UK: Individual Matters Bulletin - Winter 2010

Last Updated: 8 December 2010
Article by James Johnston

In this Winter issue of Individual Matters we have taken as our focus not the issues that are screaming at you from the media headlines, but more enduring points. If any of these points matter to you, they may well matter very much indeed.

One of the greatest anxieties a parent can face is knowing that their child, whether still small or now adult, is never likely to be able to cope in the world unaided. Ian McCulloch and Judith Morris look at just a couple of the various options available to parents, and to grandparents, to ease at least some of those worries. That article is complemented by one offering a solution to a problem that can afflict the other end of life: Liz Neale and Rachel Rodrigo consider the position of the elderly person whose Will has become badly out of date but who sadly is now so mentally frail that they can no longer make decisions and change it.

The next two of our articles consider a possible crisis that can grip an individual at any stage in their life. Helen Pidgeon identifies a new hurdle for the divorcing spouse who believes that his or her former partner is not being honest about their assets. Elaine Dobson gives advice on how to avoid being one of the many who make the horrifying discovery that, though the bricks and mortar may remain, ownership of their property has been 'stolen' from them.

Foreign holiday homes – indeed all foreign assets – need good advance planning, both in the UK and abroad, to be sure that the right person inherits it, and does so without too great a tax liability. Judith Millar gives some pointers.

The media were full of how the Coalition Government has increased the rate of capital gains tax, from 18% to 28%. They were, however, less expansive about the practical difficulties produced by the fact that the rate was changed in the middle of the tax year instead of the usual 6 April date. The implications for settlors, beneficiaries and trustees of offshore trusts require a particularly cool head, and Helen Ratcliffe puts her mind to this in her article.

Lastly, Alastair Collett shows how to plan ahead for just one of the myriad problems caused by the UK's current immigration rules: the spouse who suddenly finds he or she has no right to remain in the UK.

Disabled and vulnerable beneficiaries – a helping hand

By Ian McCulloch, and Judith Morris

All parents worry about their children. But parents and family members worry especially about children – whether still young or now adult – who need more protection than most, and who may never become fully independent.

Sometimes the child or young adult may be physically disabled or have cognitive problems to an extent that they are recognised, for the purposes of state benefits, as being 'disabled'. Sometimes the worry may be a young adult who, although very talented in some directions, just seems completely unable to grasp even the basics of financial management or prudence, so that they need protection both from themselves and from others.

Gifting by Will to disabled and vulnerable beneficiaries

For vulnerable beneficiaries there are alternatives that are much better than simply leaving them an outright gift of capital by Will. Suppose a grandparent has died and has left a sizeable sum outright to each of their four young adult grandchildren. Three of the grandchildren will handle it wisely. One will not only waste it, but may also harm themselves in the process. Too often it is only after the grandparent's death that the parent comes to us for help. There may be 'first aid' options in the period following a death, but the best time to achieve protection is when the Will is being planned.

Similarly there are planning opportunities and traps where a beneficiary under a Will is, or may become, entitled to disability living allowance or a similar benefit. An incautiously planned gift may deprive that beneficiary of state benefits to which they would otherwise have been entitled.

Lifetime gifts to disabled or vulnerable individuals

Many disabled young adults are capable of living independently and a parent or grandparent may want to make a lifetime gift to them, maybe to help purchase a house or flat. Simply to provide cash may affect their state benefits, or make them a prey to fraudsters or unscrupulous 'friends'. A lifetime gift of this sort needs to be structured to achieve a careful balance between the practicalities, tax planning, and maintaining the young person's access to any benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled.

Alterations to the Will of someone who no longer has mental capacity

By Liz Neale and Rachel Rodrigo

Too often, when an elderly person suffers from dementia or no longer has mental capacity over an extended period of time, their Will gradually becomes seriously out of date. Families often assume that there is no option but to leave the Will unaltered, accepting this as one of the many sad aspects of failing mental faculties.

In fact, where a person has lost 'testamentary capacity', it is possible for those who care about them to ask the Court of Protection to make what is known as a 'statutory Will' on their behalf. In the past, the Court would have tried to make the Will that the person would themselves have made if they had still been able to do so. Following the recent case of Re P, the Court will now make the Will that it considers to be in the person's 'best interests'. This may not sound very different but it means that one important factor that the Court may take into account, in making its decision, is the way the person would have liked to be remembered.

Obviously, making a Will that involves the Court of Protection will cost more than making a straightforward Will, and obtaining a Court-approved Will is not likely to be cost-effective where the figures are small. But where the fact that a Will has been left unchanged may cause great family unhappiness, or major tax or practical headaches, the possibility can definitely be worth exploring.

The end of 'self-help' in uncovering a spouse's true wealth in divorce proceedings

By Helen Pidgeon

The mistrust that can arise in a divorce situation sometimes extends – maybe rightly – to an instinct that one party is not revealing the true extent of their assets. In the past, if that spouse (it was usually, but not always, the wife) had a good 'root around' her husband's study and copied his personal and business documents, this was acceptable as long as she did not break open any doors or cupboards to do so, and provided she quickly passed them to her solicitors who in turn immediately gave them to the husband's lawyers. The information could then be used in the divorce proceedings and the husband had to respond in his financial disclosure.

Whilst not actively encouraged, it used to be considered that this 'self-help' was an important aid to ensure that husbands gave full disclosure of their financial circumstances. Following the recent Court of Appeal Judgment in the case of Imerman this is now not so simple

The Court of Appeal stamped firmly on this sort of behaviour, describing it as a breach of the age old law of 'confidence'. It possibly involves criminal offences such as theft or burglary. Where information is downloaded from a personal, passwordprotected, computer, criminal offences under the Computer Misuse Act and Data Protection Act may have been committed. However much help to their case the information may be, these are serious matters with potentially grave consequences.

The Court did not feel that it could condone such 'self-help' – even though, without it, the Court might not have the benefit of a true picture of the family's wealth before deciding how to divide it.

A wife (or, of course, a husband if the tables are turned) is now left in the position that, if she believes the husband is not properly declaring his assets, she must have enough of a suspicion, and proof to go with it, to enable her to obtain an order for the seizure of documents.

If the wife does engage in 'self-help', the husband can obtain an order for the return to him of the documents taken by the wife and destruction of any copies taken, thereby severely curtailing their use within divorce proceedings.

This Court decision will leave some spouses in a precarious financial position whilst allowing other spouses intent on hiding their true wealth a greater opportunity to do so. So good advice at the earliest stage possible is particularly important in cases where one spouse suspects that the other is not being completely open about their financial position.

Who's been stealing my house? Electronic property theft

By Elaine Dobson

In 2007 the Land Registry recognised the need to strengthen their procedures to prevent fraudulent property transfers. In 2007/2008 £15m had been paid out in compensation by the Land Registry as a result of fraud and forgery, whereas in 2008/2009 the figure was £5m. The overall figure may have fallen, but for anyone who falls victim to this scam the moment when they discover that, though the bricks and mortar remain, their house has been 'stolen', remains horrifying. All property owners, whether individuals, trustees or executors, should consider whether action is required to minimise the possibility of property fraud.

The most significant action should be to check the address for correspondence that is noted on the Land Registry title. The Land Registry now accepts up to three addresses, and an email address and an overseas address can be accepted. The importance of the correct addresses is particularly significant where a property may be left empty for periods of time. Examples are holiday homes, buy-tolet property, inherited property and trust property.

Generally the cases that are vulnerable to this type of fraud are those where the legal owners are not aware of the day-to-day activities and correspondence received at the property. In a recent example brought to us to resolve, a £1m house had been used by a fraudster as collateral to secure a £½m mortgage. The property had been inherited and then let. The transfer of the house into the fraudster's name was achieved by accessing the property, forging the owner's details and by posing as in occupation at the time of the mortgage valuation.

How do you protect yourself?

The Land Registry will contact the registered proprietor if an application is received in relation to any change in the registered details. For this to be an effective protection it is vital that the address for correspondence that is recorded at the Land Registry is correct.

The Land Registry does operate a compensation scheme, but this can take several months to administer and if, for example, the owner of the house is fending off a debt action this can be very distressing. It will also be unacceptable to an owner if they are trying to sell the property.

The Land Registry has a guidance note on how to protect the information relating to a property and detailing the documentation required before the Land Registry will amend the register. This and the change of details forms, can be accessed on the Land Registry website.

Offshore trusts: how will the split year capital gains tax rate apply?

'Will you, won't you, will you, won't you, will you join the dance?' (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland)

By Helen Ratcliffe

The 'will they ... won't they ...' change the capital gains tax (CGT) rate speculation, which had been simmering ever since the differential between income tax and CGT rates became so out of kilter, finally and not unsurprisingly, ended with the Emergency Budget on 22 June 2010. Latterly speculation had not just been about what the new rate would be, but also when it would take effect. The financial predicament of the Government suggested an immediate rate change would be introduced, extraordinary though that would be, and the Emergency Budget did precisely that.

So how does this mid-year rate change apply to offshore trusts where, for example, the original legislation requires you to look at the position at the end of the tax year? With the publication of the Finance (No 2) Act 2010, we can now understand how the change will apply to offshore trusts.

For many years now the gains in offshore trusts have been taxed either:

  • by reference to the settlor, if UK resident and domiciled (the settlor charge), or
  • by reference to distributions, otherwise known as capital payments, to UK resident beneficiaries (the beneficiary charge).

The CGT rate prior to 23 June 2010 was 18% for the settlor charge. Where the beneficiary charge applied and the distribution of gains had been deferred, the CGT rate could be increased by an interest mechanism to 28.8% so that there was a sliding scale between 18% and 28.8%. Post–22 June 2010, the headline CGT rate for the settlor charge will be 28%, and for the beneficiary charge where the interest penalty is applied the CGT rate at its maximum will be 44.8%.

Against that background, the table below shows how the gains will be taxed in 2010/11.

Given the complexity of the new legislation which we have seen in recent years, it is fair to say that there was widespread dread of some more difficult wording – it was a relief to see that the introduction of the split year rate seems clear and that it does not overly increase the burden of compliance.

Do you need a foreign Will?

In the last issue of Individual Matters, Judith Millar reflected on the divergence between the laws in continental Europe and in the UK relating to Wills and succession to property. In this article, she considers some of the practical implications for those who own a foreign holiday home.

By Judith Millar

'Forced heirs'

The principle of 'testamentary freedom' – being able to leave your estate to beneficiaries of your choosing – is embedded deep within the English common law. What is not always appreciated is that many other legal jurisdictions take a completely different approach.

One consequence of this can be that the provisions of a properly executed English Will, intended to cover your worldwide estate, may be overridden when it comes to the distribution of foreign assets.

This can happen because a number of civil law jurisdictions (for example, many European countries) operate a system whereby close family members, known as forced heirs, must receive a fixed portion of the foreign estate. For example, if you have children they may end up owning part of your foreign holiday home, even though you would have preferred your spouse to have full control and enjoyment of it. This can be especially problematic in the case of second marriages.

Immovable property

Broadly speaking, who will inherit land ('immovable' property) is decided according to the law where the asset is actually located. But, as with all laws, there are notable exceptions. Under the Spanish Civil Code, for example, inheritance to all property, immovable or not, is governed by the law of the deceased's nationality.

At first sight this might seem to suggest that the Spanish forced heirship rules should not apply to, say, the villa in Sotogrande that a British national owns. However, that is not the end of the matter. Spanish law says that English law applies, but English law 'bats' the question back to Spain again. This is because English law says that the law applying to foreign immovables is the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is situated. A game of legal ping-pong may be of academic interest but the uncertainty, delay and expense it would cause would be very unwelcome following a death.

Fortunately, the position under Spanish law has now been clarified in a succession of Court decisions with a result that, for a British national owning Spanish property, it is accepted that the principle of testamentary freedom holds good.

That certainty does not hold for other countries, however, and in order to ensure that your intended beneficiaries inherit your foreign assets, and that they do so in the most efficient way possible, it is important to plan ahead.

Forward planning for foreign assets – inheritance and taxation

Ideally, that planning should begin when you are acquiring the asset. At that stage, options may be available that cannot be adopted later - for example, a form of joint ownership that ousts any forced heirship provisions. Advice needs to be taken from an appropriate professional, in the relevant jurisdiction, and considered in conjunction with your UK advice. In some cases, there can be pressure to buy the property via a company. Occasionally this should be considered (though probably less often than it is offered to prospective buyers) and specialist UK and foreign advice is required.

Once you have bought the foreign property, do you need to have a separate foreign Will for it? In the case of the Sotogrande villa, it would be usual and advisable to have a Spanish Will, limited to your Spanish property, prepared by a Spanish notary which would be in a double English and Spanish format. By contrast, if the villa was not in Spain but, say, St Tropez, a better way to achieve the desired result might be to sign an English Codicil, dealing exclusively with the French property, rather than having a separate French Will.

Whichever approach is taken, one thing is certain: it is crucial that the documents governing the inheritance of the foreign assets and of the UK assets dovetail with each other, otherwise there is a risk that they may cancel each other out leading to a complicated and expensive estate to administer on death.

Tax worries?

So far this article has looked at who would inherit. The other key aspect is the taxation of your foreign property. In cross-border situations tax liabilities can sometimes interact in unexpected ways. Being prepared by taking UK and foreign advice at an early stage can reduce their impact.

The moral of the story? Get good advice, locally and in the UK, both on who will inherit your property and on how to minimise tax bills on it – and then enjoy your foreign home without worries!

UK immigration rules and the stranded spouse

By Alastair Collett

Many newspaper column-inches have been devoted recently to whether there has been, and still is, an exodus of talent from the UK and City of London because of the changes to UK taxation of non-doms and of banking executives. There have certainly been some individuals who have left, and not all of them have appreciated that immigration law can play havoc with family and domestic life in a wholly unexpected way: decisions taken for financial or tax reasons must also be looked at in the light of all circumstances, including their immigration law effect.

The general rule under UK immigration law is that the dependant spouse and children of a principal applicant for UK residence on a limited leave to remain can only stay for so long as the principal's permission to remain is in force.

Take the example of a US or Russian family where the 'principal applicant' has been working in London on, for example, a work permit or as a highly skilled migrant. He (or she) decides to relocate to, for example, Switzerland to work full time abroad for tax reasons. The relevant tax forms are filed to confirm exit from the UK. The intention is that the spouse and children will split their time between London and Switzerland. But once the 'principal applicant' has relocated to Switzerland the dependant spouse and children may find themselves stranded with no continuing permission to live in the UK. The dependants' leave to remain terminates when the principal relocates, so their plans are thrown into chaos, and their route to settled status in the UK from five years' continuous residence blocked.

With good advice, this may not be the end of the road for the spouse and children's residence in the UK. The spouse may be able to qualify for permission to work in a category leading to settlement, or it may be possible to obtain a more limited permission linked to the children's education. This will not lead to rights to settle however, and any previously qualifying time will be lost. If the position is not realised until after the primary applicant has already left the UK the remaining family members are likely to have to leave the UK and make their application from abroad.

Spouses and children who are European Community or Economic Area nationals will not be adversely affected as they will have access to the free movement rights available under European law. But for anyone who does not have full rights of residence in the UK it is vital that tax and other planning does not neglect the immigration implications.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

James Johnston
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions