UK: Kirch Group And World Cup Broadcast Rights

Last Updated: 16 May 2001

Kirch Group is now selling UK broadcasting rights to the 2002 FIFA World Cup Finals which it purchased in 1996 from FIFA. Some of the UK press have already begun to paint Kirch, a German media company, as the enemy, threatening to deny every UK resident the right to watch World Cup football for free by selling the exclusive rights to Pay TV or worse still on a pay per view basis. A general election looms and it is not surprising that Culture Secretary Chris Smith has been trying to re-assure the public that current UK law ensures that World Cup matches must be shown by a free to air broadcaster. The relevant legislation has been approved by the European Commission as apparently complying with European law. It is interesting to note that the Kirch Group have simply stated that they may sell matches apart from those involving UK national teams, the final, semi-finals and opening match (the "Prime Matches"), to the highest bidding broadcaster, provided that there is no breach of the law. It seems to be accepted that the Prime Matches will always be on free to air television. Is it possible that some matches in the 2002 World Cup finals will not be shown, as has been the case in the past, exclusively by BBC and ITV?

A brief look at the rule book cuts through some of the emotive politics involved in this issue.

The UK Broadcasting Act 1996 ("the Act"), the Independent Television Commission ("ITC") Code on Sports and other Listed Events ("ITC Code") and The Television Without Frontiers Directive 97/36/EC (the "Television Directive") deal with the public's right to view events of major importance ("Listed Events"). Article 3(a) of the Television Directive provides that "Each Member State may take measures in accordance with Community law to ensure that broadcasters under its jurisdiction do not broadcast on an exclusive basis events which are regarded by that Member State as being of major importance for society in such a way as to deprive a substantial proportion of the public in that Member State of the possibility of following such events via live coverage or deferred coverage on free television." The UK alone in Europe lists every match of the World Cup Finals (i.e. 64 matches) as forming part of its own Listed Events.

The Act distinguishes between national free to air terrestial channels ("Qualifying Broadcasters" i.e. those broadcasters broadcasting to at least 95% of UK viewers on free TV, namely, ITV, Channel 4 and BBC) and everyone else ("Non Qualifying Broadcasters"). Oddly, Channel 5 is a Non Qualifying Broadcaster since it only reaches around 80% of the UK population. The legislation does not, as has been reported, prohibit Non-Qualifying Broadcasters from showing Listed Events. Such a prohibition would contravene basic European law principles in relation to competition and freedom of movement. To take an extreme example, what if the BBC and ITV were to agree that they would each offer £1 for the broadcast rights? Whilst public policy exemptions to basic European law principles are permitted, those exemptions must be reasonable.

The Act prescribes a number of rules concerning the exclusive live broadcast of Listed Events. For a broadcaster in one of the categories (Qualifying or Non-Qualifying) to show a listed event live, a broadcaster in the other category must also show that event, except where the ITC consents to an exclusive broadcast by a broadcaster. In giving consent the ITC is required to have regard to the ITC Code. The ITC Code sets out the criteria for determining when consent to a live exclusive broadcast may be given. Those criteria are based on determining whether all broadcasters have had a fair and reasonable opportunity to acquire the rights. On the face of it, if broadcasters in one category have a fair and reasonable opportunity to acquire the rights but do not do so, e.g. by not offering a fair price, then a broadcaster in the other category must be granted consent by the ITC to an exclusive live broadcast.

The granting of consent by the ITC is the subject of ongoing litigation involving TV Danmark's exclusive live broadcast of certain Danish World Cup qualifying matches. In the Court of Appeal the ITC unsuccessfully claimed that the Television Directive prevented them from allowing TV Danmark to exercise its rights to broadcast the Danish qualifying games exclusively because such consent would deprive a substantial proportion of the Danish population of the possibility of watching these games. The ITC argued that despite agreeing that TV Danmark's acquisition of the Danish games satisfied the ITC Code, the reality was that no consent could be given to any exclusive exercise of the broadcasting rights to these matches. They sought to imply an additional requirement that rights be re-offered to the previously unsuccessful Danish public service broadcasters. This argument was rejected. The Court of Appeal found that maximum coverage and the general public's right to view events of major importance must not be achieved at any cost but that other factors must be taken into account such as the need to sustain competition, the prevention of public broadcaster market dominance and the need to have regard to the binding nature of a contract. In the Court's view, the Danish public service broadcasters had had the opportunity of acquiring the relevant rights on fair and reasonable terms during the auction process and were not to be given a second bite of the cherry. Although the Court of Appeal decision supports a simple interpretation of the ITC Code, the ITC are continuing the fight. The ITC appeal to the House of Lords will be heard in the first week of July 2001 where they are likely to argue again that relevant European Law preventing television broadcasters from exercising their rights in a manner that denies a substantial proportion of the population the opportunity to view Listed Events will be breached if they grant consent to TvDanmark's exclusive live broadcast on the basis of the acquisition process. It is interesting that the ITC are arguing that their own ITC Code does not comply with European Law whilst TvDanmark are arguing that it does.

Therefore, in light of the above Court of Appeal decision and applying the law as it currently stands, if a Non-Qualifying Broadcaster such as Sky or On Digital acquires the rights to broadcast World Cup matches live, under a fair auction process, that broadcaster will need to seek consent from the ITC to broadcast exclusively. The successful broadcaster should be granted consent provided that broadcasters in the other category have had a fair and reasonable opportunity to acquire the rights on fair and reasonable terms and omitted to do so.

The position is slightly complicated in the case of domestic Listed Events by the fact that the Act makes void any contract to the extent that it purports to grant rights exclusively to any one broadcaster. (Interestingly, these sections of the Act were not notified to the European Commission for approval in accordance with the Television Directive).

The other legal issue which has been raised in the press and which applies specifically to the Kirch Group sale, is the timing of their acquisition of the broadcast rights. The UK listed events regime only applies to rights acquired after the Act came into force in October 1996. It is by no means clear that the Kirch Group's rights are subject to the Act at all. Chris Smith has reportedly said that the World Cup Finals have been listed since 1985. Although it is true that Section 182 of the Broadcasting Act 1990 (and previous legislation) dealt with the concept of Listed Events, it did so in a different way to the existing legislation. Under the previous regime a broadcaster was prohibited from showing Listed Events (including the World Cup) on a pay per view basis. Pay or subscription TV was not restricted under that regime. The relevance of previous Listed Events regime under the 1990 Act is immaterial. If the Act does not apply to Kirch Group's acquisition they may be free to sell the rights as they wish or may be free to show matches themselves.

Kirch Group fear that they will be unfairly prevented from selling their rights either by the actions of broadcasters, the ITC, the UK Government or the European Commission. Consequently, Kirch applied in February 2001 to the European Court seeking judgement that measures taken by the UK Government to implement Article 3(a) of the Television Directive (see above) are wrong and incompatible with EU law and that, consequently, the European Commission's decision approving the UK implementation measures is also wrong and should be annulled and that, in addition, the UK measures and the decision infringe fundamental principles of Community Law, the Television Directive and Kirch's right to property and/or freedom to carry on an economic activity.

Consequently, as the parties involved have started to examine the facts and the law more closely, it is becoming increasingly clear that the issue is not as simple as the football watching public might wish. In a recent debate of 26 April in the House of Commons Mr John Grogan (MP for Selby) made it clear that all of the World Cup matches should be made available free-to air in the UK. The Government dealt with the issue by stating in response that "Listing does not guarantee that any event will be broadcast live. Rights holders are not required to sell live rights and broadcasters are not obliged to purchase them or show the events. However, the legislation clearly stipulates that where live rights are made available for the World Cup, they must be made available to free-to-air broadcasters on a fair and reasonable basis." A vanilla statement of the current law compared to statements made earlier this year by Chris Smith Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport in an open letter to Dieter Hahn (Managing Director of Kirch) which proclaimed that the Government would do all in its power to conserve "the Crown Jewels" of UK sport events and ensure that all 64 World Cup matches would be safeguarded for the entertainment and enjoyment of the British public. Now the Government is sitting on the fence and maintaining that this political hot potato should remain decidedly in the hands of the ITC as regulator.

It is interesting to note that the UK is the only country in Europe to have made the watching of football so important that every match in the World Cup is listed. Can it be true that a Match involving say, Australia and Morocco is an issue of shared national experience to all of us? On this analysis why are only the finals of Wimbledon listed? Surely the quarters should also be listed where at least someone British is likely to be playing? Why is the last day of the Premier League Season not listed?

Ultimately, at the heart of the matter lies the philosophical issue of whether the right of the armchair viewer to watch all 64 matches in the World Cup, (as opposed to just significant matches) exceeds those of the commercial rights holder and FIFA. It is well worth remembering that most of the revenue generated by the World Cup goes to FIFA (a non profit making organisation) which then re-invests it in the development of Football around the world. Shouldn't FIFA see fit to maximise its profits and sell to the highest bidder? Given that government spending on sport is minimal, it seems ironic that governing bodies should be prevented from raising revenue to develop their sports by the imposition of market distorting legislation.

Tony Ghee is a Partner and Jonny Searle is a solicitor in the Media Department of Ashurst Morris Crisp. They are also members of the firm's Sports Group. Ashurst Morris Crisp have been advising TV Danmark 1 Limited in their successful challenge of the ITC in relation to the cross border broadcast of listed events. The matter is now awaiting judgement in the House of Lords and the European Court. The firm is also advising Kirch Group in connection with its sale of the World Cup rights. The information contained in this article is for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in specific instances where individual advice should be sought.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions