UK: What Can You Do If Your Insurer Goes Bust?

Last Updated: 25 March 2011
Article by Jeremy Hill and Christopher Henley

This article was originally posted in February 2010, The In-House Laywer.

History shows that, at least since the 1950s, the likelihood that any authorised insurance company will not be able to pay its claims in full is reassuringly small. The level and composition of assets required by insurers, and their liquidity in particular, is carefully regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), as is the standard of their management. The FSA rigidly enforces its regulations because a problem with an insurer can result in disproportionate loss to its policyholders.

PAST EXAMPLES

Such stringent regulation is the result of some high-profile collapses. The failure of Emil Savundra's Fire, Auto & Marine Insurance Company to pay debts owed to 400,000 motorists in 1966 led to a significant tightening of UK insurance legislation and responsibility for insurance supervision shifting to the Board of Trade under the Companies Act 1967. The insolvencies of Vehicle and General Insurance Company, London United Investments plc and others have also contributed to current regulatory standards.1

The most prominent insolvency of recent times was that of the Independent Insurance Company Ltd (IIC), whose founder and chief executive, Michael Bright (previously awarded Entrepreneur of the Year and Insurance Man of the Year), was sentenced to seven years in jail in 2007 for his role in the company's downfall. The collapse of IIC cost £357m in compensation. Three months before it imploded, IIC was the ninth-biggest insurer in Britain, with a market value of almost £1bn.

REGULATION

The current recession is also a threat to insurers' financial stability, as defaults on corporate bonds, downgrading by rating agencies, falling asset values in real estate and the number of fraudulent claims increase during harsh economic times.2 Following its establishment in 2001 as the sole financial regulator (in place of eight independent regulators), the FSA responded by implementing a fundamental change in the way that insurers are regulated. These measures include a more proactive and challenging relationship between insurers and the FSA, and a risk-based approach that places explicit responsibility on senior management to ensure that firms' systems and controls are adequate. The FSA uses a range of tools, including focused on-site work, and reports by external auditors, actuaries and other professionals, to test the controls put in place by management.

EVEN TIGHTER CONTROLS?

New controls are constantly being developed. Solvency II, the title given to the benchmark for the next statutory fi nancial regime and the subject of much debate between insurers, trade organisations and regulatory bodies, is designed to harmonise regulatory standards across Europe and reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage between EU countries by October 2012. Its prudential regime is divided into the three 'pillars' of minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and public transparency and market discipline through public reporting standards, disclosure, and other tools. Financial controls put in place by the FSA have considerably reduced the possibility of insurer failure but the current economic climate has resulted in many apparently reliable and well-managed insurers being downgraded by rating agencies, a problem that may worsen before it improves.

WHAT CAN YOU DO IF YOUR INSURER HAS FINANCIAL PROBLEMS?

If you hear of such problems before they become official, you would have to decide whether to trust what may be no more than rumours. A conversation with your broker might yield useful information, although it is worth remembering where their interests compete with your own. Agreement that the insurer might not be solvent could indicate that the insurance should never have been placed with it and brokers will be eager to avoid any losses resulting from such an admission.

If you decide that the rumours are true, or that the risk of the insurer collapsing is too high, you could activate any cancellation clause in the policy, ensuring that any debt owed to you by the insurer pre-dates its liquidation. Although gaining an advantage over other creditors through judgment and execution would probably be an unrealistic expectation, given the likely time frame, one advantage that you would gain through such action is a head start over policyholders that had waited until insolvency proceedings had begun. The latter may have to pay higher premiums as a result of increased demand and an urgent need for replacement policies at any cost, owing to statutory or contractual requirements, such as security for loans. As a general matter, you could also consider including a clause in all your insurance contracts that enables you to cancel the policy if the security rating of your insurer falls below an agreed standard, with a pro rata return of premium.

Having arranged alternative ongoing insurance and put your mind at rest in respect of future claims, you should then consider the recovery of claims that have been fi led with your insurer but not paid and the premium for the unexpired portion of the policy period. If there has been no official insolvency attachment, there is nothing that you can do in respect of claims. Usually the insurer will insist on dealing directly with a claimant against any policyholder, with a view to minimising its liability. Equally, in the absence of an express clause dealing with your cancellation, you would generally not be entitled to recover any premium because the premium is payable in full the moment that the insurer is at risk. It is at this point that the insurer could be liable for any claim up to the policy limit. The only way around this common law position is to show that the insurance is divisible into more than one constituent part. Frequently, the insurer will have agreed to a cancellation clause under which the premium will be returned pro rata , subject to front-end loading for administration if cancelled within a specified time after its inception. Either way, the claim is unsecured. Insureds with premium financing arrangements will be liable for continued payments, as contractually agreed with any applicable third parties, in the absence of any contractual release mechanism.

