the court should have decided on policy grounds to take a more expansive view of 'criminal property'.

Militating against a policy decision are the court's obiter remarks that the Crown's argument that G could have been properly 'charged with an offence of converting or transferring criminal property contrary to section 327(1)(c) or (d). The difficulty with these comments is that they operate on the basis that the money G used and returned to H became 'criminal property' when H first gave it to him: an argument expressly rejected by the court deciding the principal matter of the ambit of section 328.

The court has come in for further criticism from the Law Society, who in a recent online publication suggested that the court had failed in its attempt not to stray from the provisions in the statute. The substance of the Law Society's critique is that the court, at paragraph 15, erroneously created an extra limb for the mental element of an offence under section 328:

'There are two aspects to the mental element of the offence [...]: first, the defendant must intentionally or recklessly enter into an arrangement which facilitates the acquisition, retention etc. of criminal property by or on behalf of another person; second, he must know or suspect that the arrangement will have that effect.'

The Law Society make the point that the intention/recklessness criterion, although a constituent element of the offence under international law, was deliberately removed from the draft Bill.1 This goes further to highlight the imbalance between the gold-plated approach taken by the UK government to anti-money laundering legislation compared to many other countries, including most of the European Union and the USA.

Challenging a Suspicious Activity Report

If a bank knows or suspects that a transaction request concerns criminal property, it must disclose a suspicious activity report (SAR) to the authorities; otherwise, criminal liability under sections 328 and 330 may be incurred. There is an inevitable delay while the authorities perform their background checks. In Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 31; [2010] Bus LR 1514 , the appellant had lost c.$638.5m as a result of the delays that resulted from the bank making section 338 disclosures to SOCA. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that the appellant had to be kept largely in the dark of the reason behind the delays, given the stringency of the 'tipping-off' provisions.

Following Shah, there are three mechanisms by which the customer can seek redress from the bank making a disclosure:

  • Challenging whether there was a basis for the bank's suspicion in the first place;
  • Alleging breach of duty by the bank in not making disclosure as soon as reasonably possible.
  • Alleging the bank breached its duty as agent to keep its principal informed.

In relation to challenging the basis for the suspicion, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial judge's finding that the customer might need to adduce evidence of bad faith on the part of the bank if he is to avoid the prospect of summary judgment. The court reasoned that the burden is on the bank to demonstrate its suspicion, and there is no reason why the customer should not be able to put the bank to proof on that. The court went on to say that the evidence provided by HSBC in Shah would not have sufficed for these purposes, the bank having provided a witness statement on behalf of the bank's solicitor who attested to the bank's general disclosure policy and the mere fact that a relevant suspicion had been held.

The overall intention behind the decision in Shah was to deter banks from making unnecessary disclosures out of an excess of caution. The extent to which the deterrence will adjust bank behaviour is unclear, as Professor Stanton2 has observed:

'...the view was that a stage would be reached in the proceedings at which the customer was entitled to information about the handling of his affairs. No indication was given as to the extent of the duty...'

Stanton is of the view that the decision will have limited effect for three reasons; first, the low threshold set out for proving suspicion in R v Da Silva [2006] EWCA Crim 1654; [2007] 1 WLR 303, where it was held that the suspicion need not be based on reasonable grounds; second, the risk of attracting criminal liability in the event of non-disclosure will continue to weigh heavily on the banks; third, it will be hard for a customer to prove that the breach of a professional duty of care is attributable to the institution's delay as opposed to the effect of the statute. Thus, while banks may make more effort in terms of documenting their statutory compliance, it does not follow that there will be a substantive change in banks' decision-making processes.

Still, before reaching the conclusion that financial institutions in the UK have in effect, to borrow from Longmore LJ in Shah, 'carte blanche' to do as they please, it should be recognised that, in terms of money laundering at least, Britain's financial sector is amongst the most tightly regulated anywhere. This can be discerned from the paper3 recently published by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the inter-governmental body whose Recommendations are regarded as the international authority on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards. The paper refers, for instance, to a possible extension to Recommendation 13 so that private sector banks would have to report transactions where there was a suspicion of tax crime. The first point is that, in the UK at least, such a transaction is already covered by current reporting requirements. The second point is that the UK not only adopts Recommendation 13 almost verbatim already but also attaches the possibility of a penal sanction. Moreover, the Recommendation only goes so far as to say that the 'financial institution...should be required, directly by law or regulation, to report promptly its suspicions to the financial intelligence unit.' No requirement to impose a criminal penalty for failure to report is made.

Self reporting and Suspicious Activity Reports

In case it was ever unclear, the SFO has now published guidance which states in no uncertain terms that a SAR on its own does not amount to a self report for their purposes. Thus, in the event of a corporate making a SAR about the receipt of funds which it suspects may be the proceeds of a corruptly obtained contract, this would not be sufficient to count in the corporate's favour as far as the SFO is concerned. They will assume that the corporate has chosen not to self report.4

This guidance must be considered when advising on matters relating to other agencies from HMRC to the FSA. If there is a potential problem with any aspect of a transaction but for whatever reason a decision is taken not to self report in spite of a SAR being filed, care is needed both with the drafting of the SAR as well as any communication that may be made short of a self report to the relevant enforcement agency.

Other developments

It was not a surprise that the Supreme Court declined to restrict the ability of the FSA to prosecute money laundering cases. In the case of R v Rollins [2010] UKSC 39, the court held that the FSA had always been able to bring any prosecution subject to statutory restrictions and conditions, and provided that it was permitted to do so by its memorandum and articles of association. Another similar challenge had met the same fate at an earlier stage in the appeals process and we must now wait to see whether the government decide to make the sweeping changes they have spoken of and form a new Economic Crime Authority to take over all prosecutions for serious fraud and related matters. As things stand, any major change involving substantial investment looks very unlikely.


1. See e.g. Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime Strasbourg, 8.XI.1990 article 6; UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 200O article 6.

2. Professor of Law, Bristol University, Professional Negligence Case Comment 2010, 26(1) 56-59

3. 'The Review of the Standards – Preparation for the 4th Round of Mutual Evaluations (October 2010),


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Corker Binning is a law firm specialising in fraud, regulatory litigation and general criminal work of all types. For further information go to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions