UK: Lessons from ICO v Ofcom for Satellite Operators

Last Updated: 26 August 2010
Article by Joanne Wheeler

On 30 July 2010, the Administrative Court refused an application by ICO Satellite Limited (ICO) for judicial review of a decision by the Office of Communications  (Ofcom) to request the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) to cancel ICO's filing in the ITU's Master International Frequency Register (MIFR) for the ICO-P mobile satellite communications system (ICO-P satellite network).

The ICO v Ofcom  decision highlights the role of Ofcom, as the national administration in the UK for interfacing with the ITU in respect of spectrum rights at the international level, in monitoring the use of spectrum assignments by satellite operators.  Ofcom's Procedures for the Management of Satellite Filings (Guidance)  sets out details of reports on the status of the implementation of an assignment that operators are required to provide to Ofcom, evidencing any variations from the operator's business plan, and providing details of the spectrum coordination progress and status.  If Ofcom believes that insufficient progress is being made against milestone commitments, based on the information supplied by the operator, it has the power to take action to cancel a filing at the ITU.

This bulletin seeks to draw out some of the key lessons from the decision for satellite operators.

To view the article in full, please see below:




Full Article

On 30 July 2010, the Administrative Court refused an application by ICO Satellite Limited (ICO) for judicial review of a decision by the Office of Communications (1) (Ofcom) to request the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) to cancel ICO's filing in the ITU's Master International Frequency Register (MIFR) for the ICO-P mobile satellite communications system (ICO-P satellite network)(2).

The ICO v Ofcom(3) decision highlights the role of Ofcom, as the national administration in the UK for interfacing with the ITU in respect of spectrum rights at the international level, in monitoring the use of spectrum assignments by satellite operators. Ofcom's Procedures for the Management of Satellite Filings (Guidance)(4) sets out details of reports on the status of the implementation of an assignment that operators are required to provide to Ofcom, evidencing any variations from the operator's business plan, and providing details of the spectrum coordination progress and status. If Ofcom believes that insufficient progress is being made against milestone commitments, based on the information supplied by the operator, it has the power to take action to cancel a filing at the ITU.

This bulletin seeks to draw out some of the key lessons from the decision for satellite operators.

Radio spectrum: its nature and coordination by the ITU

The use of radio spectrum and orbital positions, limited and valuable resources (especially in a world with ever increasing demand for mobile telephony and wireless broadband services), are coordinated at the international level by the ITU, a United Nations agency with 191 Member States, including the UK. Such coordination is necessary to avoid harmful interference to the transmission of radio communication signals and to ensure rational, economical and efficient use of the resource.

UK operators wishing to submit an application to the ITU for the management and processing of a satellite filing must do so through Ofcom. It is necessary to submit such an application to the ITU so that the radio spectrum that the operator wishes to use can been registered in the MIFR and receive international recognition.

The relevant facts in ICO v Ofcom

At the heart of the dispute between ICO and Ofcom were the following facts.

In January 2004, Ofcom notified the ITU that the ICO-P satellite network had been "brought into use" in accordance with the ITU regulatory regime, an event which resulted in the ICO-P filing being recorded in the MIFR. In its business plan to Ofcom, ICO had indicated that the ICO-P satellite network would comprise a network of 12 satellites, and that all the satellites would be launched by 2005. To this day, ICO has launched only one of the ICO-P satellites.

Three days after Ofcom's notification, ICO terminated its satellite construction and launch contracts with Boeing due to a dispute as to contractual performance. The dispute has since resulted in a judgment for ICO in the first instance before a United States court, but Boeing's appeal remains pending. At the time, Ofcom was not informed by ICO of the matter, and had instead learnt about the development from media reports.

Correspondence regarding the change in ICO's circumstances between the parties followed, culminating in a letter from Ofcom to ICO in December 2006 (Ofcom Letter), requesting that ICO provides evidence to Ofcom by June 2007 that ICO has:

  • contracts in place to complete and launch the remainder of the ICO-P satellite network; and
  • secured the necessary funding to finance the bringing of the ICO-P satellite network into commercial operation.

In April 2008, on the basis that ICO had not provided evidence that sufficient ICO-P satellites were ready to launch, that the necessary contracts were in place to launch the additional satellites or that ICO had funding in place to complete the deployment of its ICO-P satellite network, Ofcom notified ICO of its provisional decision to request the ITU to cancel the ICO-P filing in the MIFR, subject to further representations made by ICO.

In February 2009, Ofcom notified ICO that it had made a decision to write to the ITU to request that the ICO-P filing be cancelled (Ofcom Decision). Central to the Ofcom Decision was a finding that ICO had not shown evidence of the two matters as requested in the Ofcom Letter.

The grounds of ICO's challenge

ICO sought judicial review of the Ofcom Decision on three grounds:

  • that Ofcom had regard to an irrelevant factor, namely, an erroneous basis that it had a duty under the ITU regulatory regime to cancel ICO's filing by reason of the delay in bringing the ICO-P satellite network into full use within the time period specified by Ofcom;
  • that Ofcom failed to have regard to relevant considerations, namely:
  • the lack of any pressing need to cancel the ICO-P filing in the MIFR at the time, in the absence of any prejudice to third parties;
  • the adverse impact of the Ofcom Decision on ICO;
  • the possibility that the dispute with Boeing might be resolved during the appellate process in the United States; and
  • Article 13.6 of the ITU Radio Regulations, which contemplates that a range of actions could have been taken in the circumstances, of which cancellation is only one; and
  • that the Ofcom Decision was in all the circumstances disproportionate.

The Court's decision

Justice Lloyd Jones of the Administrative Court rejected all three grounds of ICO's challenge.

Firstly, Ofcom was not influenced by an irrelevant consideration in taking the Ofcom Decision; it had not proceeded on the basis that it had a duty under the ITU regulatory regime to cancel ICO's filing in the circumstances. Rather, Ofcom was merely acting in accordance with the Guidelines (which was not challenged by ICO); in particular, Ofcom was entitled to ask ICO to provide evidence of the two matters required by the Ofcom Letter, and that the Ofcom Decision was made solely on the basis of ICO's failure to meet the requirements of the Ofcom Letter.

Secondly, Ofcom had not failed to have regard to any relevant considerations. In particular, his Honour held the following.

  • There is nothing in any of the ITU regulatory instruments or the Guidance which suggests that it is necessary or appropriate to consider whether prejudice might be caused to any third parties in maintaining a filing before moving to cancellation. To require Ofcom to have regard to the question of possible prejudice to third parties would be "entirely unworkable" because it would simply not be feasible for Ofcom to carry out an assessment of the prospects for all other relevant satellite filings and potential filings.
  • There is also nothing in the ITU regulatory instruments or the Guidance which supports the view that the impact of the cancellation of a spectrum assignment to the operator concerned is a relevant consideration. The mere fact that "immense sums" of more than $3 billion had been invested into the ICO-P filing by ICO which was not being used in accordance with its notified characteristics could not provide any immunity from cancellation; on the contrary, the Court observed that to attach any weight to such considerations might frustrate the regulatory regime's objectives of rational, economical and efficient use of radio spectrum.
  • That Ofcom did in fact give careful consideration to the possible outcome of the dispute with Boeing, but that Ofcom was "clearly entitled" to conclude that ICO had not provided any evidence that ICO would be able to conclude the relevant contracts with Boeing. ICO did not fail to have regard to Article 13.6 of the ITU Radio Regulations.
  • Finally, on the question of proportionality, the Court noted that the real issue was whether the Ofcom Decision was more than what was necessary to accomplish the objective of the Guidance, and in particular, whether a less extreme action could have been taken by Ofcom in the circumstances. The Court held that where a national administration has come to the view that a filing is not being used in any real sense and that there is no evidence to suggest that this position will change, then neither retention nor modification of the filing at the ITU level would be appropriate; cancellation was necessary and there was "no other effective remedy available".

Key implications for satellite operators

For UK satellite operators which submit filings through Ofcom to the ITU, the ICO v Ofcom decision has the following key implications.

  • Firstly, the decision highlights that some of the due diligence requirements set by Ofcom in its Guidance go beyond the requirements under the ITU regulatory regime. In particular, under paragraph 5.3 of the Guidance, Ofcom requires detailed commercial information from applicants in order to be satisfied that the proposed satellite network has adequate financial backing.(5)
  • Secondly, Ofcom will monitor the progress of an operator's "bringing into use" of its spectrum assignments by reference to the business plan (including systems specifications and milestones) that the operator files with Ofcom. Accordingly, care and caution should be taken by a satellite operator in preparing its business plan in support its filing at the ITU; in particular, a satellite operator should seek to build flexibility into its business plan to anticipate potential contingencies (for example, disputes with a critical supplier, accidents etc) which could affect its use of the radio spectrum.(6)
  • Finally, the decision highlights the importance of the need for satellite operators to engage appropriately and as early as possible with Ofcom, especially in circumstances where the operator's ability to deploy its satellite system in accordance with the characteristics notified by the operator has changed beyond its control.

(1) As the national administration that acts as the notifying administration in respect of ITU satellite filings.

(2) ICO-P is a constellation of medium earth orbit satellites planned to operate in the 2 GHz mobile satellite service frequency allocations. The original proposal from ICO was for a constellation of 10 satellites in orbit, providing global coverage.

(3) [2010] EWHC 2010, available here.

(4) Ofcom, Procedures for the Management of Satellite Filings (27 March 2007), available here.

(5) We do not wish to discuss the pros and cons of this here, but simply to note the point.

(6) Ofcom would also need to be able to accept such flexibility.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 26/08/2010.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.