Where an official insolvency attachment emerges, you will be subject to the Micawber Principle: £1 of assets and 19/6d of claims – result happiness; 19/6d of assets and £1 of claims – result misery.3 Where insolvency proceedings have begun, it is unlikely that the happy version of the formula will exist. The best that you can hope for will be a prompt reconciliation of assets and liabilities, and some dividend thereafter. The two most common forms of reconciliation are the schemes of arrangement and administration.4

SCHEMES OF ARRANGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Variety of procedures

Schemes of arrangement were for a long time used as a compromise between an insurer and its insureds because they avoided the rigidity of winding-up rules for insurers and the delays in declaring dividends.5 Directors would usually petition the court for a winding-up order, obtain an adjournment of proceedings and appoint a provisional liquidator (an independent, licensed insolvency practitioner). Such an approach prevents the automatic termination of any policies underwritten, and ensures that there is no breach of statutory obligations to maintain insurance under the Road Traffic Act 1998 and the Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969.

Insurers are protected from attack by creditors seeking to gain an advantage over other creditors pending the hearing of a winding-up petition. This status could continue for years, with constant adjournment of the final petition. Claims arising from long-term issues, such as asbestosis and related reinsurance disputes, might not be resolved for decades and the resulting legal paralysis required a mechanism to enable an orderly run-off with the maximum possible distribution to creditors in the shortest practicable time. These factors resulted in the administration procedure becoming available for insolvent insurers from 2002.6

Administration

An administrator is an officer of the court whose primary goal is to rescue the company as a going concern. If they cannot, their secondary goal is to achieve a better result for creditors than would be possible if the company were wound up, by continuing to trade and selling the business as a going concern. Frequently, however, an administrator will move with little delay to their third goal, that of realising assets for the purposes of a distribution. Alternatively, the administration is used as a precursor to a scheme of arrangement. The duration of the appointment is 30 months, in comparison to 12 months for non-insurance companies, and can be extended by an agreement of the creditors or an order of the court. Administrators must carry out their functions as quickly and efficiently as reasonably possible. Creditors have a right to complain to the court if they do not consider that administrators are satisfying this obligation.

Although recent case law might have made it more difficult to utilise schemes of arrangement, owing to logistical complications and the right of creditors to argue prejudice even if they are in the minority, they remain the primary tool in insurer insolvencies.7 However, if the insurer's funds are inadequate to discharge its liabilities, alternative remedies might be available.

REMEDIES

Government protection

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) provides consumers and small businesses with some statutory protection. Although the FSCS's main objective is to maintain continuity, which it does by trying to find another provider to take over the policy in the event of an insolvency, it is also a fund of last resort designed to compensate customers of FSA-authorised financial services firms, including insurers and insurance intermediaries, that are unable to pay claims or return premium.

The limits of the compensation depend on whether the policy is compulsory or not. Compensation for compulsory insurance, such as third-party motor and employer's liability insurance, is 100%. The limit for non-compulsory insurance is 100% of the first £2,000 and 90% of the remainder. Businesses with a turnover of £1m or more are not usually eligible for compensation under the FSCS, except in relation to claims against them that should be covered by compulsory insurance or where the business had an annual turnover of less than £1m on the date that the general insurance contract was entered into. Larger businesses are unable to claim compensation from the FSCS unless one of these exceptions applies, and will have to take their chances in the scheme of arrangement for any return of premiums and/or claims under the policy.

Cut-through clauses

A cut-through clause is usually included where an insurer wishes to satisfy clients that sufficient security exists to prevent any losses in the event of an insolvency or is acting as a front for a reinsurer, or where an insured is anxious about the continuing ability of its insurer to meet claims. A cut-through clause might take the form of a priority payment arrangement in circumstances in which it is intended that the insured have the benefit of any reinsurance receivables due to the reinsurer, in priority over other creditors. It might also take the form of a direct payment arrangement under which the insured is entitled to hold the reinsurer secondarily responsible for meeting its claims. Unfortunately, in situations in which the insurer becomes insolvent, such expectations are false.

Although a cut-through clause would clearly satisfy both limbs of the test under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 2001, it is a cardinal principle of English insurance law that all creditors of an insolvent company should receive equal treatment of the limited funds available to the liquidator of that company on a pro rata basis. This is subject to the Insurers (Reorganisation and Winding-Up) Regulations (IR) 2004, under which an order for the priority of payment of debts of a UK-authorised insurer is that 'preferential creditors' (essentially employee salary and pension claims) are given priority over insurance debts and all other debts.8

Cut-through clauses are intended to ensure that an otherwise unsecured insured is paid in priority to other creditors. However, it is not acceptable for an insolvent debtor (the reinsured) to contract out of this principle to the benefit of one of its creditors. Although the position is not entirely clear, and a cut-through clause might be distinguishable from a distribution of the insolvent estate on the basis that the insured will be paid directly by the reinsurer and the insurer no longer requires payment to be made to it, it may also conflict with the aims of IR 2004. On balance, it would be unwise to rely on the payment of any claim by a reinsurer.

Brokers' obligations

There is very little English case law defining the extent of brokers' duties in relation to their selection of insurance security. From what little there is can be distilled the principle that the broker is under a duty to select an insurer that it reasonably believes to be solvent, which effectively means that it must be capable of meeting claims as they fall due and is likely to remain in such a position. English courts have not yet provided any guidance on the extent of the investigations that brokers must carry out to satisfy this test, although HIH Casualty & General insurance Company Ltd v JLT Risk Solutions Ltd [2007] did confirm that the broker could be subject to ongoing obligations in certain circumstances.

The leading English authority on brokers and their obligations in relation to security is Osman v J Ralph Moss Ltd [1970], in which insurance brokers placed a contract of motor insurance with an insurer whose 'shaky financial foundation... was well known in insurance circles at that time'. The Court of Appeal held that the brokers were guilty of negligence in recommending that Mr Osman purchase insurance from a company known to be in financial difficulties and in failing to advise him in clear terms as to its position. When he was fined £25 for driving without an insurance policy, the Court of Appeal held that Osman was entitled to recover the premium he had paid, the £25 fine that had been imposed and various other costs, on the basis that these were reasonably foreseeable consequences of the broker's breach of duty to inform Osman that he was uninsured. This obligation can be qualified by the fact that the brokers in Osman were aware that the insurer was financially unsound when the insurance was placed.

In Australian Lewis v Tressider Andrews Associates [1987] considered various English authorities and concluded that brokers are obliged to inform the insured of any information that it receives, indicating that the insurer might not remain financially sound, even if the broker is personally satisfied that no real problem exists. Brokers are accepted as owing professional obligations and, even where an insured has asked a broker to place the insurance with a particular insurer, they will generally be unable to avoid liability for any later insolvencies by stating that they acted only as an intermediary in carrying out the insured's request.

In General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation v Tanter, The Zephyr [1985] the court stated that:

'The broker's skill and expertise extends beyond merely giving his client advice and complying with his client's instructions. He must make use of his knowledge of the market and use appropriate skills.'

This may come as a shock to some brokers but a client's knowledge of the market may be based on invalid or obsolete information, and the broker should be better placed to evaluate the market in any event, particularly as that is one of the most important aspects of their job. A further reason for brokers' liability in this area is that they might have access to market knowledge that is unavailable to the client, such as information on an insurer's unwillingness to pay claims. On renewal of insurance, brokers must reassess the quality of each insurer, particularly those that have been chosen by the insured. However, the broker will not be liable to the insured where they can show that the information available to them, exercising reasonable diligence, indicated that the insurer was neither insolvent, close to insolvency, nor likely to be incapable of meeting future claims.

COMMENT

The long and the short of an insurer's insolvency is that you will generally recover little more than unearned premium and claims in respect of compulsory insurances. Any sum that you may receive for other insurances may off set the cost of replacement insurance but would be very unlikely to cover the expense of any substantial property or public liability claim

Footnotes

1 London United Investments plc was an insurance holding company with a network of over 40 companies in a variety of jurisdictions.

2 The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is currently dealing with 26 insolvent general insurers, some of which became insolvent in the early 1990s.

3 The Micawber Principle is derived from Wilkins Micawber, a character in Charles Dickens' David Copperfi eld, whose other maxim was that 'something will turn up'.

4 Not to be confused with administrative receivership, in which the protagonist is appointed by and solely looks after one party's interests through the realisation of the assets of the company in reduction of the secured debt of their appointor, rather than objectively, and who has no authority to deal with the claims of unsecured creditors. The Enterprise Act 2003 was a positive step by the government to phase out the use of administrative receivers.

5 See s895 of the Companies Act (CA) 2006, which replaced s425 of the CA 1985. Section 899 of the CA 2006 provides that the court may sanction a scheme if it has been agreed by at least 75% in value of a company's creditors or class of creditors.

6 Now governed by Part 26 of CA 2006.

7 See, for example, solvent schemes of arrangement such as Scottish Lion Insurance Company Ltd (2009) CSOH 127 and the British Aviation Insurance Co Ltd (2006) BCC 14.

8) SI 2004 No 353, implementing the Insurance Undertakings Directive . In essence, insurance claims now have priority over other unsecured creditors

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.