UK: Limiting the Scope of Privilege for In-House Lawyers

Last Updated: 21 September 2010
Article by Paul Stone, Lynne Gregory and Elora Mukherjee


The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has just published its much awaited judgment in Akzo Nobel Chemicals Limited and Akcros Chemicals Limited v European Commission. This judgment has confirmed the existing limitation on the ability of European in-house counsel to claim legal professional privilege in competition investigations by the European Commission. This decision is likely to cause consternation and controversy amongst in-house lawyers across Europe as it was hoped that the ECJ might take the opportunity to change the law in this area. This note considers the scope of the ruling as well as reviewing, by way of background, the basic principles of privilege under English law.

Basic Principles

The rationale for legal professional privilege is to enable lawyers to advise their clients in confidence. If a document is privileged, it does not need to be disclosed to the court or the opposing party in any litigation. Under English law, legal professional privilege can be divided into two categories:

1. Legal Advice Privilege

This covers confidential communications made between a lawyer and his client for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice. Litigation need not have been threatened or contemplated at the time when the advice was sought or given.

2. Litigation Privilege

This privilege covers a wider category of communications, but only in circumstances where litigation is contemplated. If it is, the privilege covers not only communications between the litigant and his lawyer, but also communications between the lawyer and a third party, or between the litigant and a third party, provided that the dominant purpose of such communications is to give or obtain advice with regard to the litigation or to obtain or collect evidence or information for use in it.

Litigation privilege extends to any proceedings in which parties may be required to give disclosure including high court, county court, and employment tribunal cases, as well as arbitrations.

English case law has confirmed that privilege extends to employed solicitors and barristers, not just those in private practice. However, this is subject to an important exception in relation to European Commission investigations.

European Commission Investigations

There is one important area where in-house lawyers are in a significantly worse position than lawyers in private practice. This relates to the European Commission's power to require production of documents in the course of competition investigations. In AM&S Europe Ltd -v- Commission of the European Communities (1983) the ECJ held that AM&S could not withhold from the Commission privileged communications made with its in-house lawyers since such a privilege was not recognised under Community law.

In AM&S, the ECJ established a two-tier test for the purposes of determining whether written communications between lawyers and clients are subject to legal professional privilege during the course of competition investigations by the Commission:

  • the first tier required that the communication must be requested and given for the purposes of the client's rights of defence;
  • the second tier stated that the lawyer involved must be independent, that is, not bound to the client through an employment relationship.

The second tier of the test established in AM&S was heavily criticised at the time. The issue resurfaced two decades later in the case of Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd -v- European Commission. The matter related to a Commission investigation regarding possible anti-competitive practices by Akzo Nobel and Akros Chemicals in relation to heat stabilisers. The Commission, assisted by the UK OFT, carried out a dawn raid at the companies' premises in the UK. During the raid, the Commission seized and made copies of numerous documents. Akzo claimed legal privilege in relation to email exchanges between an Akzo executive and an in-house lawyer (a full member of the Dutch Bar). The email exchange consisted of a request for comments on a draft letter and response with changes to the wording of the letter.

The Commission refused to recognise privilege for the documents and Akzo appealed the decision to the European Court of First instance (CFI, now the General Court). Many commentators hoped that, as AM&S had been decided at a time when in-house legal departments were less common and less tightly regulated in many EU countries, the European courts might take the opportunity to reformulate the law.

However, the CFI rejected the arguments put forward by the companies that communications with in-house lawyers should attract privilege. The CFI upheld the ECJ decision in AM&S and stated that privilege could not extend to in-house lawyers because such lawyers were not "fully independent" of the client. The court stated that there is a wide variation across Europe in the way in which in-house counsel are regulated and that many are excluded from the protection of privilege.

Akzo Nobel and Akros appealed the CFI decision to the ECJ, and their appeal was supported by a number of European governments including the UK; the International Bar Association and other bodies representing lawyers.

The ECJ's Judgment

The ECJ issued its judgement on 14th September. The ECJ ruled that in-house lawyers, despite the fact they may be enrolled with a Bar or Law Society and the fact that they are subject to professional ethics codes, do not enjoy the same degree of independence from their employers as lawyers working in external law firms. The ECJ considered that, since inhouse lawyers occupy the position of employee, that position, by its very nature, does not allow them to ignore the commercial strategies pursued by their employers, and affects their ability to exercise professional independence. Moreover, the ECJ considered that in-house lawyers have complete economic dependence on their employers, in contrast to external lawyers who can withdraw their services and are not dependent on one source of income. Further, the ECJ noted that in-house lawyers may be required to carry out tasks such as competition law co-ordination, which may have an effect on the commercial policies of their employers, and that such functions cannot but reinforce the close ties between in-house lawyers and their employers.

The ECJ also rejected the notion that the role of in-house lawyers has evolved in recent years whereby more EU countries have accepted that they can claim privilege and have made them subject to the same ethics codes as external lawyers. The Court considered that no predominant trend towards extending privilege to in-house lawyers could be discerned in the legal systems of the various European Member States.

Furthermore, the ECJ rejected the argument that a refusal to apply the principle of legal privilege to correspondence exchanged with an in-house lawyer violates the principle of equal treatment on the basis that the professional independence of external lawyers and the economic dependence of in-house counsel meant they were not in a comparable situation.

The Court also rejected arguments that denying privilege to in-house lawyers breached the principle of legal certainty or companies' rights of defence. The Court held that the legal position of in-house counsel was clear where the Commission was conducting an investigation and that those instructing lawyers must accept the restrictions and conditions applicable to that profession.

Implications of the Judgment

The position therefore remains that in European Commission investigations, communications with in-house lawyers are not protected by privilege – regardless of the legal ethics they are subject to or the professional organisations to which they belong. Many companies rely on their in-house legal departments to ensure compliance with competition laws. The decision means the Commission can continue to raid these departmental files. To avoid the material being disclosed, in-house lawyers must either record as little as possible in writing or seek external legal advice whenever an EU competition law issue arises.

It should be stressed that this case related to the application of privilege solely in the context of competition investigations by the European Commission and should not be seen as creating any wider precedent to be applied in national courts. It is worth noting that in competition investigations which are conducted at national level by the OFT, the English law on legal professional privilege continues to apply, such that it continues to extend to communications made between clients and their in-house lawyers.


In-house lawyers in England can generally benefit from privilege in much the same way as external lawyers provided they are advising on legal rather than administrative matters. However, the decision in the Akzo Nobel case means companies would be advised to consider using external law firms for competition compliance issues that may be subject to investigation by the European Commission, or to discuss matters verbally.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.