UK: Empty Second Charge Holder can Share in the Prescribed Part

Last Updated: 15 December 2010
Article by Martin Brown and Inga West

In the recent decision of Re PAL SC Realisations 2007 Ltd [2010] EWHC 2850 (Ch), the Court confirmed that a secured creditor of a company, which is in administration or liquidation, whose security is valueless, can release the security in its entirety and share in the "prescribed part" in respect of its (formerly secured) debt.

What is the prescribed part?

The "prescribed part" in insolvency proceedings is a share of the net proceeds realised from the sale of property covered by floating charges.  It is provided for by section 176A of the Insolvency Act 1986, which requires administrators, liquidators and receivers to set the prescribed part aside for distribution to the unsecured creditors.  The office holder is not permitted to distribute the prescribed part to the proprietor of a floating charge except insofar as it exceeds the amount required for the satisfaction of unsecured debts.

The prescribed part was created by the Enterprise Act 2002 as a quid pro quo for the abolition of Crown Preference.  In an administration, liquidation or receivership, preferential claims enjoy priority status, and are paid out of floating charge realisations ahead of any floating charge holders.  Preferential claims therefore reduce the returns to floating charge holders. 

Before 2002, certain debts due to the Crown, such as certain amounts of unpaid VAT and other tax, were preferential in insolvency proceedings.  They were referred to generically as "Crown Preference".  In 2002, Crown Preference (but not other preferential claims) was abolished.  Parliament decided that the benefit of the abolition of Crown Preference should not go to floating charge holders in the form of increased floating charge returns, but should instead be made available to the unsecured creditors.  Consequently, the prescribed part was introduced.  It was designed to prevent floating charge holders from receiving the benefit of the abolition of Crown Preference by ring-fencing a part of the floating charge realisations and requiring office holders to set the fund aside for distribution to the unsecured creditors. 

The size of the prescribed part is determined by a formula prescribed by the Secretary of State.  The formula is designed to produce an amount that is roughly equivalent to the average amount that would previously have been distributed to the Crown in respect of the former Crown preferential claims in an equivalent sized insolvency.  The formula comprises a sliding scale, which depends on the quantum of the net floating charge realisations, currently: (i) where the net property value does not exceed £10,000, 50% of that; and (ii) where the net property exceeds £10,000 in value, 50% of the first £10,000 in value and 20% of that part that exceeds £10,000 in value, subject to a maximum prescribed part of £600,000.

Previous case law

Prior to this case, there were two notable decisions concerning the prescribed part: Re Permacell Finesse Ltd (in liquidation) [2008] BCC 208 and Re Airbase Service (UK) [2008] 1 WLR 1516.  In those cases, the court held that a (fixed or floating) secured creditor whose security was not sufficient to satisfy the whole of its debt, and who continued to rely on its security for part of its debt, could not share in the prescribed part in respect of any shortfall that was not covered by the value of its security.

In respect of a floating charge holder, this was because the creditor remained a "proprietor of a floating charge", and section 176A(2)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1986 prohibits the office holder from distributing the prescribed part to the "proprietor of a floating charge". 

The reasoning in respect of a fixed charge holder differed slightly because of the drafting of the section: notwithstanding there was a shortfall in the value of the fixed charge holder's security, its debts could not be regarded as "unsecured" for the purposes of section 176A(2)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986, which requires the prescribed part to be made available for the satisfaction of "unsecured debts".  The Judge concluded that the prescribed part provision was designed so as to exclude a secured creditor from participating in the prescribed part.  For these purposes, "secured creditor" is defined by section 248(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986, meaning a "creditor of the company who holds in respect of his debt a security over property of the company, and "unsecured creditor" is to be read accordingly."

Against the background of these two decisions in which secured creditors were not allowed to share in the prescribed part in respect of any shortfall in the value of their security, the outcome of this most recent case might appear surprising.


In Re PAL SC Realisations 2007 Ltd [2010] EWHC 2850 (Ch), there were three secured creditors, whose priority was governed by an intercreditor agreement.  When the company went into administration and the business was sold, the realisations fell short of the debt owed to the senior lender, leaving the private equity investors and management with empty security.  There were no creditors with preferential claims. The only return to the unsecured creditors was to be from the prescribed part. 

The security trustee, who held security on behalf of the private equity investors, released the security in its entirety (but not the underlying debt) and then mounted a claim to be allowed to share in the prescribed part.

The liquidators applied for directions. 


The Judge agreed with the security trustee.  He distinguished the facts of this case from Permacell and Airbase  because in both those cases, the secured creditor was continuing to rely on its security and seeking to share in the prescribed part in respect of a shortfall. The facts of  Re PAL SC were different because the secured creditor had surrendered its (albeit worthless) security in its entirety.

The Judge relied on the wording of Rule 4.88(2) of the Insolvency Rules 1986, which provides:

"If a secured creditor voluntarily surrenders his security for the general benefit of creditors, he may prove for his whole debt, as if it were unsecured".

He interpreted the last five words of the rule ("as if it were unsecured") to mean that in circumstances where a secured creditor voluntarily surrenders his security and proves for the whole debt, the debt becomes unsecured.

Extrapolating this reasoning to the definition of "secured creditor" in section 248(1) Insolvency Act 1986, which defines a secured creditor as "a creditor of the company who holds in respect of his debt a security over property of the company, and "unsecured creditor" is to be read accordingly", the Judge considered that as the identity of the creditor's debt had, following the surrender of its security, changed to that of an unsecured debt, so too must the creditor be regarded as an unsecured creditor.

It followed that as the creditor was, after the surrender of its security, an unsecured creditor with an unsecured debt, there was nothing in section 176A Insolvency Act 1986 that prevented it from sharing in the prescribed part.


Although this outcome might be regarded by some as surprising, we do not think that it offends the original statutory purpose of the prescribed part, which was to prevent floating charge holders from benefitting from the abolition of Crown Preference.  On these particular facts, the prescribed part has fulfilled its legislative purpose by preventing the distribution to the senior lender from being swelled by the abolition of Crown Preference. By contrast, the private equity investors were completely out of the money as secured creditors: they were never in line to receive any floating charge realisations.  To prevent such a creditor from participating in the prescribed part would seem to be going further than Parliament intended.

As the prescribed part is a relatively immature statutory creature, there are still a number of unresolved questions which have yet to receive judicial scrutiny. To consider just a few here:

Q  Would the outcome of this case be the same if the surrendering secured creditor was the senior lender with first priority instead of being a junior creditor? 

A The priority of the secured creditor ought to make no difference – the critical feature is that the secured creditor surrenders its security in its entirety and proves as an unsecured creditor in accordance with rule 4.88(2) Insolvency Rules 1986 (and equivalent rules for other procedures).

Q Is a secured creditor allowed to surrender its security and share in the prescribed part in respect of its (formerly secured) debt even where its security has some value, but the value is less than the dividend the creditor would receive by proving as an unsecured creditor and sharing in the prescribed part? 

A Any secured creditor can choose to surrender its security in its entirety and prove for its debt as if it were unsecured under Rule 4.88(2) Insolvency Rule 1986.  Applying the reasoning in Re PAL SC, suggests that such a creditor could choose to surrender and share in the prescribed part rather than rely on a low value security.  Re Permacell and Re Airbase still restrict such a creditor from doing both, however.

Q Where a junior secured creditor, whose security has no value, is required by an intercreditor obligation to turn over any distribution or dividend it receives to a senior creditor, would the junior creditor be allowed to surrender its security and share in the prescribed part even though its share would have to be turned over to the senior secured creditor?

A Applying a literal interpretation of section 176A and the reasoning in Re PAL SC, a junior creditor could surrender and share in the prescribed part notwithstanding that it was also required to turn over the dividend to senior secured creditors.  However, this would mean that the senior creditor would indirectly receive a share of the prescribed part, which is plainly contrary to the legislative purpose of the section.  It is unclear how a court would respond to these facts, but it is possible that a court may try to find a way to prevent this.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 10/12/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions